Literature DB >> 35203085

Early Vasopressor Utilization Strategies and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Camilo Toro1,2, Tetsu Ohnuma1,3,4, Jordan Komisarow1,5, Monica S Vavilala6, Daniel T Laskowitz3,5,7, Michael L James3,7, Joseph P Mathew3, Adrian F Hernandez8, Ben A Goldstein4, John H Sampson5, Vijay Krishnamoorthy1,3,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early hypotension after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is associated with increased mortality and poor long-term outcomes. Current guidelines suggest the use of intravenous vasopressors, commonly norepinephrine and phenylephrine, to support blood pressure after TBI. However, guidelines do not specify vasopressor type, resulting in variation in clinical practice. We describe early vasopressor utilization patterns in critically ill patients with TBI and examine the association between utilization of norepinephrine, compared to phenylephrine, with hospital mortality after sTBI.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US hospitals participating in the Premier Healthcare Database between 2009 and 2018. We examined adult patients (>17 years of age) with a primary diagnosis of sTBI who were treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) after injury. The primary exposure was vasopressor choice (phenylephrine versus norepinephrine) within the first 2 days of hospital admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes examined included hospital length of stay (LOS) and ICU LOS. We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis in all patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor placement. Regression analysis was used to assess differences in outcomes between patients exposed to phenylephrine versus norepinephrine, with propensity matching to address selection bias due to the nonrandom allocation of treatment groups.
RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, 24,718 (37.1%) of 66,610 sTBI patients received vasopressors within the first 2 days of hospitalization. Among these patients, 60.6% (n = 14,991) received only phenylephrine, 10.8% (n = 2668) received only norepinephrine, 3.5% (n = 877) received other vasopressors, and 25.0% (n = 6182) received multiple vasopressors. In that time period, the use of all vasopressors after sTBI increased. A moderate degree of variation in vasopressor choice was explained at the individual hospital level (23.1%). In propensity-matched analysis, the use of norepinephrine compared to phenylephrine was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.65; CI, 1.46-1.86; P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Early vasopressor utilization among critically ill patients with sTBI is common, increasing over the last decade, and varies across hospitals caring for TBI patients. Compared to phenylephrine, norepinephrine was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched analysis. Given the wide variation in vasopressor utilization and possible differences in efficacy, our analysis suggests the need for randomized controlled trials to better inform vasopressor choice for patients with sTBI.
Copyright © 2022 International Anesthesia Research Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35203085      PMCID: PMC9381646          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   6.627


  38 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Vasopressors on Cerebral Circulation and Oxygenation: A Narrative Review of Pharmacodynamics in Health and Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Line Thorup; Klaus U Koch; Richard N Upton; Leif Østergaard; Mads Rasmussen
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.956

Review 2.  Sympathetic control of the brain circulation: Appreciating the complexities to better understand the controversy.

Authors:  Patrice Brassard; Michael M Tymko; Philip N Ainslie
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.145

3.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.

Authors:  S P Baker; B O'Neill; W Haddon; W B Long
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-03

Review 4.  In adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury, does the use of norepinephrine for augmenting cerebral perfusion pressure improve neurological outcome? A systematic review.

Authors:  Patryck Lloyd-Donald; William Spencer; Jacinta Cheng; Lorena Romero; Ron Jithoo; Andrew Udy; Mark C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Harbingers of poor outcome the day after severe brain injury: hypothermia, hypoxia, and hypoperfusion.

Authors:  Elan Jeremitsky; Laurel Omert; C Michael Dunham; Jack Protetch; Aurelio Rodriguez
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2003-02

6.  Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data.

Authors:  Bryan Lau; Stephen R Cole; Stephen J Gange
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Defining Hypotension in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Keita Shibahashi; Kazuhiro Sugiyama; Yoshihiro Okura; Jun Tomio; Hidenori Hoda; Yuichi Hamabe
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  The roles of cerebral blood flow, capillary transit time heterogeneity, and oxygen tension in brain oxygenation and metabolism.

Authors:  Sune N Jespersen; Leif Østergaard
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Neurorehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Michael Oberholzer; René M Müri
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-18

10.  Cerebral autoregulation following head injury.

Authors:  M Czosnyka; P Smielewski; S Piechnik; L A Steiner; J D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.