| Literature DB >> 35208941 |
André M Marques1, Alexandre Siqueira da Rocha Queiroz2, Elsie F Guimarães3, Ana Carolina Mafud4, Paulo de Sousa Carvalho4, Yvonne Primerano Mascarenhas4, Thais da Silva Barenco5, Pâmella Dourila N Souza5, David William Provance6, José Hamilton M do Nascimento7, Cristiano G Ponte5, Maria Auxiliadora C Kaplan2, Davyson de Lima Moreira1,3, Maria Raquel Figueiredo1.
Abstract
The Piper species are a recognized botanical source of a broad structural diversity of lignans and its derivatives. For the first time, Piper tectoniifolium Kunth is presented as a promising natural source of the bioactive (-)-grandisin. Phytochemical analyses of extracts from its leaves, branches and inflorescences showed the presence of the target compound in large amounts, with leaf extracts found to contain up to 52.78% in its composition. A new HPLC-DAD-UV method was developed and validated to be selective for the identification of (-)-grandisin being sensitive, linear, precise, exact, robust and with a recovery above 90%. The absolute configuration of the molecule was determined by X-ray diffraction. Despite the identification of several enantiomers in plant extracts, the major isolated substance was characterized to be the (-)-grandisin enantiomer. In vascular reactivity tests, it was shown that the grandisin purified from botanical extracts presented an endothelium-dependent vasorelaxant effect with an IC50 of 9.8 ± 1.22 μM and around 80% relaxation at 30 μM. These results suggest that P. tectoniifolium has the potential to serve as a renewable source of grandisin on a large scale and the potential to serve as template for development of new drugs for vascular diseases with emphasis on disorders related to endothelial disfunction.Entities:
Keywords: lignans; medicinal plants; piperaceae; secondary metabolites; vascular reactivity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208941 PMCID: PMC8876808 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Spectra from an HPLC analysis of grandisin isolated from a methanol extract of Piper tectoniifolium leaves.
Quantification of (−)-grandisin in different vegetative parts and extracts of Piper tectoniifolium.
| Sample * | (−)-Grandisin | SD | RSD% | mg/g | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.78 | 0.52 | 0.98 | 527.80 | 5.20 | |
| Methanol leaf extract | 1.77 | 0.02 | 1.35 | 17.70 | 0.20 |
| Methanol branch extract | 7.84 | 0.03 | 0.45 | 78.40 | 0.30 |
| Methanol inflorescence extract | 2.08 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 20.80 | 0.04 |
* For extract preparation, see material and methods.
Figure 2Molecular structure of (−)-grandisin. (A) The perspective of the asymmetric part of the molecular structure of (−)-grandisin with complete molecular structure with numbering scheme and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level; (B) perspective of the electronic interactions between (−)-grandisin molecules for the formation of the crystalline reticulum (perspective view of the C-H···π interactions (dashed cyan lines) dimer in grandisin, with graph-set R44(12)); (C) absolute configuration of grandisin determined by X-ray (2R,3S,4S,5R)-3,4-dimethyl-2,5-bis(3,4,5-trimethoxycyclohexyl)oxolane.
Figure 3Concentration-response curves of (−)-grandisin in endothelium-intact and removed aortic rings pre-contracted with PHE 1 μM. Cumulative concentrations of (−)-grandisin (0.3 μM, 1 μM, 3 μM, 10 μM and 30 μM) were added. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 5).
Figure 4Precipitation from an n-hexane extract of branch material: (A) precipitated material after transfer of the primary extract into the solvent chosen for the countercurrent chromatography (CCC) system; (B) recrystallized material after 24 h in contact with the CCC solvent system.