| Literature DB >> 35209221 |
Sulaiman Sulaiman1,2, Shabir Ahmad1, Syeda Sohaila Naz2, Sara Qaisar2, Sayyar Muhammad1, Amal Alotaibi3, Riaz Ullah4.
Abstract
Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) were synthesized through the coprecipitation method and used as nanocarriers for etoricoxib (selective COX-2 inhibitor drug) and montelukast (leukotriene product inhibitor drug) in combination therapy. The CuO NPs, free drugs, and nanoformulations were investigated through UV/Vis spectroscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, XRD, SEM, and DLS. SEM imaging showed agglomerated nanorods of CuO NPs of about 87 nm size. The CE1, CE2, and CE6 nanoformulations were investigated through DLS, and their particle sizes were 271, 258, and 254 nm, respectively. The nanoformulations were evaluated through in vitro anti-inflammatory activity, in vivo anti-inflammatory activity, in vivo analgesic activity, in vivo anti-pyretic activity, and in vivo acute toxicity activity. In vivo activities were performed on albino mice. BSA denaturation was highly inhibited by CE1, CE2, and CE6 as compared to other nanoformulations in the in vitro anti-inflammatory activity. The in vivo bioactivities showed that low doses (5 mg/kg) of nanoformulations were more potent than high doses (10 and 20 mg/kg) of free drugs in the inhibition of pain, fever, and inflammation. Lastly, CE2 was more potent than that of other nanoformulations.Entities:
Keywords: CuO nanoparticles; analgesic potential; anti-inflammatory agent; anti-pyretic agent; etoricoxib; montelukast; nanomedicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35209221 PMCID: PMC8875186 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1UV/vis spectrum of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs), etoricoxib (ET), montelukast (MT), and synthesized nanomaterials.
Figure 2FT-IR spectrum of CuO NPs, ET, MT, and synthesized nanomaterials.
Figure 3XRD spectrum of CuO NPs, ET, MT, and synthesized nanomaterials.
Crystallite size of the nanoformulations.
| S.No. | Name/Code | Crystallite Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CuO | 13.7 |
| 2 | ET | 41.64 |
| 3 | MT | Amorphous |
| 4 | CE1 | 19.17 |
| 5 | CE2 | 17.87 |
| 6 | CE3 | 20.97 |
| 7 | CE4 | 22.53 |
| 8 | CE5 | 19.60 |
| 9 | CE6 | 21.98 |
| 10 | CE7 | 18.88 |
Figure 4SEM image of CuO NPs.
Figure 5DLS graphs of CE1, CE2, and CE6.
Figure 6Graphical representation of in vivo anti-inflammatory activity. PC—positive control, NC—negative control.
Quantity of etoricoxib and montelukast in 5 mg of each nanoformulation.
| S.NO. | 5 mg | Etoricoxib (mg) | Montelukast (mg) | RSD (±) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | CE1 | 2.8 | - | 0.07 |
| 2. | CE2 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.05 |
| 3. | CE3 | 1.80 | 0.77 | 0.08 |
| 4. | CE4 | 1.45 | 1.35 | 0.06 |
| 5. | CE5 | 0.77 | 1.75 | 0.07 |
| 6. | CE6 | 0.75 | 2.10 | 0.08 |
| 7. | CE7 | - | 2.95 | 0.06 |
In vitro anti-inflammatory activity.
| S.No. | Code | Absorbance at 660 nm | Inhibition (%)± SEM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negative control | 0.6900 | 0 |
| 2 | CE1 | 0.2039 | 70.45 ± 1.12 |
| 3 | CE2 | 0.1463 | 78.79 ± 1.56 |
| 4 | CE3 | 0.3822 | 44.61 ± 1.12 |
| 5 | CE4 | 0.7444 | 7.884 ± 1.25 |
| 6 | CE5 | 0.6335 | 8.188 ± 1.46 |
| 7 | CE6 | 0.2040 | 70.43 ± 1.52 |
| 8 | CE7 | 0.2802 | 59.39 ± 1.14 |
| 9 | Etoricoxib (ET) | 0.0221 | 96.80 ± 1.36 |
| 10 | Montelukast (MT) | 0.1476 | 78.61 ± 1.95 |
| 11 | CuO | 0.1677 | 75.69 ± 1.80 |
| 12 | Positive control | 0.0755 | 89.06 ± 1.75 |
In vivo anti-inflammatory activity.
| Drug | Dose | Inhibitory Effect (%) ± SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | ||
| Negative control | - | 6.37 ± 1.08 | 4.75 ± 1.03 | 5.93 ± 1.02 |
| Positive control | 10 | 68.84 ± 1.23 | 71.33 ± 1.12 | 85.78 ± 1.24 |
| Et | 10 | 65.19 ± 1.21 | 64.30 ± 1.53 | 79.26 ± 1.42 |
| Mt | 10 | 43 ± 1.24 | 48 ± 1.35 | 57 ± 1.45 |
| CE1 | 5 | 62.72 ± 1.21 | 62.77 ± 1.24 | 76.84 ± 1.22 |
| CE2 | 5 | 69.17 ± 1.25 | 83.56 ± 1.31 | 86.99 ± 1.32 |
| CE6 | 5 | 62.29 ± 1.39 | 63.38 ± 1.42 | 69.59 ± 1.38 |
In vivo analgesic activity.
| Drug | Dose | Inhibitory Effect (%) ± SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | ||
| Negative control | - | 7.79 ± 1.02 | 6.20 ± 1.10 | 3.03 ± 1.21 |
| Positive control | 10 | 58.34 ± 1.21 | 83.38 ± 1.24 | 83.22 ± 1.45 |
| Et | 10 | 24.30 ± 1.24 | 35.37 ± 1.10 | 48.61 ± 1.15 |
| Mt | 10 [ | 9.53 ± 1.32 | 7.95 ± 1.24 | 6.41 ± 1.42 |
| CE1 | 5 | 35.97 ± 1.54 | 49.41 ± 1.41 | 63.86 ± 1.24 |
| CE2 | 5 | 26.37 ± 1.45 | 51.53 ± 1.32 | 73.88 ± 1.52 |
| CE6 | 5 | 19.19 ± 1.12 | 34.71 ± 1.21 | 51.72 ± 1.54 |
Figure 7Graphical representation of in vivo analgesic activity.
In vivo anti-pyretic activity.
| Drug | Dose | Temperature (°F) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Yeast Injection | 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 4 h | ||
| Negative control | - | 98.6 | 101 | 101 | 101 | 101 | 101 |
| Positive control | 20 [ | 98.6 | 100 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 |
| Et | 20 | 98.6 | 99.8 | 99 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 |
| Mt | 20 [ | 98.6 | 100.7 | 101 | 101 | 100.5 | 100.5 |
| CE1 | 5 | 98.6 | 101 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 |
| CE2 | 5 | 98.6 | 100.5 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 |
| CE6 | 5 | 98.6 | 101.5 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 | 98.6 |
Figure 8Graphical representation of in vivo anti-pyretic activity.
Composition of nanoformulations.
| S.No. | Code | CuO (%) | Etoricoxib (%) | Montelukast (%) | PVA wt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CE1 | 20 | 80 | - | 2.5 |
| 2 | CE2 | 20 | 60 | 20 | |
| 3 | CE3 | 20 | 50 | 30 | |
| 4 | CE4 | 20 | 40 | 40 | |
| 5 | CE5 | 20 | 30 | 50 | |
| 6 | CE6 | 20 | 20 | 60 | |
| 7 | CE7 | 20 | - | 80 | |
| 8 | ET | - | 100 | - | - |
| 9 | MT | - | - | 100 | - |
| 10 | CuO | 100 | - | - | - |