| Literature DB >> 35209922 |
Chukwuka Eze1, Elia Lombardo2, Lukas Nierer2, Yuqing Xiong2, Maximilian Niyazi2,3, Claus Belka2,3,4, Farkhad Manapov2,3,4, Stefanie Corradini2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a relatively novel advancement in the field of radiation oncology, ensuring superior soft-tissue visualisation, allowing for online plan adaptation to anatomical and functional interfractional changes and improved motion management. Platinum-based chemoradiation followed by durvalumab is the recommended treatment for stage IIB(N1)/III NSCLC. However, this is only the case for patients with favourable risk factors and sufficient pulmonary function and reserve.Entities:
Keywords: Hypofractionation; Image-guided radiotherapy; NSCLC; Pulmonary function; Thoracic radiotherapy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35209922 PMCID: PMC8876180 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02011-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Fig. 1PET/CT at initial diagnosis 12/2020; note enhanced FDG-uptake in the primary tumour (SUVmax 7) and LN pos. 11R (SUVmax 4) and Follow-up CT 3 months post-MRgRT in 04/2021 demonstrating a partial remission
Fig. 2Box-plot of percentage change in D2, D50, D95 and D98 for all 16 fractions compared to the baseline plan
Relevant organs at risk dosimetric parameters of the baseline plan; MLD mean lung dose, relative organ volume receiving ≥ 5 Gy (V5), ≥ 10 Gy (V10), ≥ 20 Gy (V20)
| Lung, total | |||
| V5 (%) | V10 (%) | V20 (%) | MLD (Gy) |
| 36.0 | 24.9 | 13.3 | 7.4 |
| Lung, right | |||
| V5 (%) | V10 (%) | V20 (%) | MLD (Gy) |
| 45.6 | 40.3 | 24.9 | 11.0 |
| Lung, left | |||
| V5 (%) | V10 (%) | V20 (%) | MLD (Gy) |
| 25.4 | 8.2 | 0.6 | 3.6 |
| Esophagus | |||
| Mean (Gy) | V5 (%) | V10 (%) | V20 (%) |
| 9.5 | 40.2 | 36.2 | 25.5 |
| Heart | |||
| Mean (Gy) | V5 (%) | V10 (%) | V20 (%) |
| 1.2 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
Treatment delivery times and resulting duty cycle efficiencies for each fraction
| Delivery time (mins) | Beam-on time (mins) | Duty cycle efficiency (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fr 1 | 8.48 | 1.71 | 20.20 |
| Fr 2 | 9.68 | 1.73 | 17.86 |
| Fr 3 | 8.86 | 1.71 | 19.32 |
| Fr 4 | 8.49 | 1.69 | 19.88 |
| Fr 5 | 9.04 | 1.72 | 18.99 |
| Fr 6 | 8.86 | 1.73 | 19.46 |
| Fr 7 | 9.10 | 1.71 | 18.83 |
| Fr 8 | 8.84 | 1.72 | 19.46 |
| Fr 9 | 8.40 | 1.72 | 20.45 |
| Fr 10 | 9.86 | 1.73 | 17.58 |
| Fr 11 | 8.50 | 1.74 | 20.45 |
| Fr 12 | 9.18 | 1.79 | 19.48 |
| Fr 13 | 8.47 | 1.77 | 20.96 |
| Fr 14 | 8.45 | 1.8 | 21.24 |
| Fr 15 | 8.38 | 1.76 | 20.98 |
| Fr 16 | 8.43 | 1.75 | 20.76 |
Fig. 3Isodose distribution for representative slices in all main planes and the corresponding dose-volume histogram with the green colour depicting 95% (45.6 Gy) of the prescribed dose to the PTV Boost and the cyan colour depicting 95% (38.0 Gy) of the prescribed dose to the PTV 40 Gy
Fig. 4Box-plot of the primary tumour motion for fraction 1. We calculated the median and inter-quartile range (IQR) amplitudes of the extracted target centroid positions relative to the centroid position of the boundary contour. For the first fraction, the target posterior-anterior motion was 2.48/2.53 mm (median/IQR) and -0.85/0.98 mm (median/IQR) for the inferior-superior motion. Box-plots for every fraction are provided in the Additional file 2
Fig. 5Primary tumour motion in posterior-anterior and inferior-superior directions for the first few minutes of fraction 1; “Beam-on” time intervals are denoted by the green bars while time intervals where the cine imaging was paused are denoted by the red bars. During gantry rotation, acquisition of cine imaging was paused hence the patient breathes freely