Literature DB >> 35210535

Obesity paradox in ICU? A topic of discussion, not a key issue!

Gérard Audibert1, Aurélie Bannay2, Olivier Ziegler3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35210535      PMCID: PMC8866110          DOI: 10.1038/s41366-022-01099-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.551


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor:

We thank Stovitz et al. [1] for their valuable comments on our paper [2]. We notice that they agree on the basis of the study i.e. analyzing differences in covid-19 mortality risk across BMI categories. Moreover, they do not seem to challenge the main finding of our study. Their main focus relates to the “obesity paradox” which is debated in our discussion section. We raised the notion of obesity paradox as an hypothesis of what we measured in critically ill patients with COVID 19, whereas Stovitz et al. [1] consider that there was a collider stratification bias. This was already discussed before [3]. The main argument being that our findings may be in relation with an « unmeasured reason » responsible for severe COVID 19 both in non-obese patients and in patients with severe obesity. Although this may be partially true [4], it is difficult to figure out what could be these « unmeasured reasons », present both in non-obese and severely obese patients. Moreover, obesity paradox does not apply to all categories of BMI. It disappears for class 3 Obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²), as clearly demonstrated by recent studies of ICU critically ill patients [5-7]. More precisely, Chetboun et al. [7] showed a significant relation between BMI and invasive mechanical ventilation but adjusted regression models showed a significant association between BMI and 28-day all-cause mortality, which was only increased in obesity class 3 (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) (adjusted HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.06–2.64). Gong et al. [8] reported significant associations between BMI and obesity and increased development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that persist after adjusting for known risk factors for the development of ARDS. While obesity was found to be associated with increased ICU length of stay, there was no significant association between obesity and ARDS mortality, after adjusting for potential predictors of mortality including Apache III score, etiology of ARDS (septic shock or direct pulmonary injury) or comorbidities. Moreover a paradoxical better survival has been generally observed in critically ill patients with obesity [9], with overweight and moderate obesity being protective as compared with lean BMI or normal BMI or more severe obesity [10]. To take into account the arguments of Stovitz et al. [1, 3], we agree with this slightly modified formulation of a “seemingly obesity survival paradox” observed in critically ill patients with COVID 19 and we reinforce our conclusion that “obesity paradox should not be interpreted as a safety message for moderate obese patients with severe COVID19, but should lead intensivists to aggressively manage these patients in view of their good prognosis”.
  6 in total

1.  The paradox prevails: Outcomes are better in critically ill obese patients regardless of the comorbidity burden.

Authors:  Prakash Acharya; Laxmi Upadhyay; Ahmed Qavi; Ashutossh Naaraayan; Stephen Jesmajian; Sabita Acharya; Rajani Bharati
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 2.  Obesity in the critically ill: a narrative review.

Authors:  Miet Schetz; Audrey De Jong; Adam M Deane; Wilfried Druml; Pleun Hemelaar; Paolo Pelosi; Peter Pickkers; Annika Reintam-Blaser; Jason Roberts; Yasser Sakr; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US.

Authors:  Shruti Gupta; Salim S Hayek; Wei Wang; Lili Chan; Kusum S Mathews; Michal L Melamed; Samantha K Brenner; Amanda Leonberg-Yoo; Edward J Schenck; Jared Radbel; Jochen Reiser; Anip Bansal; Anand Srivastava; Yan Zhou; Anne Sutherland; Adam Green; Alexandre M Shehata; Nitender Goyal; Anitha Vijayan; Juan Carlos Q Velez; Shahzad Shaefi; Chirag R Parikh; Justin Arunthamakun; Ambarish M Athavale; Allon N Friedman; Samuel A P Short; Zoe A Kibbelaar; Samah Abu Omar; Andrew J Admon; John P Donnelly; Hayley B Gershengorn; Miguel A Hernán; Matthew W Semler; David E Leaf
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Structural Bias in Studies of Cardiovascular Disease: Let's Not Be Fooled by the "Obesity Paradox".

Authors:  Steven D Stovitz; Hailey R Banack; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Body mass index is associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  M N Gong; E K Bajwa; B T Thompson; D C Christiani
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Collider Bias Is Only a Partial Explanation for the Obesity Paradox.

Authors:  Matthew Sperrin; Jane Candlish; Ellena Badrick; Andrew Renehan; Iain Buchan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.822

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Obesity Impact on SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Pros and Cons "Obesity Paradox"-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Damiana-Maria Vulturar; Carmen-Bianca Crivii; Olga Hilda Orăsan; Emanuel Palade; Anca-Dana Buzoianu; Iulia Georgiana Zehan; Doina Adina Todea
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.