| Literature DB >> 35212274 |
Guang Sheng Zhao1, Song Liu2, Ying Liu3, Chuang Li1, Ruo Yu Wang4, Jie Bian5, Rui Ping Zhu6, Jun Zhou1, Yue Wei Zhang3.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of gelatin sponge microparticles-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (GSMs-TACE) plus synchronous antigen-presenting dendritic cell (DC) sequential reinfusion for advanced large liver cancer (LC).Patients with large LC were assigned to the experimental (combined sequential DC therapy) or control group. All patients received standardized GSMs-TACE. In the experimental group, 60 mL of peripheral blood was collected for in vitro culture of DCs (10-14 days). Then, intravenous reinfusion was conducted 3 times within 10, 20, and 30 days after surgery. Adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded and evaluated. The overall survival, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization frequency, and physical score (PS) were calculated.The median survival time of the experimental group was significantly longer than that of the control group. There were significant differences in median progression-free survival between the 2 groups (P < .05) and the objective effective rate at 1 and 6 months and 1 year (P < .05), but not 2 years (P > .05). The PSs of 2 groups were significantly improved at 1 month after GSMs-TACE, with more obvious improvement in the experimental group (P < .05).GSMs-TACE plus synchronous DC sequential reinfusion significantly prolonged the median survival time, improved the tumor response rate and PS, prolonged progression-free survival, and reduced intervention frequency. GSMs-TACE plus synchronous DC sequential reinfusion treatment is suitable for comprehensive treatment of patients with advanced larger LC in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35212274 PMCID: PMC8878883 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028803
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
General clinical information of patients in the experiment group and the control group.
| Clinical information | Total | Experimental group | Control group |
|
| Number | 100 | 45 | 55 | |
| Average age (yrs) | 62.84 ± 6.51 | 59.93 ± 5.36 | 64.44 ± 7.85 | .17 |
| Gender | .30 | |||
| Male | 68 | 33 | 35 | |
| Female | 32 | 12 | 20 | |
| History of hepatitis | .97 | |||
| Hepatitis B | 68 | 30 | 38 | |
| Hepatitis C | 14 | 6 | 8 | |
| Alcoholic liver disease | 12 | 6 | 6 | |
| None | 6 | 3 | 3 | |
| Child-Pugh grading | .66 | |||
| A | 70 | 30 | 40 | |
| B | 30 | 15 | 15 | |
| BCLC staging | .88 | |||
| B | 67 | 31 | 36 | |
| C | 33 | 14 | 19 | |
| Portal vein tumor thrombus (+/–) | 22/78 | 10/35 | 12/43 | .84 |
| Mean maximum diameter of tumor (cm) | 8.0 | 8.9 | 7.4 | .37 |
| Tumor size (cm) | .93 | |||
| ≥5, <10 | 66 | 29 | 37 | |
| ≥10 | 34 | 16 | 18 | |
| Number of tumors | .54 | |||
| Single lesion | 76 | 36 | 40 | |
| Multiple lesion | 24 | 9 | 15 | |
| AFP (ng/mL) | .76 | |||
| ≤400 | 27 | 11 | 16 | |
| >400 | 73 | 34 | 39 |
AFP = alpha-fetoprotein, BCLC = Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer.
Evaluation of tumor response of patients in the experimental and the control group after treatment.
| CR | PR | SD | PD | Objective effective rate | ||||||
| After treatment | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % |
| 1 mo experimental | 28 | 62.2 | 15 | 33.3 | 2 | 4.4 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 95.6∗ |
| Control | 31 | 56.4 | 16 | 29.1 | 8 | 14.5 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 85.5∗ |
| 6 mo experimental | 21 | 46.7 | 15 | 33.3 | 4 | 8.8 | 2 | 4.4 | 36 | 85.7∗ |
| Control | 14 | 28.0 | 20 | 40.0 | 11 | 22.0 | 5 | 10.0 | 37 | 68.5∗ |
| 1 yr experimental | 13 | 35.1 | 13 | 35.1 | 8 | 21.6 | 3 | 8.1 | 26 | 70.3∗ |
| Control | 6 | 17.1 | 13 | 37.1 | 8 | 22.8 | 8 | 22.8 | 19 | 54.3∗ |
| 2 yrs experimental | 7 | 28.0 | 11 | 44.0 | 5 | 20.0 | 2 | 8.0 | 18 | 72.0† |
| Control | 3 | 18.8 | 8 | 50.0 | 2 | 12.5 | 3 | 18.9 | 8 | 68.8† |
CR = complete remission, PR = partial remission, SD = stable disease, PD = progressive disease.
P < .05.
P > .05, compared between groups.
Figure 1(A) The enhanced MRI image before interventional surgery showed diffuse nodular liver tumors in the liver (arrow); (B) Plain CT scan at 4 days after intervention showed obvious low-density changes (arrow); (C) Enhanced CT at 8 weeks after intervention showed that the range of tumors in the liver was significantly reduced, and there was no obvious enhancement (arrow); (D) 12 months after the first intervention, compared with pre-operative MRI, most of the liver tumors disappeared, and a few residual lesions showed no enhancement (arrow). CT = computed tomography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 3(A) Angiography during interventional surgery showed multiple nodular staining in the liver, blood is supplied by the branches of the hepatic artery; (B) Angiography after interventional embolization showed the tumor staining disappears; (C) Sequential DC reinfusion treatment after interventional surgery, and interventional angiography at 8 weeks after surgery showed no exact tumor staining. Compared with the first interventional angiography image, some suspected tumors have a small blood supply at the edge; (D) The distal branch of the hepatic artery was truncated, and the abnormally stained artery disappeared. Sequential DC reinfusion treatment was performed again after surgery. DC = dendritic cell.
Figure 4The progression-free survival time of 2 groups.
Figure 5Comparison of overall survival time between 2 groups.
Comparison of overall survival time and GSMs-TACE frequency between the experimental group and the control group.
| 6-mo survival rate | 12-mo survival rate | 24-mo survival rate | |||||||
| Group | N | N | % | N | % | N | % | Median survival time | GSMs-TACE frequency |
| Experimental | 45 | 42 | 93.3 | 37 | 82.2 | 25 | 55.6 | 25.0 ± 5.8 | 2.9 ± 0.8 |
| Control | 55 | 50 | 90.9 | 35 | 63.6 | 16 | 28.1 | 17.0 ± 2.4 | 4.3 ± 1.1 |
| X2/t | 0.197 | 3.369 | 15.458 | 9.309 | 7.131 | ||||
|
| .657 | .06 | .000 | .000 | .000 | ||||
GSMs-TACE = gelatin sponge microparticles-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
Figure 6Trend chart of comparison of physical scores between the 2 groups.
Comparison of incidence of adverse reactions between the experimental and the control group.
| Leukocyte decline | Thrombocytopenia | Abdominal diarrhea | Poor appetite and fatigue | Stomach discomfort | Cholecystitis | ||||||||
| Group | N | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % |
| Experimental | 45 | 4 | 8.9 | 5 | 11.1 | 11 | 24.4 | 13 | 28.9 | 20 | 44.4 | 5 | 11.1 |
| Control | 55 | 5 | 9.1 | 8 | 14.5 | 16 | 29.1 | 17 | 30.9 | 22 | 40.0 | 8 | 14.5 |
| X2 | 0.001 | 0.258 | 0.271 | 0.048 | 0.201 | 0.258 | |||||||
|
| .971 | .611 | .603 | .826 | .654 | .611 | |||||||