| Literature DB >> 35205317 |
Yan Zhao1,2, Wei Xu2, Lijing Wang3, Shuai Han2, Yongzhong Zhang2, Qingzhi Liu2, Baoshen Liu2, Xiangyu Zhao1.
Abstract
Lesion mimic mutants provide ideal genetic materials for elucidating the molecular mechanism of cell death and disease resistance. The maize necrotic leaf mutant (nec-t) is a recessive mutant with necrotic spots and yellow-green leaves. In this study, we found that nec-t was a light and temperature-dependent mutant. Map-based cloning and the allelic test revealed that nec-t was a novel allelic mutant of the Necrotic4 gene. Necrotic4 encodes the coproporphyrinogen III oxidase (CPX1), a key enzyme in the tetrapyrrole pathway, catalyzing coproporphyrinogen III oxidate to protoporphyrinogen IX. Subcellular localization showed that the necrotic4 protein was localized in the chloroplast. Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis showed that the Necrotic4 mutation caused the enhanced chlorophyll degradation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) response. The mechanism of plant lesion formation induced by light and temperature is not clear. Our research provides a basis for understanding the molecular mechanism of necrosis initiation in maize.Entities:
Keywords: coproporphyrinogen III oxidase; light; maize; necrotic lesions; temperature
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205317 PMCID: PMC8872553 DOI: 10.3390/genes13020272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Requirement of light and high temperature for lesion development in nec-t. (A) The seedling phenotype of nec-t in the field. The arrowhead indicates necrotic spots. (B) Requirement of light for lesion formation in nec-t plant. The arrow indicates the leaf region wrapped using aluminum foil. (C) The phenotype of nec-t and WT plants (7 days) under high-temperature (30 °C) conditions. The arrowhead indicates necrotic lesions. (D) The phenotype of nec-t and WT plants (10 days) under low-temperature (24 °C) conditions.
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of nec-t and WT leaves.
| φPSⅡ | Fv/Fm | |
|---|---|---|
| WT | 0.441 ± 0.318 a | 0.736 ± 0.363 a |
|
| 0.147 ± 0.021 b | 0.627 ± 0.018 b |
Small letters a and b indicate differences between nec-t and WT at p < 0.05, according to the least significant difference (LSD) tests. ΦPSII: the actual photochemical efficiency of PSII under light; Fv/Fm: the optimal/maximal photochemical efficiency of PSⅡin the dark.
Figure 2Chloroplast ultrastructure of the nec-t mutant and wild-type leaves at different temperatures. (A,F,K,P) Garland structure. (B,G,L,Q) Bundle sheath cells. (C,H,M,R) Chloroplast structure in vascular bundle sheath cells. (D,I,N,S) Mesophyll cells. (E,J,O,T) Chloroplast structure in mesophyll cells. WT-30 and nec-t-30 represent the wild-type and mutant tissues at 30 °C; WT-24 and nec-t-24 represent wild-type and mutant tissues at 24 °C. ch, chloroplast; sg, starch; BS, bundle sheath cells; M, mesophyll cells. Bar = 10 μm in (A,F,K,P), 5 μm in (B,D,G,I,L,N,Q,S), 500 nm in (C,E,H,J,M,O,R,T).
Figure 3DAB staining for hydrogen peroxide of nec-t mutant leaves. (A,C) DAB staining of WT (A) and nec-t (C) leaves at 30°C. (B,D) DAB staining of WT (B) and nec-t (D) leaves at 24 °C.
Predicted genes in the mapped region (136.46 kb) of nec-t gene.
| Gene ID | Location | Gene Functional Annotation |
|---|---|---|
| Chr2:10781211-10785395 | coproporphyrinogen III oxidase | |
|
| Chr2:10788145-10793291 | Probable potassium transporter 15 |
|
| Chr2:10838361-10839551 | embryonic protein DC-8 |
|
| Chr2:10869880-10871152 | Probable metal-nicotianamine transporter YSL7 |
|
| Chr2:10896918-10901679 | methionine aminopeptidase |
Figure 4Map-based cloning and expression analysis of nec-t. (A) Map-based cloning of the nec-t gene. The black region represents the nec-t gene, and the arrow indicates the insertion position [22]. (B) Validation of inserted fragments in nec-t. The amplified fragment of WT and B73 was 2.0 k, and that of nec-t was about 2.9 k. (C) NEC-T protein is co-located with the chloroplast. NEC-T: the coding protein of Nec-t gene; GFP: green fluorescent protein; 35S: 35S promoter; NEC-T-GFP, NEC-T-GFP fusion protein; 35S:GFP: control of GFP protein. bar = 10 μm. (D) Relative expression of the Necrotic4 gene under different temperatures in the leaves of WT, nec-t, and nec4. H, 30 °C; L, 24 °C. (E) Relative expression of the Necrotic4 gene in different tissues. 3-L: Leaves of 3 days after germination; 30-L: Leaves of 30 days after germination; S: stem; R: root; T: tassel; E: ears. Error bars indicating SD were obtained from three biological repeats.
ProtoIX, Mg-ProtoIX, and Pchl content in nec-t and WT leaves.
| ProtoIX (mg/g) | Mg-ProtoIX (mg/g) | Pchl (mg/g) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 0.873 ± 0.057 a | 0.562 ± 0.039 a | 0.504 ± 0.039 a |
|
| 0.370 ± 0.016 b | 0.229 ± 0.012 b | 0.180 ± 0.027 b |
Small letters a and b indicate differences between nec-t and WT at p , according to the least significant difference (LSD) tests.
Figure 5Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between WT and nec-t by RNA−seq. (A) The most significantly related GO terms of the functional annotated DEGs, p value < 0.05. (B) Heat maps of differentially expressed genes involved in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism. (C) Heat maps of differentially expressed genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis. (D) Heat maps of differentially expressed genes involved in plant hormone signal transduction. (E) Heat maps of differentially expressed genes involved in ROS scavenging.