| Literature DB >> 35203773 |
Salima Tiji1, Mohammed Lakrat2,3, Yahya Rokni4,5, El Miloud Mejdoubi2, Christophe Hano6, Mohamed Addi7, Abdeslam Asehraou4, Mostafa Mimouni1.
Abstract
N. sativa is an interesting source of bioactive compounds commonly used for various therapeutic purposes. Associate its seeds extracts with biomaterials to improve their antimicrobial properties are highly demanded. This study aims to investigate the encapsulation of NS extracts in hydroxyapatite nanoparticle sodium silicate glass (nHap/SSG) scaffold. NS essential oil (HS) was extracted by hydrodistillation, while hexane (FH) and acetone extracts (FA) were obtained using Soxhlet extraction. (FH) was the most abundant (34%) followed by (FA) (2.02%) and (HS) (1.2%). GC-MS chromatography showed that the (HS) contained beta cymene, alpha thujene, β-pinene and thymoquinone, while (FH) had mostly fatty acids and (FA) decane, 2.9-dimethyl, benzene 1,3,3-trimethylnonyl and beta cymene. Loaded nHap/SGG scaffolds with various amount of (FH), (HS) and (FA) at 1.5, 3, and 6 wt%; were elaborated then characterized by ATR-FTIR, X-ray and SEM techniques and their antimicrobial activity was studied. Samples loaded with 1.5 wt% HE was highly active against C. albicans (19 mm), and at 3 wt% on M. luteus (20 mm) and S. aureus (20 mm). Additionally, loaded scaffolds with 1.5 wt% AE had an important activity against M. luteus (18.9 mm) and S. aureus (19 mm), while the EO had low activities on all bacterial strains. The outcome of this finding indicated that loaded scaffolds demonstrated an important antimicrobial effect that make them promising materials for a wide range of medical applications.Entities:
Keywords: Nigella sativa L.; antimicrobial activity; composite scaffold; hydroxyapatite
Year: 2022 PMID: 35203773 PMCID: PMC8868394 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
GC-MS Chemical composition of N. sativa L essential oil (HS).
| Elution Order | Component | RT 1 | % Area 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alpha-ThujeneOriganene (C10H16) | 5.000 | 13.70 |
| 2 | Alpha-Pinene (C10H16) | 5.133 | 2.21 |
| 3 | Beta-Pinene (C10H16) | 5.842 | 2.19 |
| 4 | 1,2,4, trimethylbenzene, (C9H12). | 6.100 | 1.30 |
| 5 | Beta-Cymene (C10H14) | 6.600 | 38.05 |
| 6 | Gamma-Terpinene (C10H16) | 7.158 | 0.69 |
| 7 | Aldehyde lilac (C10H16O2) | 7.792 | 0.55 |
| 8 | Carvacrol (C10H14O) | 8.175 | 2.19 |
| 9 | Thymoquinone | 10.233 | 5.69 |
1 RT: retention time; 2 % Area: percentage obtained by electronic integration measurement using a mass detector RT trace.
GC-MS Chemical composition of N. sativa L. hexane extract (FH).
| Elution Order | Component | RT 1 | % Area 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.4-Decadienal | 15.100 | 1.79 |
| 2 | 2-oxo-methyl ester Hexadecanoic acid | 15.592 | 1.06 |
| 3 | Phenol, 4-methoxy-2,3,6-trimethyl- | 18.417 | 1.56 |
| 4 | Palmitic acid, methyl ester | 22.600 | 1.32 |
| 5 | L(+)Ascorbic acid 2.6-dihexadecanoate | 23.108 | 4.39 |
| 6 | Oleic acid methyl ester | 24.358 | 2.96 |
| 7 | Linoleic acid | 25.117 | 80.65 |
| 8 | E/Z-1,3,12-Nonadecatriene | 25.608 | 6.24 |
1 RT: retention time; 2 % Area: percentage obtained by electronic integration measurement using a mass detector RT trace.
GC-MS Chemical composition of N. sativa acetone extract (FA).
| Elution Order | Component | RT 1 | % Area 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pentanoic acid, heptyl (C12H24O2) | 4.47 | 2.72 |
| 2 | 1-Hepten-5-yne, 2-methyl-3-methylene (C9H12) | 4.92 | 4.56 |
| 3 | (R)-(2.2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane-4)methanol (C6H12O3) | 5.14 | 3.28 |
| 4 | Cumol (C9H12) | 5.46 | 3.84 |
| 5 | Psi-cumene (C9H12). | 5.73 | 3.23 |
| 6 | Benzene (1,3,3-trimethylnonyl) (C18H30) | 5.95 | 21.62 |
| 7 | beta.-Cymene (C10H14) | 6.41 | 15.76 |
| 8 | Decane, 2.9-dimethyl (C12H26) | 7.50 | 17.31 |
| 9 | 1.3-Dioxolane-4-methanol,2,2-dimethyl,acetate (C8H14O4) | 7.66 | 2.94 |
| 10 | Dodecane (C12H26) | 8.98 | 3.56 |
| 11 | p-Cymen-3-ol (C4H14O) | 10.53 | 1.84 |
| 12 | Glycerine diacetate (C7H12O5) | 11.13 | 1.88 |
| 13 | Stearic acid (C18H36O2) | 18.12 | 0.73 |
| 14 | Palmitic acid (C16H32O2) | 18.43 | 7.29 |
| 15 | Linoleic acid (C18H32O2) | 19.40 | 1.12 |
| 16 | alpha.-Glyceryl linoleate (C21H38O4) | 20.03 | 6.85 |
| 17 | Oleic acid (C18H34O2) | 20.07 | 0.56 |
| 18 | Nonadecanoic acid (C21H42O2) | 20.26 | 0.98 |
1 RT: retention time; 2 % Area: percentage obtained by electronic integration measurement using a mass detector RT trace.
Figure 1XRD spectrums of HAP with and without encapsulated extracts from N. sativa.
Figure 2ATR-FTIR spectrums of free and loaded composite scaffolds.
Figure 3SEM images of free and loaded nHAp/SGG composite scaffolds.
N. sativa (FH) (FA) and (HS) extract inhibition (in millimeters) at different percentages of encapsulation (1.5, 3 and 6 wt%) in nHAp/SSG materials against yeast, Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains.
| Extracts | Inhibition Zones Diameter (in mm) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nHAp/SSG@ | ||||||||||
| Strain | Control | FH | FA | HS | ||||||
| 1.5% | 3% | 6% | 1.5% | 3% | 6% | 1.5% | 3% | 6% | ||
| Yeast strain | ||||||||||
|
| 0 ± 0.23 | 19 ± 0.21 | 17 ± 0.25 | 12 ± 0.70 | 15 ± 0.56 | 13 ± 0.35 | 12 ± 0.42 | 11.5 ± 0.42 | 12 ± 0.70 | 11 ± 0.28 |
| Gram negative | ||||||||||
|
| 0 ± 0.28 | 11 ± 0.57 | 10 ± 0.21 | 07 ± 0.28 | 11 ± 0.85 | 10 ± 0.42 | 7.6 ± 0.28 | 11.7 ± 0.14 | 11 ± 0.57 | 8.9 ± 0.35 |
|
| 0 ± 0.14 | 11 ± 0.35 | 11 ± 0.42 | 09 ± 0.14 | 11 ± 0.85 | 11 ± 0.85 | 9.5 ± 0.35 | 11 ± 0.14 | 12 ± 0.14 | 11 ± 0.28 |
| Gram positive | ||||||||||
|
| 0 ± 0.45 | 18 ± 0.70 | 20 ± 0.85 | 15 ± 0.14 | 16 ± 0.42 | 18.9 ± 0.21 | 13.2 ± 0.70 | 11.9 ± 0.70 | 12.2 ± 0.21 | 11.3 ± 0.85 |
|
| 0 ± 0.31 | 12 ± 0.49 | 20 ± 0.35 | 11 ± 0.49 | 11 ± 0.28 | 19 ± 0.28 | 10 ± 0.70 | 12 ± 0.14 | 13 ± 0.07 | 11 ± 0.07 |
|
| 0 ± 0.65 | 12 ± 0.35 | 10 ± 0.85 | 09 ± 0.28 | 12 ± 0.28 | 11 ± 0.07 | 10.2 ± 0.78 | 12 ± 0.70 | 10.6 ± 0.14 | 9.3 ± 0.92 |
Figure 4Loaded nHAp/SGG composite scaffold preparation.