| Literature DB >> 35207910 |
Shiying Chen1,2,3, Xiaowei Zhang1,2,3, Zongan Li1,2,3, Shuang Wang1,2, Yixuan Wang1,2,3, Jinying Li1,2,3, Daogao Wu1,2, Zhiqiang Wang1,2, Dehong Chen1,2, Wenli Lu1,2, Ning Mao1,2, Wensheng Yang1,2, Minglei Xu1,2.
Abstract
Erbium metal with purity ≥ 99% was cold rolled to 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60% deformations and the Er metal of 60% deformation was annealed at different temperatures for 1 h. The effect of cold rolling deformation and annealing on the microstructure and texture evolution of Er metal was investigated by XRD, EBSD, Microhardness tester, and OM. P is the orientation index, which is used to judge the preferred orientation. The research results showed that grains were broken and refined gradually with increasing deformation, the average grain size was 3.37 µm, and the orientation distribution was uniform for 60% deformation; deformation twins appeared in the grain when the deformation was less than 40%, which contributed to the generation of (0001) plane orientation. Comparing with the initial state, the (011-0) plane orientation gradually weakened and the (111-0) plane orientation had a trend of further strengthening with the increasing deformation; the (1-21-0) plane orientation remained unchanged, but there was a gradual weakening trend when the deformation was greater than 50%. For 60% deformation of Er metal, the deformed microstructure was replaced by fine equiaxed grains with the increasing annealing temperature, and the high-performance Er metal with fine and uniform equiaxed grains can be obtained under annealing at 740 °C for 1 h.Entities:
Keywords: annealing; cold rolling; crystal orientation; erbium target; microstructure
Year: 2022 PMID: 35207910 PMCID: PMC8880798 DOI: 10.3390/ma15041370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic diagram of cold rolling process of Er metal.
Figure 2RD-ND surface of Er samples.
Figure 3Microstructure, inverse pole figure (IPF) map and grain distribution of the initial as-cast metal: (a) microstructure; (b) crystal orientation; and (c) grain size distribution.
Figure 4EBSD IPF maps during different cold rolling deformation: (a) 30%, (b) 40%, (c) 50%, and (d) 60%.
Figure 5The relationship curve between deformation and average grain size.
Figure 6Grain distribution characteristics of Er metal with various cold rolling deformations: (a) 30%, (b) 40%, (c) 50%, and (d) 60%.
Proportion of recrystallization area and deformation area of Er metal with various cold rolling deformation.
| Deformation | Recrystallized (%) | Substructure (%) | Deformed (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 1.79 | 9.93 | 88.28 |
| 40% | 3.44 | 0.35 | 96.21 |
| 50% | 2.09 | 3.30 | 94.60 |
| 60% | 6.60 | 8.84 | 85.09 |
Figure 7Misorientation distribution of Er metal with various cold rolling deformation: (a) initial state, (b) 30%, (c) 40%, (d) 50%, and (e) 60%.
Figure 8XRD map of Er metal with various cold rolled deformation.
Figure 9The relationship between the orientation index changes of Er metal with various cold rolling deformation.
The orientation index of crystal orientation under different deformation.
| Deformation |
| P (0001) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 1.791 | 1.104 | 0.852 | 1.552 |
| 40% | 1.600 | 1.220 | 0.945 | 1.617 |
| 50% | 1.440 | 0.971 | 0.723 | 1.558 |
| 60% | 1.184 | 1.120 | 0.681 | 1.771 |
Figure 10The metallography of 60% deformation with various annealing temperatures: (a) 460 °C, (b) 500 °C, (c) 540 °C, (d) 620 °C, (e) 660 °C, (f) 700 °C, (g) 740 °C, (h) 780 °C, and (i) 820 °C.
Figure 11The relationship curve between annealing temperature with grain size and microhardness at 60% deformation.
Hardness and grain size of 60% deformation at different heat treatment temperatures.
| Temperature (°C) | 460 | 500 | 540 | 620 | 660 | 700 | 740 | 780 | 820 |
| Microhardness (HV) | 134.47 | 111.65 | 98.03 | 97.51 | 97.70 | 96.73 | 96.55 | 97.00 | 96.45 |
| Grain size (µm) | 4.23 | 4.46 | 5.43 | 11.05 | 13.33 | 21.52 | 24.53 | 25.55 | 26.09 |