| Literature DB >> 35206022 |
Nadia Palmieri1, Walter Stefanoni1, Francesco Latterini1, Luigi Pari1.
Abstract
This paper focused on eggs enriched with omega-3-fatty acids with the aim of understanding if functional eggs were of interest to Italian consumers, and analyzing which characteristics of table egg quality, consumers' attitudes and socio-demographic characteristics affect the consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) a premium price for eggs enriched with omega-3-fatty acids. We performed an online survey on 312 Italian consumers. The analysis was based on the Tobit regression model. The findings showed that unmarried females were more willing to pay a premium price for functional eggs than male consumers. Furthermore, the probability of showing a higher WTP for functional eggs increased among consumers reporting a higher income. Moreover, the WTP for functional eggs increased with the growing importance that people attributed to items such as the size of eggs, rearing type, feed given to chickens, and the provenience and brand of eggs. These results suggested that consumers need to have clear information about functional eggs. As expected, WTP for functional eggs decreased with increasing neophobia and food techno-neophobia factors. In conclusion, the findings showed an interesting potential for eggs enriched with omega-3-fatty acids, which seems to be a product with high possibility to be greatly appreciated on the market, especially if accompanied by a good, informative campaign for increasing people's knowledge level.Entities:
Keywords: Italy; camelina; consumers’ attitude; egg quality characteristics; functional eggs; omega-3-fatty acids; willingness to pay (WTP)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35206022 PMCID: PMC8870929 DOI: 10.3390/foods11040545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
The factor analysis for food neophobia and food technology neophobia groups.
| Items Group | Neophobia | Technology Neophobia |
|---|---|---|
| Food neophobia (σ = 0.96) | ||
| I am constantly sampling new and different foods (new_food *) | 0.86 | |
| I like foods from different cultures (different_culture *) | 0.93 | |
| At dinner parties, I will try a new food (dinner_try *) | 0.87 | |
| I like to try new ethnic restaurants (restaurant *) | 0.90 | |
| Food technology neophobia (σ = 0.90) | ||
| New food technologies are unnecessary (no_new_tec) | 0.76 | |
| The environmental benefits of new food technologies are often overstated (env_tec) | 0.92 | |
| The benefits of new food technologies to reduce world hunger are often overstated (hunger_tec) | 0.91 | |
| New food technologies decrease the natural quality of food (low_quality) | 0.84 | |
| There is no sense in trying out high-tech food products because the ones I eat are already good enough” (good) | 0.73 |
* Reversed coded. Source: Our elaboration on the survey data.
The WTP for functional egg in comparison to the price of conventional one considering a price of EUR 0.32 [62].
| Levels of WTP for Functional Eggs | % |
|---|---|
| WTP = 0 | 25.00% |
| WTP ≤ 50% | 69.00% |
| WTP > 50% | 6.00% |
| Total | 100.00 |
Source: Our elaboration on the survey data.
Results of the Tobit regression model.
| Tobit Regression | N. obs= | 312 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log-likelihood: −274.832 | Pseudo R2= | 0.15 | |
| Dept. Variable: WTP functional eggs | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Intercept 1 | −0.321 | 0.203 | 1.15 × 10−1 |
| Intercept 2 | −0.562 | 0.044 | 2.00 × 10−16 *** |
| eggs size | 0.099 | 0.034 | 3.00 × 10−3 ** |
| color shell | 0.085 | 0.044 | 6.30 × 10−2 |
| rearing type | 0.089 | 0.026 | 6.00 × 10−4 *** |
| provenience | 0.197 | 0.057 | 6.00 × 10−4 *** |
| color_yolk | −0.014 | 0.021 | 4.91 × 10−1 |
| animal_feed | 0.077 | 0.019 | 5.81 × 10−5 *** |
| brand_prod | 0.067 | 0.021 | 1.90 × 10−3 ** |
| neophobia | −0.078 | 0.023 | 8.00 × 10−4 *** |
| food techno-neophobia | −0.037 | 0.015 | 1.60 × 10−2 * |
| gender | −0.142 | 0.072 | 4.90 × 10−2 * |
| marital status | −0.253 | 0.071 | 4.34 × 10−4 *** |
| income | 0.083 | 0.029 | 4.37 × 10−3 ** |
Note: ***, **, * Significance at 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05 levels. Source: Our elaboration on the survey data.