| Literature DB >> 35214444 |
Jun Chen1, Shiyan Xu2, Kaikai Liu1, Shuqi Yao1, Xiao Luo1, Huan Wu1.
Abstract
In order to cut down on costs to the greatest possible extent, enterprises hope to distribute goods to different customers at the lowest costs possible. Based on this, this paper proposes an optimal location method for an intelligent transportation logistics warehouse. This scheme combines a variety of complex mechanisms to allow IoT devices to provide input. The scheme makes full use of the irreducibility of a blockchain system to promote the development and design of blockchain logistics applications. This method is aimed at tracking the progress of transportation of products in the whole supply chain. Experimental results show that, compared with traditional methods, the optimal positioning method has the advantages of fewer calculations, a high positioning accuracy, and a low overall cost, and it obtains the best warehouse positioning results. Based on the Internet of Things and blockchain technology, the application of intelligent logistics systems enables enterprises to intuitively understand their current inventory and the transportation status of goods, thus better controlling changes in enterprise resources.Entities:
Keywords: IoT; blockchain; intelligent transportation logistics; optimal warehouse location
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35214444 PMCID: PMC8878182 DOI: 10.3390/s22041544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Overall architecture of an IoT connection management platform.
Figure 2The basic elements of logistics.
Figure 3The decision-making process of IoT users.
Figure 4Blockchain-based IoT model and conceptual model of an urban logistics system.
Figure 5Multi-route real-time scheduling planning model.
Information fusion parameter estimation and significance test.
| Path Description | Fusion Parameters | Path Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| Learning ability | 6.68 | 6.76 |
| Generalization ability | 5.24 | 5.21 |
| Management ability | 6.35 | 5.55 |
Figure 6The relationship between information fusion parameters and paths.
Structure analysis of intelligent transportation logistics network.
| Network | Number of Nodes | Number of Relationships | Network Density | Central Potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meet information | 165 | 215 | 0.745 | 0.231 |
| Mutual information | 177 | 233 | 0.568 | 0.237 |
| Weighted summation | 161 | 221 | 0.561 | 0.231 |
Figure 7Distance analysis of nodes in intelligent transportation logistics network.
Figure 8Perceived service node search success rate.
Figure 9Location coverage.