| Literature DB >> 35204291 |
Paweł Kubica1, Adam Kokotkiewicz2, Magdalena Anna Malinowska3, Alicja Synowiec4, Małgorzata Gniewosz4, Shah Hussain5, Muhammad Yaqoob5, Günther K Bonn5, Thomas Jakschitz5, Eman A Mahmoud6, Tarek K Zin El-Abedin7, Hosam O Elansary8, Maria Luczkiewicz2, Halina Ekiert1, Agnieszka Szopa1.
Abstract
Different types of microshoot cultures (agar, stationary liquid, agitated, and bioreactors) of Verbena officinalis were optimized for biomass growth and the production of phenylpropanoid glycosides and phenolic acids. Using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry, the presence of verbascoside, isoverbascoside, leucoseptoside A/isomers, and cistanoside D/isomer was confirmed in the methanolic extracts obtained from all types of in vitro cultures. The compound's content was determined by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. The main metabolites in biomass extracts were verbascoside and isoverbascoside (maximum 4881.61 and 451.80 mg/100 g dry weight (DW)). In the soil-grown plant extract, verbascoside was also dominated (1728.97 mg/100 g DW). The content of phenolic acids in the analyzed extracts was below 24 mg/100 g DW. The highest radical scavenging activity was found in the biomass extract from agitated cultures, the most effective reducing power in agar culture extract, and the highest chelating activity in extract from bioreactor cultures. The extracts showed significantly stronger bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against Gram-positive bacteria (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.3-2.2 mg/mL and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 0.6-9 mg/mL) than against Gram-negative bacteria (MIC 0.6-9 mg/mL, MBC of 0.6-18 mg/mL). The biomass extract from liquid stationary culture showed the strongest antibacterial activity, while the extract from soil-grown herb had the lowest.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial properties; antioxidant activity; in vitro cultures; phenolic acids; phenylpropanoid glycosides; vervain
Year: 2022 PMID: 35204291 PMCID: PMC8868826 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11020409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Macroscopic appearance of experimental biomass in the investigated types of V. officinalis cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA), and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA).
Figure 2Comparison of the Gi values of V. officinalis microshoots grown in the investigated types of V. officinalis cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA), and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA).
Phenylpropanoid glycosides identified by UHPLC-HR-QTOF-MS.
| Rt (min) | Analyte |
|---|---|
| 4.3 | Verbascoside |
| 4.5 | Isoverbascoside |
| 4.7, 4.9, 5.1 | Leucoseptoside A/isomers |
| 5.6, 5.8 | Cistanoside D/isomer |
Verbascoside and isoverbascoside concentrations (mg/100 g DW ± SD) measured in extracts from V. officinalis in vitro biomass and from plant material.
| Extract | Verbascoside | Isoverbascoside |
|---|---|---|
| Vo-A | 4818.22 ± 79.89 | 330.56 ± 0.17 |
| Vo-LS | 4777.11 ± 5.23 | 264.90 ± 1.33 |
| Vo-LA | 4881.61 ± 99.7 | 451.80 ± 2.85 |
| Vo-RITA | 4722.20 ± 142.74 | 266.50 ± 2.32 |
| Vo-in vivo | 1728.97 ± 29.78 | 78.34 ± 3.28 |
Phenolic acid concentrations (mg/100 g DW ± SD) and total phenolic content measured in extracts of V. officinalis in vitro cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA) and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA) and from plant material (Vo-in vivo).
| Extract | Ferulic Acid | Protocatechuic Acid | Rosmarinic Acid | Total Phenolics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vo-A | 8.35 ± 0.54 | 3.76 ± 0.07 | nd | 163.58 ± 1.28 |
| Vo-LS | 17.19 ± 0.48 | 5.30 ± 0.19 | nd | 137.96 ± 4.25 |
| Vo-LA | 23.69 ± 0.21 | 7.59 ± 0.48 | nd | 122.93 ± 2.08 |
| Vo-RITA | 16.66 ± 0.75 | 3.51 ± 0.08 | nd | 129.25 ± 1.63 |
| Vo-in vivo | 29.76 ± 2.51 | 25.75 ± 1.65 | 2.53 ± 0.11 | 137.51 ± 3.60 |
nd—not detected.
Figure 3Free radical scavenging activity of extracts of V. officinalis in vitro cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA) and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA) and of plant material (Vo-in vivo). Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Determination of free radical scavenging activity (DPPH test), reducing power, and ferrous ion (Fe2+) chelating activity of extracts of V. officinalis in vitro cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA) and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA) and of plant material (Vo-in vivo).Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
| Extract | DPPH Test, IC50 [mg/mL] | Reducing Power Assay [ASE/mL] | Fe2+ Chelating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vo-A | 0.081 ± 0.036 | 4.215 ± 0.006 | 0.110 ± 0.037 |
| Vo-LS | 0.184 ± 0.051 | 3.048 ± 0.006 | 0.085 ± 0.020 |
| Vo-LA | 0.313 ± 0.022 | 2.452 ± 0.003 | 0.182 ± 0.036 |
| Vo-RITA | 0.125 ± 0.060 | 2.684 ± 0.005 | 0.034 ± 0.017 |
| Vo-in vivo | 0.214 ± 0.011 | 2.800 ± 0.005 | 1.674 ± 0.023 |
| Standard | BHT | BHT | EDTA |
Figure 4Reducing power of extracts of V. officinalis in vitro cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA) and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA) and of plant material (Vo-in vivo). Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5Ferrous ion (Fe2+) chelating activity of extracts of V. officinalis in vitro cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA) and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA) and of plant material (Vo-in vivo). Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
MIC (MBC) values (mg/mL) of extracts of V. officinalis in vitro cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA) and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA) and of plant material (Vo-in vivo).
| Gram-Positive Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Vo-A | 0.3 (0.6) | 1.1 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 4.5 (4.5) | 4.5 (4.5) |
| Vo-LS | 0.6 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (2.2) | 1.1 (2.2) | 0.6 (0.6) | 0.6 (0.6) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.2 (2.2) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) |
| Vo-LA | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 1.1(1.1) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.1) | 4.5 (4.5) | 4.5 (4.5) |
| Vo-RITA | 0.6 (1.1) | 0.6 (1.1) | 1.1 (1.1) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 1.1 (1.1) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 2.2 (2.2) | 4.5 (4.5) | 4.5 (4.5) |
| Vo-in vivo | 0.6 (9.0) | 1.1 (9.0) | 2.2 (4.5) | 2.2 (9.0) | 1.1 (4.5) | 1.1 (9.0) | 1.1 (4.5) | 2.2 (9.0) | 2.2 (4.5) | 4.5 (9.0) | 4.5 (9.0) | 4.5 (18) |
Percentage of antibacterial activity (A%) of extracts of V. officinalis in vitro cultures; agar (Vo-A), stationary liquid (Vo-LS), agitated (Vo-LA) and bioreactor cultures (Vo-RITA) and of plant material (Vo-in vivo).
| MIC | Vo-A | Vo-LS | Vo-LA | Vo-RITA | Vo-In Vivo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.6 | 8 | 25 | 0 | 17 | 8 |
| 1.1 | 50 | 92 | 42 | 33 | 42 |
| 2.2 | 83 | 100 | 83 | 83 | 75 |
| 4.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |