| Literature DB >> 35204253 |
Elżbieta Rząsa-Duran1, Agata Kryczyk-Poprawa2, Dawid Drabicki2, Adrian Podkowa2, Katarzyna Sułkowska-Ziaja3, Agnieszka Szewczyk3, Katarzyna Kała3, Włodzimierz Opoka2, Piotr Zięba4, Maciej Fidurski4, Bożena Muszyńska3.
Abstract
Ilex paraguariensis (yerba mate) is a plant species of the holly genus Ilex native to South America from the family Aquifoliaceae and is used for the production of yerba mate infusion. The leaves of the plant are steeped in hot water to make a beverage known as mate. The present study aimed to quantify and compare the content of selected elements in dried leaves and stems of I. paraguariensis (originating from Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil) available in the market in Poland and determine the amount of these elements and bioactive compounds that pass into the infusion prepared from them. The contents of the following antioxidant compounds were assessed: neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, 4-feruloylquinic acid, isochlorogenic acid, rutoside, astragalin, caffeine, and indole derivatives. All the tested samples showed the presence of elements such as magnesium, zinc, copper, iron, and manganese. The highest antioxidant activity was determined for infusion prepared from yerba mate samples from Brazil. Drinking approximately 1 L of the infusion a day will partially cover the daily requirement of these elements and bioactive compounds. The highest content of organic compounds with antioxidant properties (phenolic compounds and caffeine) was found in yerba mate infusions from Brazil.Entities:
Keywords: Ilex paraguariensis; antioxidants; bioelements; production process; roasted yerba mate; yerba mate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35204253 PMCID: PMC8868397 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11020371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Analyzed products of yerba mate.
Figure 2Comparison of the contents of (A) Fe, Zn, and Mn; (B) Cu; (C) Mg in yerba mate samples (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test (p < 0.05)). Bars with an asterisk (*) are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Mg(II), Zn(II), and Mn(II) contents of yerba mate infusions.
| Element | Sample | Content (mg/L) | % of Content in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg | YM-B1 | 144.75 ± 6.8 | 29.9% |
| YM-P2 | 44.45 ± 13.7 | 14.0% | |
| Zn | YM-P1 | 3.14 ± 0.0 | 27.8% |
| YM-B1 | 1.00 ± 0.0 | 24.9% | |
| Mn | YM-A1 | 3.67 ± 0.1 | 18.9% |
| YM-P2 | 1.70 ± 0.0 | 50.2% |
Coverage of the daily recommended requirement when drinking 1 L of yerba mate infusion per day prepared using the described method.
| Element | Sample | % RDA at Intake of | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | ||
| Mg | YM-B1 | 34.5% | 45.2% |
| YM-P2 | 10.6% | 13.9% | |
| Zn | YM-P1 | 28.6% | 39.3% |
| YM-B1 | 9.1% | 12.5% | |
| Mn | YM-A1 | 159.8% | 204.1% |
| YM-P2 | 80.0% | 94.5% | |
Content of organic compounds in yerba mate samples analyzed in the present research.
| Neochlorogenic Acid | Chlorogenic Acid | Cryptochlorogenic Acid | Caffeic Acid | 4-Feruloylquinic Acid | isochlorogenic Acid | Rutoside | Astragalin | Caffeine | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [mg/g dry mass] ± SD | |||||||||
| YM-B1 | 39.03 ± 0.64 a | 19.00 ± 0.29 a | 17.84 ± 0.29 a | 0.60 ± 0.02 a | 2.92 ± 0.10 a | 28.82 ± 0.47 a | 8.77 ± 0.26 a | 1.61 ± 1.10 | 1.17 ± 0.00 a |
| YM-B2 | 24.46 ± 0.18 | 12.37 ± 0.06 | 12.18 ± 0.19 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 22.20 ± 0.20 | 6.53 ± 0.09 | 1.61 ± 0.01 | 0.74 ± 0.02 |
| YM-B4 | 25.95 ± 0.20 c | 12.12 ± 0.30 | 13.59 ± 0.30 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 1.75 ± 0.08 | 24.32 ± 0.20 | 8.19 ± 0.23 | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 0.86 ± 0.02 b |
| YM-A1 | 15.61 ± 0.28 | 7.04 ± 0.24 | 6.91 ± 0.36 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 1.19 ± 0.08 | 11.26 ± 0.32 | 4.98 ± 0.21 | 0.93 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.01 |
| YM-A2 | 20.06 ± 0.05 | 10.22 ± 0.24 | 11.60 ± 0.33 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 1.40 ± 0.05 | 14.83 ± 0.19 | 6.18 ± 0.14 | 0.94 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.01 |
| YM-A3 | 23.81 ± 0.28 | 12.13 ± 0.28 | 12.07 ± 0.42 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 1.52 ± 0.12 | 21.06 ± 0.56 | 6.51 ± 0.49 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.01 |
| YM-P1 | 16.86 ± 0.07 | 10.52 ± 0.36 | 11.36 ± 0.48 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 1.91 ± 0.15 | 15.90 ± 0.12 | 5.51 ± 0.16 | 0.98 ± 0.28 | 0.46 ± 0.02 |
| YM-P2 | 5.39 ± 0.09 a | 3.21 ± 0.06 a | 3.48 ± 0.10 a | 0.07 ± 0.00 a | 0.57 ± 0.00 a | 4.78 ± 0.13 a | 1.73 ± 0.03 a | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.00 ab |
| YM-B3 * | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 1.77 ± 0.050 | 1.32 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 0.29 ± 0.01 |
Each analysis was performed in triplicate (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test; values followed by a different letter (a, b, c) within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05) * roasted yerba mate (not statistically analyzed because roasting degrades organic compounds).
Comparison of the total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of analyze yerba mate samples.
| DPPH° * | FRAP ** | TPC *** | TFC *** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YM-B1 | 61.29 ± 1.44 e | 69.39 ± 2.84 c | 86.23 ± 2.84 c | 475.56 ± 11.74 d |
| YM-B2 | 52.34 ± 1.98 cd | 42.04 ± 1.86 b | 70.16 ± 2.61 c | 338.35 ± 33.84 bc |
| YM-B3 | 20.20 ± 0.77 a | 1.94 ± 0.49 a | 22.05 ± 0.52 a | 36.65 ± 2.82 a |
| YM-B4 | 46.23 ± 1.38 bc | 117.88 ± 14.45 e | 62.92 ± 2.03 bc | 360.91 ± 14.92 bc |
| YM-A1 | 53.03 ± 0.81 d | 62.75 ± 1.77 c | 82.23 ± 3.05 c | 582.71 ± 24.43 e |
| YM-A2 | 43.46 ± 1.27 b | 52.22 ± 3.87 bc | 57.74 ± 3.88 b | 340.23 ± 21.35 bc |
| YM-A3 | 50.95 ± 3.01 cd | 56.87 ± 1.67 bc | 66.03 ± 3.81 bc | 329.89 ± 28.19 b |
| YM-P1 | 41.86 ± 2.49 b | 41.77 ± 3.98 b | 56.35 ± 2.01 b | 332.71 ± 25.84 b |
| YM-P2 | 59.55 ± 1.61 e | 62.15 ± 3.83 c | 85.06 ± 5.97 c | 404.13 ± 14.19 c |
* % of a reduced radical DPPH°, ** µM Fe2+ per 1 mL of Yerba Mate infusion, *** mg per 1 mL of Yerba Mate infusion. Each analysis was performed in triplicate (Tukey test: values followed by a different letter (a, b, c, d, e) within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).