Literature DB >> 35212803

Two peculiar cases of cranial fractures running through craniotomy burr holes: may this be a kind of "exception" to the Puppe rule.

Alberto Amadasi1,2, Lorenzo Franceschetti3,4, Francesca Magli3, Annalisa Cappella5,6, Enrico Angelo Muccino3, Katiuscia Bisogni7, Debora Mazzarelli3, Cristina Cattaneo3.   

Abstract

A correct assessment on the position, path, and direction of fracture lines is crucial when the sequence of different injuries on the skull has to be ascertained. In this context, the so-called Puppe's rule on intersecting fracture lines has always been considered a cornerstone of such an investigation. However, there is one factor that has never been previously considered: how do fracture lines behave when they reach the edges of an old and remodeled hole from a previous craniotomy? Two peculiar cases are presented of subjects undergoing cranial fractures due to blunt force trauma (case 1) and gunshot (case 2). Both previously underwent neurosurgical operations with persistence of the burr holes produced by the craniotomy drill (15 and 20 years before death). What was arguable, according to Puppe's rule, was that the fracture lines, when at the edge of the craniotomy hole, stopped. However, what has been detected was different than what expected: fracture lines continued exactly in the opposite direction, as though they were "skipping" the hole, following the same direction and the same axis and stopping a few centimeters over on the opposite side of the craniotomy hole. Puppe's rule has never been refuted, but these cases are the closest to an exception ever seen in forensic anthropology.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranial fractures; Craniotomy burr holes; Exception; Forensic anthropology; Puppe’s rule

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35212803     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02804-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  8 in total

1.  Gunshot wounds to the skull: comparison of entries and exits.

Authors:  G Quatrehomme; M Y Işcan
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1998-06-08       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Bevelling in exit gunshot wounds in bones.

Authors:  G Quatrehomme; M Y Işcan
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1997-09-19       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  [Puppe's rule--a literature review].

Authors:  Gunther Geserick; Klaus Krocker; Ingo Wirth
Journal:  Arch Kriminol       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

4.  Head injuries caused by small-calibre, high velocity bullets. An experimental study.

Authors:  C J Clemedson; B Falconer; L Frankenberg; A Jönsson; J Wennerstrand
Journal:  Z Rechtsmed       Date:  1973-10-16

5.  [Priority of multiple gunshot injuries of the skull].

Authors:  B Madea; C Henssge; H B Lockhoven
Journal:  Z Rechtsmed       Date:  1986

6.  A systematic approach to the interpretation of gunshot wound trauma to the cranium.

Authors:  Hugh E Berryman
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Pattern of intersecting fractures and direction of fire.

Authors:  D S Dixon
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 8.  Intersecting fractures of the skull and gunshot wounds. Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Guido Viel; Axel Gehl; Jan P Sperhake
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.