| Literature DB >> 35206548 |
Olga Vl Bitkina1, Jaehyun Park1, Hyun K Kim2.
Abstract
With the continuous technological enhancement of banking services, customers can avail of better, more secure services which present improved opportunities and convenience. Of the many methods available to perform banking operations, customers commonly use traditional banking, online banking, and mobile banking. Each of these existing methods has advantages and limitations that affect customer experience, trust, satisfaction, and continued intention to use such services. In this study, an attempt was made to develop and fit a model to evaluate and measure the effect of perceived characteristics on banking services. To this end, a questionnaire was administered to 91 participants in Korea to investigate their experiences in the three types of services: offline banking (traditional banking), online banking, and automated teller machines (ATM). The factor design for evaluating the user experience through the perceived characteristics of the banking system was performed by conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The proposed model exhibited validity and reliability to evaluate the user experience in the banking system. The results obtained can help banking specialists and professionals increase the level of customers' trust, loyalty, and intention to use their services.Entities:
Keywords: banking services; perceived convenience; perceived ease of use; perceived security; perceived trust; perceived usefulness; user experience
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206548 PMCID: PMC8872539 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Measuring tools of the user-perceived characteristics.
| Perceived Characteristic | Service/ | Methods/Approaches | Sample | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived Trust | Online and Offline Banking, Trade, and Stocks | (1) Survey and Interview with ANOVA, | About or over 100 participants | [ |
| Perceived Security | Online and Offline Banking, Trade, and Stocks | [ | ||
| Perceived Convenience | Online Banking, Trade, Cryptocurrency | [ | ||
| Perceived Ease of Use | Online Financial Services | [ | ||
| Perceived Usefulness | Online and Offline Financial Services | [ |
Relations of PT and other constructs.
| References | Type of Banking Service | Constructs | Methods | Brief Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Internet banking | Provided information, e-banking system, the website of a bank, a bank’s characteristics | Logistic regression analysis | The most powerful factor in the trust-building process is the |
| [ | Online banking | Perceived security, usability, reputation, commitment of clients | Regression analysis | Security, privacy, usability, commitment of clients and reputation have significant association with PT |
| [ | Internet banking | PU, PEU, perceived financial risk, perceived security risk, attitude to using, behavioral intention | Structural equation modeling | Security and financial risks are negatively related to PT |
| [ | E-commerce | E-commerce knowledge, perceived reputation, perceived risk, perceived technology | Partial least squares–Structural equation modeling | e-commerce knowledge, perceived risk and perceived technology have significant influence on PT |
| [ | E-commerce | Word of mouth, online experience, security/privacy, perceived risk, brand reputation, quality information | Multiple regression analysis | Security/privacy, word of mouth, online experience, quality information, and brand reputation have a significant and positive relationship with PT |
PEU and PU as items representing constructs.
| References | Type of Service | Represented | Methods | Brief Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Mobile banking | Intention to use mobile banking | Partial least squares | PEU and PU do not have significant effects on intention |
| [ | Mobile government | User intention to adopt M-government | Structural equation modeling | PEU and PU have insignificant effects on adoption |
| [ | Mobile banking | User intention to adopt mobile banking | Binary logistic regression | PEU and PU influence the successful adoption of mobile banking |
| [ | Mobile-based services | Behavioral intention to use | Partial least squares | PEU and PU have significant effects on intention |
| [ | Electronic banking | Reducing the problems/deficiencies in the use of electronic banking services | Regression analysis | With enhanced PEU, problems of using of electronic banking are decreased. |
Exploratory Factor Analysis Results.
| Items | Factors | Cronbach’s Alpha | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| PT6 |
| 0.462 | −0.080 | 0.662 |
| PT1 |
| 0.363 | −0.008 | |
| PT7 |
| 0.340 | −0.041 | |
| PT3 |
| 0.154 | 0.042 | |
| PS6 | 0.297 |
| 0.002 | 0.719 |
| PS8 | 0.354 |
| 0.061 | |
| PS1 | 0.174 |
| 0.073 | |
| PC7 | 0.178 | −0.087 |
| 0.663 |
| PC8 | 0.022 | 0.036 |
| |
| PC4 | −0.064 | 0.192 |
| |
Bold indicates the factor groups with highest load values.
Figure 1Factor Loading CFA Results.
CFA Goodness-of-fit Indexes.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Goodness-of-fit index (GFI) | 0.906 |
| Root-mean-square error (RMSEA) | 0.077 |
| Normed fit index (NFI) | 0.891 |
| Comparative fit index (CFI) | 0.955 |
| Relative chi-square (CMIN/DF) | 1.591 |
Developed Model.
| Factors | Items |
|---|---|
| Perceived Security | To what extent are your operations protected from threats while using online banking (offence; attack; theft of money, documents, information, passwords, etc.)? |
| Perceived Convenience | A lot of time is needed to obtain online banking services. |
| Perceived Trust | To what extent is online banking reliable as a system of banking service provision? |