| Literature DB >> 35206201 |
Somenath Chakraborty1, Beddhu Murali1, Amal K Mitra2.
Abstract
The tragic pandemic of COVID-19, due to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus-2 or SARS-CoV-2, has shaken the entire world, and has significantly disrupted healthcare systems in many countries. Because of the existing challenges and controversies to testing for COVID-19, improved and cost-effective methods are needed to detect the disease. For this purpose, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a strong forecasting method for detecting COVID-19 from chest X-ray images. In this paper, we used a Deep Learning Method (DLM) to detect COVID-19 using chest X-ray (CXR) images. Radiographic images are readily available and can be used effectively for COVID-19 detection compared to other expensive and time-consuming pathological tests. We used a dataset of 10,040 samples, of which 2143 had COVID-19, 3674 had pneumonia (but not COVID-19), and 4223 were normal (not COVID-19 or pneumonia). Our model had a detection accuracy of 96.43% and a sensitivity of 93.68%. The area under the ROC curve was 99% for COVID-19, 97% for pneumonia (but not COVID-19 positive), and 98% for normal cases. In conclusion, ML approaches may be used for rapid analysis of CXR images and thus enable radiologists to filter potential candidates in a time-effective manner to detect COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Deep Learning Model; SARS-CoV-2; chest X-ray
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206201 PMCID: PMC8871610 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1A Block Diagram Representation of the Deep Learning Model (DLM).
Figure 2Detail Layer Architecture Representation of ResNet18 Deep Learning Neural Network Model [30].
Figure 3ResNet 2 and ResNet 3-layer block.
Figure 4Proposed Deep Learning Model (DLM) Architecture.
Calculation of the Screening Test Statistics.
| Based on the Gold Standard | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Disease Present | Disease Absent | Total | |
| Predicted Model Positive | True positive (TP) | False positive (FP) | TP + FP |
| Predicted Model Negative | False negative (FN) | True negative (TN) | FN + TN |
| Total | TP + FN | FP + TN | TP + FP + FN + TN |
Dataset Sample details before and after data augmentation.
| Stage of Data | COVID-19 | Pneumonia | Normal | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before augmentation | 2143 | 3674 | 4223 | 10,040 |
| After augmentation | 3535 | 6072 | 6967 | 16,574 |
Figure 5(a) Confusion matrix of the sample data; (b) Area under the ROC curve for the model.
Comparison of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score of the proposed model and other models.
| Study [Ref] | No. Images Used | AI Method Used | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed Model | 10,040 | Deep Learning Model | 96.43 | 93.68 | 99.0 | 93.0 |
| Das et al. [ | Unknown | Deep transfer learning | 92.41 | 91.29 | 92.0 | 89.0 |
| Wang et al. [ | 13,975 | Deep convolutional neural network | 92.04 | 90.41 | 94.0 | 87.0 |
| Narin et al. [ | 7486 | Deep convolutional neural network | 91.26 | 89.24 | 93.0 | 86.0 |
| Altan et al. [ | 2905 | A hybrid model, having 2D Curvelet transformation, a Salp swarm algorithm (SSA) and deep learning | 91.85 | 92.42 | 91.0 | 90.0 |
| Ozturk et al. [ | 1000 | Deep neural network | 93.40 | 92.12 | 89.0 | 90.0 |
| Minaee et al. [ | 5,000 | Deep transfer learning | 90.49 | 92.08 | 91.0 | 88.0 |
| Khan et al. [ | 1300 | Deep neural network | 89.60 | 84.98 | 87.0 | 86.0 |
| Civit-Masot et al. [ | 396 | VGG16-based (convolutional) Deep Learning Model | 94.52 | 92.11 | 96.0 | 92.0 |