| Literature DB >> 35208064 |
Yu Gao1, Hongwei Zhao1,2, Guang Chen1, Qi Peng1, Yingying Liu1, Fei Song1,2, Qingquan Liu1,2.
Abstract
In this work, a crosslinked polycarboxylate superplasticizer (crosslinked-PC) was synthesized via the free radical polymerization reaction. Pentaerythritol tetraacrylate (PETA) was used as the crosslinked agent. A comparative comb-like polycarboxylate superplasticizer (comb-like-PC) was prepared under the same reaction conditions. The dispersion retention capacity, dispersion capability, hydration characteristics of the cement paste and setting time were investigated in detail. At the dosage of 0.6% bwoc, the fluidity of the cement/crosslinked-PC paste was about 340 mm, which was 40~50 mm larger than the cement/comb-like-PC paste. The dispersion retention capacity of the cement/crosslinked-PC paste was observed to be much superior due to higher adsorbed amounts on the cement particles. Moreover, the cement/crosslinked-PC paste exhibited the initial and final setting durations of 196 and 356 min, respectively, which indicated an enhancement of 18 and 68 min compared to the cement/comb-like paste. The crosslinked copolymers exhibit a stronger retardation effect than the comb-like copolymers due to their enhanced adsorbed amounts and stronger steric hindrance effect. This is further illustrated by the characterization of the hydration process and hydration products. It can be concluded that it is feasible to improve the dispersive capacity and the dispersion retention capacity of PC by changing the molecule structure from comb-like to slightly crosslinked.Entities:
Keywords: crosslinked; polycarboxylic; superplasticizer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208064 PMCID: PMC8875641 DOI: 10.3390/ma15041524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Synthetic routes for the preparation of the comb-like-PC and crosslinked-PC.
Monomer combination in synthesis of the PCs.
| Sample | HPEG | KPS | AA | SAMS | PETA | TGA | H2O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comb-like-PC | 20 | 15 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0.5 | 60 |
| Crosslinked-PC | 20 | 15 | 30 | 10 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 60 |
Figure 2FTIR (a) and 1H−NMR (b) spectra comb-like-PC and crosslinked-PC.
Figure 3GPC chromatograms of comb-like-PC (a) and crosslinked-PC (b).
The molecular weight and distribution of PCs.
| Sample | Mn | Mw | PD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comb-like-PC | 27,348 | 69,706 | 2.55 |
| Crosslinked-PC | 38,882 | 109,588 | 2.82 |
Figure 4Fluidity (a) and time-dependent fluidity loss (b) of the cement/comb-like-PC and cement/crosslinked-PC pastes.
Figure 5Schematic representation of the dispersion and adsorption behaviors of crosslinked-PC on cement particles.
Figure 6Absorbed amounts comb-like-PC and crosslinked-PC in cement paste at various dosage (% bwoc).
Figure 7Setting times of cement pastes in the absence or presence of PCs (0.5% bwoc).
Figure 8The hydration exothermic heat flow curves of cement/PC samples (0.5% bwoc) (a) and blank cement samples (b).
The cement hydration parameters extracted from the heat evolution curves.
| Sample |
| (dQ/dt)A (mW/g) | (dQ/dt)C (mW/g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 2.79 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.32 |
| Cement/Comb-like-PC | 3.85 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.30 |
| Cement/Crosslinked-PC | 4.05 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.29 |
Figure 9The viscosity η’ versus shear rate variations in the cement pastes at the PC dosage of 0.5% bwoc.
Figure 10WAXD patterns (a) and the compressive strengths (b) of the hydration products.
Figure 11SEM micrographs of cement samples after hydration for 1 day (a–c) and 7 days (a’–c’) with a magnification of 5000.