Literature DB >> 35203838

Comprehensive Analysis of Imipenemase (IMP)-Type Metallo-β-Lactamase: A Global Distribution Threatening Asia.

Pisut Pongchaikul1,2,3, Paninee Mongkolsuk1.   

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance, particularly beta-lactam resistance, is a major problem worldwide. Imipenemase or IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) has become a more prominent enzyme, especially in Asia, since it was discovered in the 1990s in Japan. There are currently 88 variants of IMP-type enzymes. The most commonly identified variant of IMP-type enzymes is IMP-1 variant. IMP-type MBLs have been detected in more than ten species in Enterobacterales. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most frequent carrier of IMP-type enzymes worldwide. In Asia, IMP-type MBLs have been distributed in many countries. This work investigated a variety of currently available IMP-type MBLs at both a global level and a regional level. Out of 88 variants of IMP-type MBLs reported worldwide, only 32 variants were found to have susceptibility profiles. Most of the bacterial isolates carrying IMP-type MBLs were resistant to Carbapenems, especially Imipenem and Meropenem, followed by the 3rd-generation cephalosporins, and interestingly, monobactams. Our results comprehensively indicated the distribution of IMP-type MBLs in Asia and raised the awareness of the situation of antimicrobial resistance in the region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial resistance; carbapenemase; β-lactamase

Year:  2022        PMID: 35203838      PMCID: PMC8868347          DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-6382


1. Introduction

Multidrug resistance organisms, especially β-lactamase-harbouring pathogens, are a major global public health problem worldwide resulting in high mortality, high morbidity and rising economic costs [1]. The β-lactamase enzyme, which can be produced by both gram-positive bacteria and gram-negative bacteria, inactivates β-lactam antibiotics (i.e., penicillin, cephalosporin, carbapenem and monobactam) by hydrolysing the amide bond of β-lactam ring [2]. Currently, there are more than 7270 enzymes available in the β-lactamase database (Beta-Lactamase database. Available online: www.bldb.eu, accessed on 30 November 2021). β-lactamase can be classified into four classes based on Ambler classification. Class A, C, D include serine protease-derived β-lactamases while class B includes the metallo-or zinc dependent β-lactamase (MBL) [3]. Imipenemase (IMP) is encoded by bla genes. Along with other enzymes in this group: Verona Integron-encoded Metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), São Paulo metallo-β-lactamase (SPM) and German imipenemase (GIM). IMP belongs to class B β-lactamase and has carbapenemase activity [4]. Similar to other MBLs, IMP MBL breaks β-lactam ring with zinc as a catalyst and the enzyme can be inhibited by EDTA. IMP is commonly transferred between organisms, especially Gram-negative bacteria, via class 1 or class 3 of integron [5]. The discovery of bla was first reported in Japan in 1988 from P. aeruginosa strain GN17203 [6]. There are currently 88 variants of IMP reported worldwide. Even though IMP-type MBLs are important and widely distributed around the world, a comprehensive review of this enzyme has not been conducted. Moreover, a previous phylogenetic construction was restricted due to the limited number of available sequences. To understand the comprehensive picture of the bla gene, a review of relevant literature and a phylogenetic tree reconstruction was performed to investigate the distribution of IMP-type MBLs, phylogenetic relationship of the genes, and the association between phylogenetic cluster and antibiotic susceptibility.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Review of Literature

A comprehensive literature search was performed by PM and PP on Pubmed/Medline and EMBASE until 30 November 2021 to obtain relevant articles. The search terms used were “IMP and β-Lactamases”. A list of references was stored and the duplicates were removed using Endnote. PM and PP separately screened and selected the titles and the abstracts mentioning IMP metallo-β-lactamase. Articles were included when the prevalence of bla gene was reported. Articles were excluded when the English version was not available.

2.2. blaIMP Gene Sequence Retrieval and Analysis

A total number of 88 sequences of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase genes (bla) were found and downloaded from both β-lactamase databases [7] (last accessed, November 2021) and GenBank database in November 2021. IMP−36, IMP−50 and IMP−57 could not be found and retrieved from both databases. Multiple sequence alignment of both nucleotide sequences and amino acid sequences was processed using an iterative refinement algorithm in MUSCLE with default parameters [8] and manually edited in MEGA software version 11 [9]. The analysis of overall domain family of the BlaIMP was conducted in Pfam [10].

2.3. Phylogenetic Tree Estimation

Prior to the construction of the phylogenetic tree, the model test was conducted to estimate the most appropriate model using built-in functions in MEGA [9]. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with 1000 bootstraps was constructed using General Time Reversible (GTR) model with gamma distribution for nucleotide sequences using FastTree [11]. The tree was visualised in FigTree (FigTree. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 30 November 2021) and annotated in the interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) [12].

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of IMP-Type MBLs

A search of the NCBI database and EMBASE using “IMP and β-Lactamases” for gene encoding bla demonstrated a variety of variants of IMP-type MBL genes as well as species of IMP-carrying organisms. There were 88 variants of IMP-type MBL genes currently deposited on NCBI’s GenBank. These 88 variants were identified in 29 species across 32 countries (Table 1). Interestingly, most of the bla genes identified were from hospital isolates (Table 1). According to the genes submitted to GenBank and the literature search, the detection of bla was frequently reported from Japan (25%), followed by China (17%) and France (7%) (Figure 1A).
Table 1

List of currently available IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase genes.

IMP TypeHostCountry of IsolationReference or AccessionSource of Isolates
IMP−1 Achromobacter xylosoxidans JapanEF027105.1, KF032823.1, KF032821.1, KF032820.1Hospital
Comamonas thiooxydans JapanAP025194.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Japan AB983593.1Hospital
Thailand[13]Hospital
MalaysiaKX987869.1Hospital
ChinaAY386702.1, AY912485.1Hospital
IranKR703251.1, JX648311.1, JX644173.1, JQ766530.1Hospital
NepalLC636409.1Hospital
SingaporeAY168635.1, AY625689.1, AY625688.1, AY625687.1, AY625686.1Hospital
EgyptKX452681.1Hospital
(Direct submission from Brazil)GU831553.1, GU831552.1, GU831551.1, GU831550.1, GU831549.1, GU831548.1, GU831547.1, GU831546.1N/A
(Submitted from the UK, unpublished)MH594579.1Hospital
Turkey DQ842025.1Hospital
IndiaKF570107.1Hospital
USAMK388919.1, MF479262.1N/A
Pseudomonas putida SingaporeAY251052.1Hospital
Pseudomonas fluorescens SingaporeAY250709.1Hospital
Serratia marcescens JapanAB162950.1, AB162949.1, AB162948.1, AB162947.1, NG_049172.1Hospital
Klebsiella pneumoniae IranLC512050.1, LC512051.1Hospital
Klebsiella pneumoniae Japan[14]Hospital
Acinetobacter spp.Korea[15]Hospital
Acinetobacter bereziniae KoreaEU014166.1, EU686386.1Hospital
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus ThailandHM185482.1Hospital
Acinetobacter baumannii Japan[15]Hospital
(Submitted from Korea, unpublished)EF375699.1Hospital
IranKR080548.1, KF723585.1Hospital
(Submitted from Brazil, unpublished)KF381490.1, KF381489.1, KF381488.1, KF381487.1Hospital
ThailandHM036079.1Hospital
Acinetobacter pittii KoreaGQ288398.1, GQ288393.1Hospital
TaiwanGU064942.1, GU064941.1N/A
GQ864268.1Hospital
JapanAB753459.1N/A
Acinetobacter nosocomialis KoreaGQ288394.1Hospital
TaiwanGU064940.1, GU064939.1, GU064938.1N/A
Citrobacter freundii JapanAB754498.1N/A
Citrobacter youngae (Direct submission from Ireland)MW847603.1Hospital
Enterobacter aerogenes Japan[15]Hospital
Enterobacter cloacae (Direct submission from Japan)LC508022.1Hospital
Japan[15]Hospital
ChinaMK088089.1Hospital
Enterobacter hormaechei ChinaMG287118.1N/A
Escherichia coli Japan[16]Hospital
IranLC512049.1Hospital
Proteus mirabilis BrazilKY057362.1Hospital
Proteus vulgaris Japan[16]Hospital
Providencia rettgeri JapanAB754496.1N/A
Leclercia adecarboxylata ChinaKJ531212.1Hospital
IMP−2 Acinetobacter baumannii ItalyAJ243491.1, NG_049183.1Hospital
IndiaKC588963.1Hospital
Serratia marcescens JapanAB182996.1N/A
Pseudomonas aeruginosa IndiaKC588963.1Hospital
IMP−3 Shigella flexneri (Published in USA)NG_049194.1N/A
IMP−4 Acinetobacter baumannii Hong KongNG_049203.1, AF445082.1, AF244145.1Hospital
SingaporeDQ532122.1, AY795963.1, AY590475.1Hospital
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (Direct submission from Malaysia, unpublished)DQ307573.1N/A
Citrobacter freundii ChinaEU368857.1Hospital
JQ818252.1N/A
Escherichia coli ChinaAB636651.1N/A
(Direct submission from India)MF169878.1N/A
Enterobacter cloacae ChinaKF699334.1Hospital
KoreaKY884003.1N/A
JapanLC198842.1Hospital
Enterobacter aerogenes ChinaKF184385.1Hospital
Klebsiella pneumoniae ChinaEU368858.1, KF184388.1, FJ384365.1Hospital
JQ808503.1, JN106667.1, KF680003.1N/A
Klebsiella oxytoca ChinaJQ820404.1N/A
KY913900.1Animal
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ChinaDQ297664.1N/A
MalaysiaGQ221782.1Hospital
IMP−5 Acinetobacter baumannii PortugalNG_049212.1, JF810083.1Hospital
IMP−6 Escherichia coli JapanAB753460.1N/A
Serratia marcescens JapanNG_049220.1, AB040994.1Hospital
Providencia rettgeri JapanAB754497.1N/A
Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB188812.1Hospital
KoreaEU117233.1Hospital
IMP−7 Pseudomonas aeruginosa CanadaNG_049221.1, AF318077.1Hospital
CzechJX982232.1Hospital
Japan LC091209.2, LC091210.2Hospital
MalaysiaGQ221781.1, AF416736.2, GU213192.1Hospital
IndiaHM641894.1Hospital
SingaporeAY625685.1Hospital
SlovakiaEF601914.1Hospital
IMP−8 Acinetobacter baumannii TaiwanEF127959.1Hospital
China DQ845788.1Hospital
Escherichia coli SingaporeKF534724.1Hospital
Enterobacter cloacae Taiwan[16]Hospital
ChinaJQ820405.1N/A
Klebsiella pneumoniae ChinaJQ820406.1, EU368856.1Hospital
TaiwanNG_049222.1, AF322577.2Hospital
TunisiaHE605039.1Non-hospital
Klebsiella oxytoca ChinaHQ651093.1Hospital
Serratia marcescens TaiwanEU042136.1N/A
IMP−9 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ChinaAY033653, EU176818.1Hospital
KF184386.1, KF255597.1, KF255596.1, KF255595.1N/A
(Direct submission from China)HM106459.1N/A
IMP−10 Achromobacter xylosoxidans JapanAB074435.1, AB195638.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB074434.1, AB074433.1, NG_049173.1, AB195637.1Hospital
(Direct submission from Japan, Unpublished)DQ288156.1Hospital
Pseudomonas putida ItalyAJ420864.1Hospital
Klebsiella pneumoniae TunisiaHE605040.1Non-hospital
IMP−11 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB074437.1Hospital
Acinetobacter baumannii JapanAB074436, NG_049174.1Hospital
Enterobacter cloacae JapanLC628821.1N/A
IMP−12 Pseudomonas putida ItalyNG_049175.1Hospital
IMP−13 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ItalyFJ172676.1, FJ172674.1, AJ512502.1, NG_049176.1Hospital
FranceJX131371.1Hospital
ThailandGU207399.1Hospital
Pseudomonas monteilii ItalyJN091097.1Hospital
Klebsiella pneumoniae Tunisia HE605041.1Non-hospital
IMP−14 Achromobacter xylosoxidans Thailand KJ406506.2, KJ406505.2Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ThailandAY553332.1, NG_049177.1Hospital
IMP−15 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ThailandNG_049178.1, AY553333.1Hospital
VietnamLC075716.1N/A
SpainKC310496.1Hospital
IMP−16 Pseudomonas aeruginosa BrazilAJ584652.2, NG_049179.1Hospital
IMP−17 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ItalyNG_049180.1Hospital
IMP−18 Pseudomonas aeruginosa USAAY780674.2, NG_049181.1Hospital
MexicoHM138673.1N/A
(Direct submission from Costa Rica, unpublished)KC907377.2Hospital
(Direct submission from Japan, unpublished)AB587676.1N/A
IMP−19 Acinetobacter baumannii IranJQ766528.1N/A
JapanAB184977.1 Hospital
Achromobacter xylosoxidans JapanAB201263.1N/A
Enterobacter cloacae JapanAB201264.1N/A
Aeromonas caviae FranceNG_049182.1Hospital
Klebsiella pneumoniae (Direct submission from Japan, unpublished)LC062960.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB184976.1Hospital
Pseudomonas putida JapanAB201265.1N/A
Serratia marcescens PolandMH071810.1N/A
MF678587.1Hospital
IMP−20 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB196988, NG_049184.1N/A
IMP−21 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB204557, NG_049185.1N/A
IMP−22 Providencia rettgeri JapanAB754495.1N/A
Pseudomonas aeruginosa AustriaFM876313.1Hospital
Pseudomonas fluorescens ItalyDQ361087.2, NG_049186.1Non-hospital
IMP−23 Citrobacter freundii ChinaNG_049187.1N/A
IMP−24 Serratia marcescens TaiwanEF192154.1, NG_049188.1Hospital
IMP−25 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ChinaEU352796Hospital
KoreaEU541448.1, NG_049189.1Hospital
(Direct submission from China, unpublished)KY081418.1, KY081417.1, HM175876.1N/A
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Direct submission fom China)GU944726.1N/A
IMP−26 Enterobacter cloacae ChinaHQ685900.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa MalaysiaJQ629930.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa NepalLC636067.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa SingaporeGU045307.1, NG_049190.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa VietnamLC075717.1N/A
IMP−27 Morganella morganii MexicoKY847875.1, KY847873.1N/A
Proteus mirabilis USAJF894248.1Hospital
(Direct submission from USA)NG_049191.1N/A
Providencia rettgeri USAKY847874.1N/A
IMP−28 Klebsiella oxytoca SpainHQ263342.1, NG_049192.1Hospital
IMP−29 Pseudomonas aeruginosa FranceHQ438058.1, JQ041634, NG_049193.1Hospital
IMP−30 Escherichia coli ChinaKM589497.1Hospital
Pseudomonas aeruginosa RussiaNG_049195.1N/A
IMP−31 Pseudomonas aeruginosa GermanyKF148593.1, NG_049196.1Hospital
IMP−32 Klebsiella pneumoniae ThailandNG_049197.1, JQ002629.1Hospital
IMP−33 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ItalyJN848782, NG_049198.1Hospital
IMP−34 Klebsiella oxytoca JapanAB700341.1, NG_049199.1Hospital
Acinetobacter colistiniresistens JapanLC276939.1Hospital
IMP−35 Pseudomonas aeruginosa GermanyJF816544.1, NG_049200.1Hospital
IMP−36Not found in NCBI database and pubmed
IMP−37 Pseudomonas aeruginosa FranceJX131372.1, NG_049201.1Hospital
IMP−38 Klebsiella pneumoniae ChinaHQ875573.1, NG_049202.1N/A
IMP−39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa FranceMK507818.1, NG_064724.1Hospital
IMP−40 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB753457, NG_049204.1N/A
IMP−41 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanAB753458, NG_049205.1N/A
IMP−42 Acinetobacter soli JapanAB753456.1, NG_049206.1N/A
IMP−43 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanNG_049207.1Hospital
IMP−44 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanNG_049208.1Hospital
IMP−45 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ChinaKJ510410.1, NG_049209.1Animal
FranceKU984333.1Hospital
IMP−46 Pseudomonas putida FranceMK543944.1, MK507819.1, NG_064725.1Hospital
IMP−47 Serratia marcescens (Direct submit USA)KP050486.1N/A
IMP−48 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Direct submit USA, unpublished)NG_049210.1, KM087857.1N/A
IMP−49 Pseudomonas aeruginosa BrazilNG_049211, KP681694.1 N/A
IMP−50Not found in NCBI database and pubmed
IMP−51 Pseudomonas aeruginosa VietnamNG_049213.1, LC031883.1Hospital
IMP−52 Escherichia coli JapanNG_049214.1, LC055762.1N/A
IMP−53 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Direct submit USA)NG_049215.1N/A
IMP−54 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ThailandKU052795.1, NG_049216.1N/A
IMP−55 Acinetobacter baumannii IranKU299753.1, NG_049217.1Hospital
IMP−56 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexicoKU351745.1Hospital
GuatemalaKU315553.1, NG_049218.1N/A
IMP−57Not found in NCBI database and pubmed
IMP−58 Pseudomonas putida DenmarkKU647281.1, NG_049219.1N/A
IMP−59 Escherichia coli AustraliaKX196782.1, NG_055477.1N/A
IMP−60 Enterobacter cloacae JapanLC159227.1, NG_050945.1Hospital
IMP−61 Acinetobacter baumannii (Direct submission from Germany, unpublished)KX462700.1, NG_051166.1Hospital
IMP−62 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mexico KX753224.1, NG_051513.1Hospital
IMP−63 Pseudomonas aeruginosa FranceKX821663.1, NG_052049.1Hospital
IMP−64 Proteus mirabilis USANG_054710.1, KX949735.2N/A
IMP−65 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Thailand KY315991.1, NG_066508.1Hospital
IMP−66 Escherichia coli JapanLC190726.1, NG_054676.1N/A
IMP−67 Providencia rettgeri (Direct submission from USA, unpublished)MF281100.1, NG_055271.1N/A
IMP−68 Klebsiella pneumoniae JapanMF669572.1, NG_055584.1N/A
IMP−69Providencia spp.ChinaMF678349.1, NG_055665.1N/A
IMP−70 Pseudomonas aeruginosa GermanyMG748725.1, NG_056176.1Hospital
Providencia rettgeri JapanLC348383.1N/A
IMP−71 Pseudomonas aeruginosa FranceMG818167.1Hospital
IMP−72 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexicoMH021847.1N/A
IMP−73 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanMH021848.1, NG_057463.1N/A
IMP−74 Pseudomonas aeruginosa BrazilMH243349.1, NG_057606.1N/A
IMP−75 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexicoMH243350.1, MW692112.1, NG_057607.1N/A
IMP−76 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanNG_061409.1Hospital
IMP−77 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanNG_061410.1Hospital
IMP−78 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanNG_061411.1Hospital
IMP−79 Pseudomonas aeruginosa FranceMG873561.1, NG_061626.1Hospital
IMP−80 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanNG_062274.1Hospital
IMP−81 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ColumbiaMN267699.1N/A
IMP−82 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Direct submission from Germany, unpublished)MN057782.1Hospital
(Direct submission from USA, unpublished)NG_065873.1Hospital
IMP−83 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexicoMN104595.1, NG_065874.1N/A
IMP−84 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Direct submission from Switzerland, unpublished)MN219692.1N/A
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Direct submission from USA, unpublished)NG_065875.1N/A
IMP−85 Pseudomonas aeruginosa FranceMN510335.1, NG_066696.1Hospital
IMP−86 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ChinaMT241520.1, NG_076650.1N/A
IMP−87 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ChinaMT241521.1, NG_076651.1N/A
IMP−88 Pseudomonas aeruginosa JapanLC558310.1, NG_070737.1Hospital
IMP−89 Pseudomonas putida ChinaNG_070738.1N/A
IMP−90 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Direct submission from Germany, unpublished)MW811441.1 Hospital
(Direct submission from USA, unpublished)NG_074713.1Hospital
IMP−91 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ChinaMZ702721.1, NG_076634.1N/A
Figure 1

Distribution of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase annotated genes (A) worldwide (B) in Asia.

According to Figure 1A, Asia accounted for 69% of the reporting countries. The presence of the bla gene was reported in 12 countries, namely, China (including Hong Kong), India, Iran, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Nepal, Singapore, Thailand, Turkey and Vietnam. Focusing on Asia, Japan and China were the first (36%) and the second (25%) most frequently bla identified countries. Thailand and Singapore were the third most frequently reported countries (7%) (Figure 1B). The most frequently reported bla carriers were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, followed by Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae. By considering the variant of bla in countries with high prevalence of bla in Asia, bla was the most frequently reported in Japan (23%) and Singapore (50%). bla and bla were the most frequently reported in China (27%) and Thailand (27%), respectively (Figure 2A–D).
Figure 2

Distribution of bla annotated genes in four countries in Asia: (A) Japan, (B) China, (C) Thailand and (D) Singapore. IMP-N is used to represent blaIMP-N.

3.2. In Silico Analysis of IMP-Type MBLs

In silico analysis of IMP-type MBL genes was conducted to investigate the diversity of the genes. Using multiple sequence alignment of 88 variants of IMP-type MBLs, the conserved sequences of active sites were identified as follows: His95, Phe96, His97, Asp99, Ser100, His157, Cys176 and His215 (numbered according to IMP−1; Supplementary Materials Figure S1) [17]. These sequences were residues of a lactam ring-catalytic site. The overall analysis showed 79.3%–96.7% amino acid sequence similarity. To investigate other functions of the protein, we performed protein domain prediction in Pfam. The result showed that this protein contained only one domain, namely ‘Metallo-hydrolase-like-MBL-fold superfamily’, covering from amino acid position 23 to position 234 (result not shown). A phylogenetic tree was constructed to visualise the relationship of the genes. bla genes were separated into three main clusters (Figure 3). Group I contains 38 variants. Noticeably, bla, bla and bla, previously identified as group II [18], were currently in a subgroup of group I, called group Ia, with 95.1% bootstrap support. These three variants were isolated from strains with European origin. Group II contains 41 variants. Lastly, group III contains nine variants (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Phylogenetic relationship of bla genes. An unrooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed using nucleotide sequences of 88 bla genes with 1000 bootstrap supports was visualised together with antibiotic susceptibility profile of 32 variants of the bla gene. Red squares indicated “resistant” while green squares indicated “susceptible”. IMP-N is used to represent blaIMP-N.

3.3. Resistance of IMP MBL Variants-Carrying Strains

The pattern of antibiotic susceptibility of the isolate carrying each bla variant was obtained from the articles to investigate whether the variation in each variant was associated with susceptibility. The susceptibility profiles were taken from bacterial isolates carrying those bla genes. By reviewing the literature, most of the antibiotic agents tested were in the group of cephalosporin and carbapenem (Figure 3), especially anti-pseudomonal antibiotics, since P. aeruginosa was the most abundant species identified to possess the bla gene. Out of 88 available variants, susceptibility profile was reported only in 32 variants (Figure 3, right panel). Overall, strains with bla were resistant to several β-lactam antibiotics. For carbapenem, almost all of the isolates with bla variants were resistant to both meropenem and imipenem. IMP−19, −28, and −34 enzymes were unable to inactivate the carbapenems. Similarly, Cephalosporin was shown to be less active against bla -carrying species. Likewise, isolates with bla were resistant to cephalosporins. Aztreonam, a monobactam, was also shown to have an anti-bacterial effect on most of bla carriers. By combining the antibiotic susceptibility profile with the phylogenetic tree to investigate the relationship between clustering and susceptibility, it was found that susceptibility pattern was not associated with the phylogenetic tree (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

The attention to clinically important bacteria has been rising due to the multidrug resistance caused by the production of drug-inactivating enzymes, especially β-lactamases [19]. More critically, the carbapenemase enzyme has been increasingly detected in pathogens that are associated with nosocomial infections [20,21]. This study is the first to comprehensively investigate the epidemiology and the diversity of IMP-type MBLs, class B β-lactamase with carbapenemase ability. An IMP-type MBL is encoded by the bla gene (N = an order of variant discovered) which can be located on the chromosome or the plasmid, which facilitates the transfer of the bla gene via horizontal gene transfer [22,23]. Our study showed that the bla gene was detected in clinically relevant species, including P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, which are associated with nosocomial infection and listed in “Priority 1: CRITICAL” list of antibiotic resistant pathogens by WHO (WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed, accessed on 30 December 2021). Interestingly, our analysis revealed that the top two countries where bla genes were detected were both Asian countries: Japan and China. Japan is the first place where IMP-type MBLs (IMP−1) were reported [6]. In Asia, there were 28, 15, 7 and 5 variants of the bla gene identified in Japan, China, Thailand and Singapore, respectively. A recent study revealed that carbapenemases (derived from P. aeruginosa) are distributed throughout Thailand [18]. However, the epidemiological study of IMP variants in Japan and China has not yet been conducted. It is, therefore, important to note that the bla gene is one of the causes of antibiotic resistance in Asia. The phylogenetic tree is commonly used to investigate the evolutionary relationship of genes or organisms. Our findings revealed that a reconstructed phylogenetic tree using 88 bla variants clustered the genes into three main groups (Figure 2). In a broad picture, this tree was similar to the previous version [18]. Nevertheless, group Ia, which was previously clustered in group II, was currently identified in group I with high bootstraps. It is important to note that the structure of phylogeny of bla is nearly well-defined although some branches remain dynamic depending on the number of genes added to the tree. The change of position in the phylogenetic tree could be caused by the increased number of tested genes in our study. A search for antibiotic susceptibility profiles revealed that strains containing 32 variants (out of 88) were tested for their susceptibility. The profile showed that the 3rd-generation cephalosporins and carbapenem were less effective against most strains with the bla gene. Interestingly, Aztreonam is the only agent that is active to the strains with most types of bla (Figure 3). However, the association between susceptibility and the phylogenetic tree was absent. This is supported by the findings showing that the sequence of the active site (catalytic site) was highly conserved within the members of MBLs [17]. It is of note that nucleotide or amino acid substitutions outside the active site might not affect the β-lactam-hydrolysing activity of the enzyme. In addition, the susceptibility profile of the strains containing each bla variant must be performed to ensure the association between the substitution/phylogenetic tree and the antibiotic resistance pattern. It is important to note that the susceptibility profile was taken from bacterial isolates, so the susceptibility can be affected by another mechanism, such as other β-lactamases or efflux pumps [24]. All in all, the findings of this work demonstrated that antibiotic resistance-associated genes were distributed to several regions around the world. This emphasised that the need of discovering or inventing novel antibiotic agents and enforcing antibiotic stewardship is urgent.

5. Conclusions

Carbapenemase, especially IMP-type MBLs, causes public health problems worldwide. This study is the first to comprehensively analyse all currently available variants of IMP-type MBLs and their associated susceptibility. Asian countries, especially Japan and China, are presently under a wide spread of bla -carrying bacteria which are antibiotic-resistant organisms listed by WHO. An unrooted phylogenetic backbone of bla gene variants illustrated two separate groups without susceptibility or geographical association. This strengthens antibiotic stewardship policy on a global level to control antibiotic resistance problems.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases.

Authors:  Anne Marie Queenan; Karen Bush
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments.

Authors:  Morgan N Price; Paramvir S Dehal; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Mechanisms of β-lactam antimicrobial resistance and epidemiology of major community- and healthcare-associated multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Sarah S Tang; Anucha Apisarnthanarak; Li Yang Hsu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  PCR detection of metallo-beta-lactamase gene (blaIMP) in gram-negative rods resistant to broad-spectrum beta-lactams.

Authors:  K Senda; Y Arakawa; S Ichiyama; K Nakashima; H Ito; S Ohsuka; K Shimokata; N Kato; M Ohta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Emergence and nosocomial spread of carbapenem-resistant OXA-232-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Brunei Darussalam.

Authors:  Muhd Haziq Fikry Abdul Momin; Apostolos Liakopoulos; Lynette M Phee; David W Wareham
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.035

7.  Class 1 integron containing metallo beta-lactamase gene blaIMP-1 in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Thailand.

Authors:  Nitsara Boonkerd; Phannarai Pibalpakdi; Mujarin Tiloklurs; Pannika R Niumsup
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.211

8.  Beta-lactamase database (BLDB) - structure and function.

Authors:  Thierry Naas; Saoussen Oueslati; Rémy A Bonnin; Maria Laura Dabos; Agustin Zavala; Laurent Dortet; Pascal Retailleau; Bogdan I Iorga
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.051

9.  Impact of multi-drug resistant bacteria on economic and clinical outcomes of healthcare-associated infections in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miquel Serra-Burriel; Matthew Keys; Carlos Campillo-Artero; Antonella Agodi; Martina Barchitta; Achilleas Gikas; Carlos Palos; Guillem López-Casasnovas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pfam: The protein families database in 2021.

Authors:  Jaina Mistry; Sara Chuguransky; Lowri Williams; Matloob Qureshi; Gustavo A Salazar; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Silvio C E Tosatto; Lisanna Paladin; Shriya Raj; Lorna J Richardson; Robert D Finn; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of a novel metallo β-lactamase, SZM-1, in Shenzhen Bay, South China.

Authors:  Lingxu Fang; Zongbao Liu; Zhongyi Lu; Rongzhong Huang; Rong Xiang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.