Literature DB >> 35206711

Knockout of the ABCB1 Gene Increases Susceptibility to Emamectin Benzoate, Beta-Cypermethrin and Chlorantraniliprole in Spodoptera frugiperda.

Qi Li1,2, Minghui Jin2, Songmiao Yu2, Ying Cheng2, Yinxue Shan2, Peng Wang2, Haibin Yuan1, Yutao Xiao2.   

Abstract

ATP-binding cassette transporter B1 (ABCB1, or P-glycoprotein) is known to be an important participant in multidrug resistance in mammals, and it also has been proved as a transporter for some insecticides in several lepidopteran insects, yet the precise function of this transporter in Spodoptera frugiperda is unknown. Here, we generated a SfABCB1 knockout strain of the S. frugiperda using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to explore its potential roles in determining susceptibility to chemical insecticides or Bt toxins. Bioassay results showed that the susceptibility of SfABCB1 knockout strain to beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole and emamectin benzoate were significantly increased compared with the wild-type strain DH19, whereas there were no changes to Bt toxins for Cry1Ab, Cry1Fa and Vip3Aa. Our results revealed that SfABCB1 plays important roles in the susceptibility of S. frugiperda to beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole and emamectin benzoate, and imply that overexpression of ABCB1 may contribute to beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole and emamectin benzoate resistance in S. frugiperda.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABCB1; Bt toxins; CRISPR/Cas9; Spodoptera frugiperda; insecticides

Year:  2022        PMID: 35206711      PMCID: PMC8875147          DOI: 10.3390/insects13020137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insects        ISSN: 2075-4450            Impact factor:   2.769


1. Introduction

The fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda, Lepidoptera Noctuidae) is a major polyphagous agricultural pest. S. frugiperda is a native pest in tropical and subtropical America, with strong migratory ability, high reproductive capacity, and extremely wide host range, causing serious economic losses [1,2]. In 2018, S. frugiperda invaded Yunnan Province in China and spread its damage rapidly [3]. At present, the use of chemical pesticides is the main method to control S. frugiperda. Therefore, the problem of field populations’ pesticide resistance needs to be paid great attention. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters belong to a large subfamily of transmembrane proteins with important physiological functions that are conserved in archaea, eubacteria and eukaryotes [4]. According to the sequence similarity of ATP binding sites, ABC transporters can be divided into eight subfamilies A~H [5,6]. The first ABC transporter (ABCB1, or P-glycoprotein) in a eukaryote was found in humans (Homo sapiens) [7], and it is also the first protein found in humans that is resistant to drugs treating cancer. With the rapid increase in the completion of arthropod whole-genome sequencing, research on the the ABC transporter gene family is also growing rapidly. Based on sequence similarity, the ABCB subfamily of insects is considered to be involved in resistance to insecticides and other chemicals [8]. Recent studies have shown that ABC transporters can actively export bound toxins outside the cell and cause xenobiotic resistance [9,10]. In addition, members of the ABC transporter subfamily, such as C2 [11,12,13], A2 [14] and B1 [15], have been shown to play a decisive role in the sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. However, the role of SfABCB1 in handling insecticides and Bt toxins is unknown. In this study, a SfABCB1 knockout strain of S. frugiperda was generated by the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system to investigate the relevance of susceptibility of SfABCB1 to insecticides and Bt toxins. Results showed that the SfABCB1 knockout strain was more sensitive to beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole and emamectin benzoate than the wild-type (WT) strain. Our results showed the importance of SfABCB1 in S. frugiperda combating beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole and emamectin benzoate, and provided further evidence for the participation of the ABCB1 gene in insecticide resistance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

S. frugiperda strain DH19 was collected from Ruili, Yunnan Province of China, in January 2019 [13] and reared in the laboratory on an artificial diet without exposure to any pesticides or Bt toxins. Insects were kept at 27 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 10% relative humidity (RH) with 14 h light:10 h dark photoperiod. Adults were provided 10% sucrose solution for nutrition.

2.2. Insecticides and Bt Toxins

Formulated insecticides (emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole, indoxacarb, tebufenozide, bifenthrin, chlorpyrifos, abamectin, chlorfenapyr and decamethrin) used in bioassays were provided by Prof. Chaobin Xue (Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China). The Cry1Ab, Cry1F and Vip3Aa toxins used in this study were obtained from the Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) (Beijing, China).

2.3. Design and Preparation of sgRNA

The small guide RNA (sgRNA) for editing the SfABCB1 gene was designed using the sgRNAcas9 design tool [16]. After on-target and off-target analysis, a sgRNA-ABCB1 target sequence (5′-CCGCAGTATCCACGCCACTGAACACGC-3′) was selected at exon2 (Figure 1A). The selected sgRNA was checked by comparing it against the S. frugiperda genome (https://bipaa.genouest.org) (accessed on 1 March 2021) for potential off-target sites. The template DNA for in vitro transcription of the sgRNA was made using PCR-based fusion of two oligonucleotides with the T7 promoter. In vitro transcription was performed with the GeneArt Precision gRNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cas9 protein was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the knockout of SfABCB1. (A) Schematic diagram of the sgRNA-targeting sites. The black line indicates the genome locus of Spodoptera frugiperda ABCB1 (SfABCB1) and the two grey boxes represent the two exons of SfABCB1. The sgRNA-targeting site was located on the sense strand of exon-3. The sgRNA-targeting sequence is in black, and the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence is in red. (B) Representative chromatograms of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product sequencing of G0 moths, and the indel mutation is presented in the green box.

2.4. Egg Collection and Microinjection

Eggs freshly laid (within 2 h after oviposition) were washed with distilled water and then placed on a glass slide and fixed with double-sided adhesive tape. About 1 nL mixture of sgRNA (150 ng/μL) and Cas9 protein (50 ng/μL) was injected into individual eggs using a microinjector (Nanoject III, Drummond, Broomall, PA, USA). After injection, eggs were incubated at 25 °C and 65% RH for hatching.

2.5. Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Mutations of SfABCB1

For analysis of mutations, PCR fragments flanking the targeted sites were amplified with ABCB1 primers (SFB1-E3-4F: AGGGACAAACTCTTCATAACC, SFB1-E3-4R: TGGCAGCGTAAGACAGAA). The genomic DNA was extracted with a Multisource Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen, New York, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR conditions were: 94 °C for 5 min, 34 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 35 s, followed by a final extension period of 72 °C for 10min. PCR amplicons were then analyzed via agarose gel electrophoresis. Direct sequencing of PCR products was conducted and double sequencing peaks, indicating a mutation event, were identified. PCR products were then recovered and cloned into pEASY-T3 Vector (TransGen, Beijing, China) and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

2.6. Insect Bioassays

The toxicity of each pesticide and Bt toxin to DH19 and the SfABCB1 knockout strain was measured by diet overlay bioassays. A volume of 900 μL warm artificial diet was dispensed into a 24-well plate (surface area = 2 cm2). The formulated insecticides were diluted to generate five serial solutions with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). For Cry1Ab, Vip3Aa and Cry1Fa toxins, gradient concentrations of toxin solutions were prepared with distilled water. Control groups were treated with DMSO or distilled water, respectively. After the diet cooled down, a volume of 40 μL of the solutions above was applied on the diet surface in each well and left to dry. For the chemical insecticide treatments, a one third-instar larva was placed in each well, and 24 larvae were used for each concentration. Mortality was scored after 2 days. Larvae were considered dead if they did not move with gentle prodding. For Cry1Fa, Cry1Ab and Vip3Aa toxin treatments, newly hatched neonates were 1 larva in each well tested and mortality was recorded after 7 days. For all three toxins, larvae were considered dead if they did not move or weighed less than 3 mg at the end of bioassays. The LC50 values (the concentration of pesticide or Bt protein that will kill 50% of larvae) and the corresponding 95% fiducial limits were calculated through probit analysis of the mortality data using DPS. LC50 values were considered significantly different if fiducial limits did not overlap.

3. Results

3.1. CRISPR/Cas9 Mediates Efficient SfABCB1 Knockouts

A mixture of Cas9 protein and in vitro transcribed sgRNA were co-injected into 200 newly laid eggs to target ABCB1 in S. frugiperda. After injection, 18.5% (37/200) of injected eggs hatched and 78.4% (29/37) of the neonates developed into adults (G0). Male and female moths of G0 were backcrossed with the strain DH19 on a large scale, and the next generation (G1) was produced by single pair mating. After sufficient eggs were collected, genomic DNA samples of individual G0 moths were prepared, and PCR products were directly sequenced to screen SfABCB1 genotypes. The results indicated that 20.1% (6/29) of the G0 moths were mutagenized. PCR products of the target sequence were TA-cloned and sequenced to determine the exact mutations.

3.2. Mutation Inheritance

To generate a homozygous knockout strain, a strain with 31-bp insertion among the detected mutations was selected (Figure 1B). G1 larvae obtained from the hybridization of 31-bp insertion G0 moth and DH19 stain were reared to pupae, and 23 out of 96 pupae carrying the 31-bp insertion allele were identified by testing exuviates of final instar larvae. Adults from these pupae were mass-crossed to obtain a G2 generation. Ninety-six individuals from the G2 were genotyped using final instar exuviates, and 14.6% (14/96) were identified as homozygous. These homozygous individuals were pooled to produce a SfABCB1 knockout strain (ABCB1-KO) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Diagram detailing crossing strategy to obtain a homozygous strain. The G0 moths were heterozygous mutant after microinjectionDH19. Moths from DH19 and mutant G0 moth were mated to obtain G1 generation. Heterozygous G1 individuals were mass-crossed to obtain G2 generation, and 14.6% (14/96) of the tested individuals were identified as homozygous. These homozygous individuals were pooled to produce a SfABCB1 knockout strain (ABCB1-KO).

3.3. Effect of ABCB1 Knockout on Susceptibility of S. frugiperda to Insecticides

Larvae of the homozygous knockout strain were bioassayed to determine their susceptibility to insecticides relative to the unedited strain. The susceptibility of third instar larvae to emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin, and chlorantraniliprole was significantly increased (based on non-overlapping fiducial limits) by an estimated 4.18-fold, 2.94-fold and 2.89-fold, respectively (based on (LC50) values) in the knockout strain ABCB1-KO compared to the WT strain. The bioassay results for chlorantraniliprole also showed a significant increase of an estimated 2.94-fold in susceptibility in SfABCB1 compared to the WT larvae. There was a 2.89-fold increase in susceptibility to beta-cypermethrin in SfABCB1 compared to the WT larvae. Results from bioassays with other insecticides showed no significant changes of susceptibility in ABCB1-KO compared to WT larvae (Table 1).
Table 1

Susceptibility of third instar larvae from ABCB1 knockout strain (SfABCB1) and wild-type strain of Spodoptera frugiperda to 10 different pesticides.

InsecticideStrainLC50 (ng/cm2) a95%FL bN cToxicity Ratio d
Emamectin benzoateWT0.1986 0.1392~0.28353124.18 e
SfABCB1 0.0475 0.0389~0.0579312
ChlorantraniliproleWT15.6798 10.2730~23.93222402.94 e
SfABCB1 5.34173.1296~9.1173240
Beta-cypermethrinWT1263.8372 1069.3669~1493.67312402.89 e
SfABCB1 437.2371 274.4066~696.6900240
IndoxacarbWT33.4869 27.7322~40.43581682.04
SfABCB1 16.4150 9.0952~29.6256168
TebufenozideWT184.2462 95.2849~356.26461681.75
SfABCB1 105.4464 53.0900~209.4357168
BifenthrinWT250.9376 189.0816~333.02911681.69
SfABCB1 148.8243 80.1117~276.4723168
ChlorpyrifosWT1315.3782 880.0563~1966.03311921.42
SfABCB1 924.1850 629.1825~1357.504192
AbamectinWT2087.3459 1753.1752~2485.21231921.24
SfABCB1 1684.8867 1341.9900~2115.3983192
ChlorfenapyrWT55.6443 31.3381~98.80271921.20
SfABCB1 46.5237 26.3887~82.022192
DecamethrinWT94.7553 57.1813~157.01931921.02
SfABCB1 92.596258.1709~147.3942192

a Lethal concentration that kills 50% of S. frugiperda larvae. b 95% fiducial limits of LC50, units are ng toxin per cm2 diet. c Number of larvae tested. d Toxicity ratio = LC50 value for wild-type strain (WT) divided by LC50 value for knockout strain (sfABCB1). e LC50 of the same toxin significantly greater for the wild-type strain (WT) than sfABCB1 by the conservation criterion of no overlap of the 95% fiducial limits [17].

The bioassay results showed that the difference in mortality between WT and ABCB1-KO was the largest after treating with emamectin benzoate, followed by beta-cypermethrin and chlorantraniliprole. By comparing the results of different concentrations of each toxin tested, we found that the trends of larvae mortality were not always the same when treated with emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin or chlorantraniliprole. For emamectin benzoate, the mortalities of sfABCB1 were less than that of WT at low concentrations. However, the mortality ratios of sfABCB1 were significantly higher than that of WT when treated with emamectin benzoate higher than 0.04 ng/cm2 (Figure 3a). For beta-cypermethrin and chlorantraniliprole, the mortality rate of sfABCB1 strain was always higher than that of WT strain (Figure 3b,c). However, no significant differences were detected between the two strains treated with 3200 ng/cm2 beta-cypermethrin, and 2 ng/cm2 and 4 ng/cm2 chlorantraniliprole only (Figure 3b,c).
Figure 3

Mortality rate of DH19wild type and sfABCB1 strains at different concentrations of (a) emamectin benzoate; (b) beta-cypermethrin and (c) chlorantraniliprole. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.

3.4. Susceptibility of ABCB1 Knockout Neonates to Bt Toxins

To determine the potential roles of SfABCB1 in the toxicology of Bt toxins, we performed a bioassay using Cry1Ab, Cry1Fa and Vip3Aa. The results showed no significant changes in the susceptibility of SfABCB1 knockout strain compared with the wild-type strain DH19 when treated with the three Bt toxins (Table 2).
Table 2

Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda neonates from ABCB1 knockout strain (SfABCB1) and wild-type strain to 3 Bt toxins.

InsecticideStrainLC50(μg/cm2) a95%FL bN cToxicity Ratio d
Vip3AaWT19.4096 8.1743~46.08751921.36
SfABCB1 14.26774.4004~46.2605192
Cry1AbWT14.5213 11.1550~18.90332640.87
SfABCB1 16.6693 13.9074~19.9797264
Cry1FaWT0.6803 0.0099~46.58841920.67
SfABCB1 1.0194 0.0231~44.9738192

a Lethal concentration that kills 50% of S. frugiperda larvae. b 95% fiducial limits of LC50, units are ng toxin per cm2 diet. c Number of larvae tested. d Toxicity ratio = LC50 value for wild-type strain (WT) divided by LC50 value for knockout strain (sfABCB1).

4. Discussion

ABC transporters play an indispensable role in multidrug resistance in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, where ABCB1 (p-glycoprotein) acts as a widely specific cellular efflux pump for hydrophobic organic chemicals in mammals that has been widely studied [18,19]. After the ABC gene was proved to be related to multidrug resistance in humans, the role of the insect ABC gene in insecticide resistance has attracted increasing attention. However, the functional correlation between ABC transporters and drug resistance in arthropods is limited. In this study, the ABCB1 gene was edited by reverse genetics and its functional relevance to susceptibility of pesticides (emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin and chloranthramide) was confirmed. The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system has been successfully used to manipulate different target genes in many non-model species [20,21], including S. frugiperda [22]. In this study, we obtained a mutation frequency of 20.1% in G0. As one of the main criteria to evaluate the efficiency of gene editing techniques, mutation frequency may be affected by a variety of factors, such as target gene selection, sgRNA or Cas9 dose, and the form of Cas9 (plasmid, mRNA or Cas9 protein) [23]. Microinjection techniques (injection location, injection depth and needle size) also affect mutation frequency and G0 survival rate [24]. It is reported that ABCB1 is related to resistance to insecticides [6]. Some studies have shown that the expression of ABCB1 in the insecticide-resistant strains is significantly increased. The ABCB1 activity or expression levels in both vertebrates and invertebrates were raised when treated with pyrethroids, cyclodienes or organophosphates (OPs) [25,26,27]. Studies have shown that after treating the Helicoverpa armigera with a high concentration of chlorantraniliprole, the expression of ABCB1 increased significantly. Increased levels of ABCB1 protein were also found in populations of H.armigera resistant to pyrethroids and OP [26,28]. Knock out of ABCB1 gene in Spodoptera exigua resulted in three times the sensitivity to abamectin and emamectin benzoate [29]. In three types of chlorantraniliprole-resistant strains of Chilo suppressalis, the expression of ABCB1 was up-regulated in varied degrees [30]. In addition, the synergistic effect of verapamil on pyrethroid toxicity has been confirmed to be correlated with changes in the ABCB1 expression level in H. armigera [26,28], while similar findings have been confirmed in C. pipiens [25] and Apis mellifera [31]. In this experiment, the ABCB1 knockout strain was significantly more susceptible to beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole and EB. We speculate that the absence of ABCB1 failed to transport beta-cypermethrin, chlorantraniliprole and emamectin benzoate extracellularly, and accumulating toxins in cells raised the sensitivity of SfABCB1 strain to pesticides (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Model to explain the role of ABCB1 in Spodoptera frugiperda in increasing susceptibility to emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin, and chlorantraniliprole in vivo. (a) Model of ABCB1 in wild type DH19strain (WT). ABCB1 can transport some pesticides extracellular, but not Bt; (b) Model of ABCB1 in knockout strain (sfABCB1). The deformed ABCB1 protein cannot perform normal transportation functions, resulting in cellular toxins accumulation.

However, in comparison with emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin, and chlorantraniliprole, knockout of SfABCB1 showed barely no effect on the sensitivity of S. frugiperda to p-indoxacarb, chlorpyrifos, abamectin, tarfenac, tebufenozide, bifenthrin and deltamethrin. Similarly, Bass et al. [25] reported that verapamil had no effect on the toxicity of chlorpyrifos in C. pipiens, and no relationship between pyrethroid exposure and ABCB1 expression was detected in Trichoplusia ni [32]. Nevertheless, the increase of transcriptional level of ABCB1 can always be detected in the abamectin-resistant strains of Plutella xylostella [33]. The knockout of ABCB1 increased the susceptibility of Spodoptera exigua to abamectin and emamectin benzoate, but has no effect on the toxicity of chlorantraniliprole and beta-cypermethrin [29]. These results indicate that the defense function of ABCB1 against insecticides varies among different species. Whether this difference is caused by the phenomenon of gene replenishment remains to be further explored. ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC) include a large family with similar functions and sequences. There are eight ABC transporters in subfamily B. Although they have some differences in functionality, it cannot be ruled out that they have some common functions because they all have common domains. Similar results were reported in Bt receptors, ANP1 and APN6. In a resistance strain of Trichoplusia ni, APN1 was significantly down-regulated, whereas APN6 was significantly up-regulated [34]. It has been reported that the down-regulation of PxABCB1 was associated with Cry1Ac resistance in P. xylostella [35]. However, the bioassay results of this study implied that ABCB1 was not the receptor of Cry1Ab, Cry1Fa or Vip3Aa in S. frugiperda. Our results are consistent with the SeABCB1 which was also not involved in the Bt toxins detoxification mode. This difference may be influenced by the different Bt toxins or difference species. The results of this study provided new evidence for the role of SfABCB1 in the susceptibility of S. frugiperda to emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin, and chlorantraniliprole, and also proved that the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system is effective for studying the function of candidate genes in S. frugiperda. These results will provide guidance for explaining the insect resistance mechanisms of emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin, and chlorantraniliprole. Due to the short period in which S. frugiperda has been invasive in China, no monitoring of its resistance to insecticides has been conducted until now. Therefore, clarifying the resistance mechanism of S. frugiperda to pesticides is very important for improving resistance management strategies and the sustainable control of S. frugiperda.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study provide new functional evidence for SfABCB1 as a transporter of emamectin benzoate, beta-cypermethrin and chlorantraniliprole, and confirmed that ABCB1 in S. frugiperda is not the receptor of the three Bt toxins, Cry1Ab, Cry1Fa and Vip3Aa.
  31 in total

1.  Evidence for p-glycoprotein modification of insecticide toxicity in mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens complex.

Authors:  D S Buss; A R McCaffery; A Callaghan
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.739

2.  Knockout of a P-glycoprotein gene increases susceptibility to abamectin and emamectin benzoate in Spodoptera exigua.

Authors:  Y-Y Zuo; J-L Huang; J Wang; Y Feng; T-T Han; Y-D Wu; Y-H Yang
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.585

3.  P-glycoprotein ATPase from the resistant pest, Helicoverpa armigera: purification, characterization and effect of various insecticides on its transport function.

Authors:  Ravindra M Aurade; Senigala K Jayalakshmi; Kuruba Sreeramulu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-02-23

4.  Differential alteration of two aminopeptidases N associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in cabbage looper.

Authors:  Kasorn Tiewsiri; Ping Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Nanomedicine for targeted cancer therapy: towards the overcoming of drug resistance.

Authors:  Alina Shapira; Yoav D Livney; Henk J Broxterman; Yehuda G Assaraf
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 18.500

6.  Functional characterization of SlitPBP3 in Spodoptera litura by CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing.

Authors:  Guan-Heng Zhu; Jun Xu; Zhen Cui; Xiao-Tong Dong; Zhan-Feng Ye; Dong-Juan Niu; Yong-Ping Huang; Shuang-Lin Dong
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.714

7.  CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of the abdominal-A homeotic gene in the global pest, diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella).

Authors:  Yuping Huang; Yazhou Chen; Baosheng Zeng; Yajun Wang; Anthony A James; Geoff M Gurr; Guang Yang; Xijian Lin; Yongping Huang; Minsheng You
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.714

8.  An ABC transporter mutation is correlated with insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin.

Authors:  Linda J Gahan; Yannick Pauchet; Heiko Vogel; David G Heckel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Killing them with kindness? In-hive medications may inhibit xenobiotic efflux transporters and endanger honey bees.

Authors:  David J Hawthorne; Galen P Dively
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fall armyworm migration across the Lesser Antilles and the potential for genetic exchanges between North and South American populations.

Authors:  Rodney N Nagoshi; Shelby Fleischer; Robert L Meagher; Mirian Hay-Roe; Ayub Khan; M Gabriela Murúa; Pierre Silvie; Clorinda Vergara; John Westbrook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.