Dongni Luo1, Bingyan Liu, Lini Gao, Shengxin Fu. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University) Hainan, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lateral epicondylitis is a common musculoskeletal disorder, and ultrasound therapy is one of the most used treatments in the clinic. The effect remains uncertain, and the present paper aims to figure it out with a meta-analysis. METHODS: The Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies published before Jure 1, 2021. Continuous variables were compared by calculating the standard difference of the means, whereas categorical dichotomous variables were assessed using relative risks. A random-effects model was used if the heterogeneity statistic was significant; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the quantitative analysis, including 442 participants (287 ultrasonic treated patients and 155 controls). The VAS scale decreased markedly after ultrasound therapy (P = .027). However, no statistically significant difference could be found between ultrasound therapy and the control groups at all post-treatment time points. Similarly, no benefits could be found when comparing the pre- and post-treatment grip strength with ultrasonic therapy (P = .324). Moreover, though ultrasound treatment always continues for a long time, the present study demonstrated there were no additional benefits when comparing short- and long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound therapy is helpful to relieve pain for LE patients, but no such benefit could be found for grip strength. However, it has no significant advantage against other conservative treatments like rest and brace.
OBJECTIVE: Lateral epicondylitis is a common musculoskeletal disorder, and ultrasound therapy is one of the most used treatments in the clinic. The effect remains uncertain, and the present paper aims to figure it out with a meta-analysis. METHODS: The Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies published before Jure 1, 2021. Continuous variables were compared by calculating the standard difference of the means, whereas categorical dichotomous variables were assessed using relative risks. A random-effects model was used if the heterogeneity statistic was significant; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the quantitative analysis, including 442 participants (287 ultrasonic treated patients and 155 controls). The VAS scale decreased markedly after ultrasound therapy (P = .027). However, no statistically significant difference could be found between ultrasound therapy and the control groups at all post-treatment time points. Similarly, no benefits could be found when comparing the pre- and post-treatment grip strength with ultrasonic therapy (P = .324). Moreover, though ultrasound treatment always continues for a long time, the present study demonstrated there were no additional benefits when comparing short- and long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound therapy is helpful to relieve pain for LE patients, but no such benefit could be found for grip strength. However, it has no significant advantage against other conservative treatments like rest and brace.
Authors: A P D'Vaz; A J K Ostor; C A Speed; J R Jenner; M Bradley; A T Prevost; B L Hazleman Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2005-11-22 Impact factor: 7.580