Literature DB >> 3520986

The prognostic value of the eosinophil in acute renal allograft rejection.

M R Weir, M Hall-Craggs, S Y Shen, J N Posner, S V Alongi, F J Dagher, J H Sadler.   

Abstract

A case report of marked peripheral blood eosinophilia and eosinophilic infiltration of a rejected renal allograft in a transplant recipient stimulated our review of the clinical course of 132 consecutive renal transplant recipients. A total of 187 acute rejections occurred in 112 patients. Diagnosis was made by renal biopsy in 124 cases. The percentage of eosinophils in the leukocyte differential of patients with irreversible rejection was 5.2 +/- 5.7 (mean +/- SD) versus that seen in patients with reversible rejection, 2.9 +/- 3.5 (P less than .05). The difference in the total eosinophil counts in each group was not statistically significant. Patients with peripheral blood eosinophil percentages greater than or equal to 4% had a 37.9% irreversible rejection rate, whereas those who had less than 4%, had a 22.4% loss rate (P less than .01). Six of seven patients with greater than or equal to 2% eosinophils in the inflammatory infiltrate of their renal allograft lost their kidney, whereas grafts with less than 2% eosinophils had a 36.8% loss rate (P less than .02). We conclude that the increased presence of eosinophils in the peripheral blood and/or renal allograft biopsy specimen is an adverse prognostic factor for acute rejection outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3520986     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198606000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  The Regulatory Function of Eosinophils.

Authors:  Ting Wen; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Solving the Conundrum of Eosinophils in Alloimmunity.

Authors:  Cherie Alissa Lynch; Yizhan Guo; Zhongcheng Mei; Daniel Kreisel; Andrew E Gelman; Elizabeth A Jacobsen; Alexander Sasha Krupnick
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 3.  Programmed T cell differentiation: Implications for transplantation.

Authors:  Rebecca L Crepeau; Mandy L Ford
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 4.868

Review 4.  A Player and Coordinator: The Versatile Roles of Eosinophils in the Immune System.

Authors:  Hai Long; Wei Liao; Ling Wang; Qianjin Lu
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  A comparison of organ cultured fetal pancreas allo-, iso-, and xenografts (pig) in non-immunosuppressed non-obese diabetic mice.

Authors:  T E Mandel; J Kovarik; M Koulmanda
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  The immunophenotyping of different stages of BK virus allograft nephropathy.

Authors:  Ping Li; Dongrui Cheng; Jiqiu Wen; Xuefeng Ni; Xue Li; Kenan Xie; Jinsong Chen
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.606

7.  Eosinophilia and risk of incident end stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Anam Tariq; Keisuke Okamato; Azka Tariq; Avi Z Rosenberg; Karim M Soliman; David W Ploth; Mohamed G Atta; Blaithin A McMahon
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Early Eosinophilic Antibody-mediated Rejection in a Renal Allograft Recipient.

Authors:  H Satish; Sreejith Parameswaran; B H Srinivas; N G Rajesh; R Jayasurya; Rajesh Padhi; P S Priyamvada
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

9.  Targeting the mTOR pathway uncouples the efficacy and toxicity of PD-1 blockade in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Khashayar Esfahani; Tho-Alfakar Al-Aubodah; Pamela Thebault; Réjean Lapointe; Marie Hudson; Nathalie A Johnson; Dana Baran; Najwa Bhulaiga; Tomoko Takano; Jean-François Cailhier; Ciriaco A Piccirillo; Wilson H Miller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.