| Literature DB >> 35214999 |
Zubair Akbar Qureshi1, Sardar Bilal2, Imtiaz Ali Shah2, Ali Akgül3, Rabab Jarrar4, Hussein Shanak4, Jihad Asad4.
Abstract
Currently, pagination clearly explains the increase in the thermophysical attributes of viscous hybrid nanofluid flow by varying morphological aspects of inducted triadic magnetic nanoparticles between two coaxially rotating disks. Copper metallic nanoparticles are inserted with three different types of metallic oxide nanoparticles: Al2O3, Ti2O, and Fe3O4. Single-phase simulation has been designed for the triadic hybrid nanofluids flow. The achieved expressions are transmuted by the obliging transformation technique because of dimensionless ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Runge-Kutta in collaboration with shooting procedure are implemented to achieve the solution of ODEs. The consequences of pertinent variables on associated distributions and related quantities of physical interest are elaborated in detail. It is inferred from the analysis that Cu-Al2O3 metallic type hybrid nanofluids flow shows significant results as compared with the other hybrid nanoparticles. The injection phenomenon on hybrid nanofluids gives remarkable results regarding shear stress and heat flux with the induction of hybridized metallic nanoparticles. Shape and size factors have also been applied to physical quantities. The morphology of any hybrid nanoparticles is directly proportional to the thermal conductance of nanofluids. Peclet number has a significant effect on the temperature profile.Entities:
Keywords: MHD; computational analysis (shooting technique); heat and mass flux; morphology effect; triadic hybridize nanofluid model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35214999 PMCID: PMC8877281 DOI: 10.3390/nano12040671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Physical model.
Thermophysical properties of HNFDs [62,63,64,65,66].
| Properties | (HNFDs) |
|---|---|
| Density |
|
| Viscosity | |
| Heat Capacity |
|
| Thermal Conductivity (K) |
Properties of base fluids and NPs [67].
| Base Fluid/NP’s |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| H2O | 997.1 | 4179 | 0.613 |
| Cu | 8933 | 385 | 401 |
| Al2O3 | 3970 | 765 | 40 |
| Fe3O4 | 5180 | 670 | 9.7 |
| TiO2 | 4250 | 686.2 | 8.9538 |
Different parameters of the effect in shear stress and tensional stress.
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1 | 0.02 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.03 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| 0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
The effect of different hybridized nanoparticles on Nusselt number (.
| Cu-TiO2/H2O | Cu-Fe3O4/H2O | Cu-Al2O3/H2O | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4% | 5.9063 | 5.9308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Different parameter (Reynold number), (wall expansion parameter) Sc (Schmidt number) effects on Sherwood number.
| Cu-Al2O3/H2O | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| −1.5 | 1 | 1 |
|
| −1 |
| ||
| 1 |
| ||
| 1.5 |
| ||
| −1 |
| ||
|
| |||
| 1 |
| ||
| 2 |
| ||
| 2 |
| ||
| 4 |
| ||
| 6 |
| ||
| 8 |
| ||
The effect of different physical nondimensional parameters Re, α (wall expansion), M (magneitc parameter), N (shape factor), Ec (Eckert number), Pr (Prandtl number), Pe (Peclet number) θ (temperature) on heat transfer.
|
|
|
|
| Ec | Pr | Pe |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 0.1 | 1 | 3 | 0.000068 | 6.2 | 6.8 |
|
| 0.6 |
| ||||||
| 0.9 |
| ||||||
| 1.2 |
| ||||||
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| |||||
| 0.3 |
| ||||||
| 0.4 |
| ||||||
| 0.1 | 4 |
| |||||
| 7 |
| ||||||
| 11 |
| ||||||
| 1 | 3.7 |
| |||||
| 4.8 |
| ||||||
| 5.7 |
| ||||||
| 3 | 0.00078 |
| |||||
| 0.00088 |
| ||||||
| 0.00098 |
| ||||||
| 5.7 |
| ||||||
| 6.7 |
| ||||||
| 7.7 |
| ||||||
| 2.8 |
| ||||||
| 5.8 |
| ||||||
| 8.8 |
|
Magnetic-filed effect in and at lower wall .
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
|
Figure 2The influence of the scale of hybrid NPs under the thermal conductivity coloring umbrella. Reprinted from [68].
Figure 3The influence of the scale of hybrid NPs under the viscosity coloring umbrella. Reprinted from [68].
Figure 4Tangential velocity profile effect for magnetic parameter for .
Figure 5Temperature profile effect for magnetic parameter for .
Figure 6Concentration profile effect for Schmidt number for .
Figure 7Temperature profile effect size for .