| Literature DB >> 35214879 |
Ajay Yadav1,2, Nishant Kumar2, Ashutosh Upadhyay2, Olaniyi Amos Fawole3, Manoj Kumar Mahawar4, Kirti Jalgaonkar5, Deepak Chandran6, Sureshkumar Rajalingam7, Gokhan Zengin8, Manoj Kumar9, Mohamed Mekhemar10.
Abstract
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruit is also known as the apple of tropics, belongs to the family of genus Psidium, and is widely cultivated in tropical zones of the world. Recently, the importance of guava fruit has increased due to its inherent nutritional content, pleasant aroma, excellent flavor, and delicious taste. It is considered an excellent source of nutrients and phytochemicals. Guava is a climacteric fruit that continues to mature or ripen even after harvest, showing an increase in the rate of respiration and metabolic activities within a short period, leading to rapid senescence or spoilage of fruit. It has limitations in terms of commercialization due to short storage life after harvest and sensitivity to diseases and chilling injury during the storage period. Many postharvest technologies such as edible packaging, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), composite packaging, controlled atmosphere packaging (CAP), antimicrobial/antifungal packaging, and nano packaging have been used to retard the chilling injury and enhance the keeping quality of guava fruits during the storage period to control respiration rate, reduce weight loss, minimize lipid oxidation, and maintain organoleptic properties. However, these packaging technologies have varied effects on the internal and external quality attributes of guava fruits. This review, therefore, discusses the physiology, mechanism of ripening, oxidation, and ethylene production of guava fruits. The review also discusses the packaging technologies and their effect on the postharvest characteristics of guava fruits during the storage period.Entities:
Keywords: MAP and CAP; edible packaging; nano and smart packaging; oxidation; packaging technologies; physiological disorder; shelf-life extension
Year: 2022 PMID: 35214879 PMCID: PMC8879830 DOI: 10.3390/plants11040547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Mechanism of fruit ripening (modified from Bouzayen et al. [44]).
Figure 2The figure indicating that the application packaging, i.e., edible, active, and composite, has the potential to maintain the postharvest quality attributes, such as color, aroma, firmness, and consumer acceptability by retarding the loss of moisture; reducing ethylene production; and minimizing the lipid peroxidation, respiration rate, and enzymatic and metabolism synthesis due to creation of water and gas barrier between fruit surface and environment.
Figure 3Graphical indication of the mechanism and functions of MAP for improving the shelf life of guava. The low level of oxygen in the MAP packaging is responsible for the retarding the moisture loss, change in color of fruits, and the lower lipid/pigment oxidation. On contrary, the increasing level of carbon dioxide in MAP packaging system of guava fruits has potential to inhibit microbial spoilage while maintaining overall postharvest attributes (modified from: Soltani et al., [73]; Paine and Paine [80]).
Effect of MAP/CAP packaging on the shelf life of guava fruits.
| Guava Variety | Packaging Technologies | Type of Package | Optimum Storage Condition | Storage Life | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guava cv. Pedro Santo | CAP | Plastic bucket | 5 kPa O2 + 5 kPa CO2 | 28 days at 12.2 °C and 95% RH | [ |
| Guava cv. Lucknow-49 | CAP | 50 µm LDPE | 9% O2 + 5% CO2 | 42 days at 10 °C | [ |
| Guava cv. Lucknow-49, | CAP | - | 2.5, 5, 8, and 10 kPa O2 with 2.5, 5, and 10 kPa CO2 (balance N2) | 30 days at 8 °C and 60–80% RH | [ |
| Guava cv. Pedro Sato | CAP | Hermetic plastic containers | 21, 15, 10, 5, and 1 kPa) | 28 days at 12.5 °C | [ |
| Guava cv. Baruipur | Active MAP | 40 µm PVC | 3 g ES and 46 g MS with a head space gaseous concentration of 12.6% O2 + 5% CO2 | 32 days at 4 °C | [ |
| Guava cv. Baruipur | Passive MAP | 45 µm BOPP film | 5% O2 and 4% CO2 | 26 days at 10 °C | [ |
| Guava | Active MAP | 76.2 µm LDPE | Potassium permanganate embedded in silica crystals for modifying the gaseous concentration inside the package | 49 days at 8 ± 2 °C | [ |
| Guava cv. Allahabad Safeda | Passive MAP | 45 µm PP with perforation | Perforations (five holes in each side of film with a size of 0.3 mm diameter) for modifying the gaseous composition | 4 days at 25–28 °C and 60–70% R.H. and 28 days at 8–12 °C and 88–90% R.H. | [ |
| Guava cv. Hisar Safeda | Passive MAP | 50 µm LDPE | Films with selective permeability enhance the environment surrounding the guava | 21 days at 7 ± 3 °C | [ |
| Guava | Passive MAP | 20 µm PP with perforation | 12.5 mm perforation in films maintained the required gaseous conditions | 20 days at 10 °C | [ |
Composite edible packaging to enhance the shelf life of guava fruits.
| Matrix | Guava Variety | Effect on Quality Parameter | Shelf Life | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gum Arabic (10%) + garlic extract (20%) |
| Reduction in loss of weight, skin browning; retention of ascorbic acid with lower value of total sugars; and increase in flavonoid content. | 15 days at 25 ± 3 °C | [ |
| Agar (4%) + pomegranate seed oil (0.4 mL/L) |
| Reduction in weight loss; no significant change in carotenoid content; Total soluble solid, skin color was maintained without excessive lose | 10 days at 10 °C and 40% RH | [ |
| Carboxymethyl cellulose (2.7%) + stearic acid (2.1%) + lecithin (3.2%) + date pit oil (2%) |
| Reduction in weight loss; retention of ascorbic acid, firmness, TSS, and titratable acidity, compared to control sample. | 16 days at 25 °C | [ |
| Tamarind seed Powder (0.05%) + Beeswax (1%) + sunflower oil (5.5%) |
| Reduction in weight loss; retention of ascorbic acid, firmness, TSS, and titratable acidity, compared to control sample. | 13 days at 30 ± 2 °C and 21 days at 25 ± 1 °C. | [ |
| Tamarind starch (3%) + pomegranate seed oil (0.24 mL/mL) |
| Reduction in loss of weight; better retention of firmness as than control sample; delay in ripening of fruit. | 21 days at 10 ± 2 °C and 80 ± 5% RH | [ |
| Arrowroot starch (2%) |
| Reduction in respiration rate, causing delayed ripening of fruit; retention of firmness, ascorbic acid; reduction in weight loss as compared to control sample. | 20 days of storage the temperature of 10 ± 2 °C with 85 ± 5% RH | [ |
| Chitosan (1%) + poly-vinyl-pyrrolidine (1%) + salicylic acid (2 mM) |
| Coated guava showed reduced enzyme activity of polyphenol oxidase, cell wall degrading enzymes; retention of skin color, and firmness; and reduction in weight loss as compared to control samples. | 15 days at 27 ± 1 °C and 48 ± 2% RH | [ |
| Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (5%) + beeswax (20%) |
| Reduction in loss of weight; retention of firmness; and decrease in L* value and hue angle as compared to control sample. | 8 days at 21 ± 0.3 °C and 77 ± 6% RH | [ |
| Jackfruit seed starch (2%) + chitosan (2%) + alignate (2%) |
| Reduction in loss of weight; retention of firmness; and decrease in L* value and hue angle as compared to control sample. | 22 days at 10 ± 2 °C e 80 ± 2% RH | [ |
| Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (1%) + palm oil (0.3%) |
| Decrease in enzyme activity of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD); reduction in loss of weight, color value, and retention of firmness. | 12 days 24 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 5% RH | [ |
| Chitosan (3%) + 4% palm stearin: palm kernel olein (75:25) |
| Coated samples showed reduction in respiration rate and ethylene production, and reduction in loss of weight and retention of firmness and TSS as compared to uncoated samples. | 31 days at 5 ± 2 °C | [ |
| Cashew gum (1%) + carboxymethylcellulose (2%) |
| MRI studies of coated guava reveled that after 8 days of storage, there is surface tissue decay; retention of firmness and ascorbic acid; reduction in weight loss as compared to uncoated fruits. | 08 days at 25–28 °C and 76.0 ± 12.4% RH | [ |
Essential-oil-based edible coatings for enhancing the shelf life of guava fruits.
| Matrix | Best Combination | Effect of Coatings | Shelf Life | Deposition | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gum Arabic (GA) + Cinnamon Essential Oil (CEO) + Oleic Acid | 10%GA + 1% OA + 1% CEO | Retention of fruit firmness; reduction in physiological loss of weight; lowering of browning index; enhancement of bioactive molecules such as phenolics and flavonoids and enhancement of antioxidant activity. | 10 ± 1 °C and 90% relative humidity for 28 days | Dipping | [ |
| Chitosan (C)+ Ruta graveolens Essential Oil (RGEO) | 2% C + 1.5% RGEO | Microbial analysis shows a reduction of 2 log CFU/g in yeast and molds count; in situ growth inhibition of | 12 days 24 ± 2 °C and relative humidity of 70% | Dipping | [ |
| Gum Arabic (GA) + Cinnamon Essential Oil (CEO) | 10% GA + 1% CEO | Reduction in loss of weight by 42.72% as compared to control sample. Retention of firmness, chlorophyll content, and caretonenoid content by 21.03%, 66.67%, and 56.7%, respectively, as compared to control sample; enhancement of ascorbic acid content (114.22 mg 100 g−1 FW). | 28 days at (10 ± 1 °C, 90–95% RH followed by 1 day at room temperature | Dipping | [ |
| Arabic Gum (AG) + Sodium Caseinate (SC) + Cinnamon Oil (CE) + Lemongrass Oil (LG) | 5% AG + 1% SC + 2% CE + 2% LG | Decrease in enzyme activity of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD); increase in antioxidant capacity; better retention of ascorbic acid and bioactive compounds such as phenolic and flavonoids. | 35 days 4–7 °C and 80% RH | Dipping | [ |
| Arabic Gum + Sodium Caseinate (SC) + Tulsi Extract (TE) | 5%AG + 1% SC and 2.5% TE | The value of OTR (oxygen transmission rate) and WVTR (water vapor transmission rate) was lower than control sample, which resulted in delaying in ripening of fruit and extension of shelf life. | 7 days at 28 ± 2 °C | Dipping | [ |
| Groundnut Oil, Sesame Oil, Baobab Oil, Olive ( | peanut and sesame oil coating | Extending the shelf life of guava fruits and controlling nutritional value, microbial growth, firmness, and appearance of the fruits. | Enhanced shelf life of guava fruits at Room conditions | Dipping | [ |
| Cassava Starch (CS) + Chitosan (C) + | 2.0% CS + 2.0% C and 1.0%, 2.0% or 3.0% EOM | Essential oil at all concentrations was effective in inhibiting Gram positive as well Gram negative bacteria; coating reduced the browning of guava; enhancement in L* value and reduction in a* and b* value during storage; and reduction in weight loss and better retention of firmness in coated sample | 10 days at 25 °C | Dipping | [ |
L*, a* and b* represents the colour values of the tomato.
Main outcomes of the effect of packaging technologies on guava fruits.
| S.No. | Key Quality Attributes | Outcomes of the Effect of Packaging Technologies | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Weight Loss | Packaging technologies are more effective at controlling weight loss than unpackaged/uncoated fresh guava due to the water barrier properties offered by the packaging material that slows down the transpiration rate along with migration of water vapor from the surface of fresh produce to the external environment. | [ |
| 2. | Respiration Rate | Packaging technologies aim at modifying the gaseous atmosphere surrounding the guava in such a way that reduces the respiration rate and delays the onset of respiratory peak due to the selective permeability of O2 and CO2 offered by the packaging materials. The reduction in respiration rate delays the ripening-associated changes in the guava fruit during storage. | [ |
| 3. | Ethylene Biosynthesis | Packaging technologies such as MAP and edible coatings delay ethylene biosynthesis and its accumulation during the ripening of guava due to decrease in the respiration rate and reduction in the activity of various enzymes involved in biosynthesis of ethylene. | [ |
| 4. | Color | Retention of green color of the fresh guava in packaged form as compared to uncoated samples during the storage due to the lowering of respiration rate and inhibition of browning, causing enzymatic activity. | [ |
| 5. | Firmness | Packaging technologies are effective at retaining the firmness of fresh guava due to limiting the oxygen concentration, which in turn delays the solubilizing of pectin and slows down the activities of cell-walldegrading enzymes such as polygalacturonase (PG) and pectinesterase (PE). | [ |
| 6. | Total Soluble Solids (TSS) and Titrable Acidity (TA) | Packaging technologies slow downs the increase in TSS and TA during the storage of guava by lowering the respiration rate, which slows down the hydrolytic activity of enzymes associated with the hydrolysis of complex biomolecules such as carbohydrates and organic acids. | [ |
| 7. | Ascorbic Acid | Packaging technologies aim at delaying or preventing the oxidation of ascorbic acid by ascorbate oxidase due to limiting the oxygen concentration and improve the retention of ascorbic acid in fresh guava during storage. | [ |
| 8. | Microbial Decay | Packaging technologies offer an external barrier to fresh guava for the inhibition or reduction of microbial population. Edible coatings with antimicrobial agents are effective at reducing total yeast, mold, and bacterial counts and preventing microbial-spoilage-associated changes. | [ |
| 9. | Chill Injuries | Packaging technologies such as MAP and edible coatings have the potential to reduce the incidence of chilling injury in fresh guava by minimizing lipid peroxidation and browning-associated changes during low temperature storage. | [ |
| 10. | Sensory Properties | The application of packaging technologies on fresh guava fruit improves or maintains the overall sensory characteristics better than uncoated/unpackaged fruit due to the delay in ripening-associated changes induced by lowering of respiration rate and ethylene biosynthesis. | [ |