| Literature DB >> 35205188 |
David Perpetuini1, Damiano Formenti2, Pierpaolo Iodice3, Daniela Cardone1, Chiara Filippini1, Antonio Maria Chiarelli1, Giovanni Michielon4, Athos Trecroci4, Giampietro Alberti4, Arcangelo Merla1.
Abstract
Infrared thermography (IRT) allows to evaluate the psychophysiological state associated with emotions from facial temperature modulations. As fatigue is a brain-derived emotion, it is possible to hypothesize that facial temperature could provide information regarding the fatigue related to exercise. The aim of this study was to investigate the capability of IRT to assess the central and peripheral physiological effect of fatigue by measuring facial skin and muscle temperature modulations in response to a unilateral knee extension exercise until exhaustion. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) was recorded at the end of the exercise. Both time- (∆TROI: pre-post exercise temperature variation) and frequency-domain (∆PSD: pre-post exercise power spectral density variation of specific frequency bands) analyses were performed to extract features from regions of interest (ROIs) positioned on the exercised and nonexercised leg, nose tip, and corrugator. The ANOVA-RM revealed a significant difference between ∆TROI (F(1.41,9.81) = 15.14; p = 0.0018), and between ∆PSD of myogenic (F(1.34,9.39) = 15.20; p = 0.0021) and neurogenic bands (F(1.75,12.26) = 9.96; p = 0.0034) of different ROIs. Moreover, significant correlations between thermal features and RPE were found. These findings suggest that IRT could assess both peripheral and central responses to physical exercise. Its applicability in monitoring the psychophysiological responses to exercise should be further explored.Entities:
Keywords: frequency-domain analysis; infrared thermography; resistance training; strength training; thermal imaging; unilateral exercise
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205188 PMCID: PMC8869276 DOI: 10.3390/biology11020322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental session.
Figure 2(a) ROIs placed over a representative participant; (b) temperature time courses of each ROI during the experiment.
Figure 3Effect of knee extension exercise on ∆TROI of Exercised Leg, Nonexercised Leg, Nose Tip, and Corrugator. Each box shows the median and interquartile range, with the whiskers indicating the range of values. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 for pairwise comparisons between ROIs.
Figure 4Effect of knee extension exercise on ∆PSD of frequency bands of Exercised Leg, Nonexercised Leg, Nose Tip, and Corrugator. The box shows the median and interquartile range with the whiskers indicating the range of values. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 for pairwise comparisons between ROIs.
The r Pearson’s correlation coefficients between RPE and the thermal features for each ROI. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
| Exercised Leg | Nonexercised Leg | Nose Tip | Corrugator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPE vs. ∆TROI | −0.84 ** | −0.21 | −0.16 | −0.39 |
| RPE vs. ∆PSD Metabolic | 0.54 | 0.49 | −0.52 | −0.43 |
| RPE vs. ∆PSD Cardiac | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.57 |
| RPE vs. ∆PSD Respiratory | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.44 |
| RPE vs. ∆PSD Neurogenic | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.75 * | 0.29 |
| RPE vs. ∆PSD Myogenic | −0.41 | −0.22 | −0.71 * | −0.80 * |