| Literature DB >> 35214322 |
Saeed Ali Alsareii1, Mohsin Raza2, Abdulrahman Manaa Alamri1, Mansour Yousef AlAsmari1, Muhammad Irfan3, Umar Khan2, Muhammad Awais2.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) offer immense potential to transform conventional healthcare systems. The IoT and AI enabled smart systems can play a key role in driving the future of smart healthcare. Remote monitoring of critical and non-critical patients is one such field which can leverage the benefits of IoT and machine learning techniques. While some work has been done in developing paradigms to establish effective and reliable communications, there is still great potential to utilize optimized IoT network and machine learning technique to improve the overall performance of the communication systems, thus enabling fool-proof systems. This study develops a novel IoT framework to offer ultra-reliable low latency communications to monitor post-surgery patients. The work considers both critical and non-critical patients and is balanced between these to offer optimal performance for the desired outcomes. In addition, machine learning based regression analysis of patients' sensory data is performed to obtain highly accurate predictions of the patients' sensory data (patients' vitals), which enables highly accurate virtual observers to predict the data in case of communication failures. The performance analysis of the proposed IoT based vital signs monitoring system for the post-surgery patients offers reduced delay and packet loss in comparison to IEEE low latency deterministic networks. The gradient boosting regression analysis also gives a highly accurate prediction for slow as well as rapidly varying sensors for vital sign monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Internet of Things (IoT); gradient boosting regression; healthcare; human activity classification (HAC); machine learning (ML); obesity; patient monitoring; post-surgery recovery; ultra-reliable low latency communication (URLLC)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35214322 PMCID: PMC8876547 DOI: 10.3390/s22041420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Superframe structure and network topology.
Description of frequently used variables in the proposed IoT framework.
|
| Variables | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Total nodes in a cluster |
| 20–80 |
| High Priority Nodes |
| 20, 40, 60 |
| Time slots in a superframe |
| 20 |
| Total High Priority Channels (HPC) |
| 1, 2, 3 |
| Total Monitoring Communications Channels (MCC) |
| 1, 2, 3 |
| Superframe Duration |
| 10 ms |
| Timeslot Duration |
| ~60 µs |
| Maximum cluster-size |
| 80 |
| Probability of failed communication of a node |
| 0–0.25 |
|
|
| |
| Control Channel |
| 1 |
| Communications/data Channel |
|
|
| Frequency channel space |
| - |
| Number of frequency channels used |
| 4 |
| Average delay variation from specified interval in IEEE low latency deterministic networks (LLDN) |
| - |
| Average delay variation from specified interval in proposed scheme |
| - |
| Radio Communication channels | RCCa | |
| Channel Number | a |
Figure 2Average delay and communications reliability (RCC = 1, MCC = 3).
Figure 3Slow changing sensory data.
Figure 4XGB-slow varying data: Predicted vs. Actual.
Figure 5Varying Sensory Data.
Figure 6XGB regressor-average data variations: Predicted vs. Actual.
Figure 7Rapidly changing sensory data.
Figure 8XGB-rapid data variations: Predicted vs. Actual.