Literature DB >> 35211589

Effect of precise nursing service mode on postoperative urinary incontinence prevention in patients with prostate disease.

Xi-Chun Zheng1, Ting-Ting Luo1, Dan-Dan Cao1, Wen-Zhi Cai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with benign prostatic disease often experience detrusor morphological changes and dysfunction. In severe cases, it leads to bladder detrusor dysfunction, resulting in dysuria, frequent urination, urgent urination, incomplete urination, and other symptoms including renal function injury. An operation to restore normal urination function and to control postoperative complications, as far as possible, is the most common method for benign prostatic disease. AIM: To observe the effect of precise nursing service mode on postoperative urinary incontinence prevention in patients with prostate disease.
METHODS: In total, 130 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic disease, from January 2018 to June 2021, in our hospital, were selected and divided into observation and control groups according to their treatment options. Sixty-five cases in the control group were given routine nursing mode intervention and 65 cases in the observation group received precise nursing service mode intervention. The intervention with the observation group included psychological counseling about negative emotions, pelvic floor exercises, and post-hospital discharge care. The complications of the two groups were counted, and the general postoperative conditions of the two groups were recorded. The urinary flow dynamics indexes of the two groups were detected, and differences in clinical international prostate system score (IPSS) and urinary incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores were evaluated.
RESULTS: Postoperative exhaust time (18.65 ± 3.23 h and 24.63 ± 4.51 h), the time of indwelling catheter (4.85 ± 1.08 d and 5.63 ± 1.24 d), and hospitalization time (8.78 ± 2.03 d and 10.23 ± 2.28 d) in the observation group were lower than in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After the operation, the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) increased (P < 0.05), the residual urine volume (RUV) decreased (P < 0.05), and the maximum closed urethral pressure (MUCP) was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) compared to pre-operation. The Qmax of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, while the RUV was lower than that of the control group. There was no significant difference in MUCP between the observation and control groups (P > 0.05). The I-QOL score of the two groups improved (P < 0.05), and the IPSS decreased (P < 0.05). After the operation, the I-QOL score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the IPSS was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of urethral injury (1.54% and 3.08%), bladder spasm (0.00% and 1.54%), and secondary bleeding (1.54% and 4.62) between the observation and control groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The precise nursing service mode can reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence in patients with prostate disease, thus improving postoperative urodynamics and rehabilitation, and quality of life. ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Life quality; Precise nursing service mode; Prostate disease; Urinary incontinence; Urodynamics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35211589      PMCID: PMC8855263          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


Core Tip: The precise nursing service mode can reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence in patients with prostate disease, thus improving postoperative urodynamics and rehabilitation, as well as patients’ quality of life.

INTRODUCTION

Urinary incontinence is one of the most common postoperative complications in patients with benign prostate disease who fail to respond to conservative treatment. Urinary incontinence can not only cause local skin eczema, erosion, incontinence dermatitis, and other complications but also exert psychological pressure on patients, seriously affecting their physical and mental health after surgery[1,2]. Previous studies have found that postoperative local edema, a long catheter indwelling time, hyperplastic gland compression, hemostatic balloon placement, and psychological factors were related to urinary incontinence. The postoperative nursing quality has greatly influenced the care for urinary incontinence; however, routine nursing mode focuses on basic nursing. Therefore, targeted interventions for urinary incontinence are often inadequate[3]. Precise nursing service mode is a novel nursing mode, providing care based on patients’ needs rather than care being imposed on them by the nursing staff. Hence, this intervention administers the right care to the right patient at the right time. Comprehensive precision nursing intervention helps to improve patients' cognition, compliance, and satisfaction while reducing complications. It has been applied in many areas such as in intensive care units, surgery, orthopedics, gynecology, and pediatrics, and has achieved beneficial results[4,5]. Neurogenic bladder, caused by dysuria, has no completely effective treatment in China or abroad. Urinary incontinence can be alleviated by using a bladder therapy instrument after the prostate operation. Our study aimed to observe the effect of precise nursing service mode on the prevention of postoperative urinary incontinence in patients with prostate disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Case data

A total of 130 patients, on average (62.89 ± 11.71) years old, diagnosed with benign prostatic disease from January 2018 to June 2021, in our hospital, were selected and divided into observation and control groups according to their treatment options. Sixty-five cases in the control group were given routine nursing mode intervention, and 65 cases in the observation group received precise nursing service mode intervention. There was no statistical significance of the baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). Written informed consent was given by patients in this study.

Selection of cases

Inclusion criteria: (1) Preoperative biopsy was performed on patients with prostate specific antigen < 4 ng/mL, which met the criteria of benign prostatic hyperplasia in The Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of Urology in China. Cystoscopy, urodynamic examination, and digital rectal examinations were performed to confirm the diagnosis; (2) Patients were ≥ 50 years old, ≤ 85 years old; (3) Electro prostatectomy was performed after invalid conservative observation and drug treatment; (4) Neurogenic bladder was excluded; (5) Patients had no history of lower urinary tract trauma; and (6) They understood the purpose and methods of this study, voluntarily participated in it, and signed the informed consent. Exclusion criteria: (1) Obstruction of urination due to urinary calculi, urethral stricture, and other reasons; (2) skin disease or severe skin damage in the perineal region; (3) psychological urinary incontinence or previous urethral trauma; (4) mental abnormalities; and (5) serious heart, liver, kidney, and other organ diseases.

Methods

The control was given routine nursing mode intervention, including vital signs’ monitoring, proper catheter fixation and unobstructed, continuous bladder irrigation, dietary guidance, psychological counseling, prevention of falls and pressure sores, and analgesic drugs as directed by doctors. The observation group was given precise nursing service mode intervention. Moreover, psychological intervention occurred first to understand the factors causing patients' negative emotions, to correct patients' wrong ideas through health education, to ensure patients realize the impact of negative emotions on postoperative urinary incontinence, and to help patients establish recovery confidence. Stepped pelvic floor functional exercise was adopted, and patients were guided to engage in pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training three days before the operation. Training method: the nursing staff wore disposable gloves; inserted the right index finger into the patient's anus after smearing paraffin oil and asked the patient to relax the abdominal and thigh muscles, contract the anus and urethra, relax for 5–10 s after holding for more than 3 s, and gradually extended the contraction time for 5–10 s, depending on the feeling of tightness of the anus by the pressure on the fingers. The training time was 20 min/t, 3 times/d. The training was suspended from the day of the operation to 2d after the operation, and the tube training was started on the third day after operation. The duration and intensity of the exercise was gradually increased. Patients were guided to conduct bladder function training. When the urinary catheter was just removed, the nurse responsible told the patients to urinate again immediately after urination, to avoid holding urine, to urinate regularly within a short time, and then gradually extend the interval. Once urination had occurred, they did not urinate again immediately, but maintained a relaxed and pleasant mood to relax the bladder and inhibit urination. Intermittent micturition training was conducted to stop or slow down the speed of urinary flow during micturition. Attention was paid to contract the pelvic floor muscles to prevent urine outflow before urinary incontinence caused by coughing, laughing and other actions. For patients with urinary incontinence, clothes were changed in time and perineum area cleaned, to prevent urine odor and skin irritation. The patient was guided to use the Lihe household low-frequency electronic pulse bladder instrument correctly after discharge from the hospital. Precision nursing permeates all stages of preoperative nursing, postoperative nursing, and continuous nursing to establish an out of hospital follow-up platform for specific diseases and to build a patient discharge system on effective supervision and communication.

Observation indexes and test method

The postoperative exhaust time, time of indwelling catheter, hospitalization time, urethral orifice injury, bladder spasm, secondary hemorrhage, and urinary incontinence were recorded. Clinical international prostate system score (IPSS) and urinary incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores were used to evaluate the symptoms and life quality[6,7]. There are 7 IPSSs, and the individual score is 0–5. The lower the score, the lighter the symptoms. There are 22 questions in the I-QOL score, with a total score of 0–100. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 19.0 was used for data analysis; measurement data were expressed by mean ± SD; t-test was used for comparative application; enumeration data were expressed by the number of cases (percentage); χ2 test was used for comparative application. The inspection level was 0.05.

RESULTS

The comparison of baseline data between the two groups

There were no significant differences in age, course of the disease, IPSS, prostate volume, rectal digital examination, and basic diseases between the two groups (P > 0.05), as indicated in Table 1.
Table 1

Comparison of baseline data between the two groups, n (%)

Parameters
Control group (n = 65)
Observation group (n = 65)
χ 2 /t
P value
Age (yr)63.12 ± 12.0562.85 ± 11.540.1300.896
Course of disease (yr)12.24 ± 3.0212.31 ± 2.840.1360.892
IPSS score 30.56 ± 4.6331.02 ± 4.810.5550.580
Prostate volume (mL)45.96 ± 7.8646.21 ± 7.370.1870.852
Rectal digital examination
II degree36 (55.38)41 (63.08)0.7960.372
III degree29 (44.62)24 (36.92)
Basic diseases
Bladder stones24 (36.92)19 (29.23)0.8690.351
Hypertension36 (55.38)39 (60.00)0.2840.594
Diabetes18 (27.69)20 (30.77)0.1490.700
Coronary heart disease27 (41.54)22 (33.85)0.8190.366
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease25 (38.46)23 (35.38)0.1320.716

IPSS: International prostate system score.

Comparison of baseline data between the two groups, n (%) IPSS: International prostate system score.

The comparison of postoperative outcomes between the two groups

Postoperative exhaust time, time of indwelling catheter, and hospitalization time for the observation group were lower than for the control group. The difference was significant (P < 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group
Number of cases
Postoperative exhaust time (h)
Time of indwelling catheter (d)
Hospitalization time (d)
Control group6524.63 ± 4.515.63 ± 1.2410.23 ± 2.28
Observation Group6518.65 ± 3.234.85 ± 1.088.78 ± 2.03
t 8.6913.8243.829
P value0.0000.0000.000
Comparison of postoperative outcomes between the two groups (mean ± SD)

Comparisons of urinary flow mechanics index, IPSS, and I-QOL scores of the two groups

The urinary flow mechanics index before the operation was consistent (P > 0.05), After the operation, the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) increased (P < 0.05), the residual urine volume (RUV) decreased (P < 0.05), and the maximum closed urethral pressure (MUCP) was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) compared with during pre-operation. The Qmax of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, while the RUV was lower than that of the control group. There were no significant differences in MUCP between the observation and control groups (P > 0.05). Preoperative IPSS and I-QOL scores were similar (P > 0.05). After the operation, the I-QOL score of the two groups improved (P < 0.05), and the IPSS decreased (P < 0.05). The I-QOL score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the IPSS was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05), as demonstrated in Table 3.
Table 3

Comparison of urinary flow mechanics index, international prostate system score and incontinence quality of life questionnaire score in the two groups (mean ± SD)

Group
Control group (n = 65)
Observation group (n = 65)
t
P value
MUCP (cmH2O)Preoperative24.12 ± 4.3324.05 ± 4.560.090.929
Postoperative25.69 ± 4.1325.47 ± 4.320.2970.767
RUV (mL)Preoperative74.21 ± 15.6673.25 ± 16.740.3380.736
Postoperative16.23 ± 3.21a13.14 ± 2.57a6.0580
Qmax (mL/s)Preoperative4.26 ± 1.234.31 ± 1.270.2280.82
Postoperative11.45 ± 2.03a13.65 ± 2.41a5.6290
IPSS scorePreoperative30.56 ± 4.6331.02 ± 4.810.5550.58
Postoperative8.96 ± 1.56a5.74 ± 1.04a13.8460
I-QOL scorePreoperative40.43 ± 4.5240.68 ± 5.060.2970.767
Postoperative48.74 ± 3.62a51.14 ± 3.05a4.0880

P < 0.05 vs the pre-operation of this group.

MUCP: Maximum closed urethral pressure; RUV: Residual urine volume; Qmax: Maximum urinary flow rate; IPSS: International prostate system score; I-QOL: Incontinence quality of life questionnaire score.

Comparison of urinary flow mechanics index, international prostate system score and incontinence quality of life questionnaire score in the two groups (mean ± SD) P < 0.05 vs the pre-operation of this group. MUCP: Maximum closed urethral pressure; RUV: Residual urine volume; Qmax: Maximum urinary flow rate; IPSS: International prostate system score; I-QOL: Incontinence quality of life questionnaire score.

Comparison of complications between two groups

There were no significant differences in urethral orifice injury, bladder spasm, and secondary bleeding between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of complications between two groups, n (%)

Group
Number of cases
Urethral orifice injury
Bladder spasm
Secondary bleeding
Control group652 (3.08)1 (1.54)3 (4.62)
Observation group651 (1.54)0 (0.00)1 (1.54)
χ2 0.3411.0081.032
P value0.5590.3150.310
Comparison of complications between two groups, n (%)

Comparison of urinary incontinence between the two groups

In the observation group, there were 14 cases of temporary urinary incontinence on the day the catheter was introduced; the incidence rate was 21.54%; mainly mild. Among the 14 cases of urinary incontinence in the observation group, 9 cases returned to normal within 1 wk, and 5 cases returned to normal within 1 to 4 wk. In the control group, 25 cases of temporary urinary incontinence occurred on the same day; the incidence rate was 38.46%; mainly moderate. Among the 25 cases of urinary incontinence in the control group, 13 cases returned to normal within 1 wk, and 8 cases returned to normal within 1 to 4 wk. The incidence of urinary incontinence in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and there was no significant difference in the duration of urinary incontinence between the observation and control groups (P > 0.05) as indicated in Table 5.
Table 5

Comparison of urinary incontinence between two groups, n (%)

Group
Number of cases
Urinary incontinence
Duration of urinary incontinence
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Total
< 1 wk
1 wk-4 wk
> 4 wk
Control group6510 (40.00)11 (44.00)4 (16.00)25 (38.46)13 (52.00)8 (32.00)4 (16.00)
Observation group657 (50.00)5 (35.71)2 (14.29)14 (21.54)9 (64.29)5 (35.71)0 (0.00)
χ2 4.3222.517
P value0.0350.284
Comparison of urinary incontinence between two groups, n (%)

DISCUSSION

Postoperative urinary incontinence is the common complication affecting the quality of life, with a harmful influence on patients' bodies and minds[8,9]. The main treatment for postoperative urinary incontinence is prevention, and nursing intervention plays a vital role in this process[10]. The Lihe household low-frequency electronic pulse bladder instrument provides a type of intervention. It is a non-invasive, painless physical therapeutic apparatus, multidimensional bladder stimulus with a low frequency, which can help patients to improve the bladder smooth muscle, pelvic floor muscles, and urethral sphincter function, to solve the increased residual urine, urinary retention, and urination dysfunction. The instrument can be used in professional medical institutions and at home. In the postoperative care of patients with prostate disease, it is necessary to consider patients as the center and to implement the targeted nursing plan based on fully evaluating the patient's condition, which is the essence of the precision nursing model[11]. Since its advent, the precise nursing service mode has played a key role in various clinical fields. The precision nursing emergency management system in emergency rescue, and found that it could improve the emergency response rate and overall standards of nursing staff and ensure the safety of patients’ lives[12,13]. Moreover, Spiers et al[14] applied the improved scheme based on precision nursing to the care of patients with the replantation of an amputated finger, and found that it could effectively reduce the risks of complications such as vascular crisis, postoperative infection, constipation, and could help relieve the pain. In our study, precise nursing service mode was applied to prevent postoperative urinary incontinence in patients with prostate disease, and it was found to shorten postoperative exhaust time, the time of indwelling catheter and hospitalization time, and the incidence of urinary incontinence. However, there were no significant differences in urethral orifice injury, bladder spasm, and secondary bleeding between the two groups. This is because the psychological intervention was given first under the precision nursing service mode, which could have helped patients to reduce psychological pressure and to reduce the adverse psychological effects on urinary incontinence. Before and after the operation, patients were guided to implement intervention measures such as pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation training to improve the strength of pelvic floor muscle groups and to reduce urinary incontinence caused by pelvic floor muscle relaxation. They were guided to increase urinary continence with intermittent training. Furthermore, patients were educated on how to use Lihe household low-frequency electronic pulse bladder instrument correctly after discharge. This was to help them improve urinary continence ability, to promote local blood circulation, accelerate the damage of nerve repair which can help patients recover automatic micturition function as soon as possible, and accelerate the removal of catheters. The removal of the urethra is more conducive to the early cessation of the patient's rehabilitation, which can promote the faster recovery of intestinal function[15]. The urinary flow mechanics index is important to evaluate the effects of the operation and assess patients’ urination function. In patients with prostate disease, the abnormality of the urinary flow mechanics index is related to not only the prostate disease but also the surgical trauma[16,17]. In our study, the urination function was evaluated through Qmax, RUV, and MUCP testing in the two groups. IPSSs were used to evaluate the prostate symptoms, and I-QOL scores were used to evaluate the quality of life. We found that the precision nursing service model could improve postoperative urinary flow mechanics, promote rehabilitation, and improve the quality of life of patients. This is because this nursing model can guide patients to avoid the occurrence of urinary incontinence Furthermore, it provides timely treatment after the occurrence of urinary incontinence, thus relieving the pain of patients and allowing their quality of life to improve[18]. The early removal of the catheter can not only reduce the triggering factors of urinary incontinence but also help patients to implement urination training and improve the urinary flow mechanics index. Operation on the prostate may affect the sexual function of patients, which is related to the damage of the penile anatomy, penile blood vessels, and the erectile nerve[19,20]. Nursing care for patients with prostate disease who have undergone surgery has a direct and important impact on patients’ rehabilitation. However, existing conventional nursing interventions fail to achieve satisfactory results and have no significant effect on the prevention of patient complications. Precision nursing through psychological intervention, stepped pelvic floor exercises, and home training after discharge facilitates recovery and yields satisfactory results. Compared with conventional care, precision care encompasses all stages of preoperative, postoperative, and continuous care. Moreover, it is effective in preventing urinary incontinence. However, the findings are limited by the study sample because only patients who underwent prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia were included. Patients with urinary dysfunction caused by urinary calculi, urethral stricture, and other reasons; skin diseases or severe skin damage in the perineum; psychological urinary incontinence; a previous history of urethral trauma; mental disorders; severe heart, liver, kidney, and other organic diseases were excluded. However, such patients are not uncommon in clinical settings, so future studies should explore targeted and precise care for such patients.

CONCLUSION

The precise nursing service mode can reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence in patients with prostate disease; thus, it improves postoperative urodynamics and rehabilitation, and the patients’ quality of life.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

An operation to restore normal urination function and to control postoperative complications, as far as possible, is the most common method for benign prostatic disease. The postoperative nursing quality has greatly influenced the care for urinary incontinence.

Research motivation

In order to find a reasonable nursing way to improve postoperative urinary incontinence of patients with prostate disease.

Research objectives

This study aimed to observe the effect of precise nursing service mode on postoperative urinary incontinence prevention in patients with prostate disease.

Research methods

A total of 130 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic disease were selected and divided into observation and control groups according to their treatment options. The control was given routine nursing mode intervention; The observation group was given precise nursing service mode intervention. The postoperative exhaust time, time of indwelling catheter, hospitalization time, urethral orifice injury, bladder spasm, secondary hemorrhage, and urinary incontinence were recorded. Clinical international prostate system score (IPSS) and urinary incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores were used to evaluate the symptoms and life quality.

Research results

Postoperative exhaust time, time of indwelling catheter and hospitalization time in the observation group were lower than in the control group. After the operation, the maximum urinary flow rate increased, the residual urine volume decreased, and the maximum closed urethral pressure was not statistically significant compared with during pre-operation; After the operation, the I-QOL score of the two groups improved, and the IPSS decreased. The I-QOL score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the IPSS was lower than that of the control group. The incidence of urinary incontinence in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and there was no statistical significance in the duration of urinary incontinence between the observation group and the control group.

Research conclusions

The precise nursing service mode can reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence in patients with prostate disease; thus, it improves postoperative urodynamics and rehabilitation, and the patients’ quality of life.

Research perspectives

Next, we want to explore the improvement effect of precision nursing service mode on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for other urinary diseases
  20 in total

1.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia and intraprostatic inflammation are associated with liver inflammation: it's time for prevention.

Authors:  S Privitera; G I Russo; S La Vignera; R A Condorelli; A E Calogero; F Cantiello; R Damiano; V Favilla; S Cimino; G Morgia
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.842

2.  Explanatory Power and Nursing Theory.

Authors:  Pamela G Reed
Journal:  Nurs Sci Q       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 0.883

3.  The Relationship Between Prostate Cancer and Metformin Consumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study.

Authors:  Bahareh Ghiasi; Diana Sarokhani; Farid Najafi; Morteza Motedayen; Ali Hasanpour Dehkordi
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Multicentre international experience of 532-nm laser photoselective vaporization with GreenLight XPS in men with very large prostates.

Authors:  Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Malek Meskawi; Eric Belleville; Khaled Ajib; Franck Bruyere; Alexis E Te; Bilal Chughtai; Dean Elterman; Vincent Misrai; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Urinary Bladder Contractility Revisited. Correlation of Noninvasively and Invasively Measured Contractility Parameters in Patients Eligible for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

Authors:  Ron van Mastrigt; Egbert R Boevé; Jan Groen; Sandra de Zeeuw
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Gretchen M Irwin
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 7.  Precision medicine for nurses: 101.

Authors:  Colleen Lemoine
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.315

8.  Utility after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared to conventional approaches for localized prostate cancer [socioeconomic perspective study].

Authors:  Min-Jin Lee; Dong-Ah Park; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Improvement of Urinary Incontinence, Life Impact, and Depression and Anxiety With Modified Pelvic Floor Muscle Training After Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Li-Hui Pan; Mei-Hsiu Lin; See-Tong Pang; Jeng Wang; Whe-Mei Shih
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 May-Jun

10.  Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Degu Abate; Naghmeh Abbasi; Hedayat Abbastabar; Foad Abd-Allah; Omar Abdel-Rahman; Ahmed Abdelalim; Amir Abdoli; Ibrahim Abdollahpour; Abdishakur S M Abdulle; Nebiyu Dereje Abebe; Haftom Niguse Abraha; Laith Jamal Abu-Raddad; Ahmed Abualhasan; Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji; Shailesh M Advani; Mohsen Afarideh; Mahdi Afshari; Mohammad Aghaali; Dominic Agius; Sutapa Agrawal; Ayat Ahmadi; Elham Ahmadian; Ehsan Ahmadpour; Muktar Beshir Ahmed; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Tomi Akinyemiju; Ziyad Al-Aly; Assim M AlAbdulKader; Fares Alahdab; Tahiya Alam; Genet Melak Alamene; Birhan Tamene T Alemnew; Kefyalew Addis Alene; Cyrus Alinia; Vahid Alipour; Syed Mohamed Aljunid; Fatemeh Allah Bakeshei; Majid Abdulrahman Hamad Almadi; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Ubai Alsharif; Shirina Alsowaidi; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Erfan Amini; Saeed Amini; Yaw Ampem Amoako; Zohreh Anbari; Nahla Hamed Anber; Catalina Liliana Andrei; Mina Anjomshoa; Fereshteh Ansari; Ansariadi Ansariadi; Seth Christopher Yaw Appiah; Morteza Arab-Zozani; Jalal Arabloo; Zohreh Arefi; Olatunde Aremu; Habtamu Abera Areri; Al Artaman; Hamid Asayesh; Ephrem Tsegay Asfaw; Alebachew Fasil Ashagre; Reza Assadi; Bahar Ataeinia; Hagos Tasew Atalay; Zerihun Ataro; Suleman Atique; Marcel Ausloos; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Euripide F G A Avokpaho; Ashish Awasthi; Nefsu Awoke; Beatriz Paulina Ayala Quintanilla; Martin Amogre Ayanore; Henok Tadesse Ayele; Ebrahim Babaee; Umar Bacha; Alaa Badawi; Mojtaba Bagherzadeh; Eleni Bagli; Senthilkumar Balakrishnan; Abbas Balouchi; Till Winfried Bärnighausen; Robert J Battista; Masoud Behzadifar; Meysam Behzadifar; Bayu Begashaw Bekele; Yared Belete Belay; Yaschilal Muche Belayneh; Kathleen Kim Sachiko Berfield; Adugnaw Berhane; Eduardo Bernabe; Mircea Beuran; Nickhill Bhakta; Krittika Bhattacharyya; Belete Biadgo; Ali Bijani; Muhammad Shahdaat Bin Sayeed; Charles Birungi; Catherine Bisignano; Helen Bitew; Tone Bjørge; Archie Bleyer; Kassawmar Angaw Bogale; Hunduma Amensisa Bojia; Antonio M Borzì; Cristina Bosetti; Ibrahim R Bou-Orm; Hermann Brenner; Jerry D Brewer; Andrey Nikolaevich Briko; Nikolay Ivanovich Briko; Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira; Zahid A Butt; Giulia Carreras; Juan J Carrero; Félix Carvalho; Clara Castro; Franz Castro; Ferrán Catalá-López; Ester Cerin; Yazan Chaiah; Wagaye Fentahun Chanie; Vijay Kumar Chattu; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Neelima Singh Chauhan; Mohammad Chehrazi; Peggy Pei-Chia Chiang; Tesfaye Yitna Chichiabellu; Onyema Greg Chido-Amajuoyi; Odgerel Chimed-Ochir; Jee-Young J Choi; Devasahayam J Christopher; Dinh-Toi Chu; Maria-Magdalena Constantin; Vera M Costa; Emanuele Crocetti; Christopher Stephen Crowe; Maria Paula Curado; Saad M A Dahlawi; Giovanni Damiani; Amira Hamed Darwish; Ahmad Daryani; José das Neves; Feleke Mekonnen Demeke; Asmamaw Bizuneh Demis; Birhanu Wondimeneh Demissie; Gebre Teklemariam Demoz; Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez; Afshin Derakhshani; Kalkidan Solomon Deribe; Rupak Desai; Beruk Berhanu Desalegn; Melaku Desta; Subhojit Dey; Samath Dhamminda Dharmaratne; Meghnath Dhimal; Daniel Diaz; Mesfin Tadese Tadese Dinberu; Shirin Djalalinia; David Teye Doku; Thomas M Drake; Manisha Dubey; Eleonora Dubljanin; Eyasu Ejeta Duken; Hedyeh Ebrahimi; Andem Effiong; Aziz Eftekhari; Iman El Sayed; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Shaimaa I El-Jaafary; Ziad El-Khatib; Demelash Abewa Elemineh; Hajer Elkout; Richard G Ellenbogen; Aisha Elsharkawy; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Daniel Adane Endalew; Aman Yesuf Endries; Babak Eshrati; Ibtihal Fadhil; Vahid Fallah Omrani; Mahbobeh Faramarzi; Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi; Andrea Farioli; Farshad Farzadfar; Netsanet Fentahun; Eduarda Fernandes; Garumma Tolu Feyissa; Irina Filip; Florian Fischer; James L Fisher; Lisa M Force; Masoud Foroutan; Marisa Freitas; Takeshi Fukumoto; Neal D Futran; Silvano Gallus; Fortune Gbetoho Gankpe; Reta Tsegaye Gayesa; Tsegaye Tewelde Gebrehiwot; Gebreamlak Gebremedhn Gebremeskel; Getnet Azeze Gedefaw; Belayneh K Gelaw; Birhanu Geta; Sefonias Getachew; Kebede Embaye Gezae; Mansour Ghafourifard; Alireza Ghajar; Ahmad Ghashghaee; Asadollah Gholamian; Paramjit Singh Gill; Themba T G Ginindza; Alem Girmay; Muluken Gizaw; Ricardo Santiago Gomez; Sameer Vali Gopalani; Giuseppe Gorini; Bárbara Niegia Garcia Goulart; Ayman Grada; Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra; Andre Luiz Sena Guimaraes; Prakash C Gupta; Rahul Gupta; Kishor Hadkhale; Arvin Haj-Mirzaian; Arya Haj-Mirzaian; Randah R Hamadeh; Samer Hamidi; Lolemo Kelbiso Hanfore; Josep Maria Haro; Milad Hasankhani; Amir Hasanzadeh; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Roderick J Hay; Simon I Hay; Andualem Henok; Nathaniel J Henry; Claudiu Herteliu; Hagos D Hidru; Chi Linh Hoang; Michael K Hole; Praveen Hoogar; Nobuyuki Horita; H Dean Hosgood; Mostafa Hosseini; Mehdi Hosseinzadeh; Mihaela Hostiuc; Sorin Hostiuc; Mowafa Househ; Mohammedaman Mama Hussen; Bogdan Ileanu; Milena D Ilic; Kaire Innos; Seyed Sina Naghibi Irvani; Kufre Robert Iseh; Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam; Farhad Islami; Nader Jafari Balalami; Morteza Jafarinia; Leila Jahangiry; Mohammad Ali Jahani; Nader Jahanmehr; Mihajlo Jakovljevic; Spencer L James; Mehdi Javanbakht; Sudha Jayaraman; Sun Ha Jee; Ensiyeh Jenabi; Ravi Prakash Jha; Jost B Jonas; Jitendra Jonnagaddala; Tamas Joo; Suresh Banayya Jungari; Mikk Jürisson; Ali Kabir; Farin Kamangar; André Karch; Narges Karimi; Ansar Karimian; Amir Kasaeian; Gebremicheal Gebreslassie Kasahun; Belete Kassa; Tesfaye Dessale Kassa; Mesfin Wudu Kassaw; Anil Kaul; Peter Njenga Keiyoro; Abraham Getachew Kelbore; Amene Abebe Kerbo; Yousef Saleh Khader; Maryam Khalilarjmandi; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Gulfaraz Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Khaled Khatab; Amir Khater; Maryam Khayamzadeh; Maryam Khazaee-Pool; Salman Khazaei; Abdullah T Khoja; Mohammad Hossein Khosravi; Jagdish Khubchandani; Neda Kianipour; Daniel Kim; Yun Jin Kim; Adnan Kisa; Sezer Kisa; Katarzyna Kissimova-Skarbek; Hamidreza Komaki; Ai Koyanagi; Kristopher J Krohn; Burcu Kucuk Bicer; Nuworza Kugbey; Vivek Kumar; Desmond Kuupiel; Carlo La Vecchia; Deepesh P Lad; Eyasu Alem Lake; Ayenew Molla Lakew; Dharmesh Kumar Lal; Faris Hasan Lami; Qing Lan; Savita Lasrado; Paolo Lauriola; Jeffrey V Lazarus; James Leigh; Cheru Tesema Leshargie; Yu Liao; Miteku Andualem Limenih; Stefan Listl; Alan D Lopez; Platon D Lopukhov; Raimundas Lunevicius; Mohammed Madadin; Sameh Magdeldin; Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek; Azeem Majeed; Afshin Maleki; Reza Malekzadeh; Ali Manafi; Navid Manafi; Wondimu Ayele Manamo; Morteza Mansourian; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani; Saman Maroufizadeh; Santi Martini S Martini; Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson; Benjamin Ballard Massenburg; Motswadi Titus Maswabi; Manu Raj Mathur; Colm McAlinden; Martin McKee; Hailemariam Abiy Alemu Meheretu; Ravi Mehrotra; Varshil Mehta; Toni Meier; Yohannes A Melaku; Gebrekiros Gebremichael Meles; Hagazi Gebre Meles; Addisu Melese; Mulugeta Melku; Peter T N Memiah; Walter Mendoza; Ritesh G Menezes; Shahin Merat; Tuomo J Meretoja; Tomislav Mestrovic; Bartosz Miazgowski; Tomasz Miazgowski; Kebadnew Mulatu M Mihretie; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Seyed Mostafa Mir; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Rashmi Mishra; Babak Moazen; Dara K Mohammad; Karzan Abdulmuhsin Mohammad; Yousef Mohammad; Aso Mohammad Darwesh; Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi; Hiwa Mohammadi; Moslem Mohammadi; Mahdi Mohammadian; Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani; Milad Mohammadoo-Khorasani; Reza Mohammadpourhodki; Ammas Siraj Mohammed; Jemal Abdu Mohammed; Shafiu Mohammed; Farnam Mohebi; Ali H Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Yoshan Moodley; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Maryam Moossavi; Ghobad Moradi; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Farhad Moradpour; Lidia Morawska; Joana Morgado-da-Costa; Naho Morisaki; Shane Douglas Morrison; Abbas Mosapour; Seyyed Meysam Mousavi; Achenef Asmamaw Muche; Oumer Sada S Muhammed; Jonah Musa; Ashraf F Nabhan; Mehdi Naderi; Ahamarshan Jayaraman Nagarajan; Gabriele Nagel; Azin Nahvijou; Gurudatta Naik; Farid Najafi; Luigi Naldi; Hae Sung Nam; Naser Nasiri; Javad Nazari; Ionut Negoi; Subas Neupane; Polly A Newcomb; Haruna Asura Nggada; Josephine W Ngunjiri; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Leila Nikniaz; Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum; Yirga Legesse Nirayo; Molly R Nixon; Chukwudi A Nnaji; Marzieh Nojomi; Shirin Nosratnejad; Malihe Nourollahpour Shiadeh; Mohammed Suleiman Obsa; Richard Ofori-Asenso; Felix Akpojene Ogbo; In-Hwan Oh; Andrew T Olagunju; Tinuke O Olagunju; Mojisola Morenike Oluwasanu; Abidemi E Omonisi; Obinna E Onwujekwe; Anu Mary Oommen; Eyal Oren; Doris D V Ortega-Altamirano; Erika Ota; Stanislav S Otstavnov; Mayowa Ojo Owolabi; Mahesh P A; Jagadish Rao Padubidri; Smita Pakhale; Amir H Pakpour; Adrian Pana; Eun-Kee Park; Hadi Parsian; Tahereh Pashaei; Shanti Patel; Snehal T Patil; Alyssa Pennini; David M Pereira; Cristiano Piccinelli; Julian David Pillay; Majid Pirestani; Farhad Pishgar; Maarten J Postma; Hadi Pourjafar; Farshad Pourmalek; Akram Pourshams; Swayam Prakash; Narayan Prasad; Mostafa Qorbani; Mohammad Rabiee; Navid Rabiee; Amir Radfar; Alireza Rafiei; Fakher Rahim; Mahdi Rahimi; Muhammad Aziz Rahman; Fatemeh Rajati; Saleem M Rana; Samira Raoofi; Goura Kishor Rath; David Laith Rawaf; Salman Rawaf; Robert C Reiner; Andre M N Renzaho; Nima Rezaei; Aziz Rezapour; Ana Isabel Ribeiro; Daniela Ribeiro; Luca Ronfani; Elias Merdassa Roro; Gholamreza Roshandel; Ali Rostami; Ragy Safwat Saad; Parisa Sabbagh; Siamak Sabour; Basema Saddik; Saeid Safiri; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mohammad Reza Salahshoor; Farkhonde Salehi; Hosni Salem; Marwa Rashad Salem; Hamideh Salimzadeh; Joshua A Salomon; Abdallah M Samy; Juan Sanabria; Milena M Santric Milicevic; Benn Sartorius; Arash Sarveazad; Brijesh Sathian; Maheswar Satpathy; Miloje Savic; Monika Sawhney; Mehdi Sayyah; Ione J C Schneider; Ben Schöttker; Mario Sekerija; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Masood Sepehrimanesh; Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Faramarz Shaahmadi; Hosein Shabaninejad; Mohammad Shahbaz; Masood Ali Shaikh; Amir Shamshirian; Morteza Shamsizadeh; Heidar Sharafi; Zeinab Sharafi; Mehdi Sharif; Ali Sharifi; Hamid Sharifi; Rajesh Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Reza Shirkoohi; Sharvari Rahul Shukla; Si Si; Soraya Siabani; Diego Augusto Santos Silva; Dayane Gabriele Alves Silveira; Ambrish Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Solomon Sisay; Freddy Sitas; Eugène Sobngwi; Moslem Soofi; Joan B Soriano; Vasiliki Stathopoulou; Mu'awiyyah Babale Sufiyan; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Takahiro Tabuchi; Ken Takahashi; Omid Reza Tamtaji; Mohammed Rasoul Tarawneh; Segen Gebremeskel Tassew; Parvaneh Taymoori; Arash Tehrani-Banihashemi; Mohamad-Hani Temsah; Omar Temsah; Berhe Etsay Tesfay; Fisaha Haile Tesfay; Manaye Yihune Teshale; Gizachew Assefa Tessema; Subash Thapa; Kenean Getaneh Tlaye; Roman Topor-Madry; Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone; Eugenio Traini; Bach Xuan Tran; Khanh Bao Tran; Afewerki Gebremeskel Tsadik; Irfan Ullah; Olalekan A Uthman; Marco Vacante; Maryam Vaezi; Patricia Varona Pérez; Yousef Veisani; Simone Vidale; Francesco S Violante; Vasily Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Theo Vos; Kia Vosoughi; Giang Thu Vu; Isidora S Vujcic; Henry Wabinga; Tesfahun Mulatu Wachamo; Fasil Shiferaw Wagnew; Yasir Waheed; Fitsum Weldegebreal; Girmay Teklay Weldesamuel; Tissa Wijeratne; Dawit Zewdu Wondafrash; Tewodros Eshete Wonde; Adam Belay Wondmieneh; Hailemariam Mekonnen Workie; Rajaram Yadav; Abbas Yadegar; Ali Yadollahpour; Mehdi Yaseri; Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi; Alex Yeshaneh; Mohammed Ahmed Yimam; Ebrahim M Yimer; Engida Yisma; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Z Younis; Bahman Yousefi; Mahmoud Yousefifard; Chuanhua Yu; Erfan Zabeh; Vesna Zadnik; Telma Zahirian Moghadam; Zoubida Zaidi; Mohammad Zamani; Hamed Zandian; Alireza Zangeneh; Leila Zaki; Kazem Zendehdel; Zerihun Menlkalew Zenebe; Taye Abuhay Zewale; Arash Ziapour; Sanjay Zodpey; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.