| Literature DB >> 35206904 |
Rieko Shimizu1, Shintaro Sukegawa1, Yuka Sukegawa1, Kazuaki Hasegawa1, Sawako Ono2, Ai Fujimura1, Izumi Yamamoto1, Soichiro Ibaragi3,4, Akira Sasaki3, Yoshihiko Furuki1.
Abstract
Cervicofacial subcutaneous emphysema (SE) is primarily caused by dental treatment introducing gas into the subcutaneous tissue. Air rapidly dissects into the subcutaneous tissue with face and neck swelling, leading to respiratory distress, patient discomfort, and chest pain. Computed tomography (CT) can detect spreading SE patterns. However, the true volume of SE and the degree of air changes in the body over time remain unknown. We evaluated the healing process of SE and the temporal changes in the volume of emphysema in three cases detected using our hospital's electronic health record systems based on inclusion and exclusion criteria over the past 10 years, with CT and three-dimensional (3D) images. The first case was a 46-year-old woman who presented with complaints of swelling from her right eyelid to the neck and clavicles, pain on swallowing, respiratory distress, and hoarseness. The second case was a 35-year-old man who presented with complaints of swelling over the face. The third case was a 36-year-old man who presented with complaints of swelling from the left cheek to the neck. CT revealed SE and pneumomediastinum in all cases. All the patients were administered an antibacterial drug. The CT and 3D images showed an improvement in emphysema 3 days after the onset, with more than half of the volume reduction in emphysema. This made it possible to evaluate the changes in the air content of SE. Observation with CT until the healing process of SE is completed is crucial, and 3D images also help evaluate changes over time.Entities:
Keywords: 3D images; computed tomography; dental treatment; subcutaneous emphysema
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206904 PMCID: PMC8872011 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10020290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1Flow diagram of the study representing the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Figure 2Patient (Case 1) had swelling from her right eyelid/cheek to both necks/clavicle area.
Figure 3Panoramic radiograph at the first visit.
CT at the first visit. The spread of emphysema to the tissue gap in cases 1–3 is shown separately at the facial, cervical, and mediastinal levels; this shows the air volume in the 3D model on the initial visit and 3rd day after the injury.
| Facial | Neck | Mediastinum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orbital Soft Tissue | Buccal | Masticatory Muscle | Parotid Gland | Parapharyngeal | Posterior Pharyngeal | Sublingual | Submandibular | Anterior Cervical | Posterior Cervical | Posterior Pharyngeal | Carotid Artery Space | Anterior Mediastinum | ||
| Case1 | Day 1 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Day 3 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Case 2 | Day 1 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| Day 3 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Case 3 | Day 1 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
| Day 3 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
●: Presence of subcutaneous emphysema.
Figure 4(A) Air was noted in the orbital soft tissue. (B) Air was noted in the buccal space. (C) Air was noted in the masticator muscle space. (D) Air was noted in the parotid gland space, (E) Air was noted in the submandibular space and the submental space. (F) Air was noted in the anterior cervical space and the posterior cervical space. (G) Air was noted in the mediastinum.
Figure 5(A,B) There is little air in the orbital soft tissue and buccal space. (C,D) Air in the masticatory muscle space and the parotid gland space was slightly reduced. (E–G) Air in the submandibular space and the submental space, the mediastinum was significantly reduced.
Figure 6(A) 3D model based on the CT taken at the first visit. The volume was measured to be about 713 mL. (B) 3D model on the 3rd day after injury. The volume was measured to be about 248 mL.
Figure 7(A) 3D model based on the CT taken at the first visit. The volume was measured to be about 376 mL. (B) 3D model on the 3rd day after injury. The volume was measured to be about 204 mL. (C,D) the CT taken at the first visit. (E,F) CT findings 3 days after injury.
Figure 8(A) 3D model based on CT at the first visit. The volume was measured at approximately 108 mL. (B) 3D model on the 3rd day after injury. The volume was approximately 24 mL. (C,D) CT at the first visit. (E,F) CT findings 2 days after injury.