| Literature DB >> 35205983 |
Ariel Buzera1,2, Evelyne Gikundi2, Irene Orina2, Daniel Sila2.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of pretreatments (blanching (60 and 95 °C) and boiling) and drying methods (freeze-drying and oven drying) on the quality characteristics of potato flour derived from three potato varieties, namely, Shangi, Unica, and Dutch Robjin. The percentage flour yield, color, particle size distribution, flow characteristics, microstructural and functional properties of the potato flour were determined. Unica recorded the least peeling loss, while the Dutch Robjin variety had the highest. Color parameters were significantly affected (p < 0.05) by the pretreatments and drying methods. Freeze drying produced lighter potato flour (L* = 92.86) compared to the other methods. Boiling and blanching at 95 °C followed by oven drying recorded a low angle of repose and compressibility index, indicating better flow characteristics. The smallest particle size (56.5 µm) was recorded for the freeze-drying treatment, while boiling followed by oven drying had the largest particle size (307.5 µm). Microstructural results indicate that boiling and blanching at 95 °C, followed by oven drying resulted in damaged starch granules, while freeze-drying and low-temperature blanching (60 °C) maintained the native starch granule. Particle size and the solubility index of potato flour showed strong positive correlation. This study revealed that the pretreatments and drying methods affected potato flour's physical and microstructural parameters differently, resulting in changes in their functionality.Entities:
Keywords: drying methods; flow characteristics; microstructural properties; particle size distribution; potato flour; pretreatments
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205983 PMCID: PMC8871150 DOI: 10.3390/foods11040507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Percentage peeling loss of the three varieties (Shangi, Unica, and Dutch Robjin).
Percentage yield of potato flour from three varieties as affected by pretreatments and drying methods.
| Treatment | Shangi (%) | Unica (%) | Dutch Robjin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oven drying (OD) | 18.48 ± 0.01 a | 17.31 ± 0.03 a | 22.50 ± 0.04 a |
| Blanching (60°)_OD | 17.25 ± 0.12 b | 16.31 ± 0.06 d | 20.83 ± 0.05 b |
| Blanching (95°)_OD | 15.77 ± 0.13 d | 16.01 ± 0.03 e | 20.42 ± 0.04 c |
| Boiling_OD | 16.50 ± 0.06 c | 16.83 ± 0.02 c | 19.44 ± 0.07 d |
| Freeze-drying (FD) | 18.70 ± 0.23 a | 17.64 ± 0.06 a | 22.99 ± 0.08 a |
Results are means of triplicate determinations ± standard error. Mean values with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences based on the LSD test of significance (p < 0.05, n = 3). OD, oven drying.
Color parameters of potato flour from different treatments and drying conditions.
| Samples | L* | a* | b* | Chroma | Hue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oven drying (OD) | 90.86 ± 0.01 b | 0.31 ± 0.01 d | 15.19 ± 0.01 d | 15.19 ± 0.01 d | 1.55 ± 0.01 a |
| Blanching (60°C)_OD | 84.17 ± 0.01 c | 1.43 ± 0.01 c | 11.66 ± 0.01 e | 11.75 ± 0.01 e | 1.45 ± 0.01 c |
| Blanching (95°C)_OD | 82.36 ± 0.01 d | 1.71 ± 0.01 b | 20.72 ± 0.01 b | 20.79 ± 0.01 b | 1.49 ± 0.01 b |
| Boiling_OD | 80.38 ± 0.01 e | 4.07 ± 0.01 a | 25.90 ± 0.01 a | 26.22 ± 0.01 a | 1.42 ± 0.01 d |
| Freeze-drying (FD) | 92.86 ± 0.01 a | −0.65 ± 0.01 e | 16.34 ± 0.01 c | 16.35 ± 0.01 c | −1.53 ± 0.01 e |
Results are the means of triplicate determinations ± standard error. Mean values with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences based on the LSD test of significance (p < 0.05, n = 3). OD-Oven Drying.
Figure 2Potato flour prepared from different pretreatments and drying methods. (A) Oven drying; (B) blanching at low temperature (60 °C); (C) blanching at high temperature (95 °C); (D) boiling; (E) freeze drying.
Bulk density, tapped density, and true density of potato flour prepared under different pretreatment and drying conditions.
| Samples | Bulk Density | Tapped Density | True Density |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oven drying (OD) | 0.70 ± 0.01 c | 0.97 ± 0.02 b | 1.65 ± 0.01 a |
| Blanching (60°C)_OD | 0.77 ± 0.02 b | 1.01 ± 0.01 a | 1.64 ± 0.01 a |
| Blanching (95°C)_OD | 0.87 ± 0.02 a | 1.02 ± 0.01 a | 1.65 ± 0.00 a |
| Boiling_OD | 0.91 ± 0.02 a | 1.03 ± 0.01 a | 1.65 ± 0.01 a |
| Freeze drying (FD) | 0.49 ± 0.01 d | 0.70 ± 0.01 c | 1.46 ± 0.02 b |
Results are the means of triplicate determinations ± standard error. Mean values with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences based on the LSD test of significance (p < 0.05, n = 3). OD, oven drying.
Compressibility Index (CI) and angle of repose of potato flour.
| Samples | CI (%) | Angle of Repose (°) | Flow | Type of Flour |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oven drying (OD) | 27.73 ± 0.92 b | 30.57 ± 0.29 b | Poor | Cohesive |
| Blanching (60 °C)_OD | 21.79 ± 0.52 c | 28.94 ± 0.12 c | Fair to good | Noncohesive |
| Blanching (95 °C)_OD | 16.31 ± 0.61 d | 28.89 ± 0.17 c | Good to excellent | Free-flowing (noncohesive) |
| Boiling_OD | 13.48 ± 1.78 d | 28.01 ± 0.28 d | Good to excellent | Free-flowing (noncohesive) |
| Freeze-drying (FD) | 31.56 ± 1.07 a | 32.40 ± 0.12 a | Very poor | Cohesive |
Results are the means of triplicate determinations ± standard error. Mean values with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences based on the LSD test of significance (p < 0.05, n = 3). OD, oven drying. Flow behavior of potato flour was described according to a method developed by Carr [60].
Figure 3(a) Particle size distribution curves and (b) cumulative undersize curves of potato flour samples prepared under different processing conditions.
Particle size parameters of potato flour samples.
| Samples | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oven drying (OD) | 28.36 ± 0.33 c | 97.01 ± 0.09 d | 494.08 ± 1.36 d | 102.74 ± 4.23 d |
| Blanching (60°)_OD | 27.050.41 c | 233.49 ± 3.58 c | 562.93 ± 3.25 c | 153.31 ± 3.18 c |
| Blanching (95°)_OD | 95.55 ± 0.41 b | 310.41 ± 5.79 b | 668.76 ± 6.80 b | 261.87 ± 4.17 b |
| Boiling_OD | 105.14 ± 4.48 a | 344.09 ± 3.05 a | 708.07 ± 3.28 a | 307.53 ± 3.71 a |
| Freeze-drying (FD) | 17.59 ± 0.13 d | 52.87 ± 0.90 e | 182.77 ± 6.54 e | 56.51 ± 1.80 e |
Results are the means of triplicate determinations ± standard error. Mean values with different letters in the same column indicate significant differences based on the LSD test of significance (p < 0.05, n = 3). OD, oven drying. D: 10% of granule volume diameter consists of smaller granules, D granule: 50% of granule volume diameter consists of smaller granules, D: 90% of granule volume diameter consists of smaller granules.
Figure 4(A–E) Light microscopy (1–5) and scanning electron micrographs of potato flour prepared under different conditions. (A,1) Oven drying; (B,2) blanching at low temperature (60 °C); (C,3) blanching at high temperature (95°); (D,4) boiling; (E,5) freeze drying.
Figure 5Solubility index of different potato flours at different temperatures.
Figure 6Correlation between particle size and solubility index.