Literature DB >> 35210147

Distribution and Correlates of Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Early Osteoarthritis and Preoperative Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Taghi Ramazanian1, Shi Yan2, Pouria Rouzrokh3, Cody C Wyles4, Thomas J O Byrne2, Michael J Taunton5, Hilal Maradit Kremers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the distribution of hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle in healthy populations; however, few have evaluated this metric in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to compare HKA angle distribution in early and advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients.
METHODS: Full limb radiographs were used to measure HKA angle for 983 subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort and 4,901 pre-TKA patients from an institutional cohort. Measurements were made using a previously validated deep learning algorithm. Linear regression models were used to determine the association of HKA alignment angle with patient characteristics.
RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation HKA angle was -1.3° ± 3.2° in the OAI cohort and -4.1° ± 6.1° in the pre-TKA cohort. In the OAI cohort, normal alignment (64%) was the most common knee alignment followed by varus (29%), and valgus (7%). In pre-TKA patients, the most common alignment was varus (62%), followed by normal (27%) and valgus (11%). In pre-TKA patients, mean HKA angle in primary knee OA, post-traumatic knee OA, and rheumatoid arthritis patients were -4.3° ± 6.1°, -3.2° ± 6.4°, and -2.9° ± 6.1°, respectively. HKA angle was strongly associated (P < .001) with gender and body mass index.
CONCLUSION: TKA patients have a wider alignment distribution and more severe varus and valgus alignment than individuals "at risk" for knee OA from the OAI cohort. These epidemiologic findings improve our understanding of HKA angle distribution and its correlation with demographic characteristics in early and late-stage arthritis.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; deep learning; knee arthroplasty; knee coronal alignment; osteoarthritis epidemiology

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35210147      PMCID: PMC9117418          DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.435


  5 in total

1.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Sharma; J Song; D T Felson; S Cahue; E Shamiyeh; D D Dunlop
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee.

Authors:  R W Hsu; S Himeno; M B Coventry; E Y Chao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  G M Brouwer; A W van Tol; A P Bergink; J N Belo; R M D Bernsen; M Reijman; H A P Pols; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-04

5.  Older Adults without Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis: Knee Alignment and Knee Range of Motion.

Authors:  Lissa Fahlman; Emmeline Sangeorzan; Nimisha Chheda; Daphne Lambright
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-01-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.