| Literature DB >> 35206703 |
Burarat Phesatcha1, Kampanat Phesatcha2, Bounnaxay Viennaxay3, Maharach Matra3, Pajaree Totakul3, Metha Wanapat3.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to conduct the effects of cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus) meal (CM) as a protein supplement on in vitro gas production, rumen fermentation, and methane (CH4) mitigation. Dietary treatments were randomly assigned using a completely randomized design (CRD) with a 2 × 5 factorial arrangement. The first factor was two ratios of roughage to concentrate (R:C at 60:40 and 40:60), and the second factor was the level of CM to replace soybean meal (SBM) in a concentrate ratio at 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100, respectively. It was found that in vitro DM degradability and the concentration of propionic (C3) were significantly increased (p < 0.05), while the potential extent of gas production (a + b), acetate (C2), acetate and propionate (C2:C3) ratio, and protozoal population were reduced (p < 0.05) by lowering the R:C ratio and the replacement of SBM by CM. In addition, rumen CH4 production was mitigated (p < 0.05) with increasing levels of CM for SBM. In this study, CM has the potential to improve rumen fermentation by enhancing C3 concentration and DM degradability, reduced methane production, and C2:C3 ratio. The effects were more pronounced (p < 0.05) at low levels of roughage.Entities:
Keywords: cricket meal; digestibility; protein; ruminal fermentation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206703 PMCID: PMC8877429 DOI: 10.3390/insects13020129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Feed ingredients and chemical composition of concentrate, cricket meal (Gryllus bimaculatus), and roughage sources used in the experiment.
| Items | Replacement Levels of CM for SBM | CM | RS | SBM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | ||||
| Ingredients (% as fed) | ||||||||
| Cassava chip | 60.0 | 60.0 | 58.0 | 55.0 | 55.0 | |||
| Soybean meal | 16.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Cricket meal | 0.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 12.0 | 16.0 | |||
| Coconut meal | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | |||
| Rice bran | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 7.8 | 7.6 | |||
| Palm meal | 5.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | |||
| Molasses | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |||
| Urea | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | |||
| Sulfur | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Mineral mixed | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Salt | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||
| Chemical composition | ||||||||
| Dry matter (%) | 90.3 | 90.8 | 92.3 | 92.7 | 93.1 | 94.2 | 91.6 | 90.5 |
| ------------------------------------% dry matter ----------------------------------- | ||||||||
| Organic matter | 93.6 | 94.5 | 94.1 | 93.6 | 94.4 | 96.6 | 90.7 | 94.3 |
| Ash | 6.4 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 6.4 | 5.6 | 3.4 | 9.3 | 5.7 |
| Crude protein | 14.0 | 14.1 | 14.0 | 14.3 | 14.4 | 68.5 | 2.2 | 40.1 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 20.1 | 20.8 | 24.7 | 24.5 | 24.3 | 33.1 | 75.5 | 12.8 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 10.7 | 10.5 | 12.2 | 13.5 | 13.1 | 12.7 | 47.4 | 9.7 |
| Ether extract | 2.2 | 7.2 | 8.0 | 10.6 | 11.3 | 12.5 | - | 13.2 |
CM, cricket meal; SBM, soybean meal; RS, rice straw.
Effect of cricket meal (Gryllus bimaculatus) (CM) on gas production kinetics and in vitro DM degradability.
| Treatments | R:C Ratio | SBM:CM | Gas Production Kinetics | Cumulative Gas Production at 96 h (mL/0.5 g DM Substrate) | In Vitro DM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b | c | a + b | 12 h | 24 h | ||||
| T1 | 60:40 | 100:0 | −0.4 | 70.7 | 0.04 | 70.3 | 65.7 | 52.7 | 59.3 |
| T2 | 75:25 | −0.8 | 71.5 | 0.03 | 70.7 | 68.8 | 55.9 | 59.7 | |
| T3 | 50:50 | 1.3 | 69.2 | 0.04 | 71.5 | 69.7 | 57.0 | 60.2 | |
| T4 | 25:75 | 1.1 | 69.8 | 0.04 | 70.9 | 69.1 | 57.5 | 60.5 | |
| T5 | 0:100 | 1.6 | 69.1 | 0.04 | 70.7 | 70.2 | 56.5 | 61.6 | |
| T6 | 40:60 | 100:0 | −3.1 | 76.4 | 0.03 | 73.3 | 65.3 | 62.8 | 62.8 |
| T7 | 75:25 | −2.7 | 74.3 | 0.03 | 66.1 | 66.7 | 66.5 | 62.4 | |
| T8 | 50:50 | −0.8 | 71.5 | 0.03 | 70.7 | 68.7 | 64.6 | 64.0 | |
| T9 | 25:75 | −2.2 | 73.4 | 0.03 | 71.7 | 70.1 | 65.1 | 64.1 | |
| T10 | 0:100 | −1.1 | 70.8 | 0.05 | 69.7 | 72.1 | 69.6 | 65.6 | |
| SEM | 0.38 | 0.58 | 0.008 | 1.42 | 1.18 | 0.45 | 0.58 | ||
| Comparison | |||||||||
| 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.006 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |||
| 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.78 | 0.36 | 0.28 | |||
R:C, ratio of roughage to concentrate at 60:40 and 40:60; SBM:CM, soybean meal replacement by cricket meal in a concentrate ratio at 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100, respectively; a, gas production from immediately soluble fraction, b, gas production from insoluble fraction, c, gas production rate constant for insoluble fraction, a + b, potential extent of gas; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of cricket meal (Gryllus bimaculatus) (CM) on in vitro gas production, proportions of volatile fatty acids, and methane production.
| Treatments | R:C Ratio | SBM:CM | Molar Proportions of VFA (mmol/L) | Total VFA | CH4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2 | C3 | C4 | C2:C3 | |||||
| T1 | 60:40 | 100:0 | 72.0 | 19.0 | 8.9 | 3.8 | 59.8 | 30.7 |
| T2 | 75:25 | 71.9 | 19.2 | 8.9 | 3.7 | 52.5 | 30.6 | |
| T3 | 50:50 | 71.5 | 20.5 | 7.9 | 3.5 | 56.3 | 29.7 | |
| T4 | 25:75 | 69.1 | 22.1 | 8.8 | 3.1 | 68.9 | 28.5 | |
| T5 | 0:100 | 65.2 | 24.6 | 10.2 | 2.6 | 63.6 | 26.6 | |
| T6 | 40:60 | 100:0 | 66.7 | 22.9 | 10.3 | 2.9 | 70.9 | 27.8 |
| T7 | 75:25 | 61.9 | 27.2 | 11.9 | 2.2 | 78.5 | 25.7 | |
| T8 | 50:50 | 56.9 | 31.4 | 11.7 | 1.8 | 73.9 | 21.6 | |
| T9 | 25:75 | 56.2 | 30.9 | 12.8 | 1.8 | 73.1 | 21.9 | |
| T10 | 0: 100 | 55.1 | 31.5 | 13.4 | 1.7 | 71.2 | 21.5 | |
| SEM | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 1.05 | 0.14 | ||
| Comparison | ||||||||
| R:C ratio | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.001 | ||
| SBM:CM | 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.81 | 0.004 | 0.54 | 0.004 | ||
| R:C ratio × SBM:CM | 0.26 | 0.65 | 0.14 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.07 | ||
R:C, ratio of roughage to concentrate at 60:40 and 40:60; SBM:CM, soybean meal replacement by cricket meal in a concentrate ratio at 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100, respectively; VFAs, volatile fatty acids; CH4, methane production calculated according to Moss et al. [24]. CH4 = 0.45 (C2) – 0.275 (C3) + 0.4 (C4); SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 1Effect of Cricket meal (Gryllus bimaculatus) (CM) on rumen volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and methane production. T1, 60:40 R:C + 0%CM; T2, 60:40 R:C + 25%CM; T3, 60:40 R:C + 50%CM; T4, 60:40 R:C + 75%CM; T5, 60:40 R:C + 100%CM; T6, 40:60 R:C + 0%CM; T7, 40:60 R:C + 25%CM; T8, 40:60 R:C + 50%CM; T9, 40:60 R:C + 75%CM; T10, 40:60 R:C + 100%CM.
Effect of cricket meal (Gryllus bimaculatus) (CM) in in vitro on rumen pH, ammonia–nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration, and protozoal population.
| Treatments | R:C Ratio | SBM:CM | pH | NH3-N | Protozoa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 60:40 | 100:0 | 6.5 | 18.7 | 9.1 |
| T2 | 75:25 | 6.5 | 22.4 | 9.1 | |
| T3 | 50:50 | 6.5 | 26.3 | 8.7 | |
| T4 | 25:75 | 6.6 | 25.0 | 7.4 | |
| T5 | 0:100 | 6.7 | 26.0 | 8.1 | |
| T6 | 40:60 | 100:0 | 6.5 | 23.5 | 6.5 |
| T7 | 75:25 | 6.4 | 26.6 | 6.1 | |
| T8 | 50:50 | 6.4 | 27.8 | 6.4 | |
| T9 | 25:75 | 6.4 | 28.1 | 7.2 | |
| T10 | 0:100 | 6.4 | 28.4 | 6.7 | |
| SEM | 0.14 | 1.28 | 1.42 | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| R:C ratio | 0.001 | 0.04 | 0.001 | ||
| SBM:CM | 0.72 | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||
| R:C ratio × SBM:CM | 0.36 | 0.86 | 0.65 | ||
R:C, ratio of roughage to concentrate at 60:40 and 40:60; SBM:CM, soybean meal replacement by cricket meal in a concentrate ratio at 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100, respectively; NH3-N, ammonia–nitrogen concentration (mg/100 mL); SEM, standard error of the mean.