| Literature DB >> 35211439 |
Muhammad Shahid1, Yang Cao1, Farooq Ahmed2,3, Saqlain Raza4, Jing Guo5, Najma Iqbal Malik6, Umara Rauf7, Madeeha Gohar Qureshi8, Rafit Saheed9, Rohma Maryam10.
Abstract
Maternal nutritional awareness might reduce the risk of malnutrition in children. This study assesses the impact of mothers' nutritional and health awareness (MNHA) on the nutritional status of pre-school children in rural South Punjab. Using a proportionate purposive simple random sampling technique we collect data with the help of a self-administered questionnaire on height, age, the weight of children, and socio-economic profile from 384 rural households in one of the marginalized districts of Punjab. The study applied the binary logistic regression model to compute the probability of malnutrition. The results indicate that malnutrition was high in the district (the prevalence rate for underweight is 46.1%, for stunting 34.83%, and for wasting is 15.49%). Around 91.84% of malnourished children belonged to the low MNHA category compared to medium (5.61%) and high (2.55%) MNHA categories. The results further show that the prevalence of moderate and severe stunting, wasting, and underweight in low MNHA categories was much higher with large differences compared to both medium and high MNHA categories. The binary logistic regression results depict that, across the household deprivation index (HDS), the odds of a child becoming malnourished were lower in households HDS-2 category (OR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.89), and odds were also lower in households HDS-3 category (OR = 0.001, 95% CI: 0.001-0.16). Similarly, across the scores of MNHA index, the odds of malnutrition were lower among the children of those mothers who had medium MNHA (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.002-1.24), and also the probability of child malnutrition was lower among the children of mothers who had high MNHA (OR = 0.008, 95% CI: 0.002-0.29). The study urges that well-resourced, targeted, and coordinated health and nutritional education and awareness programs are required to tackle malnutrition.Entities:
Keywords: Pakistan; health and nutritional awareness; household deprivation; malnutrition; odds ratio
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35211439 PMCID: PMC8863129 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.792164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Conceptual framework for determinants of child malnutrition. Victora et al. (21).
Proportional allocation of sample size (n = 384) distribution from Tehsils to Union Councils.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Khanpur | Bagho Bahar (Pop = 24,349) | N1 = No. of respondent's in UC1 = 24349/90811*96 = |
|
| Azeem Shah (Pop = 32,876) | N2 = No. of respondent's in UC2 = 32876/90811*96 = |
| Kotla Pathan (Pop = 33,586) | N3 = No. of respondent's in UC3 = 33586/90811*96 = | |
| Liaquatpur | Ghooka (Pop = 39,367) | N4 = No. of respondent's in UC4 = 39367/126573*81 = |
|
| Shadani (Pop = 40,990) | N5 = No. of respondent's in UC5 = 40990/126573*81 = |
| Trinda Gurgaij (Pop = 46,216) | N6 = No. of respondent's in UC6 = 46216/126573*81 = | |
| Rahimyar Khans | Bahishti (Pop = 32,870) | N7 = No. of respondent's in UC7 = 32870/111793*115 = |
|
| Sonak (Pop = 45,423) | N8 = No. of respondent's in UC8 = 45423/111793*115 = |
| Chak No. 84/P (Pop = 33,500) | N9 = No. of respondent's in UC9 = 33500/111793*115 = | |
| Sadiqabad | Kot Sanger Khan (Pop = 31,543) | N10 = No. of respondent's in UC10 = 31543/88105*92 = |
|
| Muhammad Pur (Pop = 31,269) | N11 = No. of respondent's in UC11 = 31269/88105*92 = |
| Roshan Bhet (Pop = 25,293) | N12 = No. of respondent's in UC12 = 25293/88105*92 = | |
Authors. Bold values shows the sample size in tahsils and each union councils.
Descriptive analysis describing the association between different socioeconomic characteristics over CIAF (child malnutrition) (N = 316).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex of child | Male | 93 | 47.45 | 0.140 |
| Female | 103 | 52.55 | ||
| Age of child | 0–12 | 19 | 9.69 | 0.000 |
| (in months) | 13–24 | 26 | 13.27 | |
| 25–36 | 60 | 30.61 | ||
| 37–48 | 51 | 26.02 | ||
| 49–60 | 40 | 20.41 | ||
| Birth order number | Birth order 1 | 52 | 26.53 | 0.079 |
| 2 or 3 | 79 | 40.31 | ||
| 4 or 5 | 41 | 20.92 | ||
| 6 or above | 24 | 12.24 | ||
| Mother's age | <18 years | 22 | 11.22 | 0.559 |
| at marriage | 18–25 years | 165 | 84.18 | |
| >25 years | 9 | 4.59 | ||
| Mother's | No education | 150 | 76.53 | 0.788 |
| education | Primary | 22 | 11.22 | |
| Middle | 14 | 7.14 | ||
| Matric | 6 | 3.06 | ||
| FA & Higher | 4 | 2.04 | ||
| Father's education | No education | 135 | 68.88 | 0.403 |
| Primary | 35 | 17.86 | ||
| Middle | 7 | 3.57 | ||
| Matric | 16 | 8.16 | ||
| FA & Higher | 3 | 1.53 | ||
| Mother's working | Working | 3 | 1.53 | 0.012 |
| status | Not-working | 193 | 98.47 | |
| Father's working | Govt. job | 8 | 4.08 | 0.133 |
| status | Private job | 8 | 4.08 | |
| Own business | 25 | 12.76 | ||
| Daily wages/Labor & Agriculture | 155 | 79.08 | ||
| Mother's | Punjabi | 25 | 12.76 | 0.114 |
| tongue/ethnicity | Saraiki | 171 | 87.24 | |
| Household | HDS-1 | 5 | 2.55 | 0.084 |
| deprivation status | HDS-2 | 174 | 88.78 | |
| HDS-3 | 17 | 8.67 | ||
| Nutritional and | Low | 180 | 91.84 | 0.008 |
| health awareness | Medium | 11 | 5.61 | |
| of mothers | High | 5 | 2.55 |
Authors' estimation [Significance level:
if P < 0.01,
if P < 0.05,
if P < 0.1].
Descriptive analysis illustrating the association between mother's nutritional and health awareness (MNHA) and anthropometric indicators.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Underweight | MNHL-1 (Low) | 71 (26.39%) | 61 (22.68%) | 116 (43.12%) | 248 (92.19%) |
| MNHL-2 (Medium) | 2 (0.74%) | 6 (2.23%) | 5 (1.86%) | 13 (4.83%) | |
| MNHL-3 (High) | 5 (1.86%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (1.11%) | 8 (2.97%) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Stunting | MNHL-1 (Low) | 69 (25.84%) | 87 (32.58%) | 87 (32.58%) | 243 (91.02%) |
| MNHL-2 (Medium) | 4 (1.49%) | 5 (1.87%) | 2 (0.76%) | 11 (4.12%) | |
| MNHL-3 (High) | 8 (3%) | 1 (0.37%) | 4 (1.49%) | 13 (4.86%) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Wasting | MNHL-1 (Low) | 31 (43.66%) | 17 (23.94%) | 9 (12.68%) | 57 (80.28%) |
| MNHL-2 (Medium) | 6 (8.45%) | 3 (4.22%) | 2 (2.82%) | 11 (15.49%) | |
| MNHL-3 (High) | 2 (2.82%) | 1 (1.41%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (4.23%) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Authors' estimation. Bold values shows the total frequency and percentage in cross tabulation by each section.
Binary logistic regression analysis results for CIAF (child malnutrition) and its correlates.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex of child (female-reference) | Male | −0.358 | 0.1972 | 0.699 | [0.402, 1.215] |
| Age of child (0 to 12 months-reference) | 13–24 months | 0.898 | 1.4558 | 2.455 | [0.768, 7.848] |
| 25–36 months | 2.1609 | 4.9607 | 8.679 | [2.831, 26.607] | |
| 37–48 months | 0.1272 | 0.5104 | 1.136 | [0.471, 2.740] | |
| 49–60 months | −0.1117 | 0.4129 | 0.894 | [0.362, 2.211] | |
| Birth order number (birth order 1-reference) | 2 or 3 | −0.1995 | 0.2986 | 0.819 | [0.401, 1.674] |
| 4 or 5 | −0.8183 | 0.1689 | 0.441 | [0.208, 0.934] | |
| 6 or above | −0.0578 | 0.4821 | 0.944 | [0.347, 2.568] | |
| Mother's age at marriage (<18 years-reference) | 18–25 years | −0.7169 | 0.2891 | 0.488 | [0.153, 1.558] |
| >25 years | 1.3364 | 4.9544 | 3.805 | [0.297, 48.83] | |
| Mother's education (illiterate-reference) | Primary | −0.263 | 0.8542 | 0.769 | [0.087, 6.786] |
| Middle | −0.4636 | 0.7462 | 0.629 | [0.062, 6.434] | |
| Matric | −1.5127 | 0.2932 | 0.220 | [0.016, 2.989] | |
| Father's education (illiterate-reference) | Primary | −0.2082 | 0.8851 | 0.812 | [0.096, 6.876] |
| Middle | 0.7817 | 2.6304 | 2.185 | [0.207, 23.126] | |
| Matric | 1.7912 | 7.0102 | 5.996 | [0.606, 59.293] | |
| FA & Higher | 2.2146 | 14.356 | 9.158 | [0.424, 197.75] | |
| Mother's working status (working-reference) | Not-working | 1.1969 | 4.0156 | 3.309* | [0.307, 35.685] |
| Father's working status (govt. job-reference) | Private job | −1.1423 | 0.5235 | 0.319 | [0.0128, 7.948] |
| Own business | −1.969 | 0.2173 | 0.139 | [0.007, 2.949] | |
| Daily Wage/ Labor & Agriculture | −1. 087 | 4.0149 | 2.966 | [0.208, 42.123] | |
| Mother's tongue/ethnicity (punjabi-reference) | Saraiki | −0.949 | 0.1834 | 0.387 | [0.153, 0.979] |
| Household deprivation status (HDS-1-reference) | HDS-2 | −3.835 | 0.0409 | 0.022 | [0.005, 0.879] |
| HDS-3 | −6.6539 | 0.0032 | 0.001 | [0.001, 0.155] | |
| Nutritional and health awareness of mothers (low MNHA-reference) | Medium | −3.2933 | 0.0664 | 0.037 | [0.002, 1.237] |
| High | −4.7759 | 0.0154 | 0.008 | [0.002, 0.294] | |
|
| |||||
| No. of observations = 306 | Prob>Chi2 = 0.0000 | ||||
| LR Chi2 (26) = 80.09 | Pseudo R2 = 0.1982 | ||||
*References: odd ratios; p-values; confidence intervals.
Significance level:
if P < 0.01,
if P < 0.05,
if P < 0.1.
Authors' estimation.