Literature DB >> 35210921

Examination of the generic concept and species boundaries of the genus Erioscyphella (Lachnaceae, Helotiales, Ascomycota) with the proposal of new species and new combinations based on the Japanese materials.

Yukito Tochihara1,2, Tsuyoshi Hosoya2.   

Abstract

The genus Erioscyphella Kirschst., which was morphologically confused with Lachnum, was herein examined. Based on molecular phylogenetic analyses using a combined dataset of ITS, LSU, mtSSU, and RPB2 and morphological examinations, Erioscyphella was distinguished from Lachnum and redefined by longer ascospores and the presence of apical amorphous materials and/or resinous materials equipped on hairs. Species boundaries recognized by morphology/ecology and phylogenetic analyses were cross-checked using species delimitation analyses based on DNA barcode sequences downloaded from UNITE, resulting in that species' taxonomic problems being uncovered. Six new species (E.boninensis, E.insulae, E.otanii, E.papillaris, E.paralushanensis, and E.sasibrevispora) and two new combinations (E.hainanensis and E.sinensis) were proposed. Yukito Tochihara, Tsuyoshi Hosoya.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ITS; UNITE; morphology; phylogeny; species delimitation; species hypothesis; taxonomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35210921      PMCID: PMC8847282          DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.87.73082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MycoKeys        ISSN: 1314-4049            Impact factor:   2.984


Introduction

The genus Kirschst belongs to the family Raitv. (, ) and includes 11 species: (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. Perić [lectotype of (Haines and Dumont 1984); as ‘ (P. Karst.) Kirschst.’ in the original description (Kirschstein 1938)], Ekanayaka & K.D. Hyde, Ekanayaka & K.D. Hyde, (Bres.) Kirschst., (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. Perić, B. Perić & Baral, (S.A. Cantrell & J.H. Haines) Guatim., R.W. Barreto & Crous, (Ekanayaka & K.D. Hyde) Ekanayaka & K.D. Hyde, (W.Y. Zhuang & Spooner) B. Perić & Baral, (W.Y. Zhuang & Zheng Wang) Guatim., R.W. Barreto & Crous, and (A.L. Sm.) Baral, Šandová & B. Perić. (Index Fungorum 2021). has been suggested as a monophyletic group by molecular phylogenetic analyses by Cantrell and Hanlin (1997), Hosoya et al. (2010), Perić and Baral (2014), and Guatimosim et al. (2016). However, the morphological delimitation of the genus is currently ill-defined. In the original description (Kirschstein 1938), was misleadingly defined based on features that are not taxonomically informative, such as filiform, colored, and pigmented ascospores and lanceolate paraphyses (Korf 1978; Perić and Baral 2014). After that, in the genus Retz. [type genus of ], species of so-called ‘long-spored ’, which were characterized by longer ascospores and the occurrence in tropical areas, were suggested as members of (Haines and Dumont 1984) and have been transferred into based on molecular phylogenetic analyses by Perić and Baral (2014) and Guatimosim et al. (2016). However, in fact, as morphology of , including ‘long-spored ’, is consecutive with that of the genus especially regarding the ascospore length and shape of ectal excipular cells (Haines and Dumont 1984), the morphological delimitation of has not been sufficiently discussed. Since much more potential species are thought to be included in , its morphological concept must be discussed and updated based on a wider size of taxon sampling. In the present study, the authors aimed to: a) clarify the generic boundaries of using molecular and morphological/ecological data, and b) propose new species or new combinations based on more objectively defined species boundaries. To reach our first goal, we used specimens from the herbarium of the National Museum of Nature and Science (TNS) (Tsukuba, Japan) as most of them were accompanied by culture and/or DNA extracts. In TNS, only three identified species of were recognized (, , and ); however, we presumed that many unidentified species of were housed therein. To reach our second goal, for species recognition, we tested DNA barcoding using the internal transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS), widely accepted as fungal DNA barcode (Begerow et al. 2010; Schoch et al. 2012; Hosoya 2021). ITS-based species boundaries were explored based on multiple methods, and the results were compared to species boundaries based on morphology, ecology, and phylogenetic relationships.

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling

In TNS, specimens labeled as were initially searched, and closely related specimens to were searched based on the sequence similarities of ITS. Selected specimens were tentatively identified based on morphology following Dennis (1954), Haines (1980), Haines and Dumont (1984), Spooner (1987), and Perić and Baral (2014).

Morphological observation, DNA extraction, and sequencing

Micromorphology was examined using cotton blue (CB) dissolved in lactic acid (LA) (CB/LA; 0.5 g CB and 99.5 mL LA) as a mounting fluid. To check the ascal apex iodine reaction, Melzer’s reagent (MLZ; 0.5 g I2, 1.5 g KI, 20 g chloral hydrate, and 20 g water) was initially used without KOH pretreatment, and Lugol’s iodine (IKI; 1 g I2 and 1 g KI, and 100 mL H2O) and MLZ with 3% KOH pretreatment were used when necessary. World Geodetic System 84 was used for the geographic coordinates. URLs herein shown were accessed on April 15, 2021, except for GBIF website accessed on Feb 10, 2020. DNA was extracted from cultivated isolates in 2% malt extract broth (MEB) using the modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Hosaka and Castellano 2008; Tochihara and Hosoya 2019). When isolates are not available, DNA was extracted directly from a crushed apothecium using DNA extraction buffer following Tochihara and Hosoya (2019). The isolates from which DNA extracted were deposited in the NITE National Biological Resource Center (NBRC) (Kisarazu, Japan), except for isolates with restriction on transition by Japanese laws and those unavailable because of contracts with private companies. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify the following regions: ITS (= ITS1-5.8S-ITS2), the partial large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (LSU), the partial mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU), and section ‘6–7’ of the second largest subunit of the nuclear RNA polymerase II gene (RPB2). Primer pairs for PCR reactions of ITS, LSU and mtSSU were ITS1F (5’–CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA–3’) (Gardes and Bruns 1993) or ITS1 (5’–TCCGTAGGTGAACCTCGGG–3’) (White et al. 1990) and ITS4 (5’–TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC–3’) (White et al. 1990), LR0R (5’–ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC–3’) and LR5 (5’–TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG–3’) (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), and mrSSU1 (5’–AGCAGTGAGGAATATTGGTC–3’) and mrSSU3R (5’–ATGTGGCACGTCTATAGCCC–3’) (Zoller et al. 1999) respectively. The PCR program consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 35 s, 51 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. When appropriate PCR products were not obtained, a modified PCR program was applied first, and then alternative primer pairs were tested. For RPB2, an alternative forward primer fRPB2-5F (5’–GAYGAYMGWGATCAYTTYGG–3’) (Liu et al. 1999) or RPB2-P6Fa (5’–TGGGGRYTK GTBTGYCCKGCHGA–3’) (Hansen et al. 2005) and a reverse primer bRPB2-7.1R2 (5’–CCCATNGCYTGYTTVCCCATDGC–3’) (modified from bRPB2-7.1R) (Matheny 2005; Matheny et al. 2007; Gelardi et al. 2015) were used. Sequencing was conducted on an ABI PRISM 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a BigDye Terminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). The obtained sequences were assembled using ATGC 7 (Genetyx, Tokyo, Japan). Assembled sequences were deposited in the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) via the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ), and acquired INSDC accession numbers. Assembled ITS sequences were also deposited in the UNITE database (https://unite.ut.ee/) via the PlutoF workbench (https://plutof.ut.ee/) (Abarenkov et al. 2010) and acquired UNITE accession numbers.

Phylogenetic analyses

The specimens obtained from TNS were included in the phylogenetic analyses as candidate members of (‘‡’ in Table 1). From other genera of the family , four species of , two species of , , , , , and , and one species of and were used (‘†’ in Table 1). Among the eight genera, seven of them (except ) included type species. Three species of were selected as outgroups following Tochihara and Hosoya (2019) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Taxa analyzed in the phylogenetic analyses.

Specimen no. (TNS-F-)Taxon|Collection siteCollected DateHost plants and partsStrain no. (NBRC)UNITE/GenBank accession no.#
ITS LSU mtSSU RPB2
†16740Albotrichaacutipila (P. Karst.) Raitv.Japan, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Center2006-06-17culm of unidentified bamboo104380 AB481234 LC438571 LC431751 AB481354
†16497Albotrichaalbotestacea (Desm.) Raitv.Japan, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Center2005-05-18culm of Miscanthussinensis101346 AB481235 LC424943 LC431747 AB481340
†16635Brunnipilafuscescens (Pers.) BaralJapan, Gunma, Higashi-Agatsuma2006-04-27leaf of unidentified tree104365 AB481255 LC424945 LC431750 AB481348
†16690Brunnipilapseudocannabina (Raitv.) Tochihara, Sasagawa & HosoyaJAPAN, Akita, Kosaka2006-05-26stem of unidentified herb104374 AB481272 LC533520 LC533522 LC533521
†65670Capitotrichabicolor (Bull.) BaralSWITZERLAND, Filisur2016-06-06twig of Prunusspinosa(FC-6101) LC424834 LC424942 LC533244 LC425011
†65752Capitotricharubi (Bres.) BaralSWITZERLAND, Saicourt2016-06-04twig of Rubusidaeus(FC-6075) LC438560 LC438573 LC533243 LC440395
†16439Dasyscyphellalongistipitata HosoyaJAPAN, Kanagawa, Yamakita2005-04-17cupule of Faguscrenata101335 AB481239 LC424947 LC533228 AB481331
†16527Dasyscyphellamontana Raitv.Japan, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Center2005-05-21wood of unidentified tree102336 AB481242 LC438577 LC533241 AB481336
‡16556Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Oita, Kokonoe2005-05wood of unidentified tree114449 UDB0779051 LC533153 LC533257 LC533198
‡16582Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Kanagawa, Yamakita2005-07-02wood of unidentified tree104360 AB481249 LC533176 LC533233 LC533199
‡16606Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Kanagawa, Yamakita2005-07-03wood of unidentified tree114450 UDB0779053 LC533154 LC533258 LC533200
‡16609Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Kanagawa, Yamakita2005-07-03wood of Cephalotaxusharringtonia101350††AB705234 LC533175 LC533256 LC533184
‡16639Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba Botanical Garden2006-05-01twig of unidentified tree114451 UDB0779054 LC533155 LC533259 LC533201
‡25579Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Tokyo, Hongo2009-05-25twig of unidentified tree(FC-1887) UDB0779057 LC533146 LC533250 LC533191
‡32163Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Kanagawa, Odawara2010-05-14twig of unidentified tree114456 UDB0779062 LC533158 LC533260 LC533203
‡38452Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Gunma, Naganohara2013-06-27wood of unidentified tree114463††UDB0779069 LC533171 LC533262 LC533210
‡46416Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićTaiwan, Taipei2012-04-15wood of unidentified tree(FC-2906) UDB0779067 LC533132 LC533277 LC549671
‡46841Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Gifu, Gujo2012-05-28wood of unidentified tree114462 UDB0779086 LC533170 LC533279 LC533209
‡61773Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Kanagawa, Yokohama2015-04-01twig of unidentified tree114464††UDB0779074 LC533137 LC533264 LC533211
‡61931Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Kanagawa, Zushi2015-04-16wood of unidentified tree114466 UDB0779072 LC533139 LC533266 LC533213
‡80478Erioscyphellaabnormis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Shizuoka, Oyama2017-06-26twig of unidentified tree113934 LC424837 LC424949 LC533283 LC425009
†26520Erioscyphellaboninensis Tochihara & HosoyaJapan, Tokyo, Chichijima Island2009-06-28trunk of unidentified tree114447 UDB0779049 LC533151 LC533254 LC533196
‡46419Erioscyphellabrasiliensis (Mont.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićTaiwan, Taipei2012-04-20wood of unidentified tree(FC-2910) UDB0779068 LC533133 LC533278 LC549672
‡35049Erioscyphellahainanensis (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara (←Lachnumhainanense W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang)Japan, Niigata, Minamiuonuma2010-05-14leaf of Quercusglauca114457 UDB0779064 LC533168 LC533274 LC533205
‡35056Erioscyphellahainanensis (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara (←Lachnumhainanense W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang)Japan, Niigata, Minamiuonuma2010-05-14leaf of Quercusserrata114458 UDB0779065 LC533169 LC533275 LC533206
‡61775Erioscyphellahainanensis (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara (←Lachnumhainanense W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang)Japan, Kanagawa, Hiratsuka2015-04-12leaf of Quercusmyrsinifolia114465 UDB0779071 LC533138 LC533265 LC533212
‡61941Erioscyphellahainanensis (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara (←Lachnumhainanense W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang)Japan, Kanagawa, Kamakura2015-04-24leaf of Quercusglauca112569 UDB0779073 LC533140 LC533280 LC533214
‡65722Erioscyphellahainanensis (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara (←Lachnumhainanense W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang)Japan, Gunma, Midori2016-04-24leaf of Quercusserrata subsp. Mongolicoides114469 UDB0779076 LC533142 LC533281 LC533215
‡80356Erioscyphellahainanensis (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara (←Lachnumhainanense W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang)Japan, Kanagawa, Hiratsuka2017-05-18leaf of Quercusglauca114470 UDB0779077 LC533172 LC533282 LC533186
‡80371Erioscyphellahainanensis (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara (←Lachnumhainanense W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang)Japan, Kanagawa, Hiratsuka2017-05-18leaf of Castanopsissieboldii114472 UDB0779078 LC533135 LC533246 LC533188
‡26500Erioscyphellainsulae Tochihara & HosoyaJapan, Tokyo, Hahajima Island2009-06-24wood of unidentified tree114445 UDB0779060 LC533149 LC533252 LC533194
‡39720Erioscyphellainsulae Tochihara & HosoyaJapan, Okinawa, Iriomote Island2011-06-12bark of unidentified tree114459 UDB0779063 LC533177 LC533261 LC533207
‡61920Erioscyphellaparalushanensis Tochihara & HosoyaJapan, Shizuoka, Atami2015-06-08culm of Pleioblastusargenteostriatus114468††UDB0779075 LC533141 LC533267 LC533220
†81472Erioscyphellaotanii TochiharaJapan, Hokkaido, Horonobe, Teshio Experimental Forest, Hokkaido University2018-07-11leaf of Sasasenanensis114476 UDB0779085 LC533179 LC533286 ||LC533226
‡81272Erioscyphellapapillaris TochiharaJapan, Gunma, Minakami2017-07-16leaf of unidentified bamboo113937 UDB0779081 LC533161 LC533285 LC533204
‡80399Erioscyphellasasibrevispora Tochihara & HosoyaJapan, Gunma, Higashi-Agatsuma2017-06-06sheath of SasaveitchiiUDB0779082/LC669470 LC533173 LC533268 LC533216
‡81401Erioscyphellasasibrevispora Tochihara & HosoyaJapan, Hokkaido, Tomakomai2018-06-16culm of Sasanipponica114475UDB0779084/LC669472 LC533174 LC533269 LC533217
‡26492Erioscyphellasclerotii (A.L. Sm.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićJapan, Tokyo, Hahajima Island2009-06-24wood of unidentified tree114448UDB0779050/LC669438 LC533152 LC533255 LC533197
‡38480Erioscyphellasclerotii (A.L. Sm.) Baral, Šandová & B. PerićTaiwan, Wulai2013-07-12twig of unidentified tree(FC-5208)††UDB0779070 LC533134 LC533263 LC549673
‡16838Erioscyphellasinensis (Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang) Sasagawa, Tochihara & Hosoya (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang)Japan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba Botanical Garden2007-06-15leaf of unidentified broad-leaved tree104389 AB481280 LC533164 LC533235 AB481364
‡80354Erioscyphellasinensis (Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang) Sasagawa, Tochihara & Hosoya (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang)Japan, Kanagawa, Manazuru2017-05leaf of Castanopsissieboldi114471UDB0779083/LC669471 LC533143 LC533245 LC533187
‡16841Erioscyphellasinensis (Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang) Sasagawa, Tochihara & Hosoya (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang)Japan, Ibaraki, Mt. Tsukuba2007-06-23leaf of unidentified broad-leaved tree104390 AB481281 LC533157 LC533236 LC533218
‡32161Erioscyphellasinensis (Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang) Sasagawa, Tochihara & Hosoya (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang)Japan, Kanagawa, Odawara2010-05-14leaf of Quercusmyrsinifolia113715UDB0779061/LC669449 LC533167 LC533273 LC533219
‡16837Erioscyphellasinensis (Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang) Sasagawa, Tochihara & Hosoya (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang)Japan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba Botanical Garden2007-06-15leaf of unidentified broad-leaved tree114452UDB0779055/LC669443 LC533156 LC533272 LC533202
†81520Incrucipulumciliare (Schrad.) BaralJapan, Shizuoka, Shizuoka2018-08-18leaf of Quercusmongolicasubsp.crispula113941 LC438566 LC438583 LC533284 LC438596
†17632Incrucipulumlongispineum Sasagawa & HosoyaJapan, Miyagi, Sendai2006-07-29leaf of Lyoniaovalifolia102347 AB481256 LC438579 LC533234 AB481362
†81248Lachnellulacalyciformis (Batsch) DharneJapan, Hokkaido, Engaru2017-07-12twig of Abiessachalinensis113935 LC438561 LC438574 LC533247 LC438590
†16529Lachnellulasuecica (de Bary ex Fuckel) Nannf.Japan, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Center2005-05-21twig of Larixkaempferi101348 AB481248 LC424944 LC533231 AB481341
†16494Lachnumasiaticum (Y. Otani) Raitv.Japan, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Center2005-05-18culm of unidentified bamboo101341 AB481251 LC533162 LC533229 AB481334
‡17249Lachnummapirianum (Pat. & Gaillard) M.P. SharmaMalaysia, Gerik2004-09-07leaf of unidentified treeUDB0779088/LC669476 LC533182 LC533223
‡17245Lachnummapirianum (Pat. & Gaillard) M.P. SharmaMalaysia, Gerik2004-09-07leaf of unidentified treeUDB0779087/LC669475 LC533181 LC533222
‡16442Lachnumnovoguineensevar.yunnanicum W.Y. ZhuangJapan, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Center2005-05-18culm of unidentified bamboo102339 AB481270 LC533163 LC533232 AB481342
‡16642Lachnumnovoguineensevar.yunnanicum W.Y. ZhuangJapan, Ibaraki, Mt. Tsukuba2006-05-02culm of unidentified bamboo104368 AB481271 LC533165 LC533227 §§LC533225
‡11197Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Shizuoka, Shimoda2004-07-26leaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa106495UDB0779047/LC669435 LC533166 LC533248 LC533185
‡13500Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Kagoshima, Yakushima Island2005-10-19leaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa114441††LC425039/UDB779046 LC429382 LC533240 ‡‡LC431718
‡17567Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)New Zealand2005-05-28leaf of unidentified palmUDB0779089/LC669477 LC533183 LC533288
‡24588Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Kagoshima, Amami-Oshima2009-02-24leaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa114442UDB0779052/LC669440 LC533144 LC533270 LC533190
‡24600Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Kagoshima, Amami-Oshima2009-02-25leaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa114443UDB0779056/LC669444 LC533145 LC533249 ||LC533224
‡26161Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Tokyo, Chichijima Island2009-06-27leaf of Livistonaboninensis114446UDB0779048/LC669436 LC533150 LC533253 LC533195
‡26172Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Tokyo, Kita-Iwojima Island2009-06-17leaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa(FC-1935)UDB0779058/LC669446 LC533147 LC533251 LC533192
‡26185Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Tokyo, Kita-Iwojima Island2009-06-18leaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa114444UDB0779059/LC669447 LC533148 LC533271 LC533193
‡39729Lachnumpalmae sensu lato (←Lachnumpalmae (Kanouse) Spooner)Japan, Okinawa, Iriomote Island2011-06-13leaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa114460UDB0779066/LC669454 LC533178 LC533276 LC533208
†16501Lachnumpudibundum (Quél.) J. Schröt.Japan, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Center2005-05-18wood of unidentified tree102335 AB481259 LC533160 LC533230 AB481335
†81229Lachnumrachidicola J.G. Han, Raitv. & H.D. ShinJapan, Hokkaido, Tomakomai, Tomakomai Experimental Forest2017-08-09petiole of Juglans sp.114473UDB0779079/LC669467 LC533136 LC533189
†16583Lachnumvirgineum (Batsch) P. Karst.Japan, Kanagawa, Yamakita2005-07-02wood of unidentified tree104358 AB481268 AB926119 LC431748 AB481343
†65625Neodasyscyphacerina (Pers.) SpoonerSwitzerland, Saicourt2016-06-08twig of Crataegus sp.(FC-6068) LC424836 LC424948 LC533242 LC425013
†17436Proliferodiscusalboviridis (Sacc.) SpoonerJapan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba Botanical Garden2006-07-08wood of unidentified tree108594 LC438558 LC533159 LC533239 LC425014
§17909Hyaloscyphaspiralis (Velen.) J.G. Han, Hosoya & H.D. ShinJapan, Kumamoto, Kikuchi2005-10-10wood of unidentified tree108585††LC438602 LC438604 LC533237 LC438606
§16472Hymenoscyphusvaricosporoides TubakiJapan, Ibaraki, Kasumigaura2005-05-05wood of unidentified tree104355 AB926052 LC424952 LC431746 AB481329
§18014Urceolellacarestiana (Rabenh.) DennisJapan, Iwate, Hanamaki2006-05-23stem of Parathelypterisnipponica108588††LC438603 LC438605 LC533238 LC438607

† except for and its potential species tentatively identified based on morphology ‡ or its potential species tentatively identified based on morphology § Outgroup | Original taxon name labeled on the specimen is shown enclosed by “(←)” and is only shown when it is different from a name determined in this study. ¶ Cultures not donated in NBRC is beginning with “FC-”, local suffix in TNS. ‘―’ represents no culture exist and DNA was extracted from apothecia. # UNITE accession no. is beginning with ‘UDB’. GenBank accession no. is beginning with ‘AB’ or ‘LC’. †† Primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 was used. In ITS sequences without notes (††), primer pair ITS1F and ITS4 was used. ‡‡ Primer pair fRPB2-5F and RPB2-P7R was used. §§ Primer pair RPB2-P6Fa and bRPB2-7.1R2 was used. || Primer pair RPB2-P6Fa and RPB2-P7R was used. In RPB2 sequences without any notes (‡‡, §§, ||), primer pair RPB2-P6F and RPB2-P7R was used.

Taxa analyzed in the phylogenetic analyses. † except for and its potential species tentatively identified based on morphology ‡ or its potential species tentatively identified based on morphology § Outgroup | Original taxon name labeled on the specimen is shown enclosed by “(←)” and is only shown when it is different from a name determined in this study. ¶ Cultures not donated in NBRC is beginning with “FC-”, local suffix in TNS. ‘―’ represents no culture exist and DNA was extracted from apothecia. # UNITE accession no. is beginning with ‘UDB’. GenBank accession no. is beginning with ‘AB’ or ‘LC’. †† Primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 was used. In ITS sequences without notes (††), primer pair ITS1F and ITS4 was used. ‡‡ Primer pair fRPB2-5F and RPB2-P7R was used. §§ Primer pair RPB2-P6Fa and bRPB2-7.1R2 was used. || Primer pair RPB2-P6Fa and RPB2-P7R was used. In RPB2 sequences without any notes (‡‡, §§, ||), primer pair RPB2-P6F and RPB2-P7R was used. A concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, mtSSU, and RPB2 was used in the phylogenetic analyses. Each region was aligned separately using MAFFT 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013). The Q-INS-i option was used for ITS, LSU, and mtSSU to accommodate the secondary structures of RNA, and the G-INS-1 option was used for RPB2 to assume global alignment using the entire region. The aligned sequences were edited manually using BioEdit 7.0.5.2 (Hall 1999). Phylogenetic conflicts among gene partitions were checked before the phylogenetic analyses using the concatenated matrix. Maximum likelihood (ML) trees with 1,000 bootstrap replications (Felsenstein 1985) using the ITS, LSU, mtSSU, and RPB2 datasets separately were constructed using MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018) with the GTR+G model; branches with bootstrap values > 70% were compared among trees. For mtSSU and RPB2, specimens containing missing data were excluded from the analyses. The concatenated dataset was analyzed using ML, maximum parsimony (MP), and Bayesian inference (BI). For the ML and BI analyses, substitution models were estimated for each partition (ITS, LSU, mtSSU, and each codon position of RPB2) based on Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) (Akaike 1974) using Modeltest-NG 0.1.6 (Darriba et al. 2019). ML tree search (Felsenstein 1984) and bootstrapping (Felsenstein 1985; Lemoine et al. 2018) was performed using RAxML-NG 0.9.0 (Kozlov et al. 2019) with 1,000 bootstrap replications under the substitution model SYM+I+G4 for ITS, TIM1+I+G4 for LSU, TPM1uf+I+G4 for mtSSU and RPB2 third codon position, GTR+I+G4 for RPB2 first codon position, and TPM3uf+I+G4 for RPB2 second codon position. Sequence matrix containing missing data typically yield multiple trees residing on a phylogenetic terrace (Sanderson et al. 2011; Biczok et al. 2018). Therefore, we checked if the best-scored-tree did not lie on a terrace using the Python tool called ‘terraphy’ implemented in RAxML-NG 0.9.0. MP analysis was conducted using PAUP* 4.0a 167 (Swofford 2002). All substitutions were treated as unordered and of equal weights. All gaps were treated as missing data. A heuristic parsimony search was carried out with 1,000 replicates of random step addition, with a tree bisection reconnection (TBR) branch swapping algorithm, Multrees option on, Steepest descent modification option on, and branch collapse option set to MinBrlen. Bootstrap values (MPBP; Felsenstein 1985) were estimated from 1,000 replicates of heuristic searches, with random taxon addition, TBR branch swapping, and Multrees options off. ML best-scored phylogenetic tree based on the concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, mtSSU, and RPB2 constructed using RAxML-NG. MLBP/MPBP/BPP are represented on branches in this order. In MLBP/MPBP < 50% or BPP < 0.95, a hyphen appears. No evaluation values are shown on branches when MLBP and MPBP < 50% and BPP < 0.95. The branch of a clade TNS-F-17245 + 17249 to its most recent common ancestor is only one-third of the intended length due to space limitation. BI analysis was based on MrBayes 3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. 2012) under the substitution model SYM+I+G4 for ITS, GTR+I+G4 for LSU and RPB2 first codon positions, HKY+I+G4 for mtSSU and RPB2 third codon positions, and F81+I for RPB2 second codon position. Two separate Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chains of Monte Carlo (MCMCMC) ran simultaneously starting from random trees for 20 million generations, and trees were sampled every 500 generations. The average standard deviation of split frequencies (ASDSF) and effective sample size (ESS) were checked using Tracer 1.7.1 (Rambaut 2018a) as an indication of convergence. Using post-burn-in trees, a 50% majority rule consensus tree was generated, and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) were calculated to evaluate node supports. Trees were visualized using FigTree 1.4.4 (Rambaut 2018b) based on the ML, MP, and BI analyses respectively. Branches with MLBP and MPBP > 90% and BPP > 0.95 were regarded as strongly supported. ITS-based species delimitation analyses (Fig. 2)
Figure 2.

Diagrammatic representation showing the species delimitation analyses using ITS sequences.

Diagrammatic representation showing the species delimitation analyses using ITS sequences. To maximize the number of ITS sequences, we used the UNITE Species Hypotheses (SH) system provided by the UNITE database (Kõljalg et al. 2013; Nilsson et al. 2015; GBIF 2018; Kõljalg et al. 2020). In the UNITE SH system, all fungal ITS sequences are periodically divided into species-level clusters (species hypothesis; SH) at optional sequence-distance thresholds (0%–3% in 0.5% steps), each of which is assigned to a unique UNITE SH code represented by a digital objective identifier (DOI) accessible from internet (Kõljalg et al. 2016, 2020; Nilsson et al. 2015). Based on the UNITE SH system, we collected ITS sequences of in the following process: a) selectivity of closely related sequences: for every ITS sequence newly obtained from TNS specimens (= query sequences, 49 sequences), UNITE SH code at the 3% threshold value were searched in the UNITE database to gather sequences in wider scope, and all sequences within the UNITE SH code were downloaded. b) selectivity based on taxon names: using the UNITE search page, ITS sequences named were searched, because only closely related sequences to query sequences are filtered under the a) criterion. Sequences with synonyms of species were also searched, because the UNITE lookup function is not supported by any backbone taxonomies to integrate synonyms. Sequences satisfying criterion a) or b) were downloaded for ITS-based species recognition. The obtained ITS sequences were clustered into SHs based on an OTU clustering method, hierarchical clustering method, and two coalescent-based methods. For all ITS sequences, ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 regions were extracted using ITSx (Nilsson et al. 2010) to construct an accurate ITS dataset, because the inclusion of segments of adjacent regions (such as a small subunit of 18S rRNA or LSU) may decrease the accuracy of the calculation of ITS distances (Nilsson et al. 2010). OTU clustering was executed using VSEARCH v2.17.2 (Rognes et al. 2016) implemented in the Qiime 2 microbiome analysis platform (Bolyen et al. 2019). The concatenated dataset of extracted ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 was incorporated into VSEARCH, and OTU clustering at 97% and 98.5% similarity thresholds were performed using the ‘-cluster_fast’ option. Hierarchical clustering based on pairwise sequence distances was executed using the Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) method (Puillandre et al. 2021). The datasets of extracted ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 were separately aligned using MAFFT 7 under the Q-INS-i option and edited using trimAl v1.2 (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009) under the ‘-gappyout’ option. The concatenated dataset of the three aligned partitions was analyzed using ASAP web (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/asapweb.html). Jukes-Cantor (JC69) was selected as a substitution model for computing pairwise distances of sequences. As phylogeny-based species delimitation methods, the generalized mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model (Pons et al. 2006; Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013) and the Poisson Tree Processes (PTP) model (Zhang et al. 2013) were used. In both models, speciation (species-level differentiation) and coalescence (population-level differentiation) are identified based on the length of phylogenetic trees. GMYC requires the use of phylogenetic trees following the molecular clock model (= ultrametric tree) because it detects transition points from speciation to coalescence focusing on the time axis, while PTP does not require ultrametric tree as it focuses on the number of nucleotide substitutions. Ultrametric trees were estimated using BEAST v2.6.3. (Bouckaert et al. 2019). The ITS dataset was divided into ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2, and suitable substitution models GTR+G for ITS1 and JC+G for 5.8S and ITS2 estimated using Modeltest-NG 0.1.6. were applied. To estimate branch length, a Yule model and a relaxed clock with a log-normal distribution were selected. MCMC chains were run for 1.5×108 generations and sampled every 1,000 generations. After each run, convergence was checked using Tracer 1.7.1, and the first 10% were discarded as burn-in. A consensus tree was generated using TreeAnnotator v1.10.4 in BEAST package, from 150,000 generated trees except for the first 10% regarded as burn-in. A single-threshold species delimitation analysis based on GMYC was conducted using the R package ‘splits’ (Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013). For the species delimitation analyses using PTP, an unrooted ML phylogenetic tree was constructed using RAxML-NG 0.9.0. The analysis used ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 partitions, aligned as previously described, under the substitution models TIM2+G4 for ITS1, TPM2+I+G4 for 5.8S, and GTR+I+G4 for ITS2, estimated using Modeltest-NG 0.1.6. based on the AIC. The species delimitation analysis was executed using the generated ML best-scored tree with the bPTP web server (https://species.h-its.org/). The MCMC run was set to 500,000 generations and burn-in rate was set to 0.1. The convergence of MCMC runs was visually checked. In ML and Bayesian results, a result generating fewer SHs was adopted to avoid excessive species division. SHs generated in the species delimitation analyses and the UNITE SHs at 3% and 1.5% threshold values were compared with one another.

Species recognition

In the present study, we initially recognized species boundaries based on the two criteria: Forming a monophyletic group in the phylogenetic analyses based on multigene data (Fig. 1). Members can be distinguished based on morphological and/or common ecological features (such as host plants). Species boundaries recognized by 1.and 2. were cross-checked based on the results of ITS-based species delimitation analyses. When the species boundaries are supported by the majority (= more than four methods) of the seven species delimitation methods (UNITE SH at 3% threshold, UNITE SH at 1.5% threshold, VSEARCH 97% similarity, VSEARCH 98.5% similarity, ASAP, GMYC, and PTP) (Fig. 3), we regard the species as reasonable and carry out taxonomic treatments if necessary.
Figure 3.

Species delimitation analyses using ITS sequences of and its potential members. Clusters based on UNITE SH at 3% and 1.5% threshold values at UNITE v8.2, VSEARCH at 97% and 98.5% threshold values, ASAP, GMYC, and PTP are displayed. Schematic phylogenetic relationships are shown using the ultrametric tree constructed for the GMYC analysis. The taxon names shown on the tree branches follow the results of the present study.

Species delimitation analyses using ITS sequences of and its potential members. Clusters based on UNITE SH at 3% and 1.5% threshold values at UNITE v8.2, VSEARCH at 97% and 98.5% threshold values, ASAP, GMYC, and PTP are displayed. Schematic phylogenetic relationships are shown using the ultrametric tree constructed for the GMYC analysis. The taxon names shown on the tree branches follow the results of the present study.

Results

Taxon sampling from TNS specimens

Forty-nine specimens in TNS were identified as candidates of and morphologically identified as , , , W.Y. Zhuang & Zheng Wang, (Pat. & Gaillard) M.P. Sharma, Z.H. Yu, W.Y. Zhuang, W.Y. Zhuang, and (Kanouse) Spooner (Table 1), together with six species of described here as new ([, , , , , and ], Table 1). The molecular phylogenetic analyses were based on 70 specimens selected from TNS (Table 1). The concatenated sequence matrix was composed of 2488 bp (sites 1–332 for ITS, 333–1108 for LSU, 1109–1828 for mtSSU, and 1829–2488 for RPB2). In the matrix, the following parts were treated as missing data: TNS-F-17245, 17249, and 81229 for mtSSU, and TNS-F-17567 for RPB2. The matrix was registered in TreeBase (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S28477). Among the four ML trees based on each region, no conflicts were found in clades with support > 70% (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S1). Therefore, we considered these four regions to be combinable, and phylogenetic analyses were based on the concatenated sequence matrix. In the ML analysis, the best-scored tree generated did not reside on the phylogenetic terrace. In the MP analysis, 766 nucleotide substitution sites were detected, 601 of which were parsimony-informative. A total of 182,630 equally parsimonious trees were generated with tree length = 2,985 steps, consistency index (CI) = 0.38, retention index (RI) = 0.73, and rescaled consistency index (RC) = 0.28. In the BI analysis, when two runs reached 20 million generations and the first 10,000 trees (25%) of generated trees were excluded, ASDSF was observed to fall below 0.004 and ESS of all parameters was over 200. The first 10,000 trees were discarded as burn-in. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was constructed and BPP was calculated based on the remaining 30,000 trees. As no topological contradictions occurred among the ML best-scored tree, MP 50% majority-rule consensus tree, and BI 50% majority-rule consensus tree, only ML tree was illustrated, and MLBS, MPBS, and BPP were plotted on its branches (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

ML best-scored phylogenetic tree based on the concatenated dataset of ITS, LSU, mtSSU, and RPB2 constructed using RAxML-NG. MLBP/MPBP/BPP are represented on branches in this order. In MLBP/MPBP < 50% or BPP < 0.95, a hyphen appears. No evaluation values are shown on branches when MLBP and MPBP < 50% and BPP < 0.95. The branch of a clade TNS-F-17245 + 17249 to its most recent common ancestor is only one-third of the intended length due to space limitation.

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, 49 candidates of formed a strongly supported clade (= Clade A, MLBP = 100%/MPBP = 100%/BPP = 1.00), apart from the clade of sensu stricto (= (Y. Otani) Raitv., (Quél.) J. Schröt., J.G. Han, Raitv. & H.D. Shin, and (Batsch) P. Karst.) [type of ]) (Fig. 1). Clade A and formed a relatively strongly supported clade (Clade B, MLBP = 78%, MPBP = 82%, BPP = 1.00). Within Clade A, each morphologically identified species and variety formed strongly supported monophyletic groups of their own (Fig. 1), and five strongly supported subclades were recognized (Clade I–V, Fig. 1). (TNS-F-17545, 17249) and (TNS-F-26500, 39720) did not belong to any subclade. Clade I was composed of , , , and . Within Clade I, only occurred on bamboo sheaths, while others occurred on fallen leaves of broad-leaved trees. Clade II was composed only of , which occurred on the palm petioles. Clade III was composed of and occurring on bamboo leaves. Clade IV was composed of , and , occurring on bamboo sheaths. Clade V was composed of , , and , occurring on wood.

Morphological characters within Clade A

Members of Clade A had totally and densely granulate, hyaline to brown, thin-walled hairs, fusiform to long filiform ascospores, ectal excipulum composed of textura prismatica to textura angularis, asci lacking croziers at the bases, and smooth walled ectal excipulum cells. Exceptionally, , (Hosoya et al. 2013), and W.Y. Zhuang had croziers and had granulated ectal excipulum. Moreover, hairs of Clade A lacked crystals, but were equipped with apical amorphous materials and/or resinous materials. In the present study, “crystals” refers to amber colored materials that positioned near the hair apices and were regular-shaped (e.g. tetrahedral materials, masses of needle-like materials, or cross-shaped materials), described by Raitviir (2002), Suková (2005) or Tochihara and Hosoya (2019). “Resinous materials” refers to colored, refractive, irregular-shaped materials attached on any parts of hairs, described by Spooner (1987). Crystals and resinous materials are easily detatched from hairs and broken into fragments in the squash mount. “Apical amorphous materials” is termed uniquely in this study, and refers to hyaline to brown, refractive, irregular-shaped materials positioned outside the hair apices. They are usually small and inconspicuous cap-like shaped, and conspicuously globular in some species. Apical amorphous materials do not grow to big masses and are not easily detached from hairs in the squash mount. In Clade A, members except for , and had apical amorphous materials, and , , and complex also had resinous materials (see figures of described species and Suppl. material 1: Fig. S2).

ITS-based species delimitation analyses

In UNITE v8.3, 87 ITS sequences were clustered into 23 SHs at 3% and 26 SHs at 1.5% threshold values (Table 2, Fig. 3). The UNITE SH code for each SH is presented in Table 2. In OTU clustering using VSEARCH, 87 ITS sequences were clustered into 25 SHs at 97% similarity and 28 SHs at 98.5% similarity (Table 2, Fig. 3). VSEARCH SH codes (allocated in this study uniquely; VSH97_1 to VSH97_25, VSH985_1 to VSH985_28) are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.

ITS sequences analyzed by the species delimitation analyses.

ITS sequence GenBank/UNITE accession no.TNS-F specimen no.Reference (initial appearance)Taxon name (ultimately allocated in this study)UNITE taxon nameINSDC taxon nameCountryHost plants and partsUNITE SH code (DOI) at 3% thresholdUNITE SH code (DOI) at 1.5% thresholdVSEARCH SH at 97% similarityVSEARCH SH at 98.5% similarity
AB267634 Miyoshi et al. (2007) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, Ehimetwig of CitrusjunosSH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
AB267636 (duplicate; AB267635) Miyoshi et al. (2007) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, Ehimetwig of CitrusjunosSH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
AB267641 (duplicate; AB267639, AB267640) Miyoshi et al. (2007) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, Tokushimatwig of CitrusjunosSH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
AB267642 Miyoshi et al. (2007) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, Tokushimatwig of CitrusjunosSH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
JF937578 Zhao and Zhuang (2011) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme CHINA(unspecified)SH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
JN033395 Han et al. (2014) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme KOREAWoodSH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
UDB0779067/LC66945546416this study E.abnormis --TAIWAN, Taipeiwood of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
UDB0779074/LC66946261773this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Kanagawa, Yokohamatwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
MK584950 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.abnormis E.abnormis E.abnormis CHINA, Yunnan(unspecified)SH1155612.08FU†SH1522994.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_2
AB267637 Miyoshi et al. (2007) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, NaraTwigSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_1
AB267638 Miyoshi et al. (2007) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, ShizuokaTwigSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_1
AB481249 16582 Hosoya et al. (2010) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, Kanagawa, Yamakitawood of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_1
AB705234 16609 Zhao et al. (2012) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, Kanagawa, Yamakitawood of CephalotaxusharringtoniaSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_1
LC424837 80478this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Shizuoka, Oyamatwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
MG712307 unpublished E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme CHINA(unspecified)SH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
MK282241 unpublished E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme (unspecified)(unspecified)SH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_1
MK584957 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.abnormis E.aseptata E.aseptata THAILAND, Chiang Rai(unspecified)SH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_1
MN082536 unpublished E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme (unspecified)(unspecified)SH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_1
MT995055 unpublishedE.abnormis (misregistered?) Chapsapatens Chapsapatens (unspecified)(unspecified)SH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_1
MW007918 unpublishedE.abnormis (misregistered?) Chapsapatens Chapsapatens (unspecified)(unspecified)SH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
UDB0779051/LC66943916556this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Oita, Kokonoewood of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_1
UDB0779053/LC66944116606this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Kanagawa, Yamakitawood of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
UDB0779054/LC66944216639this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Ibaraki, Tsukuba Botanical Gardentwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
UDB0779057/LC66944525579this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Tokyo, Hongotwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
UDB0779062/LC66945032163this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Kanagawa, Odawaratwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
UDB0779069/LC66945738452this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Gunma, Naganoharatwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_1
UDB0779072/LC66946061931this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Kanagawa, Zushitwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_2VSH985_3
UDB0779086/LC66947446841this study E.abnormis --JAPAN, Gifu, Gujotwig of unidentified treeSH1155612.08FUSH1523013.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_1
AB481250 16617 Hosoya et al. (2010) E.abnormis Lachnumabnorme Lachnumabnorme JAPAN, Kanagawa, Yamakitatwig of unidentified tree‡SH1155612.08FU‡SH1523013.08FUVSH97_1VSH985_1
UDB0779055/LC66944316837this studyE.sinensis (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense)--JAPAN, Ibaraki, Tsukuba Botanical Gardenleaf of unidentified broad-leaved treeSH1155682.08FUSH1523107.08FUVSH97_4VSH985_5
AB481280 16838 Hosoya et al. (2010) E.sinensis (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense)Lachnum sp.Lachnum (Lachnum sp. FC-2355)JAPAN, Ibaraki, Tsukuba Botanical Gardenleaf of unidentified broad-leaved treeSH1155682.08FUSH1523107.08FUVSH97_4VSH985_5
AB481281 16841 Hosoya et al. (2010) E.sinensis (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense)Lachnum sp.Lachnum (Lachnum sp. FC-2358)JAPAN, Ibaraki, Mt. Tsukubaleaf of unidentified broad-leaved treeSH1155682.08FUSH1523107.08FUVSH97_4VSH985_5
UDB0779061/LC66944932161this studyE.sinensis (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense)--JAPAN, Kanagawa, Odawaraleaf of QuercusmyrsinifoliaSH1155682.08FUSH1523107.08FUVSH97_4VSH985_5
UDB0779083/LC66947180354this studyE.sinensis (←Lachnummapirianumvar.sinense)--JAPAN, Kanagawa, Manazuruleaf of Castanopsissieboldii†SH1155682.08FU†SH1523107.08FUVSH97_4VSH985_5
UDB023346 unpublished E.curvispora E.curvispora -MONTENEGRO, Žijevo Mountainsneedle of PinusheldreichiiSH1155703.08FUSH1523136.08FUVSH97_12VSH985_14
MH190414 Perić and Baral (2014) E.curvispora E.curvispora E.curvispora MONTENEGRO, Žijevo Mountainsneedle of Pinusheldreichii†SH1155703.08FU†SH1523136.08FUVSH97_12VSH985_14
JF937580 Zhao and Zhuang (2011) E.brasiliensis Lachnumbrasiliense Lachnumbrasiliense CHINA(unspecified)SH1155705.08FUSH1523142.08FUVSH97_6VSH985_7
MK584953 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.brasiliensis E.brasiliensis E.brasiliensis (unspecified)(unspecified)SH1155705.08FUSH1523142.08FUVSH97_6VSH985_7
MK584967 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.brasiliensis E.brasiliensis E.brasiliensis THAILAND, Chiang Rai(unspecified)SH1155705.08FUSH1523142.08FUVSH97_6VSH985_7
UDB0779068/LC66945646419this study E.brasiliensis --TAIWAN, Taipeiwood of unidentified treeSH1155705.08FUSH1523142.08FUVSH97_6VSH985_7
JF937579 Zhao and Zhuang (2011) E.brasiliensis Lachnumbrasiliense Lachnumbrasiliense CHINA(unspecified)†SH1155705.08FU†SH1523142.08FUVSH97_6VSH985_7
KX501132 Tello and Baral (2016) E.lunata E.lunata E.lunata SPAIN, Andalucíaneedle of Pinusnigrasubsp.nigra†SH1155760.08FU†SH1523257.08FUVSH97_18VSH985_19
JX984680 unpublishedE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense) Hyaloscyphaceae Fungi (uncultured fungus)KOREA, Seoul(Total suspended particulate matter (TSP) in urban air during non-Asian dust days)SH1155844.08FUSH1523423.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_4
UDB0779064/LC66945235049this studyE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)--JAPAN, Niigata, Minamiuonumaleaf of QuercusglaucaSH1155844.08FUSH1523423.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_4
UDB0779065/LC66945335056this studyE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)--JAPAN, Niigata, Minamiuonumaleaf of QuercusserrataSH1155844.08FUSH1523423.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_4
UDB0779073/LC66946161941this studyE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)--JAPAN, Kanagawa, Kamakuraleaf of QuercusglaucaSH1155844.08FUSH1523423.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_4
UDB0779076/LC66946465722this studyE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)--JAPAN, Gunma, Midorileaf of Quercusserratasubsp.mongolicoidesSH1155844.08FUSH1523423.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_4
MK282242 unpublishedE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)Lachnum sp. Lachnumalbidulum KOREA(unspecified)SH1155844.08FU†SH1523423.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_4
UDB0779077/LC66946580356this studyE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)--JAPAN, Kanagawa, Hiratsukaleaf of QuercusglaucaSH1155844.08FUSH3597461.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_9
UDB0779078/LC66946680371this studyE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)--JAPAN, Kanagawa, Hiratsukaleaf of CastanopsissieboldiiSH1155844.08FUSH3597461.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_9
UDB0779071/LC66945961775this studyE.hainanensis (←Lachnumhainanense)--JAPAN, Kanagawa, Hiratsukaleaf of Quercusmyrsinifolia†SH1155844.08FU†SH3597461.08FUVSH97_3VSH985_9
UDB0779050/LC66943826492this study E.sclerotii --JAPAN, Tokyo, Hahajima Islandwood of unidentified treeSH1155848.08FUSH1523429.08FUVSH97_5VSH985_6
JF937584 Zhao and Zhuang (2011) E.sclerotii Lachnumsclerotii Lachnumsclerotii CHINA(unspecified)SH1155848.08FUSH1523429.08FUVSH97_5VSH985_6
MK584951 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.sclerotii E.sclerotii E.sclerotii THAILAND, Chiang Rai(unspecified)SH1155848.08FUSH1523429.08FUVSH97_5VSH985_6
UDB0779070/LC66945838480this study E.sclerotii --TAIWAN, Wulaitwig of unidentified treeSH1155848.08FUSH1523429.08FUVSH97_5VSH985_6
MK584969 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.sclerotii E.sclerotii E.sclerotii THAILAND, Chiang Rai(unspecified)†SH1155848.08FU†SH1523429.08FUVSH97_5VSH985_6
AB481271 16642 Hosoya et al. (2010) Lachnumnovoguineensevar.yunnanicum Lachnum sp.Lachnum sp. (Lachnum sp. FC-2211)JAPAN, Ibaraki, Mt. Tsukubaculm of unidentified bambooSH1236904.08FUSH1648536.08FUVSH97_10VSH985_12
AB481270 16442 Hosoya et al. (2010) Lachnumnovoguineensevar.yunnanicum Lachnum sp.Lachnum sp. (Lachnum sp. FC-2117)JAPAN, Nagano, Ueda, Sugadaira Montane Research Centerculm of unidentified bamboo†SH1236904.08FU†SH1648536.08FUVSH97_10VSH985_12
MK584965 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.alba E.alba E.alba THAILAND, Chiang Mai(unspecified)†SH2596405.08FU†SH2712425.08FUVSH97_22VSH985_25
AB267647 Miyoshi et al. (2007) Lachnumpalmae sensu lato Lachnumpalmae Lachnumpalmae JAPAN, Oitaleaf of LivistonachinensisSH1149764.08FUSH1515235.08FUVSH97_7VSH985_8
LC425039 (duplicate; UDB0779046)13500 Johnston et al. (2019) Lachnumpalmae sensu lato Lachnumpalmae Lachnumpalmae JAPAN, Kagoshima, Yakushima Islandleaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosaSH1149764.08FUSH1515235.08FUVSH97_7VSH985_8
UDB0779066/LC66945439729this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--JAPAN, Okinawa, Iriomote Islandleaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosaSH1149764.08FUSH1515235.08FUVSH97_7VSH985_8
MG283320 Zhao et al. (2018) Lachnumpalmae sensu lato Lachnumpalmae Lachnumpalmae CHINA, Linzhouroot of Przewalskiatangutica (endophyte)†SH1149764.08FU†SH1515235.08FUVSH97_7VSH985_8
UDB0779089/LC66947717567this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--NEW ZEALANDleaf of unidentified palmSH2594271.08FUSH2709065.08FUVSH97_15VSH985_16
MH921862 unpublishedLachnumpalmae sensu lato Lachnumpalmae Lachnumpalmae NEW ZEALANDunidentified part of Rhopalostylissapida†SH2594271.08FU†SH2709065.08FUVSH97_15VSH985_16
UDB0779052/LC66944024588this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--JAPAN, Kagoshima, Amami-Oshimaleaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosaSH3569651.08FUSH3597456.08FUVSH97_9VSH985_17
UDB0779047/LC66943511197this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--JAPAN, Shizuoka, Shimodaleaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa†SH3569651.08FU†SH3597456.08FUVSH97_9VSH985_17
UDB0779048/LC66943626161this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--JAPAN, Tokyo, Chichijima Islandleaf of LivistonaboninensisSH3569651.08FUSH3597457.08FUVSH97_9VSH985_11
UDB0779058/LC66944626172this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--JAPAN, Tokyo, Kita-Iwojima Islandleaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosaSH3569651.08FUSH3597457.08FUVSH97_16VSH985_11
UDB0779059/LC66944726185this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--JAPAN, Tokyo, Kita-Iwojima Islandleaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosaSH3569651.08FU†SH3597457.08FUVSH97_16VSH985_11
UDB0779056/LC66944424600this studyLachnumpalmae sensu lato--JAPAN, Kagoshima, Amami-Oshimaleaf of Livistonachinensisvar.subglobosa†SH3569653.08FU†SH3597459.08FUVSH97_25VSH985_28
U58640 Cantrell and Hanlin (1997) E.euterpes Lachnumeuterpes Lachnumeuterpes PUERTO RICO(unspecified)†SH1236906.08FU†SH1648538.08FUVSH97_21VSH985_24
KT384413 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.fusiformis Lachnumfusiforme Lachnumfusiforme THAILANDdead stems‡SH1236907.08FU‡SH1648539.08FUVSH97_11VSH985_13
MK584948 Ekanayaka et al. (2019) E.fusiformis Lachnumfusiforme Lachnumfusiforme CHINAdead stemsSH1236907.08FUSH1648539.08FUVSH97_11VSH985_13
UDB0779049/LC66943726520this study E.boninensis --JAPAN, Tokyo, Hahajima Islandwood of unidentified tree†SH3569652.08FU†SH3597458.08FUVSH97_20VSH985_21
UDB0779060/LC66944826500this study E.insulae --JAPAN, Tokyo, Hahajima Islandwood of unidentified treeSH3569654.08FUSH3597460.08FUVSH97_14VSH985_15
UDB0779063/LC66945139720this study E.insulae --JAPAN, Okinawa, Iriomote Islandbark of unidentified tree†SH3569654.08FU†SH3597460.08FUVSH97_14VSH985_15
UDB0779075/LC66946361920this study E.paralushanensis --JAPAN, Shizuoka, Atamiculm of Pleioblastusargenteostriatus†SH3569655.08FU†SH3597462.08FUVSH97_19VSH985_20
AF505515 E.lushanensis Lachnumlushanense Lachnumlushanense (unspecified)(unspecified)†SH1155706.08FU†SH1523143.08FUVSH97_8VSH985_10
JF937582 Zhao and Zhuang (2011) E.lushanensis Lachnumlushanense Lachnumlushanense CHINA(unspecified)SH1155706.08FUSH1523143.08FUVSH97_8VSH985_10
MG434782 unpublished E.lushanensis Erioscyphella sp. E.lushanensis INDIA, Tangmargroot tips of Pinuswallichiana (ectomycorrhiza)(unassigned)(unassigned)VSH97_8VSH985_10
UDB0779081/LC66946981272this study E.papillaris --JAPAN, Gunma, Minakamileaf of unidentified bamboo†SH3569656.08FU†SH3597463.08FUVSH97_23VSH985_26
UDB0779084/LC66947281401this study E.sasibrevispora --JAPAN, Hokkaido, Tomakomaiculm of SasanipponicaSH3569657.08FUSH3597464.08FUVSH97_13VSH985_23
UDB0779082/LC66947080399this study E.sasibrevispora --JAPAN, Gunma, Higashi-Agatsumasheath of Sasaveitchii†SH3569657.08FU†SH3597464.08FUVSH97_13VSH985_22
UDB0779085/LC66947381472this study E.otanii --JAPAN, Hokkaido, Horonobe, Teshio Experimental Forest, Hokkaido Universityleaf of Sasasenanensis†SH3569658.08FU†SH3597465.08FUVSH97_24VSH985_27
UDB0779087/LC66947517245this study Lachnummapirianum --MALAYSIA, Gerikleaf of unidentified tree†SH3569659.08FU†SH3597466.08FUVSH97_17VSH985_18
UDB0779088/LC66947617249this study Lachnummapirianum --MALAYSIA, Gerikleaf of unidentified treeSH3569659.08FUSH3597466.08FUVSH97_17VSH985_18

† Representative sequence of each SH ‡ Reference sequence of each SH

ITS sequences analyzed by the species delimitation analyses. † Representative sequence of each SH ‡ Reference sequence of each SH The extracted and aligned ITS sequences were composed of three partitions, ITS1 (162 bp), 5.8S (157 bp), and ITS2 (142 bp). The concatenated ITS sequence matrix was registered in TreeBase (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S28473). In the ASAP analysis, the concatenated dataset of these partitions (461 bp) was input, and 87 ITS sequences were clustered into 18 SHs with the lowest asap-score, reflecting better partitioning (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S3). In the GMYC analysis, 29 SHs were delimited (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S4). The ultrametric tree constructed for the GMYC analysis is available in TreeBase (http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S28473). For the PTP analyses, an ML best-scored tree was constructed (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S5). PTP analyses delimited 23 SHs in the Bayesian support and 26 SHs in the ML support (Suppl. material 1 Fig. S6), and the former was adopted. Comparing the number of SHs generated by different clustering methods and applied thresholds, 18 SHs by ASAP, and 23 SHs by UNITE SH at 3% threshold represented the lowest SH numbers (Fig. 3; Table 2). The ASAP results were too rough to delimit the boundaries of , , , , and . SH-classification recognized by UNITE SH at 3% threshold mostly corresponded to taxon names originally assigned to sequences. Comparing the results of seven species delimitation methods (UNITE SH at 3% threshold, UNITE SH at 1.5% threshold, VSEARCH 97% similarity, VSEARCH 98.5% similarity, ASAP, GMYC, and PTP), sequences labeled as , , , , , , , , , , and six new species candidates were distinguished as separate clusters by more than four delimitation methods (Fig. 3). These species clusters did not contradict with morphological/ecological and phylogenetic relationships (Fig. 1). Seven sequences labeled as were clustered into one SH by four species delimitation analyses, and part of the SHs included a sequence labeled as (Fig. 3). , , and did not form separate clusters supported by majority of four species delimitation analyses (Fig. 3). Sequences labeled as were clustered into one to four SHs, and some SHs included sequences labeled as (Nyl.) Frisch, , , and (Fig. 3). Twelve sequences labeled as were clustered into four to six SHs (Fig. 3).

Discussion

Generic delimitation and generic concept of

We accepted Clade A as a monophyletic unit for which is supported by morphology. Although Clade B comprised Clade A together with , Clade B should not be regarded as a genus delimitation of , because differs from members of Clade A in having apothecia proliferating from the margins continuously and thick-walled and coarsely warted hairs (Haines and Dumont 1983; Spooner 1987). All members of Clade A are distinguishable from the other lachnacenous genera. In contrast to , and are distinguished by hair apices with no granulation (Hosoya et al. 2010), , , and by hair-crystals (Baral and Krieglsteiner 1985; Tochihara and Hosoya 2019), and by ectal excipulum composed of textura globose to textura oblita (Dharne 1965). Typical members of Clade A can be easily segregated from , because the characteristic features of , such as dark-brown hairs, ectal-excipulum structure, and ellipsoid to fusoid ascospores < 10 µm long (Spooner 1987), are rare in Clade A. Among members of Clade A and sensu stricto, the shape and length of ascospores were continuous (Fig. 4), as indicated by Haines and Dumont (1984). However, ascospores longer than 15–20 µm were restricted to Clade A (Fig. 4). Moreover, most members of Clade A have hairs with apical amorphous materials, which are not seen in sensu stricto. Members of Clade A usually also have hairs not swelling at the apices and distantly septate, as Perić and Baral (2014) pointed out for three tropical members, while members of have swelling apices. The combination of such characters allows us to differentiate typical members of from .
Figure 4.

Comparison of ascospores of Clade A (= ) and the clade of sensu stricto in Fig. 1. Subclade numbers for members of Clade A in Fig. 1 are shown in parentheses. Bars show variation of ascospore length within each species.

Comparison of ascospores of Clade A (= ) and the clade of sensu stricto in Fig. 1. Subclade numbers for members of Clade A in Fig. 1 are shown in parentheses. Bars show variation of ascospore length within each species. In summary, is still difficult to define solely based on morphology because of multiple exceptional characters continuous to other genera, but its typical members could be recognizable mainly by the hair structures and ascospore length. Based on members of Clade A, is tentatively described as follows: apothecia occurring on dead hardwood leaves, rotten wood, bamboo sheaths, bamboo leaves or palm leaves; asci mostly arising from simple septa, but occasionally from croziers; ascospores fusiform to long needle-shaped, aseptate to multi-septate; paraphyses filiform to narrowly lanceolate, shortly exceeding the asci, but rarely lanceolate and long exceeding the asci; hairs straight or irregularly curved, usually not swollen at the apices, thin-walled, hyaline, but sometimes brown, totally and densely granulated, usually distantly septate, without needle-like or three-dimensional shaped crystals but mostly equipped with hyaline to brown apical amorphous materials, and/or resinous materials at any part of hairs; walls of ectal excipulum cells smooth but granulate in one species. Perić and Baral (2014) pointed out that “yellow hymenium derived from carotenoid” is one of the common characters of . This feature was not discussed in this study because some specimens were not observed when fresh; the hymenium color is variable (usually white hymenium becomes yellow) between fresh and dried states in lachnaceous species.

Host selectivity of

In , the tendency of selectivity of species to host plants or parts occurs across the genus. Each subclade within (Clade I–V) generally shared tendencies toward host selectivity as follows: Clade I on leaves of broad-leaved trees, except for occurring on bamboo sheaths, Clade II on palm leaves, Clade III on bamboo leaves, Clade IV on bamboo sheaths, and Clade V on rotten wood (Fig. 1). The results showed that selectivity to host plants, and parts of , was acquired as apomorphic characters during speciation.

Is limited to ‘tropical’ zones?

(long-spored ) has long been known as the tropical genus in (Dennis 1954; Spooner 1987; Guatimosim et al. 2016). Most long-spored species were described from tropical areas of Latin America (Dennis 1954) and tropical to temperate areas of Australasia (Spooner 1987). However, the new species or new combinations proposed in this study were reported from Japan in subtropical areas ( and ), temperate area (, , and ) and cool-temperate to subarctic areas (, , and ), showing that is not limited to tropical zones, but is also distributed in temperate to subarctic zones in the northern hemisphere.

Ascal iodine reactions seen in

Iodine reactions of the ascus apical apparatus have been classified into several types (inamyloid, hemiamyloid [Type RB and RR, and euamyloid Type BB]) (Baral 2009), and the reaction ‘MLZ- without KOH pretreatment and MLZ+ with KOH pretreatment’, observed in (Fig. 11E1 and Fig. 11E2) has been restricted to the type of hemiamyloid. However, the apical apparatus of showed a dark blue reaction in IKI without KOH pretreatment (Fig. 11E3), while the hemiamyloid apparatus usually shows a red reaction under these conditions. The hemiamyloid ascal apparatus could show IKI-blue without KOH pretreatment due to long storage in the herbarium (Baral 2009), but this is not applicable for the material of , which has been maintained for only two years in herbarium until observed. Therefore, we assessed the iodine reaction of as a new type, and color reactions with various solutions of the species should be further examined using new materials, because there are few apothecia in the type specimen.
Figure 11.

TNS-F-81272 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 113937) C Ascus arising from ascogenous hyphae D an ascus E ascal pore iodine reactions E1MLZ (-) without 3% KOH pretreatment E2MLZ (-) with 3% KOH pretreatment E3 IKI (+) without 3% KOH pretreatment F paraphysis G ascospores with guttules H ectal excipulum I hair-apex with a apical amorphous material J hairs. Mounted in CB/LA (C, D, F–J), MLZ (E1, E2), IKI (E3). Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A); 10 µm (C–J).

Species-level taxonomic treatment of

In this study, we carried out taxonomic treatment for species which were distinguished by morphology/ecology and phylogenetic analyses, and formed single clusters in species delimitation analyses. Based on this criteria, six undescribed species of have been proposed as new species of [, , , , , and ], and and have been proposed as new members of . Interpretation of species boundaries of was discussed in the taxonomy chapter. For new species and new combinations, Japanese names were also denominated for wider use of Japanese mycologists or amateurs. In the phylogenetic analyses, Malaysian materials of (TNS-F-17245, 17249) and Japanese materials of (TNS-F-16442, 16642) were also found to be members of (Fig. 1). However, we hesitate to transfer the two species into , as we cannot guarantee the identification accuracy of the materials, because of inadequate type information of the two species. Taxonomic assessments of , , and , which were not accepted as independent species in species delimitation analyses, are discussed below.

Taxonomy of and its related species

In the species delimitation analyses, sequences labeled as formed a single SH at UNITE SH 3% threshold (DOI: SH1155612.08FU) and divided into two to four SHs at UNITE SH 1.5% threshold, VSEARCH, and GMYC (Fig. 3). In ASAP, sequences labeled as belong to a single SH, but the SH also contained sequences labeled as , , , , and (Fig. 3). However, the phylogenetic analyses revealed that , and are separate from the clade of (Fig. 1), suggesting that the two species are different from . Although was not included in the phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 1), the apparent morphological and ecological differentiation (Perić and Baral 2014) and low similarity of ITS (< 97%) with members of (Fig. 3) suggest that is different from . was originally described in Thailand and characterized by having aseptate ascospores, unlike or with septate ascospores (Ekanayaka et al. 2019). However, the species delimitation analyses in this study suggested the difficulty of delimiting (MK584957) from (Fig. 3), suggesting that is a morphologically atypical (aseptate-ascospored) individual of . Although two ITS sequences of (MT995055 = specimen no. FJ19131 and MW007918 = specimen no. FJ19049) were positioned in SHs dominated by , LSU and mtSSU sequences of FJ19131 and LSU sequence of FJ19049 were closely related to spp. [, ]. Since and are phylogenetically distant, the two ITS sequences MT995055 and MW007918 have been misidentified. Considering that the monophyly of is strongly supported (Fig. 1) and members of the species share high ITS similarities (> 97%, compiled into SH1155612.08FU) (Fig. 3, Table 2), is accepted here as a species with some intraspecific morphological and phylogenetic variation.

Taxonomy of ‘

formed a strongly supported clade in the phylogenetic analyses (Clade II in Fig. 1). They also shared strong selectivity to palm leaves and characteristic morphology such as thick-walled asci, hairs with resinous materials and apical amorphous materials (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S2) and ectal excipulum composed of thick-walled prismatic cells and interwoven hyphae. However, sequences labeled as were divided into 4 to 7 SHs in all species delimitation analyses (Fig. 3), indicating that is a species complex that includes multiple potential sister species. At present, we avoid creating new species from the complex, because the morphological and ecological differences detected among SHs are not enough to delimit species boundaries, although the size of asci and ascospores differ among some SHs, as shown in Fig. 4. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that members of the complex belonged to (Fig. 1). However, we could not judge which SH within the complex is equivalent to as originally described from Honduras by Kanouse (1941) and redescribed by Spooner (1987) from the type plus another specimen from New Zealand. There are no sequences from the tropical American type locality, so phylogenetic characterization and recombination of the species were avoided in the present study.

Taxonomy

Tochihara & Hosoya sp. nov. MycoBank No: 835702 Figs 5 , 6
Figure 5.

TNS-F-26520 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114447) C ascus D ascal pore MLZ (+) E ascospores F paraphyses G ectal excipular cells H ectal excipular cells with red granules I hairs with resinous matters arising from ectal excipular cells. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–I), MLZ (D). Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 10 µm (C–I).

Figure 6.

TNS-F-26520 (Holotype) A ascospores B apothecium C vertical section of an apothecium D expansion of a vertical section of an apothecium E ectal excipular cells F asci G paraphyses H hairs.

Diagnosis.

Differs from all other species by the granulate walls of the ectal excipular cells. TNS-F-26520 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114447) C ascus D ascal pore MLZ (+) E ascospores F paraphyses G ectal excipular cells H ectal excipular cells with red granules I hairs with resinous matters arising from ectal excipular cells. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–I), MLZ (D). Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 10 µm (C–I).

Holotype.

Japan, Bonin Islands, Chichijima Island, Mt. Tsutsujiyama, , ca 270 m, 28 Jun. 2009, on fallen leaves of , T.Hosoya (TNS-F-26520). TNS-F-26520 (Holotype) A ascospores B apothecium C vertical section of an apothecium D expansion of a vertical section of an apothecium E ectal excipular cells F asci G paraphyses H hairs.

GenBank/UNITE no. ex holotype.

LC669437/UDB0779049 (ITS), LC533151 (LSU), LC533254 (mtSSU), LC533196 (RPB2).

Etymology.

Referring to the type locality Bonin Islands.

Japanese name.

Ogasawara-cha-hina-no-chawantake.

Description.

Apothecia scattered, superficial, 0.5–1.0 mm in diameter, having well-developed stipes, up to 1.5 mm high, cream to pale brown, externally covered with short and shiny hairs. Disc concave, cream to pale yellow. Ectal excipulum textura prismatica composed of long elongated cells to textura angularis, 6–25 × 5–13 µm, hyaline to relatively brown colored, somewhat thick-walled; cell walls covered by granules with a similar appearance to those on hairs. Stipe composed of textura prismatica with a granulate surface as ectal excipular cells. Medullary excipulum textura intricata of hyaline hyphae up to 3 µm wide. Hairs straight, cylindrical, 38–62 × 2.5–4.0 µm, hyaline, completely covered by brown granules, 2–3-septate, thin-walled, arising from swelling cells completely covered by granules; apex lacking crystals or apical amorphous materials, equipped with amber-colored resinous materials dissolvable with CB/LA at a little below the apex. Asci (36–)37.7–44(–46) × (3.5–)3.6–4.2(–4.5) µm (av. 41 ±3.2 × 3.9 ± 0.3 µm, n = 16), 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate; pore blue in MLZ without 3% KOH pretreatment; croziers absent at the basal septa. Ascospores (9–)10–12.3(–13) × 1.2–1.7(–1.8) µm (av. 11 ± 1.2 × 1.5 ± 0.2 µm, n = 16), Q = (6.3–)6.9–9.2(–10) (av. 7.8 ± 1.5, n = 16), fusiform, aseptate. Paraphyses straight, up to 2.5 µm wide, septate, exceeding the asci up to 5 µm, narrowly lanceolate.

Culture characteristics.

Colony of NBRC 114447/TNS-F-26520 on PDA umbonate forming a dome-shape, slightly sulcate. Context not shiny, velvety, buff at the center, paler toward the margin, dark buff from the reverse. Sectors and zonation absent. Aerial mycelium white or buff, dense cottony, forming white mycelium strands except in the margin. Margin distinct, entire, flat. Asexual morph absent.

Distribution.

Japan. (Bonin Islands). Known only from the type locality.

Notes.

Granulation on the surface of the ectal excipular cells has been observed only in in (Baral and Krieglsteiner 1985; Tochihara and Hosoya 2019), and is the first report for such a character in (Fig. 5H, 6E). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that is closely related to (Fig. 1). The two species (Clade IA, Fig. 1) have colored granules on hairs and forming red mycelia on PDA. However, granulation of ectal excipulum is seen only in . (W.Y. Zhuang and Zheng Wang) Hosoya and Tochihara comb. nov. MycoBank No: 835707 Forming apothecia with long stipes and long hairs. Differing in much shorter ascospores. Shii-Kashi-hina-no-chawantake.

Specimens examined.

Japan, Niigata, Minamiuonuma, , ca 720 m, 14 May 2010, on fallen leaves of , T.Hosoya (TNS-F-35049). Ibid (TNS-F-35056). Japan, Kanagawa, Hiratsuka, 35.33861111, 139.285, ca 80 m, 12 Apr. 2015, on fallen leaves of , M.Nakajima (TNS-F-61775). JAPAN, Kanagawa, Kamakura, , ca 40 m, 24 Apr. 2015, on fallen leaves of , M.Nakajima (TNS-F-61941). Japan, Gunma, Midori, , ca 510 m, 9 May 2016, on fallen leaves of , K.Furuya (TNS-F-65722). Japan, Kanagawa, Hiratsuka, , ca 60 m, 18 May 2017, on fallen leaves of , Y.Tochiara (TNS-F-80356). The same locality, on fallen leaves of , Y. Tochihara (TNS-F-80371). China (Hainan), Japan (Honshu: Kanto region). Based on the UNITE SH system at a 3% threshold, ITS sequences of this species were integrated into a single SH (DOI: SH1155844.08FU). SH1155844.08FU included sequences labeled as ‘’ (JX984680) in UNITE and ‘’ (MK282242) in INSDC (Table 2). JX984680 was sequenced from air samples in Seoul, South Korea, and was not tied to any fungal specimens or cultures. is common on leathery dicot leaves of the old and new world tropics (Haines 1992). resembles in morphology, but has yellow resinous substances at the tip of apothecial hairs and occurs on dead leaves of (Haines 1992), whereas lacks resinous substances and occurs on leaves of broad-leaved trees (Zhuang and Wang 1998b; Hosoya et al. 2013). Therefore, we presume that MK282242, coexisting with in every SH, was misidentified as . No sequences are available for specimens from the type locality. was therefore judged as acceptable species, and recombined into . resembles in occurring on dead leaves of spp. or spp. However, has much shorter ascospores than . In this study, presence of minute, hyaline apical amorphous materials and absence of any crystals or resinous materials were confirmed in both species (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S2). Tochihara & Hosoya sp. nov. MycoBank No: 835703 Figs 7 , 8
Figure 7.

TNS-F-39720 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B a pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114459) C asci D ascal pore MLZ (+) E ascospores F ascogenous hyphae G paraphyses H layer structures of excipulum H1 medullary excipulum H2 inner layer of ectal excipulum composed of hyphae H3 outer layer of ectal excipulum composed of textura angularisI, J hairs with apical amorphous materials. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–J), MLZ (D). Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 10 µm (A–J).

Figure 8.

TNS-F-39720 (Holotype) A expansion of a vertical section of an apothecium B ascospores C apothecium D vertical section of an apothecium E asci F paraphyses G layer structures of excipulum.

Characterized by pure white apothecia unlike related species , and two-layered ectal excipulum. Japan, Okinawa, Yaeyama, Taketomi, Iriomote Island, Otomi,, ca 50 m, 12 Jun. 2011, on fallen bark of unidentified tree, T.Fukiharu (TNS-F-39720). LC669451/UDB0779063 (ITS), LC533177 (LSU), LC533261 (mtSSU), LC533207 (RPB2).

Other specimens examined.

Japan, Bonin Islands, Hahajima Island, Sekimon,, ca 260 m, 24 Jun. 2009, on fallen bark of unidentified tree, T.Hosoya (TNS-F-26485, 26500). Referring to the occurrence of the species on remote islands in Japan. Shima-hina-no-chawantake. Apothecia gregarious, superficial, 0.7–1.4(–2.5) mm in diameter, short- and thick-stipitate, up to 0.8 mm high, externally white to cream throughout but sometimes pale brown in the lower parts, covered with white hairs. Disc concave, cream to pale yellow (fresh state not observed). Ectal excipulum composed of two layers: outer layer textura angularis, up to 20 µm thick, 3–28 × 2–8 µm, hyaline, thin to relatively thick-walled, with cell walls smooth; inner layer up to 15 µm thick, textura porrecta composed of hyaline hyphae up to 5 µm wide. Medullary excipulum up to 100 µm thick, composed of hyaline hyphae forming textura intricata; hyphae up to 3 µm wide. Hairs straight or irregularly curved, cylindrical, sometimes branched, up to 125 × 2.5–3.0 µm, hyaline, completely granulate, thin-walled; lacking crystals or resinous materials; apex usually equipped with hyaline apical amorphous materials. Asci (88–)92–101(–106) × 6–7.3(–8) µm (av. 96 ± 4.5 × 6.7 ± 0.6 µm, n = 18), 8-spored, thick-walled, cylindrical-clavate, arising from ascogenous hyphae branching several times; pore blue in MLZ without 3% KOH pretreatment; croziers absent at the basal septa. Ascospores (24–)26.7–34.5(–39) × (1.8–)1.9–2.3(–2.5) µm (av. 31 ± 3.9 × 2.1 ± 0.2 µm, n = 18), Q = (11–)12.5–17(–20) (av. 14.7 ± 2.3, n = 18), showing various shapes and lengths, usually long fusiform and sometimes hypsiloid or sigmoid due to bending of both ends, sometimes swelling or constricted irregularly, aseptate or one- to three-septate (usually one-septate). Paraphyses straight, narrowly lanceolate, up to 2.5 µm wide, septate, exceeding the asci up to 7.5 µm. Colony of NBRC 114445/TNS-F-26500 and NBRC 114459/TNS-F-39720 on PDA relatively thick-planar, pruinose, white to cream, ivory at the margin, pale sepia. Sectors and zonation absent. Aerial mycelium white to pale ocher, mainly developed except in the margin, not forming mycelial strands. Soluble pigment amber colored produced at the center. Margin unclear, flat and immersed into agar, radially undulate. Anamorph not seen. Japan (Bonin Islands, Yaeyama Islands). This fungus resembles (Dennis) Spooner in the size and shape of apothecia, ascospores, asci, and hairs. However, has completely hyaline hairs and ectal excipulum, and hairs are equipped with apical materials (Fig. 7J, 8A), whereas has partly to totally brown hairs and ectal excipulum (Spooner 1987). is currently known only from New Zealand and Australia and mainly arises from spp., which are native in the southern hemisphere (Spooner 1987). TNS-F-39720 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B a pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114459) C asci D ascal pore MLZ (+) E ascospores F ascogenous hyphae G paraphyses H layer structures of excipulum H1 medullary excipulum H2 inner layer of ectal excipulum composed of hyphae H3 outer layer of ectal excipulum composed of textura angularisI, J hairs with apical amorphous materials. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–J), MLZ (D). Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 10 µm (A–J). TNS-F-39720 (Holotype) A expansion of a vertical section of an apothecium B ascospores C apothecium D vertical section of an apothecium E asci F paraphyses G layer structures of excipulum. Tochihara sp. nov. MycoBank No: 835704 Figs 9 , 10
Figure 9.

TNS-F-81472 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114476) C asci D ascal pore MLZ (+) E ascospore F paraphyses G a hair H hair-apex with a apical amorphous material I ectal excipular cells. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–I), MLZ (D). Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A); 10 µm (C–I).

Figure 10.

TNS-F-81472 (Holotype) A ascospores B apothecium C vertical section of an apothecium D hairs with cap-like structures arising from ectal excipular cells E expansion of a vertical section of an apothecium F paraphyses G asci.

Characterized by pure white minute apothecia (< 0.3 mm in diameter) unlike with rather colored apothecia, and smaller asci compared to similar species . Holotype. Japan, Hokkaido, Horonobe, Toikambetsu, Teshio Experimental Forest, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, , ca 400 m, 11 Jul. 2018, on fallen leaves of , Y.Tochihara & K.Kaneko (TNS-F-81472). LC669471/UDB0779083 (ITS), LC533179 (LSU), LC533286 (mtSSU), LC533226 (RPB2).

Other specimen examined.

Japan, Hokkaido, Sapporo, Mt. Moiwa,, ca 530 m, 21 Jun. 1965, on fallen leaves of , Y.Otani (TNS-F-50482, in poor condition). Referring to the name of Dr Yoshio Otani, the first discoverer of this species. Kita-sasaba-hina-no-chawantake. Apothecia scattered, superficial, minute, 0.1–0.3 mm in diameter, at first spherical and later urceolate, having well-developed stipes, up to 0.3 mm high, pure white, externally covered with short white hairs, never colored brown. Disc concave, almost enclosed by an incurving margin when fresh and dry, cream to pale yellow when dry (not observed when fresh). Ectal excipulum textura prismatica like stone pavings arranged in rows, 3–25 × 3–8 µm, hyaline, relatively thick-walled; cell walls smooth. Medullary excipulum textura intricata; hyphae up to 2.5 µm wide. Hairs straight, cylindrical or tapering toward the apices, up to 60 µm long, up to 5 µm wide near the bases and 2.5–3.0 µm wide near the apices, arising from swollen ectal excipular cells, hyaline, up to 3-septate (usually 1- or 2-septate), thin-walled, completely granulated; granules dense near the apices and coarse toward the bases; apex sometimes with a hyaline and inconspicuous apical amorphous materials not dissolved with CB/LA, lacking any crystals or resinous materials. Asci (33–)34–38.8(–41) × 4–5 µm (av. 37 ± 2.2 × 4.4 ± 0.4 µm, n = 15), 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate, relatively thick-walled; pore blue in MLZ without 3% KOH pretreatment; croziers absent at the basal septa. Ascospores (11.5–)12.3–14.6(–15) × (1.2–)1.36–1.7(–1.8) µm (av. 13.4 ± 1.2 × 1.6 ± 0.2 µm, n = 15), Q = (6.7–)7.8–9.6(–10.8) (av. 8.7 ± 0.9, n = 15), fusiform, aseptate. Paraphyses straight, narrowly lanceolate to lanceolate, up to 2.5 µm wide, septate, exceeding the asci up to 10 µm. Colony of NBRC 114476/TNS-F-81472 on PDA flat, partially protruding and forming mycelial mass, divided into two sectors. One sector flat, wooly to velvety, white to cream; dark ocher from the reverse. The other sector with wooly context, white and partly yellow; pale ocher from the reverse. Aerial mycelia developed throughout the colony, white, sparse to cottony, not forming mycelium strands. Margin distinct, flat and immersed into the agar. Soluble pigment absent. Asexual morph absent. Japan (Hokkaido; subarctic zone). was first collected and documented by Otani (1967) under the misapplied name (TNS-F-50482). Based on the description, we concluded that the specimen was the same species as TNS-F-81472. The present species is very similar to (Roberge ex Desm.) Rehm in the minute apothecia, ascospore size, and narrow paraphyses; however, is pure white when fresh and dry (Fig. 9A, in dried state) and occurs on bamboo leaves, while is somewhat brown in the exterior parts of apothecia and occurs on sheaths of spp. (Dennis 1949). In the mature state, the apothecia of become urceolate (Fig. 9A and Fig. 10B), whereas the apothecia of are flat (Dennis 1949). The ITS sequence of TNS-F-81472 showed low similarity (< 80%) with that of collected in France (GenBank accession number: MH857306). Based on the French sequence, is phylogenetically a good . TNS-F-81472 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114476) C asci D ascal pore MLZ (+) E ascospore F paraphyses G a hair H hair-apex with a apical amorphous material I ectal excipular cells. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–I), MLZ (D). Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A); 10 µm (C–I). The appearance of is also similar to that of the graminicolous species W.Y. Zhuang and M. Ye documented in China (Ye and Zhuang 2003). is distinguished from in having smaller asci, although DNA sequences of the species are not available. TNS-F-81472 (Holotype) A ascospores B apothecium C vertical section of an apothecium D hairs with cap-like structures arising from ectal excipular cells E expansion of a vertical section of an apothecium F paraphyses G asci. Tochihara sp. nov. MycoBank No: 835705 Figs 11 , 12
Figure 12.

TNS-F-81272 (Holotype) A apothecium B vertical section of an apothecium C ascospores D expansion of an vertical section of an apothecium E ectal excipular cells F asci G paraphyses H hairs with cap-like structures.

Characterized by protruding papillary hairs with hyaline apical amorphous materials. Japan, Gunma, Minakami, Yubiso, Mt. Tanigawadake,, ca 710 m, 16 Jul. 2017, on both sides of a fallen leaf of bamboo, Y.Tochihara (TNS-F-81272). LC669473/UDB0779085 (ITS), LC533161 (LSU), LC533285 (mtSSU), LC533204 (RPB2). Referring to papillate hair apices. Sasaba-hina-no-chawantake. Apothecia gregarious, superficial, minute, 0.1–0.3 mm in diameter, short-stipitate, up to 0.25 mm high, externally densely covered with pure white short hairs. Disc concave, white to lemon yellow when fresh and dry. Ectal excipulum textura prismatica composed of cuboid cells, 3–13 × 2.5–7 µm, hyaline, thin-walled, lacking carotenoid pigments; cell walls smooth. Medullary excipulum textura intricata of hyaline hyphae up to 3 µm wide. Hairs straight, cylindrical, 45–75 × 3–5 µm, 2–3-septate, hyaline, totally granulate, thin-walled, arising from swollen cells; apical cells rather longer than other cells, 30–40 µm long, with papillate at the apex, sometimes swelling, equipped with hyaline and globose apical amorphous materials not dissolved with CB/LA, lacking any crystals or resinous matters. Asci (59–)59.8–66(–69) × (7.5–)7.6–8.3(–9) µm (av. 63 ± 2.9 × 8.0 ± 0.4 µm, n = 16), 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate; pore inamyloid with MLZ without 3% KOH pretreatment, faint blue with MLZ with 3% KOH pretreatment, dark blue with IKI with and without KOH pretreatment; vesicle apparatus inverted-v-shaped present near the apices; croziers absent at the basal septa; base sympodially branched. Ascospores (16–)17.5–21.7(–24) × (2–)2.3–2.8(–3) µm (av. 20 ± 2.1 × 2.6 ± 0.3 µm, n = 20), Q = (6.4–)6.8–8.9(–9.8) (av. 7.8 ± 1.0, n = 20), fusiform, aseptate, or one-septate (rarely two-septate), filled with hyaline oil drops. Paraphyses straight, cylindrical, up to 3 µm wide, septate, containing small hyaline lipid bodies, equal or scarcely exceeding the asci. Colony of NBRC 113937/TNS-F-81272 on PDA divided into two semicircular zones. The first zone umbonate, pruinose, white, producing white aerial mycelia densely, presenting wooly appearance; margin distinct, entire, flat. The second zone flat, glutinous, white to beige with concentric patterns, producing few aerial mycelia; margin entire, flat and immersed into agar, irregularly undulate. The reverse uniform unrelated to the zoning position, beige to pale dark brown throughout. Soluble pigment and asexual morph absent throughout the colony. Japan (Mt. Tanigawa). Currently known only from the type locality. This species is similar to in the dimension and shape of asci and ascospores, habitats, and inconspicuous ascus apex reaction in MLZ (Zhuang 2004). However, has ascospores containing conspicuous guttules in any mount (Fig. 11G) and filiform paraphyses rarely exceeding the asci (Fig. 11F, Fig. 12D, and Fig. 12G), whereas has non-guttulate asci and narrowly lanceolate to lanceolate paraphyses exceeding the asci by 15–18 µm (Zhuang 2004). Although DNA sequences of are not available, we judged the present fungus as different from it, because the presence or absence of guttules in ascospores is a significant taxonomic character at the species level (Baral 2015). TNS-F-81272 (Holotype) A dried apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 113937) C Ascus arising from ascogenous hyphae D an ascus E ascal pore iodine reactions E1MLZ (-) without 3% KOH pretreatment E2MLZ (-) with 3% KOH pretreatment E3 IKI (+) without 3% KOH pretreatment F paraphysis G ascospores with guttules H ectal excipulum I hair-apex with a apical amorphous material J hairs. Mounted in CB/LA (C, D, F–J), MLZ (E1, E2), IKI (E3). Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A); 10 µm (C–J). Papillate hairs are also shown in the line drawings of Spooner (Spooner 1987), suggesting the relationship of the present fungus to Australasian species. However, can be distinguished by having longer hairs, occurring on different substrates (leaves of ) and showing different ascal-iodine reactions (MLZ+) (Spooner 1987), although DNA sequences of are not available. TNS-F-81272 (Holotype) A apothecium B vertical section of an apothecium C ascospores D expansion of an vertical section of an apothecium E ectal excipular cells F asci G paraphyses H hairs with cap-like structures. Tochihara and Hosoya sp. nov. MycoBank No: 839618 Figs 13 , 14
Figure 13.

TNS-F-61920 (Holotype) A apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114468) C ascus D ascal pore iodine reactions D1MLZ (faintly +) without 3% KOH pretreatment D2MLZ (+) with 3% KOH pretreatment D3 IKI (+) without 3% KOH pretreatment E paraphysis F ascospores G ectal excipular cells H marginal section of an apothecium generating hairs I hairs with red resinous materials J apical amorphous materials of hairs. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–J), MLZ (D1, D2), IKI (D3). Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A); 10 µm (C–J).

Figure 14.

TNS-F-61920 (Holotype) A apothecia B vertical section of an apothecium C expansion of an vertical section of an apothecium D asci E hairs F ectal excipulum G paraphyses H ascospores.

Characterized by throughout red apothecia occurring on bamboo sheaths. Similar to in macro- and micromorphology and habitats, but has larger asci and ascospores. Japan, Shizuoka, Atami, Izusan, , ca 620 m, 8 Jun. 2015, on fallen sheaths of , M.Nakajima (TNS-F-61920). LC669463/UDB0779075 (ITS), LC533141 (LSU), LC533267 (mtSSU), LC533220 (RPB2). Referring to the similarity with . Akage-hina-no-chawantake. Apothecia scattered, superficial, 0.7–1.5 mm in diameter, long-stipitate, up to 2.0 mm high, externally covered with dark-red hairs. Disc concave, cream to pale yellow. Ectal excipulum well-developed textura prismatica and partly t. angularis, 6–13 × 2.0–2.5 µm, hyaline, relatively thick-walled, with smooth walls. Medullary excipulum textura intricata of hyaline hyphae up to 2 µm wide. Hairs straight, cylindrical, up to 160 µm long, 2.0–3.0 µm wide, pale brown but hyaline near the bases; hair cells narrowly septate, > 7 µm long, covered by big and amber-colored granules; granules big and dense near the apices and smaller and sparse near the bases, up to 2 µm in diameter near the apices, equipped with amber-colored resinous materials that dissolves in CB/LA at any position of hairs; apices with amber-colored apical amorphous materials, lacking any crystals. Asci (59–)61.4–70.2(–73) × (4.5–)4.7–5.6(–6) µm (av. 65.8 ± 4.4 × 5.2 ± 0.4 µm, n = 15), Q = (11.5–)12–13.6(–14.6) (av. 12.8 ± 0.8, n = 15), 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate; pore faintly blue in MLZ without 3% pretreatment, clear blue in MLZ with 3% KOH pretreatment and IKI without 3% KOH pretreatment. Ascospores (14–)15.8–20.7(–22) × (1.5–)1.7–2.0 µm (av. 18.2 ± 2.5 × 1.8 ± 0.2 µm, n = 15), Q = (7.5–)8.7–11.2(–12.6) (av. 9.9 ± 1.3, n = 15), septate, sometimes bent to U-shaped or S-shaped, containing conspicuous guttules; guttules hyaline but sometimes red. Paraphyses straight, up to 2 µm wide, septate, exceeding the asci 5–10 µm, initially cylindrical to clavate, later becoming narrowly lanceolate. Colony of NBRC 114468/TNS-F-61920 on PDA flat, sparse, dendritically spread. Context wooly, ocher to pale buff, dark buff from the reverse. Sectors and zonation absent. Aerial mycelium ocher to pale buff, dense cottony, developed near the center, forming white mycelium strands; margin distinct, flat and partly immersed into the agar. Asexual morph absent. Soluble pigments present, buff, dyeing agar without colony pale buff. Japan (Shizuoka). Currently known only from the type locality. TNS-F-61920 (Holotype) A apothecia B pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114468) C ascus D ascal pore iodine reactions D1MLZ (faintly +) without 3% KOH pretreatment D2MLZ (+) with 3% KOH pretreatment D3 IKI (+) without 3% KOH pretreatment E paraphysis F ascospores G ectal excipular cells H marginal section of an apothecium generating hairs I hairs with red resinous materials J apical amorphous materials of hairs. Mounted in CB/LA (C, E–J), MLZ (D1, D2), IKI (D3). Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A); 10 µm (C–J). is closely related to in having red hairs (Fig. 13I) and the ectal excipulum composed of well-developed rectangular cells in common (Fig. 13H, Fig. 14C, and Fig. 14F) (Zhuang and Wang 1998a). Compared with , has slightly larger asci, ascospores and hairs. Red guttules in ascospores were observed only in (Fig. 13F). In this study, we proposed the present fungus as a new species, because species delimitation analyses based on ITS sequences strongly supported that is different from (Fig. 3). TNS-F-61920 (Holotype) A apothecia B vertical section of an apothecium C expansion of an vertical section of an apothecium D asci E hairs F ectal excipulum G paraphyses H ascospores. Tochihara & Hosoya sp. nov. MycoBank No: 835706 Figs 15 , 16
Figure 15.

TNS-F-81401 (Holotype, A–F, H–J). TNS-F-16442 (G) A dried apothecia B a pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114475) C ectal excipular cells D ascus E an ascal pore MLZ (+) F ascal base with a perforated crozier G ascal base with a perforated crozier H septated paraphyses I ascospores J vertical section through the apothecium. Mounted in CB/LA (D, F–J), MLZ (E). Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 10 µm (C–J).

Figure 16.

TNS-F-81401 (Holotype A–D, F, G). TNS-F-16642 (E) A apothecium B vertical section of an apothecium C ascospores D asci (with basal structures sometimes with perforation) E ascal base arising from a crozier with perforation F paraphyses G ectal excipular cells H hairs.

Characterized by wooly appearance and yellow to orange discs, and distinguished from similar species in having shorter ascospores. Japan, Hokkaido, Tomakomai, Utonai,, ca 10 m, 16 Jun. 2018, on fallen sheaths of , Y.Tochihara & T.Hosoya (TNS-F-81401). LC669470/UDB0779082 (ITS), LC533174 (LSU), LC533269 (mtSSU), LC533217 (RPB2). Japan, Gunma, Higashiagatsuma, , ca 1330 m, 6 Jun. 2017, on fallen sheaths of , Y.Tochihara & T.Hosoya (TNS-F-80399, in bad condition). “sasi” means bamboo [host plants] and “brevispora” means shorter ascospores compared to . -no-youmou-chawantake. Apothecia gregarious, superficial, 0.6–1.3 mm in diameter, short-stipitate, up to 0.8 mm high, pure white, externally covered with long white hairs. Disc concave, yellow to pale orange when fresh and dry. Ectal excipulum textura prismatica to t. angularis, 3–16 × 2–10 µm, hyaline, thin-walled; surface smooth. Medullary excipulum textura intricata of hyaline hyphae up to 2 µm wide. Hairs straight, delicate, cylindrical with relatively acute apices, up to 190 × 2–3 µm, hyaline, totally granulate, thin-walled; apical cell a little longer than other cells, lacking any crystals, resinous materials, or apical amorphous materials. Asci (79–)82.5–90(–95) × (6–)6.6–8.1(–9) µm (av. 86 ± 4.0 × 7.4 ± 0.8 µm, n = 15), 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate; lateral parts sometimes swelling irregularly; pore blue in MLZ without 3% KOH pretreatment; croziers with perforation present at the basal septa. Ascospores (26–)27.9–36.1(–39) × (1.5–)1.7–2 µm (av. 32 ± 4.1 × 1.8 ± 0.2 µm, n = 17), Q = (13–)15–19.7(–21) (av. 17.5 ± 2.3, n = 17), long fusiform, usually 3-septate, rarely 0- to 2-septate (only observed in TNS-F-81401 because TNS-F-80399 was immature). Paraphyses straight, lanceolate, 2.5–4 µm wide, densely septate, exceeding the asci up to 15 µm. Note that the description is solely based on the holotype because another examined specimen TNS-F-80399 was in bad condition. Colony of NBRC 114475/TNS-F-81401 on PDA wrinkled. Context cottony and partially funiculose, white, turning ocher at the center; almost ocher except for the white margin from the reverse. Sectors and zonation absent. Aerial mycelium developed throughout the colony, concolous, forming mycelium strands. Margin indistinct, flat and immersed into agar. Soluble pigment absent. Asexual morph absent. Japan (cool-temperate zone, subarctic zone). is closely related to (TNS-F-16442, 16642) (Fig. 1) and occurs in the same habitats (that is, bamboo sheaths) but has shorter asci and ascospores. The ascal bases of the two species are very characteristic, in that they have croziers with perforations (Fig. 15G and Fig. 16E). In , this type of crozier has only been reported in (Baral 1984). Additionally, both species exceptionally lack any hair materials in . TNS-F-81401 (Holotype, A–F, H–J). TNS-F-16442 (G) A dried apothecia B a pure culture on PDA (NBRC 114475) C ectal excipular cells D ascus E an ascal pore MLZ (+) F ascal base with a perforated crozier G ascal base with a perforated crozier H septated paraphyses I ascospores J vertical section through the apothecium. Mounted in CB/LA (D, F–J), MLZ (E). Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 10 µm (C–J). The tropical species and (Dennis) W.Y. Zhuang also occur on bamboo sheaths. However, compared with the present fungus, the former has smaller ascospores and filiform paraphyses (Dennis 1954), and the latter has extremely large asci and ascospores (Dennis 1960). In cool-temperate to subarctic zones, and Raitv. occur on bamboo sheaths (Otani 1967; Raitviir 1985), but their ascospores are much shorter than those of the present fungus. TNS-F-81401 (Holotype A–D, F, G). TNS-F-16642 (E) A apothecium B vertical section of an apothecium C ascospores D asci (with basal structures sometimes with perforation) E ascal base arising from a crozier with perforation F paraphyses G ectal excipular cells H hairs. The wooly appearance and yellow disc of this species (Fig. 15A) resemble those of (Bres.) Baral; however, microscopic observations easily distinguish the two species. (Z.H. Yu and W.Y. Zhuang) Sasagawa, Tochihara & Hosoya, comb. et stat. nov. MycoBank No: 835709 Occurring on fallen leaves of of spp. or spp. in early summer and having needle-like ascospores. Shii-Kashi-hina-no-chawantake-modoki.

Specimen examined.

Japan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba, Mt. Tsukuba, 36.228539, 140.103504, ca 870 m, 23 Jun. 2007, on fallen leaves of , R.Sasagawa (TNS-F-16841). Japan, Ibaraki, Tsukuba, Amakubo, Tsukuba Botanical Garden, 36.101472, 140.110944, ca 20 m, 15 Jun. 2007, on fallen leaves of , R.Sasagawa (TNS-F-16838). JAPAN, Tottori, Yonago, Yonago Castle, 35.42437, 133.325472, ca 50 m, 3 Jun. 2018, on fallen leaves of , Y.Tochihara (TNS-F-81383). China (Hainan, Yunnan; Yu and Zhuang 2003). Japan (warm-temperate zone). The present fungus was treated as sp. 13 by Hosoya et al. (2010). This fungus occurs in the same habitats as , but it is easily distinguished in having longer and needle-like ascospores. resembles in the shape of ascospores, but the two species are different in that has long slender apothecial stipes, larger asci, longer ascospores, and wider paraphyses. In the present study, we transferred this fungus to and upgraded it from variety to species level, because this fungus is not phylogenetically related to ‘L’. (Fig. 1). The presence of apical amorphous materials of hairs was confirmed in this study (Suppl. material 1: Fig. S2).
  36 in total

1.  Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit.

Authors:  Y J Liu; S Whelen; B D Hall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects.

Authors:  Joan Pons; Timothy G Barraclough; Jesus Gomez-Zurita; Anabela Cardoso; Daniel P Duran; Steaphan Hazell; Sophien Kamoun; William D Sumlin; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Phylogenetic reassessment of Hyaloscyphaceae sensu lato (Helotiales, Leotiomycetes) based on multigene analyses.

Authors:  Jae-Gu Han; Tsuyoshi Hosoya; Gi-Ho Sung; Hyeon-Dong Shin
Journal:  Fungal Biol       Date:  2013-12-01

4.  Bioactive halogenated dihydroisocoumarins produced by the endophytic fungus Lachnum palmae isolated from Przewalskia tangutica.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Lv-Yi Yuan; Da-Le Guo; Ye Ye; Zhuo-Ma Da-Wa; Xiao-Ling Wang; Feng-Wei Ma; Lei Chen; Yu-Cheng Gu; Li-Sheng Ding; Yan Zhou
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Novel fungi from an ancient niche: cercosporoid and related sexual morphs on ferns.

Authors:  E Guatimosim; P B Schwartsburd; R W Barreto; P W Crous
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.051

6.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  A multigene phylogeny toward a new phylogenetic classification of Leotiomycetes.

Authors:  Peter R Johnston; Luis Quijada; Christopher A Smith; Hans-Otto Baral; Tsuyoshi Hosoya; Christiane Baschien; Kadri Pärtel; Wen-Ying Zhuang; Danny Haelewaters; Duckchul Park; Steffen Carl; Francesc López-Giráldez; Zheng Wang; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.515

8.  BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis.

Authors:  Remco Bouckaert; Timothy G Vaughan; Joëlle Barido-Sottani; Sebastián Duchêne; Mathieu Fourment; Alexandra Gavryushkina; Joseph Heled; Graham Jones; Denise Kühnert; Nicola De Maio; Michael Matschiner; Fábio K Mendes; Nicola F Müller; Huw A Ogilvie; Louis du Plessis; Alex Popinga; Andrew Rambaut; David Rasmussen; Igor Siveroni; Marc A Suchard; Chieh-Hsi Wu; Dong Xie; Chi Zhang; Tanja Stadler; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  The Taxon Hypothesis Paradigm-On the Unambiguous Detection and Communication of Taxa.

Authors:  Urmas Kõljalg; Henrik R Nilsson; Dmitry Schigel; Leho Tedersoo; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Tom W May; Andy F S Taylor; Thomas Stjernegaard Jeppesen; Tobias Guldberg Frøslev; Björn D Lindahl; Kadri Põldmaa; Irja Saar; Ave Suija; Anton Savchenko; Iryna Yatsiuk; Kristjan Adojaan; Filipp Ivanov; Timo Piirmann; Raivo Pöhönen; Allan Zirk; Kessy Abarenkov
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-30

10.  trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez; José M Silla-Martínez; Toni Gabaldón
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.