| Literature DB >> 35208238 |
Xinyi Shen1, Yuping Cai2,3, Lingeng Lu1, Huang Huang2, Hong Yan2, Philip B Paty4, Engjel Muca4, Nita Ahuja5, Yawei Zhang2,6,7, Caroline H Johnson2, Sajid A Khan5.
Abstract
The interplay between the sex-specific differences in tumor metabolome and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis has never been studied and represents an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. This study examines the link between tumor metabolome and prognosis by sex for CRC patients. Using untargeted metabolomics analysis, abundances of 91 metabolites were obtained from primary tumor tissues from 197 patients (N = 95 females, N = 102 males) after surgical colectomy for stage I-III CRC. Cox Proportional hazard (PH) regression models estimated the associations between tumor metabolome and 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and their interactions with sex. Eleven metabolites had significant sex differences in their associations with 5-year OS, and five metabolites for 5-year RFS. The metabolites asparagine and serine had sex interactions for both OS and RFS. Furthermore, in the asparagine synthetase (ASNS)-catalyzed asparagine synthesis pathway, asparagine was associated with substantially poorer OS (HR (95% CI): 6.39 (1.78-22.91)) and RFS (HR (95% CI): 4.36 (1.39-13.68)) for female patients only. Similar prognostic disadvantages in females were seen in lysophospholipid and polyamine synthesis. Unique metabolite profiles indicated that increased asparagine synthesis was associated with poorer prognosis for females only, providing insight into precision medicine for CRC treatment stratified by sex.Entities:
Keywords: asparagine metabolism; colorectal cancer; metabolomics; prognosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208238 PMCID: PMC8875032 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12020164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Demographic Characteristics and Clinical Factors.
| Characteristics | No. of Patients | 5-Year OS | 5-Year RFS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deaths, No. | Rate, % a |
| Cases, No. | Rate, % a |
| |||
| Age at diagnosis, y | ≤60 | 19 | 2 | 88.9 | 0.048 | 3 | 84.2 | 0.21 |
| 61–69 | 64 | 9 | 83.4 | 14 | 72.4 | |||
| 70–79 | 81 | 15 | 78.7 | 12 | 81.4 | |||
| ≥80 | 33 | 11 | 61.5 | 1 | 96.3 | |||
| Sex, n | Male | 102 | 23 | 74.3 | 0.18 | 17 | 77.5 | 0.48 |
| Female | 95 | 14 | 83.2 | 13 | 84.0 | |||
| Clinical stage, n | I | 47 | 3 | 92.5 | 0.001 | 5 | 88.4 | 0.09 |
| II | 86 | 13 | 82.4 | 11 | 82.0 | |||
| III | 64 | 21 | 63.5 | 14 | 73.8 | |||
| Chemotherapy, n | Yes | 66 | 18 | 68.5 | 0.03 | 15 | 73.1 | 0.03 |
| No | 131 | 19 | 83.7 | 15 | 85.0 | |||
| Anatomic tumor location, n | Left | 99 | 17 | 81.2 | 0.42 | 19 | 77.2 | 0.23 |
| Right | 98 | 20 | 75.6 | 11 | 85.3 | |||
a Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier estimation method. b p value of Log–rank test.
Figure 1Sex-specific differences in the associations between individual metabolite and CRC prognosis. (A) 5-year overall survival (OS) and (B) 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). LysoPC: lysophosphatidylcholine. All metabolites were observed with significant sex interactions (Pinteraction < 0.05). Hazard ratio (HR) for each metabolite (log2-transformed abundance) was calculated by multivariate Cox PH regression adjusted for anatomic location, chemotherapy history, clinical stage, and age (continuous). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The 95% CIs marked with asterisks indicate significant associations between the metabolite and the corresponding prognosis (p values < 0.05): A metabolite with HR < 1 was associated with better prognosis; a metabolite with HR > 1 was associated with worse prognosis. The x-axes are log-scaled.
Multivariate analyses of the associations between individual metabolites and 5-year OS by sex, using patients with complete information of KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, and MSI status (N = 136, females = 67, males = 69).
| Metabolite Name | Females | Males | Int. Sex | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| Acetyl-lysine | 1.06 | 0.76–1.49 | 0.735 | 0.57 | 0.42–0.78 | <0.001 | 0.025 |
| Adenosine | 1.01 | 0.62–1.63 | 0.976 | 1.42 | 1.04–1.94 | 0.029 | 0.254 |
| ADMA | 1.58 | 0.90–2.78 | 0.109 | 0.51 | 0.33–0.80 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Alanine | 1.43 | 0.89–2.30 | 0.144 | 0.65 | 0.46–0.91 | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Arginine | 1.70 | 0.72–4.03 | 0.227 | 0.53 | 0.28–0.99 | 0.045 | 0.049 |
| Argininosuccinic acid | 1.08 | 0.71–1.64 | 0.713 | 0.58 | 0.40–0.83 | 0.003 | 0.026 |
| Citrulline | 1.76 | 0.97–3.18 | 0.063 | 0.44 | 0.25–0.77 | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| CMP | 1.27 | 0.55–2.90 | 0.578 | 0.57 | 0.36–0.90 | 0.017 | 0.076 |
| Glycerol 3-phosphate | 4.20 | 1.24–14.25 | 0.021 | 1.03 | 0.39–2.74 | 0.948 | 0.057 |
| GMP | 1.13 | 0.62–2.07 | 0.686 | 0.59 | 0.39–0.89 | 0.013 | 0.055 |
| Histidine | 1.23 | 0.72–2.08 | 0.451 | 0.73 | 0.53–1.00 | 0.049 | 0.080 |
| Lysine | 1.54 | 0.63–3.74 | 0.341 | 0.54 | 0.30–0.98 | 0.044 | 0.030 |
| LysoPC(16:0) | 2.03 | 1.18–3.49 | 0.010 | 0.77 | 0.52–1.14 | 0.188 | 0.003 |
| LysoPC(16:1) | 1.13 | 0.69–1.86 | 0.632 | 0.67 | 0.45–0.98 | 0.038 | 0.088 |
| Methionine | 2.38 | 0.81–7.00 | 0.114 | 0.35 | 0.17–0.75 | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Ornithine | 1.63 | 0.59–4.50 | 0.347 | 0.41 | 0.19–0.91 | 0.028 | 0.032 |
| Phenylalanine | 1.68 | 0.55–5.08 | 0.359 | 0.26 | 0.09–0.71 | 0.008 | 0.027 |
| Serine | 2.88 | 0.82–10.15 | 0.100 | 0.34 | 0.16–0.71 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Spermine | 2.13 | 1.29–3.52 | 0.003 | 1.16 | 0.82–1.63 | 0.407 | 0.076 |
| Taurine | 0.63 | 0.19–2.11 | 0.451 | 0.34 | 0.14–0.79 | 0.013 | 0.475 |
| Threonine | 1.38 | 0.62–3.08 | 0.432 | 0.39 | 0.20–0.75 | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Tyrosine | 0.81 | 0.40–1.68 | 0.578 | 0.60 | 0.37–0.99 | 0.044 | 0.325 |
| Uracil | 2.87 | 0.70–11.76 | 0.143 | 0.30 | 0.16–0.58 | <0.001 | 0.005 |
| Xanthosine | 1.21 | 0.85–1.73 | 0.288 | 0.56 | 0.37–0.84 | 0.006 | 0.016 |
a p values for the association between individual metabolites and 5-year OS calculated by multivariate Cox PH regression models, adjusted for anatomic location, clinical stages, chemotherapy history, age, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, and MSI status (before FDR adjustment). The abundance of each metabolite was treated as a continuous variable and was log2 transformed. A metabolite with HR < 1 was associated with better OS; a metabolite with HR > 1 was associated with worse OS. b p value of the interaction between the metabolite and sex. Int. Sex p value < 0.05 indicate a significant sex interaction.
Multivariate analyses of the associations between individual metabolites and 5-year RFS by sex, using patients with complete information of KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, and MSI status (N = 136, females = 67, males = 69).
| Metabolite Name | Females | Males | Int. Sex | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| Arginine | 3.05 | 1.33–7.02 | 0.009 | 1.88 | 0.64–5.52 | 0.252 | 0.218 |
| Asparagine | 2.60 | 1.06–6.37 | 0.036 | 1.02 | 0.56–1.85 | 0.943 | 0.058 |
| Glutathione disulfide | 0.67 | 0.47–0.94 | 0.022 | 0.84 | 0.62–1.15 | 0.274 | 0.264 |
| Hypoxanthine | 6.02 | 0.55–65.93 | 0.142 | 0.37 | 0.17–0.80 | 0.011 | 0.023 |
| LysoPC(16:0) | 1.94 | 1.11–3.37 | 0.020 | 0.69 | 0.39–1.22 | 0.202 | 0.025 |
| LysoPE(18:2) | 1.75 | 0.79–3.89 | 0.167 | 0.40 | 0.17–0.94 | 0.035 | 0.059 |
| Methionine | 3.40 | 1.10–10.53 | 0.034 | 1.12 | 0.43–2.89 | 0.814 | 0.095 |
| N1-acetylspermine | 0.95 | 0.66–1.36 | 0.781 | 3.20 | 1.32–7.76 | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Succinate | 0.87 | 0.25–3.11 | 0.834 | 0.07 | 0.01–0.92 | 0.043 | 0.143 |
a p values for the association between individual metabolites and 5-year RFS calculated by multivariate Cox PH regression models, adjusted for anatomic location, clinical stages, chemotherapy history, age, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, and MSI status (before FDR adjustment). The abundance of each metabolite was treated as a continuous variable and was log2 transformed. A metabolite with HR < 1 was associated with better RFS; a metabolite with HR > 1 was associated with worse RFS. b p value of the interaction between the metabolite and sex. Int. Sex p value < 0.05 indicate a significant sex interaction.
Multivariate analysis of asparagine synthesis catalyzed by asparagine synthetase (ASNS).
| Prognosis | Sex | Model 1 a | Model 2 b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) c |
|
| HR (95% CI) c |
|
| ||
| OS | Females | 6.39 (1.78–22.91) | 0.004 | 0.02 | 5.68 (1.06–30.61) | 0.04 | 0.052 |
| Males | 0.57 (0.36–0.91) | 0.02 | 0.46 (0.11–1.84) | 0.27 | |||
| RFS | Females | 4.36 (1.39–3.68) | 0.01 | 0.003 | 4.89 (1.07–22.39) | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Males | 0.96 (0.61–1.50) | 0.86 | 1.15 (0.27–4.80) | 0.85 | |||
a Asparagine abundance was considered as a continuous variable (log2 transformed). b Asparagine abundance was dichotomized to low levels (≤75% percentile of asparagine abundance among all patients) (reference) and high levels (>75% percentile). c Hazard ratio for asparagine abundance in the corresponding multivariate Cox PH model, adjusted for anatomic location, clinical stages, chemotherapy history, age (continuous), and other crucial metabolites involved in ASNS-catalyzed asparagine synthesis (aspartate, glutamate, glutamine, and AMP were treated as continuous variables and were log2 transformed). d p values for the interaction between sex and asparagine.
Figure 2Cox adjusted survival curves of ASNS-catalyzed asparagine. (A) OS of females, (B) OS of males, (C) RFS of females, and (D) RFS of males. Results were based on Model 2 (Table 2) using multivariate Cox PH regression, adjusted for anatomic location, chemotherapy history, clinical stages, age (continuous), and other crucial metabolites involved in ASNS-catalyzed asparagine synthesis (aspartate, glutamate, glutamine, and AMP were treated as continuous variables and were log2 transformed). p values for the associations between dichotomized asparagine levels and the prognosis in Model 2.
Multivariate analysis of association between metabolites in ASNS-catalyzed asparagine synthesis pathway and OS and RFS for all patients using data with complete records of KRAS mutation information (N = 161, females = 78, males = 83).
| Variable a | OS | RFS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | Int. Sex | HR | 95% CI | Int. Sex | |||
| Asparagine | 1.28 | 0.74–2.22 | 0.377 | 0.035 | 2.50 | 1.27–4.91 | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Aspartate | 1.24 | 0.80–1.93 | 0.345 | 0.967 | 1.59 | 0.96–2.63 | 0.071 | 0.447 |
| Glutamate | 0.68 | 0.26–1.80 | 0.438 | 0.692 | 0.43 | 0.13–1.41 | 0.165 | 0.078 |
| Glutamine | 0.65 | 0.24–1.75 | 0.393 | 0.932 | 0.21 | 0.07–0.63 | 0.005 | 0.716 |
| AMP | 0.74 | 0.47–1.17 | 0.198 | 0.444 | 0.86 | 0.50–1.48 | 0.585 | 0.319 |
| Sex = Male (ref: female) | 2.02 | 0.94–4.32 | 0.070 | - | 0.97 | 0.40–2.34 | 0.947 | - |
| Anatomic location = RCC (ref: LCC) | 0.81 | 0.37–1.78 | 0.598 | - | 0.68 | 0.28–1.70 | 0.415 | - |
| Clinical stage = late (ref: early) | 4.46 | 1.55–12.78 | 0.005 | - | 1.32 | 0.37–4.62 | 0.669 | - |
| Chemotherapy = yes (ref: no) | 1.05 | 0.36–3.10 | 0.924 | 2.58 | 0.67–9.96 | 0.166 | ||
| Age | 1.10 | 1.04–1.16 | <0.001 | - | 0.98 | 0.92–1.05 | 0.604 | - |
| 1.09 | 0.50–2.37 | 0.832 | - | 1.48 | 0.60–3.69 | 0.398 | - | |
a All of the variables listed were included in one multivariate Cox PH model, where the abundance of each metabolite was treated as a continuous variable and was log2 transformed. b p value of the interaction between the metabolite and sex.
Multivariate analysis of association between metabolites in ASNS-catalyzed asparagine synthesis metabolic pathway and OS and RFS by sex using data with complete records of KRAS mutation information (N = 161, females = 78, males = 83).
| Variable a | OS | RFS | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | Females | Males | |||||||||
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | |||||
| Asparagine | 6.79 | 1.43–32.16 | 0.016 | 0.77 | 0.42–1.42 | 0.407 | 15.23 | 2.23–104.27 | 0.006 | 1.37 | 0.66–2.82 | 0.397 |
| Aspartate | 1.01 | 0.35–2.92 | 0.984 | 1.33 | 0.76–2.32 | 0.319 | 1.38 | 0.42–4.49 | 0.594 | 1.55 | 0.81–2.97 | 0.190 |
| Glutamate | 0.30 | 0.04–1.99 | 0.211 | 1.21 | 0.34–4.31 | 0.771 | 0.32 | 0.03–3.50 | 0.348 | 0.42 | 0.08–2.12 | 0.291 |
| Glutamine | 0.12 | 0.01–0.93 | 0.044 | 0.96 | 0.24–3.74 | 0.949 | 0.02 | 0.002–0.21 | 0.001 | 0.39 | 0.07–2.11 | 0.276 |
| AMP | 0.99 | 0.35–2.77 | 0.981 | 0.62 | 0.34–1.13 | 0.117 | 1.07 | 0.33–3.45 | 0.915 | 0.76 | 0.32–1.88 | 0.554 |
| 1.34 | 0.32–5.67 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.17–1.68 | 0.286 | 1.69 | 0.36–7.94 | 0.505 | 0.77 | 0.16–3.76 | 0.748 | |
| Anatomic location = RCC (ref: LCC) | 1.50 | 0.43–5.31 | 0.527 | 0.83 | 0.26–2.71 | 0.759 | 0.82 | 0.21–3.25 | 0.777 | 0.76 | 0.17–3.47 | 0.721 |
| Clinical stage = late (ref: early) | 9.66 | 1.34–69.57 | 0.024 | 8.09 | 1.42–46.22 | 0.019 | 1.31 | 0.19–9.03 | 0.782 | 0.61 | 0.07–4.78 | 0.636 |
| Chemotherapy = Yes (ref: no) | 1.80 | 0.37–8.74 | 0.468 | 0.46 | 0.07–2.85 | 0.402 | 3.55 | 0.47–26.49 | 0.217 | 3.33 | 0.37–29.78 | 0.283 |
| Age | 1.09 | 0.97–1.23 | 0.154 | 1.14 | 1.05–1.231 | 0.001 | 1.05 | 0.94–1.17 | 0.407 | 0.95 | 0.87–1.05 | 0.331 |
a All of the variables listed were included in one multivariate Cox PH model. The abundance of each metabolite was treated as a continuous variable and was log2 transformed.