| Literature DB >> 35206656 |
Teresa Neves1, Pedro Parreira1, Vitor Rodrigues2, João Graveto1.
Abstract
Intention to leave is influenced by the commitment and individual and structural factors. It is a critical dimension in health systems due to the shortage of professionals and the potential impact on the quality of care. The present paper: (i) characterizes organizational commitment and intention to leave; (ii) analyzes the relationship between structural factors (such as, work environment and nurse staffing), individual factors (age), and nurses' organizational commitments and intention to leave; and (iii) analyzes the differences in the intention to leave and in the organizational commitment according to service specialty, nurses' specialization, and contractual relationship in Portuguese public hospitals. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 850 nurses from 12 public hospitals units. The results show a high affective and continuance commitment of nurses with the hospital, and a reduced tendency of the intention to leave. A significant positive association was also found between the intent to leave and individual/structural factors. Organizational commitment and intention to leave levels are satisfactory, despite the influence of several factors, such as nurse staffing, work environment, or other opportunities for professional development. The results identify particularly sensitive areas that, through adequate health and management policies, can reduce nurses' intentions to leave and promote the sustainability of the health system.Entities:
Keywords: hospitals; intention to leave; nursing staff; organizational commitment; work environment
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206656 PMCID: PMC8878484 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Participant’s characteristics.
| Participant’s Characteristics | Mean | Standard Deviation |
| % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 36.11 | 7.97 | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 152 | 18.14 | ||
| Female | 686 | 81.86 | ||
| Education level | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree (3-year degree) | 10 | 1.19 | ||
| Bachelor’s degree (4-year degree) | 748 | 89.05 | ||
| Master’s degree | 80 | 9.52 | ||
| Doctoral degree | 2 | 0.24 | ||
| Title of specialist nurse | ||||
| Yes | 222 | 27.07 | ||
| Specialization area | ||||
| Rehabilitation nursing | 122 | 59.22 | ||
| Medical-surgical nursing | 57 | 27.67 | ||
| Mental health and psychiatric nursing | 10 | 4.86 | ||
| Community nursing | 9 | 4.37 | ||
| Maternal health and obstetrics nursing | 8 | 3.88 | ||
| Working as a specialist nurse | ||||
| Yes | 70 | 33.98 | ||
| No | 136 | 66.02 | ||
| Length of professional experience (years) | 12.99 | 7.80 | ||
| Employment contract | ||||
| Individual employment contract | 483 | 59.70 | ||
| Public service employment contract | 315 | 38.94 | ||
| Other | 11 | 1.36 | ||
| Service specialty | ||||
| General surgery | 223 | 26.24 | ||
| Internal medicine | 432 | 50.82 | ||
| Orthopedic | 195 | 22.94 |
Descriptive and correlational analysis of nurses’ intention to leave, organizational commitment, work environment, adequacy of staffing, and age (n = 850).
| Mean | Standard | IITLes | EITL | AOC | COC | NOC | NPWE | Dev.06 † | Dev.14 † | Age ‡ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IITL | 3.62 | 1.86 | 1 | ||||||||
| EITL | 2.21 | 1.32 | 0.416 ** | 1 | |||||||
| AOC | 4.09 | 1.25 | −0.406 ** | −0.462 ** | 1 | ||||||
| COC | 4.62 | 1.45 | −0.087 * | −0.213 ** | 0.114 ** | 1 | |||||
| NOC | 3.26 | 1.20 | −0.342 ** | −0.360 ** | 0.768 ** | 0.264 ** | 1 | ||||
| NPWE | 2.39 | 0.47 | −0.239 ** | 0.478 ** | 0.000 | 0.452 ** | 1 | ||||
| Dev. 06 † | −5.38 | 17.50 | −0.084 * | −0.084 * | 0.121 ** | 0.097 ** | 0.065 | 0.022 | 1 | ||
| Dev.14 † | −36.73 | 27.71 | −0.216 ** | −0.092 ** | 0.086 * | 0.061 | 0.046 | 0.017 | 0.859 ** | 1 | |
| Age ‡ | 36.11 | 7.97 | −0.172 ** | −0.096 ** | 0.027 | −0.189 ** | −0.058 | 0.006 | 0.015 | 0.142 ** | 1 |
IITL, internal intention to leave; EITL, external intention to leave; AOC, affective organizational commitment; COC, continuance organizational commitment; NOC, normative organizational commitment; NPWE, nursing practice work environment; Dev. 06, percentage deviation between actual staffing and estimated staffing based on Regulatory Directive No. 1/2006; and Dev. 14, percentage deviation between actual staffing and estimated staffing based on the Regulation No. 533/2014. † n = 835; ‡ n = 827. * Significant correlation at p ≤ 0.05; ** Significant correlation at p ≤ 0.001.
Results of the Mann–Whitney test on the intention to leave and organizational commitment according to the contractual relationship.
| Contract |
| Mean | Standard | U |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal intention to leave | IEC 1 | 483 | 3.95 | 1.90 | 56,423.50 | <0.001 |
| ECPF 2 | 315 | 3.12 | 1.70 | |||
| External intention to leave | IEC | 483 | 2.35 | 1.42 | 65,313.50 | 0.001 |
| ECPF | 315 | 2.02 | 1.15 | |||
| Affective organizational commitment | IEC | 483 | 4.02 | 1.21 | 71,861.50 | 0.186 |
| ECPF | 315 | 4.15 | 1.28 | |||
| Continuance organizational commitment | IEC | 483 | 4.78 | 1.36 | 64,792.50 | <0.001 |
| ECPF | 315 | 4.37 | 1.57 | |||
| Normative organizational commitment | IEC | 483 | 3.25 | 1.12 | 72,565.50 | 0.271 |
| ECPF | 315 | 3.20 | 1.25 |
1 IEC: individual employment contract; 2 ECPF: employment contract in public functions.
Results of the Mann–Whitney test on the intention to leave and organizational commitment, according to nurses’ specializations.
| Nurses’ Specializations |
| Mean | Standard Deviation | U |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal intention to leave | Specialist | 222 | 3.72 | 1.95 | 63,740 | 0.381 |
| Non-specialist | 598 | 3.57 | 1.82 | |||
| Works as specialist | 70 | 2.87 | 1.49 | 3041 | <0.001 | |
| Does not work as a specialist | 136 | 4.15 | 2.01 | |||
| External intention to leave | Specialist | 222 | 2.33 | 1.32 | 60,482 | 0.050 |
| Non-specialist | 598 | 2.16 | 1.31 | |||
| Works as specialist | 70 | 2.25 | 1.25 | 4429 | 0.414 | |
| Does not work as a specialist | 136 | 2.38 | 1.37 | |||
| Affective organizational commitment | Specialist | 222 | 4.07 | 1.22 | 65,017 | 0.652 |
| Non-specialist | 598 | 4.10 | 1.26 | |||
| Works as specialist | 70 | 4.14 | 1.13 | 4713 | 0.908 | |
| Does not work as a specialist | 136 | 4.05 | 1.24 | |||
| Continuance organizational commitment | Specialist | 222 | 4.33 | 1.56 | 56,810 | 0.001 |
| Non-specialist | 598 | 4.74 | 1.39 | |||
| Works as specialist | 70 | 3.88 | 1.63 | 3741 | 0.012 | |
| Does not work as a specialist | 136 | 4.47 | 1.50 | |||
| Normative organizational commitment | Specialist | 222 | 3.09 | 1.12 | 58,077 | 0.006 |
| Non-specialist | 598 | 3.32 | 1.21 | |||
| Works as specialist | 70 | 3.16 | 1.18 | 4754 | 0.988 | |
| Does not work as a specialist | 136 | 3.06 | 1.07 |
Figure 1Distribution of nurses’ internal and external intent to leave, according to the unit’s specialty.