| Literature DB >> 35206639 |
Gaoweijia Wang1, Shanshan Li2, Li Yang1.
Abstract
To answer to global climate change, promote climate governance and map out a grand blueprint for sustainable development, carbon neutrality has become the target and vision of all countries. Green finance is a means to coordinate economic development and environmental governance. This paper mainly studies the trend of carbon emission reduction in China in the next 40 years under the influence of green finance development and how to develop and improve China's green finance system to help China achieve the goal of "carbon neutrality by 2060". The research process and conclusions are as follows: (1) Through correlation test and data analysis, it is concluded that the development of green finance is an important driving force to achieve carbon neutrality. (2) The grey prediction GM (1,1) model is used to forecast the data of carbon dioxide emissions, green credit balance, green bond issuance scale and green project investment in China from 2020 to 2060. The results show that they will all increase year by year in the next 40 years. (3) BP neural network model is used to further predict carbon dioxide emissions from 2020 to 2060. It is expected that China's CO2 emissions will show an "inverted V" trend in the next 40 years, and China is expected to achieve a carbon peak in 2032 and be carbon neutral in 2063. Based on the results of the research above, this paper provides a supported path of implementing the realization of the carbon-neutral target of China from the perspective of developing and improving green financial system, aiming to provide references for China to realize the vision of carbon neutrality, providing policy suggestions for relevant departments, and provide ideas for other countries to accelerate the realization of carbon neutrality.Entities:
Keywords: BP neural network model; carbon neutral and carbon peak; green financial system; grey prediction GM (1,1) model; prediction of CO2 emission; relationship between green finance and carbon neutral
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206639 PMCID: PMC8872555 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
China’s green credit balance of major banking institutions from 2014 to 2019.
| Deadline | Green Credit Balance (Hundred Million Yuan) | Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Projects and Service Loans (Hundred Million Yuan) | Emerging Sectors of Strategic Importance Loans (Hundred Million Yuan) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2014 | 57,217.3 | 41,610.4 | 15,606.8 |
| 30 June 2015 | 66,361.33 | 49,734.66 | 16,626.67 |
| 30 June 2016 | 72,600 | 55,700 | 16,900 |
| 30 June 2017 | 82,956.63 | 65,312.63 | 17,644 |
| 31 December 2018 | 96,600 | ||
| 30 June 2019 | 106,000 |
Note: the data on energy conservation and environmental protection projects and services and strategic emerging industries loans in 2018 and 2019 are missing.
China’s green bond issuance scale and green project investment volume from 2015 to 2020.
| Year | Green Bond Issuance Scale (Hundred Million) | Green Project Investment Volume (Billion) |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Almost zero | Almost zero |
| December 2016 | 2312 | 5469.9 |
| December 2017 | 2497 | 4087.3 |
| December 2018 | 2862 | 4708.9 |
| December 2019 | 3826 | 5167.4 |
| June 2020 | - | 5372.9 |
Note: Data on the size of green bond issuance in 2020 is missing.
Correlation between green credit balance and CO2 emission intensity.
| Green Credit Balance | CO2 Emission Intensity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Green credit balance | Pearson Correlation | 1 | −0.997 |
| Sig.(1-tailed) | - | 0.002 | |
|
| 5 | 5 | |
| CO2 emission intensity | Pearson Correlation | −0.997 | 1 |
| Sig.(1-tailed) | 0.002 | - | |
|
| 5 | 5 |
Note: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
Correlation between green bond issuance scale and CO2 emission intensity.
| Green Bond Issuance Scale | CO2 Emission Intensity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| green bond issuance scale | Pearson Correlation | 1 | −0.947 |
| Sig.(1-tailed) | - | - | |
|
| 5 | 5 | |
| CO2 emission intensity | Pearson Correlation | - | 1 |
| Sig.(1-tailed) | −0.947 | - | |
|
| 5 | 5 |
Note: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
Correlation between green project investment and CO2 emission intensity.
| Green Project Investment | CO2 Emission Intensity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| green project investment | Pearson Correlation | 1 | −0.950 |
| Sig.(1-tailed) | - | - | |
|
| 5 | 5 | |
| CO2 emission intensity | Pearson Correlation | −0.950 | 1 |
| Sig.(1-tailed) | - | - | |
|
| 5 | 5 |
Note: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
The comparison table of prediction accuracy.
| Level | Variance Ratio (C) | Small Probability Error (P) | Correlation (R) | Relative_Error_Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| good | C ≤ 0.35 | P ≥ 0.95 | R > 0.9 | Accuracy level | |
| qualified | 0.35 < C ≤ 0.5 | 0.95 > P ≥ 0.8 | 0.9 ≥ R > 0.8 | excellent | <0.01 |
| Barely qualified | 0.5 < C ≤ 0.65 | 0.8 > P ≥ 0.7 | 0.8 ≥ R > 0.7 | qualified | 0.01–0.05 |
| unqualified | C > 0.65 | P < 0.7 | 0.7 ≥ R > 0.6 (satisfied) | Barely qualified | 0.05–0.1 |
Accuracy of the model constructed.
| Test Index | Test Value | Test Result |
|---|---|---|
| C | 0.1841 | Good |
| P | 1 | Good |
| R | 0.7314 | Barely qualified |
| Rel_Error_Mean | 0.0149 | Qualified |
Figure 1Forecast data on green credit balance, green bond issuance scale and green project investment by GM (1, 1) model from 2020 to 2060.
Figure 2Forecast data of China’s CO2 emissions from 2020 to 2060 by GM (1, 1) model.
Figure 3Prediction results of BP neural network (multi-layer) model. (a) The prediction of data on CO2 emissions in the past. (b) The learning and training process of this model.
Figure 4Forecast data on CO2 emissions from 2020 to 2060 by BP neural network model.
Figure 5Deficiency demands and paths of green finance to help achieve carbon neutrality.