| Literature DB >> 35208325 |
Enran Hou1, Fuzhang Wang2,3, Umar Nazir4, Muhammad Sohail4, Noman Jabbar4, Phatiphat Thounthong5.
Abstract
The rheology of different materials at the micro and macro levels is an area of great interest to many researchers, due to its important physical significance. Past experimental studies have proved the efficiency of the utilization of nanoparticles in different mechanisms for the purpose of boosting the heat transportation rate. The purpose of this study is to investigate heat and mass transport in a pseudo-plastic model past over a stretched porous surface in the presence of the Soret and Dufour effects. The involvement of tri-hybrid nanoparticles was incorporated into the pseudo-plastic model to enhance the heat transfer rate, and the transport problem of thermal energy and solute mechanisms was modelled considering the heat generation/absorption and the chemical reaction. Furthermore, traditional Fourier and Fick's laws were engaged in the thermal and solute transportation. The physical model was developed upon Cartesian coordinates, and boundary layer theory was utilized in the simplification of the modelled problem, which appears in the form of coupled partial differential equations systems (PDEs). The modelled PDEs were transformed into corresponding ordinary differential equations systems (ODEs) by engaging the appropriate similarity transformation, and the converted ODEs were solved numerically via a Finite Element Procedure (FEP). The obtained solution was plotted against numerous emerging parameters. In addition, a grid independent survey is presented. We recorded that the temperature of the tri-hybrid nanoparticles was significantly higher than the fluid temperature. Augmenting the values of the Dufour number had a similar comportment on the fluid temperature and concentration. The fluid temperature increased against a higher estimation of the heat generation parameter and the Eckert numbers. The impacts of the buoyancy force parameter and the porosity parameter were quite opposite on the fluid velocity.Entities:
Keywords: Soret and Dufour effect; boundary layer analysis; constructive and destructive chemical reaction; finite element scheme; heat generation; tri-hybrid nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208325 PMCID: PMC8878877 DOI: 10.3390/mi13020201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1A description of the tri-hybrid approach in nanofluids.
Thermal properties [34] of density, electrical conductivity, and thermal conductivity.
|
| 0.253 |
| 1113.5 |
|
| 32.9 |
| 6310 |
|
| 8.953 |
| 4250 |
|
| 1.4013 |
| 2270 |
Figure 2Illustration of the geometry of the current analysis.
Figure 3Flow chart regarding the finite element scheme.
Grid-independent analyses of concentration, temperature, and velocity at mid of 270 elements.
| Number of Elements |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 0.01780117292 | 0.2638819583 | 0.1043559742 |
| 60 | 0.02008198265 | 0.2370957263 | 0.09636478785 |
| 90 | 0.02028786930 | 0.2277953868 | 0.09382548703 |
| 120 | 0.02030867335 | 0.2231793011 | 0.09257835690 |
| 150 | 0.02029805160 | 0.2204312762 | 0.09183716567 |
| 180 | 0.02028205279 | 0.2186104527 | 0.09134595367 |
| 210 | 0.02026649287 | 0.2173159996 | 0.09099653209 |
| 240 | 0.02025264615 | 0.2163487639 | 0.09073525408 |
| 270 | 0.02024062141 | 0.2155986751 | 0.09053255564 |
Validation of the numerical results for skin friction coefficient by considering: .
| Skin Friction Coefficient | Present Work | |
|---|---|---|
| Sakiadis [ | −0.44375 | −0.442735 |
| Fox et al. [ | −0.4437 | −0.443639 |
| Chen [ | −0.4438 | −0.442837 |
Figure 4Analysis of velocity curves versus .
Figure 5Analysis of velocity curves versus .
Figure 6Analysis of velocity curves versus .
Figure 7Analysis of velocity curves versus .
Figure 8Analysis of the temperature curves versus .
Figure 9Analysis of the temperature curves versus .
Figure 10Analysis of the temperature curves versus .
Figure 11Analysis of concentration curves versus .
Figure 12Analysis of concentration curves versus .
Figure 13Analysis of concentration curves versus S.
Figure 14Analysis of concentration curves versus .