| Literature DB >> 35205071 |
Dmitry L Nikiforov-Nikishin1, Nikita I Kochetkov1, Ekaterina V Mikodina2, Alexei L Nikiforov-Nikishin1, Yuri G Simakov1, Natalya A Golovacheva1, Alexander V Gorbunov1, Sergei N Chebotarev3, Evgeniya Yu Kirichenko4, Igor Yu Zabiyaka5, Ivan S Pastukhov1, Anzhelika B Bren6.
Abstract
Fish as model objects have found wide applications in biology and fundamental medicine and allow studies of behavioral and physiological responses to various environmental factors. Representatives of the genus Nothobranchius are one of the most convenient objects for such studies. Male fish belonging to the family Nothobranchiidae are characterized by extremely diverse coloration, which constantly changes, depending on the age of the fish, environmental factors, and social hierarchical status. These fish species are characterized by a short life cycle, which allows changes in coloration, an indicator of the ontogenesis stage, to be estimated. Existing methods of fish color assessments do not allow the intensity of coloration of particular body zones to be clearly differentiated. In the present study, we suggest a method of two-factor assessment of specific fish body zones using modified methods of photofixation and image processing software. We describe the protocol of the method and the results of its application to different-aged groups of male Nothobranchius guentheri. The coloration of selected areas (i.e., red spot on the gill cover (RSGC), black border on the caudal fin (BBCF), and white border on the dorsal fin (WBDF)) differed significantly according to the size and age of the fish (p < 0.05). The data obtained suggest that N. guentheri can be a model for studying aging by the intensity of body coloration in males.Entities:
Keywords: Nothobranchius guentheri; age-dependent changes; coloration; live fish photography; visualization of morphological characteristics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35205071 PMCID: PMC8869725 DOI: 10.3390/biology11020205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Morphological changes in the coloration of male N. guentheri, depending on hierarchical status and age. (A) Young male with signs of primary coloration (1.5 months); (B) Young male of high hierarchical status (4.5 months); (C) Adult male (6 months); (D) Adult male with signs of coloration regression (8 months).
Figure 2First set of body zones used in the measurement of N. guentheri.
Figure 3Linear regression of MoGV and MeGV parameters as a function of male N. guentheri size. (A) Person’s correlation matrix between different zone. (B) BROI linear regression; (C) LBRIO linear regression; (D) RROI linear regression; (E) BBCF linear regression; (F) RSGC linear regression.
Numerical measurement data and the MoGVs for the two sets of zones in the entire sample. The value (p < 0.05) from unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction.
| 8 MPH | 2.5 MPH | Whole Sample | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish length | 2.47 ± 0.09 | 3.16 ± 0.44 | ≤0.0001 | 2.89 ± 0.49 |
| BROI MeGV | 45.44 ± 9.42 | 59.11 ± 15.27 | 0.0145 | 50.91 ± 13.75 |
| RROI MeGV | 75.49 ± 12.45 | 78.62 ± 13.84 | 0.8733 | 76.74 ± 13 |
| LBROI MeGV | 183 ± 27.63 | 171.9 ± 20.66 | 0.2528 | 176.9 ± 19.16 |
| BBCF MeGV | 50.03 ± 14.65 | 62.62 ± 15.77 | 0.0153 | 55.06 ± 16.22 |
| RSGC MeGV | 78.98 ± 13.46 | 80.49 ± 11.72 | 0.9978 | 79.58 ± 12.71 |
| BROI MoGV | 46.06 ± 21.06 | 57.46 ± 20.23 | 0.9525 | 50.62 ± 21.31 |
| RROI MoGV | 71.72 ± 18 | 78.58 ± 17.96 | 0.5817 | 74.47 ± 18.15 |
| LBROI MoGV | 180.2 ± 17.62 | 172.5 ± 32.45 | 0.8143 | 178.5 ± 29.76 |
| BBCF MoGV | 38.19 ± 14.34 | 55.50 ± 18.92 | 0.0003 | 45.12 ± 18.29 |
| RSGC MoGV | 64.97 ± 13.56 | 67.42 ± 14.07 | 0.8563 | 65.95 ± 13.70 |
Numerical data on X and the results of what analysis of the zones in the two groups. The value (p < 0.05) from unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction.
| BROI Area | RROI Area | LBROI Area | RSGC Area | BBCF Area | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 MPH | 52.95 ± 24.26 | 371.7 ± 182 | 385.1 ± 155.1 | 17.75 ± 8.62 | 36.38 ± 28.44 |
| 2.5 MPH | 44.67 ± 23.9 | 197.4 ± 106.9 | 205.5 ± 59.21 | 8.13 ± 3.45 | 27.85 ± 11.42 |
| 0.1975 | <0.0001 | ≤0.001 | ≤0.001 | 0.1686 | |
| Whole sample | 49.64 ± 24.46 | 302 ± 177.5 | 313.3 ± 153.3 | 13.91 ± 8.44 | 32.97 ± 23.42 |
Figure 4Linear regression of MoGV and MeGV parameters as a function of male N. guentheri size. (A) BROI linear regression; (B) LBRIO linear regression; (C) RROI linear regression; (D) BBCF linear regression; (E) RSGC linear regression.
Figure 5Comparison of MoGV and MeGV parameters in 2.5- and 8-month-old fish. The value (p < 0.05) from one-way ANOVA with comparison using Tukey’s post hoc analysis. Different superscript letters (a,b) indicate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups. (A) BROI zone; (B) LBRIO zone; (C) RROI zone; (D) RSGC zone; (E) BBCF zone.
Figure 6Comparison of the coloration areas of different zones of males of different age groups (2.5- and 8-month post-hatching). The value (*** p < 0.001) from one-way ANOVA with comparison using Tukey’s post hoc analysis. (A) fish length; (B) LBRIO zone; (C) RROI zone; (D) RSGC zone; (E) BROI zone; (F) BBCF zone.
Figure 7A comparison of the coloration of various male N. guentheri of comparable ages and sizes according to the gray value of the studied zones. (A) N. guentheri male with typical coloration and size. (B) Male with deviant type of coloration.