Literature DB >> 35211809

Total hip arthroplasty for hip fractures in patients older than 80 years of age: a retrospective matched cohort study.

Ran Schwarzkopf1, Jerry Arraut2, Mark Kurapatti1, Thomas H Christensen1, Joshua C Rozell1, Vinay K Aggarwal1, Kenneth A Egol1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increasing age and hip fractures are considered risk factors for post-operative complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Consequently, older adults undergoing THA due to hip fracture may have different outcomes and require additional healthcare resources than younger patients. This study aimed to identify the influence of age on discharge disposition and 90-day outcomes of THA performed for hip fractures in patients ≥ 80 years to those aged < 80.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 344 patients who underwent primary THA for hip fracture from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. Patients ≥ 80 years old were propensity-matched to a control group < 80 years old. Patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and 90-day post-operative outcomes were collected and assessed using Chi-square and independent sample t tests.
RESULTS: A total of 110 patients remained for matched comparison after propensity matching, and the average age in the younger cohort (YC, n = 55) was 67.69 ± 10.48, while the average age in the older cohort (OC, n = 55) was 85.12 ± 4.77 (p ≤ 0.001). Discharge disposition differed between the cohorts (p = 0.005), with the YC being more likely to be discharged home (52.7% vs. 27.3%) or to an acute rehabilitation center (23.6% vs. 16.4%) and less likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (21.8% vs. 54.5%). 90-day revision (3.6% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.558), 90-day readmission (10.9% vs. 14.5%; p = 0.567), 90-day complications (p = 0.626), and 90-day mortality rates (1.8% vs 1.8%; p = 1.000) did not differ significantly between cohorts.
CONCLUSION: While older patients were more likely to require a higher level of post-hospital care, outcomes and perioperative complication rates were not significantly different compared to a younger patient cohort. Payors need to consider patients' age in future payment models, as discharge disposition comprises a large percentage of post-discharge expenses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Hip fracture; Outcomes; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35211809     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04390-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  22 in total

1.  Radiographic Evaluations of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Plea for Uniform Assessments.

Authors:  Randa K Elmallah; Giles R Scuderi; Julio J Jauregui; R Michael Meneghini; Doug A Dennis; David B Backstein; Robert B Bourne; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Predictors of Same-Day Discharge in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients and Risk Factors for Post-Discharge Complications.

Authors:  Alex Sher; Aakash Keswani; Dong-Han Yao; Michael Anderson; Karl Koenig; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth; Claire Young; Cecil Rorabeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients 90 years of age and older.

Authors:  C J Belmar; P Barth; J H Lonner; P A Lotke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich; Heath Antoine; Andrew Swartz; David Peters; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Understanding readmission after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: who's at risk?

Authors:  James M Saucedo; Geoffrey S Marecek; Tyler R Wanke; Jungwha Lee; S David Stulberg; Lalit Puri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Effect of Bundled Payments and Health Care Reform as Alternative Payment Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Ahmed Siddiqi; Peter B White; Jaydev B Mistry; Chukwuweike U Gwam; James Nace; Michael A Mont; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 8.  Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Stefania Maggi
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Reduced short-term complications and mortality following Enhanced Recovery primary hip and knee arthroplasty: results from 6,000 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Sameer K Khan; Ajay Malviya; Scott D Muller; Ian Carluke; Paul F Partington; Kevin P Emmerson; Mike R Reed
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Jörg Eschweiler; Valentin Quack; Markus Tingart; Arne Driessen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.