| Literature DB >> 35207965 |
Alejandra Martínez-Lázaro1, Luis A Ramírez-Montoya2, Janet Ledesma-García1, Miguel A Montes-Morán3, Mayra P Gurrola4, J Angel Menéndez3, Ana Arenillas3, Luis G Arriaga5.
Abstract
In this work, unsupported Pd aerogel catalysts were synthesized for the very first time by using microwaves as a heating source followed by a lyophilization drying process and used towards formic acid electro-oxidation in a microfluidic fuel cell. Aerogels were also made by heating in a conventional oven to evaluate the microwave effect during the synthesis process of the unsupported Pd aerogels. The performance of the catalysts obtained by means of microwave heating favored the formic acid electro-oxidation with H2SO4 as the electrolyte. The aerogels' performance as anodic catalysts was carried out in a microfluidic fuel cell, giving power densities of up to 14 mW cm-2 when using mass loads of only 0.1 mg on a 0.019 cm2 electrode surface. The power densities of the aerogels obtained by microwave heating gave a performance superior to the resultant aerogel prepared using conventional heating and even better than a commercial Pd/C catalyst.Entities:
Keywords: electro-oxidation; microfluidic fuel cell; microwave heating; unsupported aerogel
Year: 2022 PMID: 35207965 PMCID: PMC8874856 DOI: 10.3390/ma15041422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Procedure for obtaining aerogels using the sol-gel methodology in this work.
Synthesis procedures and operating conditions to obtain the aerogels of this work.
| Sample | Synthesis at 67.5 °C for 2 h | Heating Reduction Device | Reduction Conditions | Drying Device |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PdA-CC | CON | CON | 24 h/45 °C | LYO |
| PdA-MC | MW | CON | 24 h/45 °C | LYO |
| PdA-MM | MW | MW | 7 h/45 °C | LYO |
| PdA-MMT | MW | MW | 7 h/67 °C | LYO |
| PdA-CON | CON | CON | 24 h/45 °C | CON |
Figure 2Microfluidic system for formic acid electro-oxidation.
Figure 3XPS of the Pd aerogels obtained.
Figure 4XRD of Pd aerogels samples.
Figure 5Physicochemical analysis. BET analysis of Pd aerogels: (a) N2 adsorption isotherms; and (b) pore size distribution. SEM of Pd aerogels: (c) PdA-CC; (d) PdA-MC; (e) PdA-MM; and (f) PdA-MMT.
Figure 6TEM micrographs of Pd aerogels. (a) PdA-CC, (b) PdA-MC, (c) PdA-MM, (d) PdA-MMT, (e,f) crystallographic patterns observed in PdA-MMT aerogel, and (g) heating effect on the particle size of Pd-CC and Pd-MMT aerogels.
Figure 7Electrochemical performance. (a) Pd aerogels profiles in 0.5 M H2SO4; (b) comparison between the aerogels in FAO; (c) stability performance on Pd-MMT vs. Pd/C; (d) PdA-MMT CV before and after the CA for 24 h; (e) FAO performance between PdA-CON, PdA-MMT, and Pd/C; and (f) MFC performance for the best aerogels obtained (PdA-MMT), a commercial catalyst (Pd/C) and an in-lab catalyst obtained by conventional procedure (PdA-CON).
Electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) values for the samples studied.
| Sample | |
|---|---|
| PdA-CON | 1.3 |
| PdA-CC | 22.1 |
| PdA_MC | 22.1 |
| PdA-MM | 22.8 |
| PdA-MMT | 28.5 |
| Pd/C | 16 |
Anodic catalyst comparison.
| Anodic | Formic Acid Concentration | Mass Loading/mg cm−2 | OCV/V | J/mA cm−2 | W Max/mW cm2 | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pd/C | 0.5 M | 0.7 | 0.9 | 7.4 | 2.9 | [ |
| Pd/C | 0.5 M | 0.1 | 0.9 | 43 | 10.5 | This work |
| Pd/MWCNT | 0.5 M | 1.3 | 0.9 | 9.1 | 2.3 | [ |
| Pd50Co50/MWCNT | 0.5 M | 1.2 | 0.9 | 5.9 | 1.75 | [ |
| PdA-MMT | 0.5 M | 0.1 | 0.88 | 118.3 | 14 | This work |
| Pd/graphene | 0.5 M | 2 | 0.7 | 30 | 15.2 | [ |
| Pt/CNx | 0.5 M | 1 | 1.1 | 9.79 | 3.43 | [ |
| Pt-Ru | 3 M | 3 | 0.47 | 1.2 | 12.5 | [ |
| Au-Pt | 1 M | - | 1.2 | 28 | 12 | [ |
| Pd | 0.5 M | 10 | 0.95 | 125 | 26 | [ |
| Pt | 0.5 M | - | 1.1 | 8 | 2.2 | [ |