Johannes Levin1,2,3, Jonathan Vöglein1,2, Yakeel T Quiroz4,5, Randall J Bateman6, Valentina Ghisays7, Francisco Lopera5, Eric McDade6, Eric Reiman7, Pierre N Tariot7, John C Morris6. 1. Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. 2. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany. 3. Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany. 4. Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Grupo de Neurociencias, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia. 6. Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. 7. Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer disease (AD) has been increasingly challenged. Here, we aim to refocus the amyloid cascade hypothesis on its original premise that the accumulation of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide is the primary and earliest event in AD pathogenesis as based on current evidence, initiating several pathological events and ultimately leading to AD dementia. BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate about the validity of the amyloid cascade hypothesis for AD has been triggered by clinical trials with investigational disease-modifying drugs targeting Aβ that have not demonstrated consistent clinically meaningful benefits. UPDATED HYPOTHESIS: It is an open question if monotherapy targeting Aβ pathology could be markedly beneficial at a stage when the brain has been irreversibly damaged by a cascade of pathological changes. Interventions in cognitively unimpaired individuals at risk for dementia, during amyloid-only and pre-amyloid stages, are more appropriate for proving or refuting the amyloid hypothesis. Our updated hypothesis states that anti-Aβ investigational therapies are likely to be most efficacious when initiated in the preclinical (asymptomatic) stages of AD and specifically when the disease is driven primarily by amyloid pathology. Given the young age at symptom onset and the deterministic nature of the mutations, autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) mutation carriers represent the ideal population to evaluate the efficacy of putative disease-modifying Aβ therapies. MAJOR CHALLENGES FOR THE HYPOTHESIS: Key challenges of the amyloid hypothesis include the recognition that disrupted Aβ homeostasis alone is insufficient to produce the AD pathophysiologic process, poor correlation of Aβ with cognitive impairment, and inconclusive data regarding clinical efficacy of therapies targeting Aβ. Challenges of conducting ADAD research include the rarity of the disease and uncertainty of the generalizability of ADAD findings for the far more common "sporadic" late-onset AD. LINKAGE TO OTHER MAJOR THEORIES: The amyloid cascade hypothesis, modified here to pertain to the preclinical stage of AD, still needs to be integrated with the development and effects of tauopathy and other co-pathologies, including neuroinflammation, vascular insults, synucleinopathy, and many others.
OBJECTIVE: The amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer disease (AD) has been increasingly challenged. Here, we aim to refocus the amyloid cascade hypothesis on its original premise that the accumulation of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide is the primary and earliest event in AD pathogenesis as based on current evidence, initiating several pathological events and ultimately leading to AD dementia. BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate about the validity of the amyloid cascade hypothesis for AD has been triggered by clinical trials with investigational disease-modifying drugs targeting Aβ that have not demonstrated consistent clinically meaningful benefits. UPDATED HYPOTHESIS: It is an open question if monotherapy targeting Aβ pathology could be markedly beneficial at a stage when the brain has been irreversibly damaged by a cascade of pathological changes. Interventions in cognitively unimpaired individuals at risk for dementia, during amyloid-only and pre-amyloid stages, are more appropriate for proving or refuting the amyloid hypothesis. Our updated hypothesis states that anti-Aβ investigational therapies are likely to be most efficacious when initiated in the preclinical (asymptomatic) stages of AD and specifically when the disease is driven primarily by amyloid pathology. Given the young age at symptom onset and the deterministic nature of the mutations, autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) mutation carriers represent the ideal population to evaluate the efficacy of putative disease-modifying Aβ therapies. MAJOR CHALLENGES FOR THE HYPOTHESIS: Key challenges of the amyloid hypothesis include the recognition that disrupted Aβ homeostasis alone is insufficient to produce the AD pathophysiologic process, poor correlation of Aβ with cognitive impairment, and inconclusive data regarding clinical efficacy of therapies targeting Aβ. Challenges of conducting ADAD research include the rarity of the disease and uncertainty of the generalizability of ADAD findings for the far more common "sporadic" late-onset AD. LINKAGE TO OTHER MAJOR THEORIES: The amyloid cascade hypothesis, modified here to pertain to the preclinical stage of AD, still needs to be integrated with the development and effects of tauopathy and other co-pathologies, including neuroinflammation, vascular insults, synucleinopathy, and many others.
Authors: Thorlakur Jonsson; Jasvinder K Atwal; Stacy Steinberg; Jon Snaedal; Palmi V Jonsson; Sigurbjorn Bjornsson; Hreinn Stefansson; Patrick Sulem; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Janice Maloney; Kwame Hoyte; Amy Gustafson; Yichin Liu; Yanmei Lu; Tushar Bhangale; Robert R Graham; Johanna Huttenlocher; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Ole A Andreassen; Erik G Jönsson; Aarno Palotie; Timothy W Behrens; Olafur T Magnusson; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Ryan J Watts; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nature Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Juha O Rinne; Stephen Salloway; Jenny Wei; Ronald Black; Michael Grundman; Enchi Liu Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-08
Authors: Johannes Levin; Sylvia Maaß; Madeleine Schuberth; Armin Giese; Wolfgang H Oertel; Werner Poewe; Claudia Trenkwalder; Gregor K Wenning; Ulrich Mansmann; Martin Südmeyer; Karla Eggert; Brit Mollenhauer; Axel Lipp; Matthias Löhle; Joseph Classen; Alexander Münchau; Jan Kassubek; Florin Gandor; Daniela Berg; Silvia Egert-Schwender; Cornelia Eberhardt; Friedemann Paul; Kai Bötzel; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Hans-Jürgen Huppertz; Ingrid Ricard; Günter U Höglinger Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jens Wagner; Sergey Ryazanov; Andrei Leonov; Johannes Levin; Song Shi; Felix Schmidt; Catharina Prix; Francisco Pan-Montojo; Uwe Bertsch; Gerda Mitteregger-Kretzschmar; Markus Geissen; Martin Eiden; Fabienne Leidel; Thomas Hirschberger; Andreas A Deeg; Julian J Krauth; Wolfgang Zinth; Paul Tavan; Jens Pilger; Markus Zweckstetter; Tobias Frank; Mathias Bähr; Jochen H Weishaupt; Manfred Uhr; Henning Urlaub; Ulrike Teichmann; Matthias Samwer; Kai Bötzel; Martin Groschup; Hans Kretzschmar; Christian Griesinger; Armin Giese Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Eric M Reiman; Jessica B Langbaum; Pierre N Tariot; Francisco Lopera; Randall J Bateman; John C Morris; Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Allen D Roses; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Maria C Carrillo; Stacie Weninger Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Jonathan Vöglein; Soheyl Noachtar; Eric McDade; Kimberly A Quaid; Stephen Salloway; Bernardino Ghetti; James Noble; Sarah Berman; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Hiroshi Mori; Nick Fox; Ricardo Allegri; Colin L Masters; Virginia Buckles; John M Ringman; Martin Rossor; Peter R Schofield; Reisa Sperling; Mathias Jucker; Christoph Laske; Katrina Paumier; John C Morris; Randall J Bateman; Johannes Levin; Adrian Danek Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 5.133
Authors: Maarten Timmers; Bianca Van Broeck; Steven Ramael; John Slemmon; Katja De Waepenaert; Alberto Russu; Jennifer Bogert; Hans Stieltjes; Leslie M Shaw; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Dieder Moechars; Marc Mercken; Enchi Liu; Vikash Sinha; John Kemp; Luc Van Nueten; Luc Tritsmans; Johannes Rolf Streffer Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2016-08-24
Authors: Pierre N Tariot; Francisco Lopera; Jessica B Langbaum; Ronald G Thomas; Suzanne Hendrix; Lon S Schneider; Silvia Rios-Romenets; Margarita Giraldo; Natalia Acosta; Carlos Tobon; Claudia Ramos; Alejandro Espinosa; William Cho; Michael Ward; David Clayton; Michael Friesenhahn; Howard Mackey; Lee Honigberg; Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez; Kewei Chen; Trisha Walsh; Carolyn Langlois; Eric M Reiman Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2018-03-08
Authors: Gary Arendash; Haitham Abulaban; Susan Steen; Ross Andel; Yanhong Wang; Yun Bai; Rob Baranowski; Jon McGarity; Lyle Scritsmier; Xiaoyang Lin; Ning Shen; Ali Aljassabi; Yitong Li; Chuanhai Cao Journal: Medicines (Basel) Date: 2022-08-03