Zhiwei Dong1, Xingyue Liu2, Chuyang Mao1,3, Jinwu He1, Xueyan Li1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China. 2. Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China China Agricultural University Beijing China. 3. Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650204, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China.
Abstract
Here we report a new twisted-wing parasite species of the family Xenidae based on both morphological and molecular evidence. By using nearly complete mitogenomes, we confirmed the twisted-wing parasites on two wasps (Vespavelutina and Vespabicolor) (China: Yunnan) as the same species, and associated its neotenic females and alate males. Combining the mitogenomic data (COI) and morphological traits, this species was identified to be a new species of the genus Xenos, namely Xenosyangi Dong, Liu & Li, sp. nov. Detailed descriptions and illustrations are provided for the new species. Zhiwei Dong, Xingyue Liu, Chuyang Mao, Jinwu He, Xueyan Li.
Here we report a new twisted-wing parasite species of the family Xenidae based on both morphological and molecular evidence. By using nearly complete mitogenomes, we confirmed the twisted-wing parasites on two wasps (Vespavelutina and Vespabicolor) (China: Yunnan) as the same species, and associated its neotenic females and alate males. Combining the mitogenomic data (COI) and morphological traits, this species was identified to be a new species of the genus Xenos, namely Xenosyangi Dong, Liu & Li, sp. nov. Detailed descriptions and illustrations are provided for the new species. Zhiwei Dong, Xingyue Liu, Chuyang Mao, Jinwu He, Xueyan Li.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mitogenome; morphology; new species; taxonomy; wasp endoparasite
are obligate endoparasites of silverfish, cockroaches, mantids, orthopterans, hemipterans, wasps, bees and flies, and they comprise about 630 species in 15 families (Kathirithamby 2018). Among 10 extant families, Saunders, 1872 uses wasps as hosts and is the one of the species-rich strepsipteran families with ca 110 described species in four genera ( Ogloblin, 1923; Saunders, 1872; Saunders, 1872; Rossius, 1793) (Pohl and Beutel 2008; Cook 2014; Benda et al. 2019). Benda et al. (2019, 2021) comfirmed the paraphyly of and polyphyly of the genera and using molecular data. The genus is one of the twisted-wing insects parasitic on eusocial wasps (Pohl and Beutel 2008; Kathirithamby 2018) and contains 41 species worldwide (Suppl. material 1: Table S1). About two-third (26 species) of species are distributed in the Americas, while the remaining 15 species are distributed in Africa (five species), Africa/Europe (one species) and Asia (nine species) (Buysson 1903; Kifune and Maeta 1985; Yang 1999; McMahon et al. 2009; Cook 2019; Cook et al. 2020; Kathirithamby 2021) (Suppl. material 1: Table S1). Among nine Asian species, five are recorded in China [ (Buysson, 1903): Yunnan, Anhui, Taiwan; Kifune & Maeta, 1985, Kifune & Maeta, 1985 and Kifune & Maeta, 1985: Taiwan; Yang, 1999: Fujian], two in Japan [ Kifune & Maeta, 1975 and Nakase & Kato 2013], one in India [ Kinzelbach, 1978] and one in Indonesia [ Kifune, 1986] (Buysson 1903; Kifune and Maeta 1985; Yang 1999; Cook 2019). Rossius, 1793, which is the type species of both this genus and all strepsipteran insects (Rossius 1793), is a well-studied species with abundant data on its morphology and biology (Kifune and Maeta 1985; Manfredini et al. 2007; Nakase and Kato 2013; Richter et al. 2017).In December 2019, some wasps ( Lepeletier, 1836 and Fabricius, 1787) were collected by local villagers in southern Gaoligong Mountains (Yunnan, China). We checked these wasp individuals and found some of them parasitized by twisted-wing parasites. We collected male adults (Figs 1–3), cephalotheca of male puparium (Fig. 4), and neotenic females (Fig. 4) of these twisted-wing parasites from the abdomen and nests of their wasp hosts (Fig. 5). We assembled the mitogenome of a neotenic female from a nest using Next-generation technologies, and found that the mitogenome sequence is similar to that of in our previous work (Zhang et al. 2021). In this study, we further make a close morphological examination of males and neotenic females and cephalotheca of male puparium, and further assembled mitogenome of a male from a nest and another neotenic female from a nest to compare them with that of the neotenic female from a nest (Zhang et al. 2021). Our morphological and molecular results revealed that these adults of different sexes and different hosts are associated with the same species of , and is new to science.
Figure 1.
Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov., male adult (holotype) A dorsal view (PRN, Pronotum; AC, ; MN, Mesonotum; PC, ; SL, Scutellum; POL, ; PN, Postnontum) B ventral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figure 3.
Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov., male adult (SEM micrographs) A compound eye (lateral) B maxilla and (lateral) C fourth antennomer (dorsal).
Figure 4.
Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov. A male cephalotheca frontal view (CP, Clypeus; AN, Antenna; EYE, Eye; MD, Mandible; MX, ) B female ventral view (BC, brood canal; BOR, birth organs) C, D female cephalothorax ventral view (BO, birth opening; SBHP, segmental border between head and prothorax; OS, mouth opening; MD, mandible). Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figure 5.
Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov. and its host wasp. ABC wasp host parasitized by the new species (red arrows: male puparium (left), female(right)) D living male. (dorsal view).
Materials and methods
Specimens
The male and neotenic female specimens of the new species Dong, Liu & Li, sp. nov. were collected from the nests of both and in Gaoligong Mountains, Xiangda Township, Longling County, Yunnan Province in December, 2019. The type materials of the new species described in this paper are deposited in the Insect Collection of Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China (KIZ). Information on the other seven species (, , , , , , ) in the phylogenetic analysis was obtained from previous reports (Carapelli et al. 2006; McMahon et al. 2011; Nakase and Kato 2013; Jůzová et al. 2015; Benda et al. 2019, 2021). In detail, male and neotenic females of (COI GenBank accessions number: AB759562–AB759569; JN082805; MK431184; MN914546) were collected from Japan and Korea (McMahon et al. 2011; Nakase and Kato 2013; Benda et al. 2019, 2021); male pupa, males and neotenic females of (COI GenBank accessions number: AB759570–AB759582, MN914545, MK431183) were collected from China, Japan and Laos (Nakase and Kato 2013; Benda et al. 2019, 2021); two males of (COI GenBank accessions number: AB759583; MK431222) were collected from Japan (Nakase and Kato 2013; Benda et al. 2021); male and neotenic females of (COI GenBank accessions number: MN914547–MN914549; MK431187) were collected from USA (Benda et al. 2019, 2021); male and neotenic females of (COI GenBank accessions number: DQ364229.1; KF803535.1; MN914557; JN082806; MN914561; MK431205) were collected from Italy, Czech Republic, Austria (Carapelli et al. 2006; Jůzová et al. 2015; Benda et al. 2019, 2021); two neotenic females of (COI GenBank accessions number: MK431185–MK431186) were collected from Laos and Nepal, and two males of (COI GenBank accessions number: MK431189-MK431190) were collected from Malaysia (Benda et al. 2019); and male and neotenic females of (COI GenBank accessions number: MN914559–MN914560; MN914569) were collected from Croatia (Benda et al. 2021).
Morphological description
Images of the living adults were taken using a Canon 70D camera in conjunction with a Canon EF 100 mm f/2.8L IS USM. The habitus images were taken using a stereomicroscope Nikon, SMZ18 equipped with NIS-Elements (Nikon, Japan). Scanning electron microscopes (SEM) images were taken using TM4000 II (Hitachi, Japan). The specimens used for SEM were directly fixed in 70% ethanol, and then dried at the room temperature. Morphological terminology follows those of Kinzelbach (1971), Kifune and Maeta (1985), Kathirithamby and Hughes (2006) and Koeth et al. (2012).
DNA extraction, library construction, sequencing, mitogenome assembling and sequence comparison
Total genomic DNA of one male collected from nest and one neotenic female collected from nest was extracted using a TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, China) based on manual instruction. Library construction, sequencing, mitogenome assembly follows those in our previous work (Zhang et al. 2021), in which the mitogenome of one neotenic female collected from was sequenced. We assembled the nearly complete mitogenomes of both male and neotenic female individuals, and compared them with that in our previous work (Zhang et al. 2021). Then the mitogenome sequences of the three individuals were compared in pairs using BLAST in NCBI website.
Phylogenetic analyses
COI is an useful molecular marker for species identification in many insects, including twisted-wing parasites (Nakase and Kato 2013; Jůzová et al. 2015; Benda et al. 2021, 2019). Here, we used the COI sequences from the nearly complete mitogenomes of one male and one neotenic female of sp. nov. and another neotenic female individual in our previous work (Zhang et al. 2021) for the association between neotenic female and male adults.Combined with 45 COI sequences of published by others (Carapelli et al. 2006; McMahon et al. 2011; Nakase and Kato 2013; Jůzová et al. 2015; Benda et al. 2021), phylogenetic analyses were performed using maximum likelihood (ML), and maximum parsimony (MP) methods with four strepsipteran species Reichert, 1914, Kinzelbach, 1971, Perkins, 1918 and Kinzelbach, 1970 () (GenBank Accession: GAZM00000000.2, MK431155, KF803415, MK431154) as outgroups (Misof et al. 2014; Jůzová et al. 2015; Benda et al. 2019) . Briefly, COI sequences were first translated to amino acid sequences with the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code, and then aligned by codons using the ClustalW algorithm in MEGA-X v10.1.8 (Sudhir et al. 2018). Next, MEGA-X was also used to find the best nucleotide substitution model (“GTR+I”) and to reconstruct phylogenetic trees with the default parameters and 1000 bootstrap iterations.
Results
Sequences and phylogenetic analyses
We assembled nearly complete mitogenomes of one male adult collected from a nest (15324 bp) (GenBank accession number: OK329871) and one neotenic female collected from a nest (14670 bp) (GenBank accession number: OK32987). The mitogenomes of these two individuals in this study and one neotenic female in our previous work (Zhang et al. 2021) contain the same sequence except for the A+T-rich region and a gap between trnaM and trnaI, suggesting the nature of the same species for these three individuals with different sexes and different host. In this study, the mitogenome of male adult was annotated as 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs) and two ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs) and an A+T-rich region, while only 36 mitogenomic genes (excl. trnM) were annotated in the incomplete mitogenome sequence of the neotenic female.We further extracted a major fragment (1518 bp) of COI sequences from three Chinese individuals (one male and two neotenic females), and combined 45 COI sequences of identified species of reported by others to make the dataset for the phylogenetic analyses using ML and MP methods. All phylogenetic trees show that the three Chinese individuals (one male individual from the nest and two female individuals from the and nests) cluster together with high bootstrap values (Fig. 6). The genetic divergence among three Chinese individuals varies from 0 to 0.014 (Table 2, Fig. 6), which is equal to that among individuals and less than that among individuals. Especially, one male and one neotenic female from the same host nests () showed no genetic divergence, suggesting their conspecific identity. These findings confirm that these male and neotenic female individuals collected from different host populations are the same species. This species can be differentiated from all the other Eurasian species of based on the genetic analyses and further morphological examination, and thus stands as a new species described below.
Figure 6.
Phylogeny tree of species inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) using Maximum parsimony method. In total, 48 COI sequences of different species were used to investigate their phylogenetic relationships. two sequences (str6-b-female and -male) were sequenced in this study, and that of (MW222190.2) was sequenced in Zhang et al. (2021). Other 45 sequences were published by the following studies (Benda et al. 2021; McMahon et al. 2011; Nakase and Kato 2013; Jůzová et al. 2015; Carapelli et al. 2006). Reichert, 1914, Kinzelbach, 1971, Perkins, 1918 and Kinzelbach, 1970 (outgroup) were used as outgroups. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using Maximum Parsimony (MP), and Maximum Likelihood (ML). Branch support values are described as Maximum Parsimony (MP)/Maximum Likelihood (ML) in MP tree.
Table 2.
Summary of pairwise distances based on COI sequences among different species.
Group
Species
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
X.moutoni
0–0.014
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2
X.oxyodontes
0.111–0.123
0–0.071
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
3
X.yangi sp. nov.
0.191–0.208
0.269–0.287
0–0.014
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4
X.pecki
0.322–0.344
0.369–0.382
0.338–0.361
0–0.036
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5
X.ropalidiae
0.330–0.348
0.308–0.341
0.302–0.333
0.326–0.358
0.089
–
–
–
–
–
–
6
X.minor
0.425–0.432
0.451–0.465
0.497–0.508
0.544–0.560
0.367–0.377
0
–
–
–
–
–
7
X.vesparum
0.425–0.440
0.451–0.473
0.497–0.516
0.544–0.568
0.367–0.385
0–0.003
0–0.003
–
–
–
–
8
X.minor
0.425–0.432
0.451–0.465
0.497–0.508
0.544–0.560
0.367–0.377
0
0–0.003
NA
–
–
–
9
X.vesparum
0.411–0.434
0.439–0.475
0.494–0.507
0.526–0.588
0.358–0.393
0.001–0.003
0.001–0.007
0.001–0.003
0.005
–
–
10
X.ropalidiae
0.275–0.383
0.329–0.404
0.382–0.433
0.452–0.474
0.368–0.421
0.435–0.517
0.435–0.525
0.435–0.517
0.437–0.552
0.2
–
11
X.vespularum
0.481–0.505
0.451–0.478
0.4472–0.478
0.549–0.577
0.458–0.472
0.608–0.612
0.608–0.616
0.608–0.612
0.590–0.608
0.519–0.523
0.001
Taxonomy
Rossius, 1793
Dong, Liu & Li
sp. nov.http://zoobank.org/41C69672-2AD0-4E04-8C8B-F1F2352813A9Chinese name 杨氏胡蜂𧎥 Figs 1
, 2
, 3
, 4
, 5
Figure 2.
Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov., male adult A hind wing B right antenna C right maxilla and D right mandible E foreleg (right) F midleg (right) G hind leg (right) H proventrite I mesoventrite J penis. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. A, B dorsal H, I ventral C–J, F lateral.
Type locality.
China, Yunnan, Longling County, Xiangda Township.
Type materials.
: male (KIZ0130767), “Gaoligong Mountains, Xiangda Township, Longling County, Yunnan Province, , 1666 m, 20.XII.2019, local villagers leg.”, kept in 75% ethanol, [red label]. (KIZ). : four males (KIZ0130768–KIZ0130771), three neotenic females (KIZ0130772–KIZ0130774), same data as holotype (KIZ), kept in 75% ethanol, [yellow label].Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov., male adult (holotype) A dorsal view (PRN, Pronotum; AC, ; MN, Mesonotum; PC, ; SL, Scutellum; POL, ; PN, Postnontum) B ventral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Other material examined.
One neotenic female, “Gaoligong Mountains, Xiangda Township, Longling County, Yunnan Province, 20. XII. 2019, local villagers leg.”, partially used for extracting genomic DNA (accession number MW222190; Zhang et al. 2021). One neotenic female and one male, “Gaoligong Mountains, Xiangda Township, Longling County, Yunnan Province, 20. XII. 2019, local villagers leg.”, both partially used for extracting genomic DNA in this study.
Diagnosis.
Male. Head transverse. Antenna (Fig. 2B) four-segmented, 1st with distal lateral extension and wider than 2nd, 3rd and 4th flabellate with subequal length. Palpus twice as long as maxilla (Fig. 2C). Mandible (Fig. 2D) slender, widened at base, tapering at tip. pentagonal. Scutellum longitudinally elongated, triangular. posteromedially with a small U-shaped notch, forming a pair of small lobes (Fig. 2H). Mesoventrite posteromedially bifurcated into a pair of long digitiform projections (Fig. 2I). Tarsus four-segmented, without claws (Fig. 2E–G). Penis colter-shaped (Fig. 2J). Cephalotheca of male puparium (Fig. 4A). almost oval, bigger than mandible. Clypeus furrowed and close to mandible. Antenna half size of eye. Neotenic female (Fig. 4B–D). Cephalothorax almost rectangular, 3/4 strongly contracted; birth opening, protuberance (Fig. 4C); apex of mandibles straight (Fig. 4D).Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov., male adult A hind wing B right antenna C right maxilla and D right mandible E foreleg (right) F midleg (right) G hind leg (right) H proventrite I mesoventrite J penis. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. A, B dorsal H, I ventral C–J, F lateral.
Description.
Male (Fig. 1). 5.6 mm (holotype), 5.5–8.1 mm (paratypes) (combined length of head, pronotum and abdomen). (Fig. 1A, B): head, antenna, maxillary , coxa, and abdomen black; femur, tibia and tarsus brown; hind wing semi-transparent. transverse, 1.44 mm in width. raspberries-like, each composed of about 84 ommatidia, ommatidiaprominent and separated by chitinous bridges covered with micortrichia (Fig. 3A). four-segmented (Fig. 2B), scapus wider than pedicellus, scapus with distal lateral extension, pedicellus half as long as scapus, 3rd and 4th flabellate with subequal length, hirsute (Fig. 3B). (Fig. 2J) smooth, sword-like, gradually thicker from middle until 3/4, and then sharply tapering at tip. (Figs 2C, 3B) covered with short hairs, twice half as long as maxillae, narrower. (Fig. 1A) quadrangular with a protuberant apex. (Fig. 1A) with two ends turned up, central depression. (Fig. 1A) saddle-shaped, central M-shaped depression, pseudo-haltere on both sides. (Fig. 1A) pentagonal with round tops. (Fig. 1A) acutely triangular. (Fig. 1A) broad, generally rounded, but emarginate anteriorly. (Fig. 1A) triangular.Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov., male adult (SEM micrographs) A compound eye (lateral) B maxilla and (lateral) C fourth antennomer (dorsal).sector with nine veins (Fig. 2A). C and Sc fused, half length of costal margin. R1 and R2 veins almost glued together, R2 vein extending from middle to wing apex; R3 vein from middle to outer margin of wing; R4 vein terminated at distal 1/4 of the wing and approximating R5 vein. MA, CuA1, CuA2 and CuP veins present and uninterrupted.laterally with anepisternum angulately curved at middle, and posteromedially with a small U-shaped notch, forming a pair of short lobes (Fig. 2H); with basisternum transversely rectangular, anterolaterally roundly prominent, posterolaterally hook-like, sternellum broadly rhombic, posteriorly bifurcated into a pair of long digitiform projections (Fig. 2I). (Fig. 2E) coxa expands, trochanterofemur with a protuberance near coxa, tibia longer than femur, widened near tarsus, tarsus four-segmented, 1st tarsomere with oval pit outside, 4th tarsomer without claws. (Fig. 2F) coxa as long as trochanterofemur, other parts similar to those of foreleg. (Fig. 2G) trochanter half length of femur, femur strong. 10-segmented as long as thorax, black; segment I tergites and sternites shrink; segment II–VIII sternites distinctly broader than tergites, segment IX narrower than segment VIII, with caudally elongated subgenital plate; segment X tube-like, curved. Anus flat. Penis colter-shaped (Fig. 2J).Cephalotheca of male puparium (Fig. 4A). Cephalotheca elliptical. Maxilla almost oval, bigger than mandible. Clypeus furrowed and close to mandible. Antenna half size of eye.Neotenic female (Fig. 4B–D). Length 11.0–16.0 mm, maximum breadth of abdomen about 4.5–5.0 mm (Fig. 4B); cephalothorax 2.2 mm in length and 1.76 mm in width (Fig. 4C, D). Coloration: cephalothorax brownish yellow, abdomen yellow. Cephalothorax almost rectangular, 3/4 strongly contracted; birth opening, protuberance (Fig. 4C); apex of mandible straight (Fig. 4D); abdomen slender, four birth organs.Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov. A male cephalotheca frontal view (CP, Clypeus; AN, Antenna; EYE, Eye; MD, Mandible; MX, ) B female ventral view (BC, brood canal; BOR, birth organs) C, D female cephalothorax ventral view (BO, birth opening; SBHP, segmental border between head and prothorax; OS, mouth opening; MD, mandible). Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Comparative notes.
Considering the geographic distance and host association of those species of Africa and Americas, we mainly compared the male adult, the cephalotheca of the male papurium, and the neotenic female of this new species with ten described known species distributed in Asia (nine species) and Europe (one species) (Table 1). These species were originally described based on the male adult, the cephalotheca of the male papurium, and/or the neotenic female (Table 1). The new species can be distinguished from (China: Yunnan, Anhui, Taiwan), (China: Fujian), (China: Taiwan), (Indonesia) and (Japan) based on the external characters of male adult. The male adult of maxilla as long as and the postlumbium is straight anteriorly and posteriorly (Kifune and Maeta 1985). The male adult of (Japan) has the postlumbium rounded anteriorly and posteriorly (Nakase and Kato 2013). The proventrite is not concaved in (China: Fujian), (China: Taiwan) and (Indonesia) (Kifune and Maeta 1985; Kifune 1986; Yang 1999).
Table 1.
Distribution and described stages of 11 species from Asia and Europe. Literature in which the species was originally described is highlighted in bold.
Species
Distribution
Male
Cephalotheca of male puparium
Neotenic female
Primary larvae
Xenosyangi Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov.
China: Yunnan
This study
This study
This study
NA
Xenosmoutoni (Buysson, 1903)
China: Yunnan, Anhui, Taiwan
Kifune & Maeta, 1985
Buysson, 1904
Buysson, 1903
NA
Xenoscircularis Kifune & Maeta 1985
China: Taiwan
NA
NA
Kifune & Maeta, 1985
NA
Xenosyamaneorum Kifune & Maeta, 1985
China: Taiwan
NA
Kifune & Maeta, 1985
Kifune & Maeta, 1985
NA
Xenosformosanus Kifune & Maeta, 1985
China: Taiwan
Kifune & Maeta, 1985
Kifune & Maeta, 1985
Kifune & Maeta, 1985
NA
Xenosdianshuiwengi Yang, 1999
China: Fujian
Yang, 1999
NA
NA
NA
Xenosoxyodontes Yuta & Makoto 2013
Japan
Yuta & Makoto, 2013
Yuta & Makoto, 2013
Yuta & Makoto, 2013
NA
Xenosvespularum Kifune & Maeta, 1975
Japan
Kifune & Maeta, 1975
Kifune & Maeta, 1975
Kifune & Maeta, 1975
NA
Xenoshebraei Kinzelbach, 1978
India
NA
Kinzelbach, 1978
Kinzelbach, 1978
NA
Xenosprovesparum Kifune,1986
Indonesia
Kifune, 1986
Kifune, 1986
Kifune, 1986
NA
Xenosvesparum Rossius, 1793
Europe; Northern Africa
Rossius, 1793
Rossius, 1793
Rossius, 1793
Pohl & Beutel, 2005
NA: Not availabl
Distribution and described stages of 11 species from Asia and Europe. Literature in which the species was originally described is highlighted in bold.NA: Not availablThe new species can be distinguished from (China: Taiwan), (China: Taiwan), (Japan), (India) and (Europe; Northern Africa) by the female cephalothorax. It is almost circular or ovoid in , , and (Kifune and Maeta 1975; Kifune and Maeta 1985). The female cephalothorax is slightly wider than long in . Besides that, this new species can be also separated from and by the oval maxillae of the male cephalotheca (the two compared species lack the oval maxillae of the male cephalotheca).
Distribution.
China (Yunnan).
Biology.
The hosts of this new species are (Fig. 5A) and (Fig. 5B). It parasitizes in the host abdomen. Its body partly protrudes from the portion between the two abdominal segments of the hosts. One wasp can usually carry 1–4 parasite individuals (Fig. 5C). After emergence, male adults fly away from their hosts (Fig. 5D). Neotenic females remain in the host’s abdomen with their anterior cephalothorax protruding. When neotenic females are removed from their host abdomen, they can be seen to be covered with larval exuviae.Dong, Liu & Li sp. nov. and its host wasp. ABC wasp host parasitized by the new species (red arrows: male puparium (left), female(right)) D living male. (dorsal view).
Etymology.
The specific epithet is dedicated to the late famous Chinese entomologist Chi-Kun Yang, who made significant contributions to the studies on in China.Phylogeny tree of species inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) using Maximum parsimony method. In total, 48 COI sequences of different species were used to investigate their phylogenetic relationships. two sequences (str6-b-female and -male) were sequenced in this study, and that of (MW222190.2) was sequenced in Zhang et al. (2021). Other 45 sequences were published by the following studies (Benda et al. 2021; McMahon et al. 2011; Nakase and Kato 2013; Jůzová et al. 2015; Carapelli et al. 2006). Reichert, 1914, Kinzelbach, 1971, Perkins, 1918 and Kinzelbach, 1970 (outgroup) were used as outgroups. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using Maximum Parsimony (MP), and Maximum Likelihood (ML). Branch support values are described as Maximum Parsimony (MP)/Maximum Likelihood (ML) in MP tree.
Discussion
Due to the discovery of sp. nov., the number of Chinese species increases to six (Fig. 7) while the Asian species add up to ten. In general, the Asian species are endoparasites of (yellow jackets and hornets) and (paperwasps) (Suppl. material 1: Table S1). () and () are common hosts for most species (Cook 2019). Except two Taiwanese species parasiting on , all other eight Asian species parasite on . Considering the species diversity of and in China (Carpenter 2011), we confirm the rich species diversity in China.
Figure 7.
Distribution of the species from China.
Distribution of the species from China.Among the 10 Asian species, six species (including the new species here) are described based on both males and neotenic females, one species solely based on males, two species are based on neotenic females and the cepholotheca of the male puparium, and one species is solely based on neotenic females (Table 1). This situation in describing new species based only on neotenic females is also common in the taxonomy of from Africa and America (Suppl. material 1: Table S1). Considering the sexual dimorphism in twisted-wing parasites it is feasible to describe a new species when both male and female specimens are available. Thus, the association of both sexes and different stages of development in the same species of is crucial for future studies. This study provide an example of associating both sexes using combined biological, morphological and molecular evidence.was originally described by Buysson (1903) based on only neotenic female specimens collected in Anhui (Ngan-hoei = Anhui Prov., Yng-chan = Xuanchen?宣城) and Yunnan (Yun-nam = Yunnan Prov., Tsé-kou = Cigu茨古 (Xu and Qiu 2020). Then, Buysson (1904) recorded its male puparium cephalotheca based on the specimens collected from the type locality. Kifune (1985) redescribed the male adult and cephalotheca of the male puparium of this species from Taiwan. In Buysson’s work, the cephalotheca of the male puparium might be the main diagnostic trait to identify Taiwan . However, the author did not give a detailed description of the male puparium cephalotheca. According to available male specimens, cephalotheca of the male puparium and the neotenic females of the new species in the present study, we compared the different stages of the new species with the description of a male adult (Taiwan), cephalotheca of the male paparium (type locality), or the neotenic female (type locality) of , facilitating the delimitation of these two species both recorded from Yunnan. In addition, our study affirms again that molecular data, e.g., the DNA barcodes, are essential for the association of dimorphic sexes and different developmental stages in twisted-wing parasites taxonomy.In the molecular data analysis, we noticed that different populations of five monophylic species (, , , , and ) show genetic divergence of less than 0.036 (Table 2). Especially for , the genetic divergence among their different populations from Laos, China, Japan is less than 0.014 (Table 2). For the other lineages including specimens identified as , and , we noticed that and form a clade including four groups (group 6, 7, 8 and 9) (Fig. 6) and their genetic divergences are less than 0.007 (Table 2), suggesting these specimens may be the same species (Benda et al. 2021). On the other hand, different populations (Laos, Nepal, Malaysia) of form two separate groups (5 and 10) with a genetic divergence of 0.368–0.421 (Table 2), which may include different species (Benda et al. 2021). These findings suggest that an integrated methodology of molecular, biological, and morphological evidence should be adopted in taxonomy of such endoparasites as twisted-wing insects.Summary of pairwise distances based on COI sequences among different species.
Authors: Bernhard Misof; Shanlin Liu; Karen Meusemann; Ralph S Peters; Alexander Donath; Christoph Mayer; Paul B Frandsen; Jessica Ware; Tomáš Flouri; Rolf G Beutel; Oliver Niehuis; Malte Petersen; Fernando Izquierdo-Carrasco; Torsten Wappler; Jes Rust; Andre J Aberer; Ulrike Aspöck; Horst Aspöck; Daniela Bartel; Alexander Blanke; Simon Berger; Alexander Böhm; Thomas R Buckley; Brett Calcott; Junqing Chen; Frank Friedrich; Makiko Fukui; Mari Fujita; Carola Greve; Peter Grobe; Shengchang Gu; Ying Huang; Lars S Jermiin; Akito Y Kawahara; Lars Krogmann; Martin Kubiak; Robert Lanfear; Harald Letsch; Yiyuan Li; Zhenyu Li; Jiguang Li; Haorong Lu; Ryuichiro Machida; Yuta Mashimo; Pashalia Kapli; Duane D McKenna; Guanliang Meng; Yasutaka Nakagaki; José Luis Navarrete-Heredia; Michael Ott; Yanxiang Ou; Günther Pass; Lars Podsiadlowski; Hans Pohl; Björn M von Reumont; Kai Schütte; Kaoru Sekiya; Shota Shimizu; Adam Slipinski; Alexandros Stamatakis; Wenhui Song; Xu Su; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Meihua Tan; Xuemei Tan; Min Tang; Jingbo Tang; Gerald Timelthaler; Shigekazu Tomizuka; Michelle Trautwein; Xiaoli Tong; Toshiki Uchifune; Manfred G Walzl; Brian M Wiegmann; Jeanne Wilbrandt; Benjamin Wipfler; Thomas K F Wong; Qiong Wu; Gengxiong Wu; Yinlong Xie; Shenzhou Yang; Qing Yang; David K Yeates; Kazunori Yoshizawa; Qing Zhang; Rui Zhang; Wenwei Zhang; Yunhui Zhang; Jing Zhao; Chengran Zhou; Lili Zhou; Tanja Ziesmann; Shijie Zou; Yingrui Li; Xun Xu; Yong Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Karl M Kjer; Xin Zhou Journal: Science Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Antonio Carapelli; Laura Vannini; Francesco Nardi; Jeffrey L Boore; Laura Beani; Romano Dallai; Francesco Frati Journal: Gene Date: 2006-07-19 Impact factor: 3.688