| Literature DB >> 35210812 |
Hua Zhang1,2,3, Shaobing Xie1,2,3, Ruohao Fan1,2,3, Fengjun Wang1,2,3, Zhihai Xie1,2,3, Weihong Jiang1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by high heterogeneity and postoperative recurrence rate. This study aimed to explore the clinical significance of activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) in endotyping CRSwNP and predicting its recurrence.Entities:
Keywords: activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule; biomarker; chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; endotypes; recurrence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35210812 PMCID: PMC8858028 DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S350609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inflamm Res ISSN: 1178-7031
The Demographic and Clinical Features of Participants
| Variables | HC Group (n=40) | neCRSwNP Group (n=70) | eCRSwNP Group (n=50) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 41.0±10.6 | 41.4±10.7 | 41.0±11.6 | 0.974 |
| Gender (male/female) | 21/19 | 39/31 | 27/23 | 0.946 |
| Smoking (yes/no) | 12/28 | 18/52 | 15/35 | 0.836 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.0±1.4 | 23.0±1.9 | 23.2±1.7 | 0.794 |
| Allergic rhinitis (yes/no) | 0/40 | 10/60 | 16/34 | <0.001 |
| Asthma (yes/no) | 0/40 | 5/65 | 9/41 | 0.009 |
| Peripheral eosinophil count (109/L) | 0.1±0.1 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 | <0.001 |
| Peripheral eosinophil percentage (%) | 2.6±1.3 | 3.1±1.3 | 3.9±1.1 | <0.001 |
| Tissue eosinophil count (n/HPF) | – | 16.5±6.5 | 47.6±20.6 | <0.001 |
| Tissue eosinophil percentage (%) | – | 6.4±1.9 | 22.0±8.6 | <0.001 |
| Disease duration, years | – | 3.0±2.5 | 3.4±3.5 | 0.022 |
| Preoperative VAS score | – | 5.2±1.6 | 5.7±1.8 | 0.130 |
| Preoperative Lund-Mackay score | – | 18.4±3.6 | 18.5±3.4 | 0.856 |
Abbreviations: neCRSwNP, non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; eCRSwNP, eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; HC, healthy control; BMI, body mass index; HPF, high power field; VAS, visual analogue scale.
Figure 1Comparison of serum ALCAM levels between CRSwNP patients and HCs. (A) ALCAM levels were significantly elevated in the CRSwNP group than the HC group. (B) Serum ALCAM levels were markedly enhanced in the eCRSwNP group than the neCRSwNP and HC groups.
Relationship Between Serum ALCAM and Clinical Variables in CRSwNP Patients
| Variables | r | P |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | −0.038 | 0.675 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | −0.159 | 0.083 |
| Peripheral eosinophil count (109/L) | 0.186 | 0.042 |
| Peripheral eosinophil percentage (%) | 0.008 | 0.388 |
| Disease duration, months | 0.083 | 0.365 |
| Preoperative VAS score | 0.112 | 0.221 |
| Preoperative Lund-Mackay score | −0.149 | 0.104 |
| Tissue eosinophil count (n/HPF) | 0.654 | <0.001 |
| Tissue eosinophil percentage (%) | 0.680 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CRSwNP, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; BMI, body mass index; VAS, visual analogue scale; HPF, high power field.
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with eCRSwNP
| Variables | OR | 95% CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allergic rhinitis (yes/no) | 1.677 | 0.544–5.164 | 0.368 |
| Asthma (yes/no) | 1.891 | 0.475–7.529 | 0.366 |
| Peripheral eosinophil count (109/L) | 3.227 | 0.009–1171.23 | 0.697 |
| Peripheral eosinophil percentage (%) | 1.627 | 1.079–2.452 | 0.020 |
| Disease duration, years | 1.074 | 0.928–1.242 | 0.339 |
| Serum ALCAM level (ng/mL) | 1.155 | 1.074–1.243 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CRSwNP, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; OR, odds rate; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2The ROC curves of potentially predictive biomarkers for discriminating eCRSwNP. (A) serum ALCAM; (B) peripheral eosinophil percentage.
Demographic Characteristics Between Primary and Recurrent CRSwNP Patients
| Variables | Non-Recurrent Group (n=78) | Recurrent Group (n=32) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 41.2±10.9 | 42.0±12.0 | 0.750 |
| Gender (male/female) | 44/34 | 15/17 | 0.404 |
| Smoking(yes/no), n | 24/54 | 7/25 | 0.484 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.1±1.8 | 22.6±1.8 | 0.192 |
| Allergic rhinitis(yes/no), n | 12/66 | 11/21 | 0.022 |
| Asthma(yes/no), n | 8/70 | 4/28 | 0.743 |
| Peripheral eosinophil count (109/L) | 0.3±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.097 |
| Peripheral eosinophil percentage (%) | 3.4±1.3 | 3.6±1.3 | 0.455 |
| Disease duration, years | 3.2±2.9 | 3.2±3.2 | 0.989 |
| Preoperative VAS score | 5.3±1.7 | 5.7±1.8 | 0.315 |
| Preoperative Lund-Mackay score | 18.7±3.4 | 17.9±3.6 | 0.191 |
| Tissue eosinophil count (n/HPF) | 24.3±17.7 | 43.9±23.1 | <0.001 |
| Tissue eosinophil percentage (%) | 10.5±7.9 | 18.8±10.8 | <0.001 |
| neCRSwNP/eCRSwNP | 52/26 | 12/20 | 0.006 |
Abbreviations: neCRSwNP, non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; eCRSwNP, eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; BMI, body mass index; HPF, high power field; VAS, visual analogue scale.
Figure 3The serum ALCAM levels in the non-recurrent CRSwNP patients and the recurrent CRSwNP patients. (A) Serum ALCAM concentrations were elevated in the recurrent CRSwNP group than the non-recurrent CRSwNP group. (B) Serum ALCAM levels were significantly enhanced in the recurrent eCRSwNP group than the non-recurrent eCRSwNP and non-recurrent neCRSwNP groups.
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with the Recurrence of CRSwNP
| Variables | OR | 95% CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allergic rhinitis (yes/no) | 2.549 | 0.816–7.961 | 0.107 |
| Tissue eosinophil count (n/HPF) | 1.053 | 0.990–1.120 | 0.103 |
| Tissue eosinophil percentage (%) | 0.887 | 0.751–1.048 | 0.160 |
| neCRSwNP/eCRSwNP | 1.642 | 0.282–9.542 | 0.581 |
| Serum ALCAM level (ng/mL) | 1.233 | 1.099–1.383 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CRSwNP, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; OR, odds rate; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4The ROC curve (A) and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (B) for serum ALCAM level in the prediction of CRSwNP recurrence.
Figure 5Comparison of ALCAM mRNA levels in the tissue of CRSwNP patients and HCs. (A) ALCAM mRNA expressions were elevated in the CRSwNP group than the HC group. (B) ALCAM mRNA levels were significantly increased in the eCRSwNP group than the neCRSwNP group. (C) no significant difference was observed in mRNA levels between the non-recurrent CRSwNP group and the recurrent CRSwNP group.
Figure 6The ALCAM protein expression in the tissue based on IHC. Representative images of ALCAM staining from HCs (A and B), eCRSwNP patients (C and D) and neCRSwNP patients (E and F).
Figure 7The ALCAM protein expression in the nasal polyps tissue based on IHC. Representative images of ALCAM staining from non-recurrent CRSwNP patients (A and B) and recurrent CRSwNP patients (C and D).
Figure 8Quantitative analysis of ALCAM immunoreactivity in nasal poly and HC samples. (A) ALCAM positive cell number was significantly greater in the eCRSwNP group than the neCRSwNP and HC groups. (B) ALCAM positive cell number was significantly greater in the recurrent CRSwNP group than the non-recurrent CRSwNP group and.
Figure 9The ALCAM protein expression in the tissue based on WB. (A) WB images of ALCAM among eCRSwNP, neCRSwNP and HC groups. (B) WB images of ALCAM between the recurrent CRSwNP and non-recurrent CRSwNP groups. (C) comparison of ALCAM relative protein level among eCRSwNP, neCRSwNP and HC groups. (D) comparison of ALCAM relative protein level between the recurrent CRSwNP and non-recurrent CRSwNP groups.
Figure 10Hypothetical model showing association between ALCAM expression and eosinophil infiltration and recurrence in CRSwNP. On allergens derived from irritants and bacteria challenge, DCs were activated and the production of ALCAM was increased, releasing its soluble form (sALCAM). This promoted the ALCAM–CD6 interactions and enhanced Th2 immune responses, then induced the eosinophil tissue infiltration and aggravation of eosinophilic inflammation, resulting in tissue eosinophilia and recurrence in CRSwNP.