| Literature DB >> 35206552 |
Muhammad Naim Ibrahim1, Nik Rosmawati Nik Husain1, Aziah Daud1, Thilaka Chinnayah2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a serious public health challenge despite enormous eradication efforts. Indigenous groups worldwide have a higher TB incidence and associated delayed sputum-smear conversion. The aim of this case-control study was to determine the epidemiology and factors associated with delayed sputum-smear conversion among Malaysian aborigines.Entities:
Keywords: Malaysian aborigines; delayed sputum smear conversion; factors associated; smear-positive pulmonary TB
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206552 PMCID: PMC8872111 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The flowchart for the case–control study.
Description of TB cases among Malaysian Aborigines from 2016 to 2020 (n = 808).
| Year | TB Cases | Pulmonary TB Cases | Smear Positive Pulmonary TB | Proportion a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 177 | 161 | 118 | 0.73 (0.66–0.80) |
| 2017 | 211 | 193 | 157 | 0.81 (0.75–0.87) |
| 2018 | 191 | 165 | 134 | 0.81 (0.74–0.87) |
| 2019 | 198 | 177 | 138 | 0.78 (0.71–0.84) |
| 2020 | 31 | 29 | 25 | 0.86 (0.68–0.96) |
| Summative | 808 | 725 | 572 | 0.79 (0.76–0.82) |
Proportion of smear-positive pulmonary TB/pulmonary TB; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.
The characteristics of smear-positive pulmonary TB and its sputum smear status at the end of the intensive phase among Malaysian aborigines from 2016 to 2020 (n = 487).
| Variables | Frequency (%) | Delayed Sputum Smear Conversion ( | Sputum Smear Converted ( |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| | 39.20 (16.33) * | 43.73 (15.82) * | 38.13 (16.29) * |
| | |||
| Female | 180 (37.0) | 32 (17.8) | 148 (82.2) |
| Male | 307 (63.0) | 61 (19.9) | 246 (80.1) |
| | |||
| Senoi | 300 (61.6) | 50 (16.7) | 250 (83.3) |
| Melayu Proto | 121 (24.8) | 32 (26.4) | 89 (73.6) |
| Negrito | 66 (13.6) | 11 (16.7) | 55 (83.3) |
| | |||
| Urban | 58 (11.9) | 13 (22.4) | 45 (77.6) |
| Rural | 429 (88.1) | 80 (18.6) | 349 (81.4) |
| | |||
| Tertiary | 5 (1.0) | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) |
| Secondary | 110 (22.6) | 18 (16.4) | 92 (83.6) |
| Primary | 179 (36.8) | 32 (17.9) | 147 (82.1) |
| Informal | 193 (39.6) | 42 (21.8) | 151 (78.2) |
| | |||
| Above poverty line | 14 (2.9) | 3 (21.4) | 11 (78.6) |
| Below poverty line | 473 (97.1) | 90 (19.0) | 383 (81.0) |
|
| |||
| | |||
| Non-smoker | 259 (53.2) | 35 (13.5) | 224 (86.5) |
| Smoker | 228 (46.8) | 58 (25.4) | 170 (74.6) |
|
| |||
| | |||
| No | 440 (90.3) | 65 (14.8) | 375 (85.2) |
| Yes | 47 (9.7) | 28 (59.6) | 19 (40.4) |
| | |||
| No | 473 (97.1) | 85 (18.0) | 388 (82.0) |
| Yes | 14 (2.9) | 8 (57.1) | 6 (42.9) |
| | |||
| Present | 371 (76.2) | 76 (20.5) | 295 (79.5) |
| No | 116 (23.8) | 17 (14.7) | 99 (85.3) |
| | |||
| New case | 462 (94.9) | 89 (19.3) | 373 (80.7) |
| Relapse | 25 (5.1) | 4 (16.0) | 21 (84.0) |
| | |||
| Low | 199 (40.9) | 26 (13.1) | 173 (86.9) |
| High | 288 (59.1) | 67 (23.3) | 221 (76.7) |
| | |||
| No lesion | 27 (5.5) | 0 (0.0) | 27 (100.0) |
| Minimal | 314 (64.6) | 28 (8.9) | 286 (91.1) |
| Moderate | 137 (28.1) | 59 (43.1) | 78 (56.9) |
| Advance | 9 (1.8) | 6 (66.7) | 3 (33.3) |
| | |||
| Yes | 443 (91.0) | 52 (11.7) | 391 (88.3) |
| No | 44 (9.0) | 41 (93.2) | 3 (6.8) |
* Mean (Standard deviation).
Simple and multiple logistic regression analysis for factors associated with delayed sputum smear conversion.
| Variables | Crude OR (95% CI) | Adj. OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| | 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) | 0.003 | ||
| | ||||
| Female | 1 | |||
| Male | 1.15 (0.71, 1.84) | 0.571 | ||
| | ||||
| Senoi | 1 | |||
| Melayu Proto | 1.78 (1.09, 2.98) | 0.023 | ||
| Negrito | 1.01 (0.49, 2.05) | 0.998 | ||
| | ||||
| Urban | 1 | |||
| Rural | 0.79 (0.41, 1.54) | 0.494 | ||
| | ||||
| Tertiary | 1 | |||
| Secondary | 0.78 (0.08, 7.42) | 0.831 | ||
| Primary | 0.87 (0.09, 8.05) | 0.903 | ||
| Informal | 1.11 (0.12, 10.22) | 0.925 | ||
| | ||||
| Above poverty line | 1 | |||
| Below poverty line | 0.86 (0.24, 3.15) | 0.822 | ||
|
| ||||
| | ||||
| Non-smoker | 1 | 1 | ||
| Smoker | 2.18 (1.37, 3.47) | 0.001 | 3.25 (1.88, 5.59) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 8.50 (4.49, 16.11) | <0.001 | 12.84 (6.33, 26.06) | <0.001 |
| | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 6.09 (2.06, 18.00) | <0.001 | 9.76 (3.01, 31.65) | <0.001 |
| | ||||
| Present | 1 | |||
| No | 0.67 (0.38, 1.48) | 0.365 | ||
| | ||||
| New case | 1 | |||
| Relapse | 0.80 (0.27, 2.38) | 0.686 | ||
| | ||||
| Low | 1 | 0.005 | ||
| High | 2.02 (1.23, 3.31) | |||
| | ||||
| No lesion | 1 | 0.525 | ||
| Minimal | 1.05 (0.83, 2.92) | 0.644 | ||
| Moderate | 1.49 (0.94, 3.45) | 0.505 | ||
| Advance | 1.37 (0.84, 2.05) | |||
| | ||||
| Yes | 1 | <0.001 | ||
| No | 102.76 (30.72, 343.73) |
a Simple logistic regression; b Multiple logistic regression; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; Forward LR and Backward LR method applied; No multicollinearity and no interaction were found; Hosmer and Lemeshow test, p-value = 0.212; The classification table is 83.4% correctly classified; The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 72.1%.