| Literature DB >> 35207489 |
Fulvio Celsi1, Paola Staffa1, Martino Lamba1, Veronica Castro1, Maddalena Chermetz1, Eva Orzan1, Raffaella Sagredini1, Egidio Barbi1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in children as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea due to tonsil hypertrophy or highly recurrent tonsillitis. Odynophagia, associated with food refusal for the first few days, is a common post-operative complaint. Available drugs for pain management, while efficacious, present some drawbacks, and a novel strategy would be welcome. Photobiomodulation (PBMT), in this context, can represent a possible choice, together with pharmacological therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate PBMT effects compared to standard pain therapy on nociceptive sensation at different time points and administration of painkiller.Entities:
Keywords: adenotonsillectomy; clinical trial; low-level laser therapy; nociception; tonsils
Year: 2022 PMID: 35207489 PMCID: PMC8878042 DOI: 10.3390/life12020202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Population characteristics.
| Median Age | Min Age | Max Age | IQR | nr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT | 5 | 3 | 16 | 2 | 10 |
| T | 5 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 12 |
UT—untreated patients; T—treated (with PBM) patients; Median, Min, and Max Age: Median, Minimum, and Maximum patient age, respectively; IQR—interquartile range; nr—number of patients in each group.
PBM protocol parameters.
| Wavelength | Mean Power | Peak Power | Fluence | Frequency | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 445 nm | 0.1 W | 0.2 W | 6 J/cm2 | 4 Hz | 60 s |
| 660 nm | 0.1 W | 0.2 W | 6 J/cm2 | 4 Hz | 60 s |
| 970 nm | 0.2 W | 0.4 W | 12 J/cm2 | 4 Hz | 60 s |
Figure 1Schematic drawing of laser’s site intervention.
Laboratory results for coagulation tests. All the parameters are within normal range.
|
| Patients | Values | Ref. Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 253 × 103 /mL | 150–400 |
| 2 | 422 × 103 /mL | 150–450 | |
|
| 1 | 1.13 | 0.80–1.20 |
| 2 | 1.15 | ||
|
| 1 | NA | |
| 2 | 13.8 s | ||
|
| 1 | 1.13 | 0.85–1.15 |
| 2 | 1.15 | 0.78–1.20 | |
|
| 1 | NA | |
| 2 | 30.8 s | ||
|
| 1 | 1.13 | 0.85–1.15 |
| 2 | 0.96 | 0.76–1.18 | |
|
| 1 | 404 mg/dL | 180–380 |
| 2 | 346 mg/dL | 160–380 | |
|
| 1 | NA | |
| 2 | 91% | 78–124% | |
|
| 1 | 106% | 70–130% |
| 2 | NA | NA | |
|
| 1 | 128% | Group 0 = 40–140% |
| 2 | NA | NA | |
|
| 1 | 97% | Group 0 = 40–130% |
| 2 | NA | NA |
Figure 2(a) PAED scale evaluated at patients awakening: UT—untreated patients; T—laser-treated patients. (b) FLACC scale evaluated at patients awakening: UT—untreated patients; T—laser-treated patients. (c) FLACC scale evaluated 24 h after surgery: UT—untreated patients; T—laser-treated patients. (d) FLACC scale evaluated 48 h after surgery: UT—untreated patients; T—laser-treated patients. Wilcoxon test results are shown above the graph; p is not significant for all the considered evaluation.