| Literature DB >> 35202659 |
R Rameshwar1, K Meenakshi2, Gowtham Hanumanram1, R Kannan1, S Magesh Kumar1, J Damodaran1, S Nandhini1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Biventricular global longitudinal strain; LV global longitudinal strain; Post Covid GLS; RV global longitudinal strain
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35202659 PMCID: PMC8863312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Heart J ISSN: 0019-4832
Distribution of Overt & Covert LV & RV dysfunction.
| REDUCED LV GLS (18%) | REDUCED RV GLS (21%) | REDUCED BIVENTRICULAR GLS (12%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORMAL EF | REDUCED EF | NORMAL TAPSE | REDUCED TAPSE | NORMAL EF | REDUCED EF | NORMAL TAPSE | REDUCED TAPSE |
| 18% | 0 | 21% | 0 | 8% | 4% | 10% | 2% |
Relation of GLS to CRP levels.
| GLS | Crp<10 mg/L | CRP 11–50 mg/L | CRP 50–100 mg/L | CRP>100 mg/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV GLS & RVGLS(Normal)49 | 11(22.4%) | 28(57.2%0 | 10(20.4%) | 0 |
| LV GLS (Reduced) 18 | 1(5.6%) | 3(16.7%) | 2(11.1%) | 12(66.7%) |
| RV GLS (Reduced) 21 | 0 | 0 | 3(14.3% | 18(85.7%) |
| RV & LV GLS (Reduced)12 | 0 | 1(8.3%) | 0 | 11(91.7%) |
Fig. 1Relation between GLS & Interleukin 6 levels(IL6).
Relation between D Dimer levels and GLS.
| GLS | D DIMER NORMAL | D DIMER 250 - 400 | D Dimer 400-2000 | D Dimer >2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV GLS & RVGLS (Normal) 49 | 13(26.5%) | 36(73.5%) | 0 | 0 |
| LV GLS (Reduced) 18 | 1(5.6%) | 2 (11.1%) | 1(5.6%) | 14(77.7%) |
| RV GLS (Reduced) 21 | 0 | 2(9.5%) | 1(4.8%) | 18(85.7%) |
| RV & LV GLS (Reduced) 12 | 0 | 1 (8.3%) | 1(8.3%) | 10(83.4%) |
Relation between Serum ferritin & GLS.
| GLS | ferritin NORMAL | ferritin 251- 500 | Ferritin >500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| LV GLS &RVGLS(Normal)49 | 18(36.7%) | 31(63.3%) | 0 |
| LV GLS (Reduced) 18 | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (11.1%) | 14(77.8%) |
| RV GLS (Reduced) 21 | 3(14.3) | 2 (9.5%) | 16 (76.2%) |
| RV & LV GLS (Reduced)12 | 12(100%) |
Fig. 2Relationship between GLS & CT severity score.
Relationship between GLS & Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio(NLR).
| GLS | NLR <3.5 | NLR >3.5–5 | NLR 6-9 | NLR >10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV GLS &RVGLS(Normal)49 | 15(30.6%) | 32(65.4%) | 1(2%) | 1(2%) |
| LV GLS (Reduced) 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18(100%) |
| RV GLS (Reduced) 21 | 1(4.7%) | 3 (14.3% | 3 (14.3%) | 14(66.7%) |
| RV & LV GLS (Reduced)12 | 0 | 1(8.3%) | 1(8.3%) | 10(83.4%) |
Fig. 3Relationship between Global longitudinal strain (GLS) & Serum albumin levels.
Relationship between Global longitudinal strain (GLS) & time to symptom onset and admission.
| LVGLS AND DURATION BETWEEN SYMPTOM ONSET AND ADMISSION | ||
|---|---|---|
| <4DAYS | >4 DAYS | |
| LV GLS &RVGLS(Normal)49 | 49(100%) | 0 |
| LV GLS (Reduced) 18 | 5(27.8%) | 13(72.2%) |
| RV GLS (Reduced) 21 | 11(52.4%) | 10 (47.6%) |
| RV & LV GLS (Reduced)12 | 0 | 12(100%) |