| Literature DB >> 35213948 |
Abstract
COVID-19 trials have relied on symptomatic subjects for judging the effectiveness of vaccine candidates, whereas asy-mptomatic subjects have been suspected as the main driver of the pandemic. An assumption of the same impact on symptomatic and asymptomatic breakthrough infections is shown to be flawed, resulting in an overestimate of the vaccines' true effectiveness. Recent available data provide the first large-scale unbiased data on asymptomatic versus symptomatic infections postvaccination, providing a unique opportunity to reassess the true infection rates after vaccination. By this, the breakthrough of the BNT162b2 vaccine is seen to be 12% rather than 5% for a corrected overall efficiency (symptomatic + asymptomatic) of 88% with the original virus strain in a real-world setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35213948 PMCID: PMC8903997 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1994800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother ISSN: 2164-5515 Impact factor: 3.452