| Literature DB >> 35205285 |
Heidy M Villalobos-Barrantes1,2,3, Beatriz M Meriño1,4, Helmut E Walter5, Pablo C Guerrero1,4,6.
Abstract
Unraveling the processes involved in the origin of a substantial fraction of biodiversity can be a particularly difficult task in groups of similar, and often convergent, morphologies. The genus Eriosyce (Cactaceae) might present a greater specific diversity since much of its species richness might be hidden in morphological species complexes. The aim of this study was to investigate species delimitation using the molecular data of the globose cacti "E. curvispina", which harbor several populations of unclear evolutionary relationships. We ran phylogenetic inferences on 87 taxa of Eriosyce, including nine E. curvispina populations, and by analyzing three plastid noncoding introns, one plastid and one nuclear gene. Additionally, we developed 12 new pairs of nuclear microsatellites to evaluate the population-level genetic structure. We identified four groups that originated in independent cladogenetic events occurring at different temporal depths; these groups presented high genetic diversity, and their populations were genetically structured. These results suggest a complex evolutionary history in the origin of globular cacti, with independent speciation events occurring at different time spans. This cryptic richness is underestimated in the Mediterranean flora of central Chile, and thus unique evolutionary diversity could be overlooked in conservation and management actions.Entities:
Keywords: Cactaceae; Central Chile; Mediterranean biome; Neotropical biodiversity; endemism
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205285 PMCID: PMC8872226 DOI: 10.3390/genes13020240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Morphological diversity of Eriosyce curvispina from nine populations sampled for phylogenetic and population evolutionary inferences.: (A), Choapa Valley (CV); (B), Tilama (Ti); (C), Los Molles (LM); (D), Putaendo (Pu); (E), Ocoa (Oc); (F), Escorial (Es); (G), Laguna Verde (LV); (H), Farellones (Fa). Photos: A by M. Rosas; B and C by P.C. Guerrero; D and E by H.M.Villalobos-Barrantes; F and G by B. M. Meriño and H by J. Keymer. The map in G shows locations of E. curvispina populations in central Chile: red crosses are occurrences; the black dots are the sampling sites used in phylogenetic analysis; the empty circles are the sampling sites used in population analysis.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on 12 microsatellites. Abbreviations are as follows: %var = percent of variance; Std.Dev. = standard deviation; p-value = probability.
| Source of Variation | Nested in | %Var | Std.Dev. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within Individuals | - | 43.4 | 0.042 | - |
| Among Individuals | Population | 38.2 | 0.042 | 0 |
| Among Populations | Region | 17.9 | 0.023 | 0 |
| Among Regions | - | 0.5 | 0.008 | 0.208 |
Figure 2Time-calibrated phylogeny of Eriosyce with internal clades collapsed, except for the Horridocactus clade, to facilitate visualization of the phylogenetic position of the putative members of E. curvispina. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, and maximum-likelihood bootstrap support values are shown below branches. Groups I to IV are based on the sequence-based phylogenetic inferences with five molecular markers (Section 2.2).
Genetic estimators for populations of the Eriosyce curvispina complex. Abbreviations are as follows: N = number of samples; Na = allele number; Ne = number of effective alleles; I = Shannon’s information index; Ho = observed heterozygosity; He = expected heterozygosity; uHe = unbiased expected heterozygosity; Fis = fixation index; %P = percentage of polymorphic loci; HW = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (multilocus per population).
| Location | Latitude | Longitude | N | Na | Ne | I | Ho | He | uHe |
| %P | HW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putaendo | −32.67 | −70.73 | 15 | 7.167 | 4.481 | 1.547 | 0.467 | 0.689 | 0.713 | 0.3537 | 100% | 0.354 |
| El Escorial | −32.74 | −70.77 | 15 | 8.250 | 5.340 | 1.819 | 0.391 | 0.795 | 0.823 | 0.5342 | 100% | 0.534 |
| Los Molles Pichidangui | −32.17 | −71.47 | 34 | 11.583 | 6.003 | 1.994 | 0.361 | 0.807 | 0.819 | 0.5634 | 100% | 0.563 |
| Laguna Verde | −33.08 | −71.67 | 13 | 7.333 | 4.798 | 1.682 | 0.375 | 0.760 | 0.790 | 0.5359 | 100% | 0.537 |
| Tilama | −32.03 | −71.18 | 15 | 7.750 | 5.370 | 1.640 | 0.425 | 0.707 | 0.732 | 0.4291 | 92% | 0.429 |
| Choapa Valley | −31.77 | −71.32 | 15 | 7.083 | 4.070 | 1.435 | 0.400 | 0.645 | 0.668 | 0.4093 | 100% | 0.409 |
| Limahuida | −31.75 | −71.13 | 15 | 10.750 | 6.235 | 2.040 | 0.570 | 0.822 | 0.851 | 0.3381 | 100% | 0.338 |
| Farellones | −33.37 | −70.29 | 15 | 6.667 | 4.562 | 1.529 | 0.332 | 0.697 | 0.723 | 0.5502 | 100% | 0.55 |
| Ocoa | −32.95 | −71.09 | 9 | 1.667 | 1.450 | 0.367 | 0.241 | 0.250 | 0.265 | 0.0990 | 67% | 0.099 |
Figure 3DAPC analysis for 150 individuals of Eriosyce curvispina based on 12 microsatellites loci. Ellipsoids depict Groups I–IV identified in the Bayesian phylogenetic inference in Figure 2.
Statistics for the 117-sample DNA sequence alignments.
| Locus | Total Length | Ingroup Variable Characters | Total Variable Characters | Parsimony Informative Characters | Ingroup Coverage (%) | Outgroup Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1354 | 622 | 743 | 347 | 16 | 83 |
|
| 1084 | 226 | 363 | 206 | 16 | 83 |
|
| 439 | 34 | 86 | 33 | 16 | 84 |
|
| 930 | 343 | 499 | 303 | 16 | 83 |
| PHYC | 1034 | 733 | 749 | 271 | 70 | 87 |
| Concatenated matrix | 4841 | 1958 | 2440 | 1160 |