| Literature DB >> 35208106 |
Timur Rizovich Ablyaz1, Evgeny Sergeevich Shlykov1, Karim Ravilevich Muratov1, Ilya Vladimirovich Osinnikov1.
Abstract
Our study was devoted to increasing the efficiency of electrical discharge machining of high-quality parts with a composite electrode tool. We analyzed the chemical composition of the surface layer of the processed product, microhardness, the parameter of roughness of the treated surface, residual stresses, and mechanical properties under tension and durability with low-cycle fatigue of steel 15. Our objective was to study the effect of the process of copy-piercing electrical discharge machining on the performance of parts using composite electrode tools. The experiments were carried out on a copy-piercing electrical discharge machining machine Smart CNC using annular and rectangular electrodes; electrode tool materials included copper, graphite, and composite material of the copper-graphite system with a graphite content of 20%. The elemental composition of the surface layer of steel 15 after electrical discharge machining was determined. Measurements of microhardness (HV) and surface roughness were made. Residual stresses were determined using the method of X-ray diffractometry. Metallographic analysis was performed for the presence of microdefects. Tensile tests and low-cycle fatigue tests were carried out. The mechanical properties of steel 15 before and after electrical discharge machining under low-cycle fatigue were determined. We established that the use of a composite electrode tool for electrical discharge machining of steel 15 does not have negative consequences.Entities:
Keywords: chemical composition; electrical discharge machining; mechanical properties; microhardness; residual stresses; roughness
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208106 PMCID: PMC8878319 DOI: 10.3390/ma15041566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Plasma channel.
Figure 2Schematic location of the zones of the surface layer after the EDM: 1—zone of saturation with elements of the working fluid; 2—zone of deposition of the material of the electrode-tool; 3—white layer formed from molten workpiece material; 4—heat affected zone; 5—zone of plastic deformation.
The main directions of research of the process of EDM.
| Topic of Study | Sources | Key Positions |
|---|---|---|
| The morphology and roughness of the surfaces after EDM | [ | The melting of the treated surface is accompanied by a change in its structure, the grain is refined, and zones of plastic deformation appear. |
| The mechanical properties of the surfaces after EDM | [ | As a result of EDM, there is a difference in the mechanical properties of the surface layer and the base material. Different surface conditions can affect the fatigue characteristics of the material. |
| The chemical composition of the surfaces after EDM | [ | During the EDM process, there is a change in the elemental composition of the surface layer. TE material has the greatest influence on the change in the composition of the surface layer. By dielectric flows, molten particles of ET material enter the melting zone of the workpiece material and mix with it. |
| The white layer formed on the surfaces after EDM. | [ | The white layer has a fine-grained structure with high chemical resistance. The white layer after EDM has a rough surface and contains many voids, pores, and microcracks. It can radically differ from the base material not only in properties, but also in chemical composition. |
Figure 3Dynamics of research in the field of EDM.
Figure 4Electrode tools: 1—copper, 2—graphite, 3—composite.
Figure 5Ring-shaped electrode tools.
EDM modes.
| Mode | I, A | Ton, μs | U, B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finishing | 2 | 40 | 50 |
| Rough | 8 | 150 | 100 |
Material parameters.
| Parametr | Value |
|---|---|
| Young’s modulus | 2 × 105 MPa |
| Poisson’s ratio | 0.28 |
OH measurement modes.
| Parametr | Value |
|---|---|
| Method of measurement | modified “χ-method” |
| Collimator | 5 mm |
| Directions φ to the point of analysis ( | 0° and −90° |
| X-ray tube anode | Cr |
| Vanadium filters | Not |
| Diffraction line (hkl) | (220) |
| Diffraction angle 2θ | 156.7° |
| The penetration depth of X-ray radiation at χ = 0° | 6.3 μm |
| Exposure time in one position of the goniometer | 20 s |
| Tilt angles χ | in the range [−30°; 30°], symmetrical in absolute values in both directions, where positive tilt angles χ in the range [0°; 40°] and negative tilt angles −χ in the range [−40°; 0°] |
| Number of tilt angles ±χ | 13, where N+χ = N−χ= 7 (including χ = 0° and assuming that the measurement at the position χ = 0° is carried out once) |
| X-ray beam oscillation (oscillation) | 3° |
Parameters of mathematical processing of OH measurement results.
| Parametr | Value |
|---|---|
| Peak calculation | Peak Fit Method |
| Peak level used for calculation | 75 |
| Subtracting background radiation values | Linear |
| Setting 2θ angles | Calibrated |
| Calculation of principal stresses | Three-way method 0°, −90° |
| Stress tensor | Three-way method 0°, −90° |
Figure 7Sketch (a) and photographs of samples, the working parts of which were processed by turning (b) and EDM (c) methods.
Figure 8Instron 8850 servohydraulic test system.
Chemical composition of samples before and after EDM.
| Mode | Electrode | Fe | Mn | Si | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original | The foundation | 0.6% | 0.2% | - | |
| Finishing | Cu | The foundation | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| C | The foundation | 0.3% | - | - | |
| Cu-C | The foundation | 0.2% | - | - | |
| Rough | Cu | The foundation | 0.6% | 0.1% | 2.8% |
| C | The foundation | 0.4% | - | - | |
| Cu-C | The foundation | 0.3% | - | 0.9% | |
Figure 9Elemental composition of samples before and after EDM: (a) in finishing mode; (b) in draft mode.
Figure 10Surface of steel 15 at 200× magnification after EDM in ET finishing mode from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Figure 11Surface of steel 15 at 100× magnification after EDM in rough ET mode from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Figure 12Surface structure of steel 15 at 100× magnification after EDM in ET finishing mode from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Figure 13Surface structure of steel 15 at 100× magnification after EDM in rough ET mode from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Figure 14The results of measuring the microhardness of the surface of steel 15 after EDM in the finishing mode using ETs from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Figure 15The results of measuring the microhardness of the surface of steel 15 after EDM in the rough mode using ETs from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Surface roughness after EDM.
| Mode | Electrode Tool | Roughness Parameters, μm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ra | Rmax | Sm | ||
| Finishing | Cu | 4.06 | 25.93 | 275.77 |
| C | 3.95 | 27.85 | 228.18 | |
| Cu-C | 4.16 | 26.23 | 221.76 | |
| Draft | Cu | 6.99 | 44.69 | 321.09 |
| C | 6.77 | 34.51 | 307.29 | |
| Cu-C | 6.84 | 42.46 | 279.92 | |
Figure 16Profilograms of the surface of steel 15 after EDM in finishing mode using ETs from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Figure 17Profilograms of the surface of steel 15 after EDM in rough mode using ETs from: (a) copper; (b) graphite; (c) composite.
Figure 18Histograms of surface roughness parameters after EDM with different ETs: (a) average roughness height (Ra); (b) maximum roughness height (Rmax); (c) average roughness pitch (Sm).
Figure 19Histograms of changes in the residual stresses of the samples in the EDM process: (a) in the finishing mode; (b) in draft mode.
Tensile mechanical properties of steel 15 depending on the processing method.
| Processing Method | E, GPa |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turning | 233 | 742 | 369 |
| EDM (Cu) | 214 | 716 | 341 |
| EDM (C) | 210 | 725 | 345 |
| EDM (Cu-C) | 247 | 723 | 355 |
Figure 20Bar graph of the change in the mechanical properties of steel 15 under tension.
Figure 21Photographs of the fracture surface of tensile specimens manufactured by: (a) EDM (copper ET); (b) EDM (composite ET); (c) EDM (graphite ET); and (d) turning.
Figure 22Photos of tensile fractured specimens made by: (a) EDM (copper ET); (b) EDM (composite ET); (c) EDM (graphite ET); (d) turning.
Study of the durability of specimens from steel 15 at low-cycle fatigue.
| Processing Method | Durability, Cycles |
|---|---|
| Turning | 27,600 |
| EDM (copper ET) | 18,938 |
| EDM (graphite ET) | 21,673 |
| EDM (composite ET) | 19,044 |
| EDM (medium) | 19,885 |
Figure 23Photographs of low-cycle fatigue fractured specimens made by: (a) EDM (copper ET); (b) EDM (composite ET); (c) EDM (graphite ET); (d) turning.