| Literature DB >> 35215118 |
Nguyen Thuy Tram1, Pham Duc Phuc2, Nguyen Hong Phi2, Le Thi Trang1, Tang Thi Nga1, Hoang Thi Thu Ha1, Phung Dac Cam1, Tran Quang Canh3, Panagiotis Karanis4,5.
Abstract
Cryptosporidium and Giardia are two water- and foodborne protozoan parasites that can cause diarrheal diseases. Poor microbial quality, sanitation conditions, and hygiene practices at exposure to biogas wastewater are important risk factors for human and animal infection. This study highlights the presence and level of both parasites in the environment in relation to biogas waste reuse in Vietnam. A total of 239 samples were collected from different types of samples in the studied districts in Bac Giang province in 2020 via direct immunofluorescent detection to study the occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. (oo)cysts. Among the samples, Cryptosporidium was found in 19 (7.9%) with concentration from 1.104 to 3.105 oocysts/100 mL, while Giardia in 40 (16.7%) with concentration from 1.104 to 2.106 cysts/100 mL, respectively. In detail, the results show that the percentages of positive detection of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in influent, effluent, sewage canal, and vegetables were 13.1% (11/84), 6.0% (5/83), 15.4% (2/13) and 5.9% (1/17) and 26.2% (22/84), 7.2% (6/83), 7.7% (1/13) and 5.9% (1/17), respectively. The results show a trend of decreasing Cryptosporidium and Giardia densities, without statistical significance. Although these parasites decreased after biogas treatment, the remaining loads observed in biogas effluent can reach the watercourses and soil receiving it. Further investigations are needed to contribute to a general understanding of the risk of protozoan parasites, as well as strategies to control and reduce the contamination of environmental water sources and plants and reduce the burden of the pathogens in biogas wastewater in Vietnam.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; Giardia; Vietnam; biogas wastewater; detection
Year: 2022 PMID: 35215118 PMCID: PMC8875155 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11020174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1Map of Bac Giang province, where the red dots are illustrated for districts of sampling.
Figure 2Schematic drawing of biogas plant types (KT1 and KT2) used by farmers in Bac Giang province).
Figure 3Schematic drawing of sampling locations (Source: Vu Van Tu and Nguyen Manh Hien). E1-Influent (composite sample of 2, 3, 4); E2-Effluent (composite sample of 5, 6, 7); E3-Sewage canal next to biogas plants and receiving both biogas and flush toilet wastewater; E4-Lake/pond in a close area of biogas plants; E5-Soil near biogas plants and receiving biogas waste; E6-Vegetables grown near biogas plants and receiving biogas waste for irrigation.
Figure 4Variation of prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in different sampling locations derived from the biogas system in Bac Giang province.
Occurrence and concentration of Giardia spp. cysts and Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts/100 mL of biogas influents, effluents, sewage canal samples, and 100 g of vegetables by district.
| Area/ | Lang Giang | Viet Yen | Hiep Hoa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogen | ||||||
| Influent (E1, n = 84) | ||||||
| Positive sample/examined (%) | 2/11 (18.8) | 1/11 (9.1) | 14/57 (24.6) | 9/57 (15.8) | 6/16 (37.5) | 1/16 (6.3) |
| Median number of parasites | 2.55 × 105 | 3 × 105 | 1 × 104 | 2 × 104 | 1.75 × 105 | 2 × 105 |
| Min–Max a | 1 × 104–5 × 105 | 3 × 105–3 × 105 | 1 × 104–2 × 106 | 1 × 104–1.4 × 105 | 1 × 104–4.1 × 104 | 2 × 105–2 × 105 |
| Effluent (E2, n = 83) | ||||||
| Positive sample/examined (%) | ND | 1/11 (9.1) | 11/56 (19.6) | ND | 5/16 (31.3) | 4/16 (25.0) |
| Median number of parasites | 2 × 105 | 2 × 105 | 1 × 105 | 1.5 × 104 | ||
| Min–Max a | 2 × 105–2 × 105 | 1 × 104–8 × 104 | 4 × 104–5.5 × 105 | 1 × 104–2 × 104 | ||
| Sewage canal (E3, n = 13) | ||||||
| Positive sample/examined (%) | ND | ND | 1/11 (9.1) | 2/11 (18.2) | ND | ND |
| Median number of parasites | 1 × 104 | 1 × 104 | ||||
| Min–Max a | 1 × 104–1 × 104 | 1 × 104–1 × 104 | ||||
| Vegetables (E6, n = 17) | ||||||
| Positive sample/examined (%) | ND | ND | 1/17 (5.9) | 1/17 (7.1) | ND | ND |
| Median number of parasites | 1 × 104 | 2 × 104 | ||||
| Min–Max a | 1 × 104–1 × 104 | 2 × 104–2 × 104 | ||||
a The median values were calculated based on the number of positive samples. Note: ND—not detected.
Characteristics of the study population in Bac Giang province, Vietnam.
| Characteristics | Lạng Giang | Viet Yen | Hiep Hoa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 135 | N = 172 | N = 87 | ||
| Area used for agriculture (1000–3000 m2) | 112 (84.2%) | 96 (61.9%) | 47 (55.3%) | <0.001 a |
| Age group (41–54 years old) | 65 (48.1%) | 77 (44.8%) | 45 (51.7%) | 0.56 a |
| Males | 107 (79.3%) | 133 (77.3%) | 66 (75.9%) | 0.83 a |
| High education level | 1 (0.7%) | 2 (1.2%) | 2 (2.3%) | 0.22 b |
| Farmer | 134 (99.3%) | 169 (98.3%) | 84 (96.6%) | 0.18 b |
| Size of the household (≥5 people) | 72 (53.3%) | 91 (52.9%) | 49 (56.3%) | 0.87 a |
| No. of pigs raised | <0.001 a | |||
| <10 pigs | 65 (48.2%) | 35 (20.4%) | 18 (20.7%) | |
| 10–50 pigs | 58 (43.0%) | 121 (70.4%) | 59 (67.8%) | |
| >50 pigs | 12 (8.9%) | 16 (9.3%) | 10 (11.5%) | |
| No. of poultry raised | <0.001 a | |||
| No poultry | 5 (3.7%) | 17 (9.9%) | 6 (6.9%) | |
| <100 | 117 (86.7%) | 140 (81.4%) | 59 (67.8%) | |
| 100–200 | 9 (6.7%) | 10 (5.8%) | 8 (9.2%) | |
| >200 | 4 (2.9%) | 5 (2.9%) | 14 (16.1%) |
ap-value based on the Pearson Chi-Square test. bp-value based on Fisher’s Exact test.
Practices of biogas wastewater management by farmers in Bac Giang, Vietnam.
| Lang Giang | Viet Yen | Hiep Hoa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 135 | N = 172 | N = 87 | ||
| 5–10 years of age of biogas plant | 72 (53.3%) | 106 (61.6%) | 48 (55.2%) | 0.002 a |
| Clean-up of biogas plant | 41 (30.4%) | 48 (27.9%) | 40 (45.9%) | 0.011 a |
| No repair of biogas plant | 126 (93.3%) | 168 (98.2%) | 85 (97.7%) | 0.08 b |
| Pig manure used for biogas plant | 134 (99.3%) | 170 (98.8%) | 87 (100%) | 0.80 b |
| Poultry manure used for biogas plant | 1 (0.7%) | 3 (1.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0.55 b |
| Possible opened effluent tank | 123 (91.1%) | 142 (83.0%) | 83 (95.4%) | 0.002 b |
| Household involved in effluent tank cleaning | 29 (21.5%) | 36 (20.9%) | 20 (22.9%) | 0.25 b |
| Household involved in sewage canal cleaning | 72 (53.3%) | 80 (46.5%) | 37 (42.5%) | 0.26 a |
| Personal protective measures | ||||
| Wearing face mask | 48 (62.3%) | 30 (31.3%) | 21 (45.7%) | <0.001 b |
| Wearing boost | 50 (64.9%) | 35 (37.2%) | 22 (47.8%) | <0.001 b |
| Wearing gloves | 42 (54.6%) | 29 (31.5%) | 18 (39.1%) | 0.001 a |
| Washing hands with soap | 43 (56.6%) | 33 (34.4%) | 18 (39.1%) | <0.001 a |
| Use of biogas wastewater | ||||
| Fertilizer of corns | 27 (20.0%) | 22 (12.8%) | 6 (6.9%) | 0.052 b |
| Fertilizer of fruit tree | 50 (37.0%) | 44 (25.6%) | 18 (20.9%) | 0.025 b |
| Fertilizer of vegetables | 26 (19.3%) | 23 (13.5%) | 8 (9.2%) | 0.12 b |
ap-value based on the Pearson Chi-Square test. bp-value based on Fisher’s Exact test.