The effect of mothers and caregivers' fasting status on the dietary diversity of children 6-23 months: A longitudinal study in Debrebirhan, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: There are various religions in Ethiopia, of which the Orthodox Tewahido Christian accounts for 44% of the population. According to the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido practice close to 200 days annually are dedicated to fasting. During this time, all followers who are above seven years old are expected to abstain from all types of food, including animal source foods and water for up to some hours daily. It is possible that such practice by mothers or caregivers could affect children's dietary practice. However, whether mothers/caregivers' fasting status influences dietary diversity of children during these periods remained uninvestigated.
METHODS: A community-based longitudinal study was conducted in Debrebirhan, North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia in seven randomly selected kebeles. We collected data in a sample of 218 mothers/caregivers, from January 29 to February 25, 2019 in the pre-fasting period and from March 18 to April 10, 2019, during fasting period on same participants. Data was entered on Epi-Data version 4.4.2.1 and analyzed using STATA 15 software. Children's dietary diversity was measured using the World Health Organization (WHO) standardized questionnaire for infant and young child feeding. The McNemar paired test was used for comparison of baseline and end line measurements. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. RESULT: A total of 218 and 216 mothers/caregivers with children 6-23 months participated in the study before and during fasting season with a response rate of 100.0% and 99.0% respectively. The median age of children was 14 months. The proportion of children who met the minimum dietary diversity before the fasting season was significantly higher (23.4%) compared to during the fasting period (5.5%). (P<0.001). The proportion of children who consumed dairy product was significantly higher (55.5%) before the fasting period compared to consumption during the fasting period (42.6%) (p<0.001). Similarly, consumption of flesh food was significantly higher before the fasting period (17.9%) compared to consumption during the fasting period (0.46%) (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The study revealed that mothers/caregivers' fasting status negatively affect the dietary diversity of children aged 6-23 months in the household by decreasing their consumption of animal source food. Intervention strategies in promoting children's dietary diversity should be designed in a way that considers Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Christian mothers/caregivers' fasting practice.

Introduction

The years from birth to two years of age is a critical period for infants and young children to have proper feeding practices in order to prevent child malnutrition [1]. Dietary diversity (DD) is an indicator used to assess the appropriateness of these infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices. It refers to increasing consumption of the number of variety of foods across and within the food groups capable of ensuring adequate intake of essential nutrients. According to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation, “minimum dietary diversity” (MDD) is defined as the proportion of children 6–23 months who consumed a minimum of four foods out of the seven food groups in the previous day. These food groups are grains, roots and tubers; legumes and nuts; dairy products; flesh foods; eggs; vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; and other fruits and vegetables [2].

However, attaining adequate dietary diversity for children 6 to 23 months has been a continual struggle for many countries around the world, particularly in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa [3] where children, 6–23 months with adequate minimum dietary diversity scores ranged from 15–71% [4, 5]. Ethiopia is also one of the countries with a high burden of inadequate dietary diversity, where only 14% of children aged 6–23 months meet the minimum dietary diversity requirement [6]. Individual, household, and societal factors have all been identified as contributing to inadequate dietary diversity thus far [7]. One sociocultural component that might influence individual dietary choices, household food consumption patterns, and family feeding practices is religion [8].

Ethiopia is home to a diverse range of religions, with Orthodox Tewahido Christians accounting for 44% of the population [9]. Fasting is an essential dietary regulation that the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido church follows to guide followers on what to eat and what not to eat [10]. It is defined as a partial or total abstention from all foods, or a select abstention from prohibited foods of animal origin for a limited time until the period of fasting is over. There are seven principal fasting periods annually. These are, 55 days lent fast period preceding Easter, the fast of the apostles ranging 14–44 days, the Fast of the Prophets of 43 days, the Fast of the Assumption 15 days in august, 3 days of the Fast of Nineveh, Tsome Gehad of Christmas and Epiphany (one day of fasting before Christmas and one day of fasting before Advent) and with the exception of two months after Ethiopian Easter, every Wednesday and Friday are fasting days almost all year-round. The great Easter fast (Lent) also known as Abiy Tsom is the most important and longest continuous fasting period of all fasts of the year [11].

Fasting for more than 200 days a year is required of all Orthodox Tewahido religion followers above the age of seven. Children under the age of seven, military personnel, the sick, pregnant and nursing mothers are exempt from strict fasting and are allowed to eat both animal and non-animal source foods, as well as water, during the religious fasting periods [12].

Although mothers are well aware that their children are not required to fast, it is likely that adults in the household’s fasting behavior affects children’s access to a variety of foods, including foods of animal origin. This is owing to the fact that during fasting periods, women may not prepare non-fasting foods separately for their children for fear of touching the forbidden foods or contaminating tools used for family food cooking, as well as the lack of non-fasting foods in the market [13, 14]. This can possibly contribute to inadequate dietary diversity among children 6 to 23 months of age.

Despite concerns over the potential negative effect of fasting periods, there are limited published works investigating the effect of mothers/caregivers’ fasting during the widely observed Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Christians’ fasting periods on children’s dietary diversity. Various studies have focused on other factors related to the child, mothers, or household characteristics; however, only a small number of papers have considered the impact of religious beliefs or fasting on child dietary diversity. The few available studies did not assess children’s dietary diversity before and during fasting periods, making inference difficult [13, 14]. The objective of the present community-based longitudinal study was therefore to estimate the effect of mothers/caregivers’ fasting practices during the Ethiopian Orthodox Lent fasting season on dietary diversity of children aged 6–23 months in Debrebirhan, Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study setting, design and population

We conducted a longitudinal study from January 29 to February 25, 2019 during the official pre-fasting period and from March 18 to April 10, 2019 during the official fasting period. The study was conducted in Debrebirhan woreda, which is located in North Shewa Zone, Amhara Regional State, 130 km away from Addis Ababa.

According to 2018 estimates, the wereda or district has a total population of 108,825. Within this population, the number of children aged 6–23 months are estimated to be 5,952, of which 5,084 reside in urban kebeles and 868 in rural kebeles (smallest administration units) [9].

Children 6–23 months whose mothers/care givers were Orthodox Tewahido Christian and who were living in randomly selected households were considered as the study population. Same households were visited and same mothers with children 6 to 23 months of age were interviewed in both rounds; before and during the fasting periods. Children whose mothers or caregivers were seriously ill or unable to hear and speak, who were absent on two repeated visits, and who had been ill in the past 1 week were excluded from the study.

Sampling method

The required sample size was determined with the aid of statistical calculation program Epi Info version 7, using a double population proportion formula assuming the proportion of children with adequate dietary diversity to be 27.2% and 13.6% before and during fasting period, respectively [13], with 80% power, 95% confidence level, 10% non-response rate and 1.5 design effect. A correction formula was used and we have estimated the final sample size as 218. We have selected five and two kebeles randomly from urban and rural sites respectively. Children aged 6–23 months whose mothers were orthodox Christian fulfilling all the inclusion criteria were included by lottery method.

Study procedure and measurements

We used an interviewer administered questionnaire to collect the required information from the mothers/caregivers. In the pre-fasting period, respondents were asked for their intention to fast in the coming lent fast period. Fasting generally entails eating only one meal per day, either in the evening or after 2.45 p.m., and abstaining from meat, fats, eggs, and dairy products [11]. However, some adhere strictly to this fasting rule, while others can fast (abstain from eating/drinking anything) for a few hours (9am or 12pm, for example), or some only fast from eating animal foods but may not stay up for several hours without taking any foods/drinks. Mothers/caregivers who abstained from all animal source foods or had stayed up to some hours without consuming any water or food in the previous day of the data collection period were considered as fasting during the lent fasting period. Children’s dietary diversity was measured using the WHO Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices (IYCF) indicators. Children who consumed four or more food groups from the seven food groups (grain, roots and tubers, legumes and nuts, dairy products, meat, egg, vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables and other fruits and vegetables) in the past 24 hour before the interview were categorized as fulfilling the minimum dietary diversity (MDD) requirement [15]. The data collection tool was first prepared in English and then translated into Amharic prior to administration. Five health extension workers (HEWs) and two supervisors were recruited and trained about the use of the data collection tool. We interviewed the same group of participants before and during fasting season through house-to-house survey. The investigators along with two supervisors supervised the overall data collection process.

Data analysis

The collected data was entered into Epi Data 7 after checking its completeness. Then it was exported to STATA 15 for cleaning and further analysis. Results from descriptive analysis were presented using tables in terms of numbers, percentage, mean, median, range and standard deviation. The McNemar paired test was used to compare the MDD before and during the fasting time and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from an institutional review board within the University of Addis Ababa. A letter of support was obtained from Addis Ababa University to the Debrebirihan City Administration and Health Office. The study participants were informed about the purpose and procedures of the study. They were also told about their right to participate or not participate in the study. A written informed consent was obtained from the mothers/caregivers in order to be part of the study. We have used code to ensure privacy and confidentiality of study participants. Counseling was given to the mothers/caregivers whose children showed a significant difference in their dietary diversity during the two periods.

Result

Socio demographic, maternal and child characteristics

The study included 218 children aged 6–23 months, 52.7 percent of whom were males and the rest were females. The children were 14 months old on average. The majority (87.6 percent) of the mothers who participated in the study were married. The mothers or caregivers were 28.6 (SD 0.3) years old on average. One hundred twenty-five (57.4 percent) of the mothers had completed secondary school, and 60.5 percent were housewives. In terms of breast-feeding status, 88.5 percent of mothers were breastfeeding at the time of data collection (See Table 1).

Table 1

Socio-demographic, maternal and child characteristics (n = 218) at baseline (Before fasting period) in Debrebirhan, North Shewa Zone Ethiopia (February-June, 2019).

Characteristics	Frequency (%)
Residence
Urban	172 (78.9%)
Rural	46 (21.1%)
Age of the mothers/caregivers
15–24	33 (15.1%)
25–34	155 (71.1%)
> = 35	30 (13.8%)
Mother/caregivers education status
No formal education	34 (15.6%)
Primary school	59 (27.1%)
Secondary school	78 (35.8%)
Higher education	47 (21.6%)
Fathers education status
No formal education	44 (20.2%)
Primary school	53 (24.3%)
Secondary school	51 (23.4%)
Higher education	70 (32.1%)
Mothers/caregivers occupation
Housewife	132 (60.5%)
Government employee	35 (16.1%)
Merchant	13 (5.9%)
Private/NGO	33 (15.1%)
Othera	5 (2.3%)
Father occupation
Farmer	38 (17.4%)
Government employee	72 (33%)
Merchant	15 (6.9%)
Private/NGO	85 (38.9%)
Otherb	8 (3.7%)
Marital status
single	15 (6.9%)
married	191 (87.6%)
divorced	12 (5.5%)
child age in month
6–11 month	60 (27.5%)
12–17 month	97 (44.5%)
18–23 month	61 (27.9%)
Child sex
Male	115 (52.7%)
Female	103 (47.2%)
Breastfeeding status (Before fasting)
Yes	193 (88.5%)
No	25 (11.5%)

a student /own business

b student /daily laborer/own business/priest.

Fasting characteristics of the mothers/care givers during the lent fasting period

All mothers/caregivers (n = 218, 100%) were fasting during the Lent season (also known as the Great Fast). The subjects had been practicing the fasting rituals for a mean of 17 ± 7.2 years. Among the respondents 89.4% of them practiced all the seven fasting periods of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church (fasting during the eves of Christmas and epiphany (Gehad tsom), the fast of the prophets (Gena tsom), the fast of Nineveh, the great fast, the fast of Apostles (Sene tsom), fast of assumption of the Virgin Merry and Wednesdays and Fridays throughout the year. During the fasting period, all of the fasting mothers/caregivers practice avoided animal source foods. In addition, 66.5% of them stayed up to 3 PM without eating/drinking any meal/drinks and 50.9% of them skipped breakfasts and stayed up to 6PM pm, and 3.6% of the fasting group fasted until 3 pm without taking any food or drink (Table 2).

Table 2

Fasting characteristics of the mother/care giver at end line (during fasting period) in Debrebirhan town, North Shewa Ethiopia, 2019.

Characteristics	Frequency(%)
Mothers/caregivers’ fasting experience in the main fasting periods
Fast all the seven main fast periods	195 (89.4%)
Fasting experience(in years)
<10 years	19 (8.9%)
10-20years	156 (72.9%)
>20 years	39 (18.2%)
Fasting characteristics
Not consuming animal source food except fish	9 (4.1%)
Not consuming animal source food including fish	206 (94.5%)
Not consuming animal source food including fish and fast up to 9 am	145 (67.4%)
Not consuming animal source food including fish and fast up to 12 pm	111 (51.6%)
Not consuming animal source food including fish and fast up to 3 pm	8 (3.7%)

Food consumption pattern and MDD of children 6–23-months age during the non-fasting and lent fasting periods in Debrebirhan, North Shewa Ethiopia, 2019

Before the fasting period the mean Dietary Diversity Score (DDS), was 3.05 (± 0.94) ranging between 1 and 6. During the fasting period, the mean DDS was 2.68 (± 0.68), ranging between 1 and 6.

The proportion of children who consumed grains, roots and tubers, legumes and nuts, dairy products, flesh foods, eggs, Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetable and other fruits and vegetables in the pre-fasting period were 98.6%, 79.4%, 55.5%, 17.9%, 29.4%, 9.2% and 15.1% respectively. In the fasting period 99.1%, 82.1%, 42.6%, 0.46%, 7.3%, 18.3% and 19.7% of children have consumed grains, roots and tubers, legumes and nuts, dairy products, flesh foods, eggs, Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetable and other fruits and vegetables respectively (Fig 1).

Fig 1

Food consumption pattern and MDD of children 6 to 23 months of age during the non-fasting and lent fasting periods in Debrebirhan, North Shewa Ethiopia, 2019.

Before the fasting period, 23.4% of children met the MDD score while only 5.5% of children meet the MDD score during the fasting period.

Those mothers who didn’t fed any of the animal source foods were asked for the reason why they did not feed animal source foods in the previous day (in both pre-fasting and during fasting period) Around 57.1% of the respondents in the pre-fasting period claimed their economic status/insufficient income as a reason not to fed diet of animal origin. During the fasting period around 79.3% of the mothers reported the fasting period as a reason not to buy and cook a non-fasting food to their children (Table 3).

Table 3

Mothers/caregivers’ reasons for not feeding foods of animal origin to their children (before and during the fasting period in Debrebirhan, North Shewa Zone Ethiopia, 2019.

Variable	Before fasting	During fasting
Reason not to fed diet of animal origin	Frequency (%)	Frequency (%)
Insufficient income	36 (57.1%)	4 (3.3%)
Non-availability	1 (1.6%)	11 (9.1%)
child is too young	9 (14.3%)	3 (2.5%)
Fasting status	0 (0.0)	96 (79.3%)
Otherd	17(26.9%)	7 (5.8%)

child didn’t like it/ he refuse to eat/ I don’t remember

Comparison of food consumption pattern of 6–23-month-old children during the non-fasting and lent fasting periods in Debrebirhan, North Shewa Ethiopia, 2019

The result from the McNemar test shows a significant decrease in child DDS from 23.4% during the pre-fast period to 5.5% during the lent fast season (P<0.001). The proportion of children who consumed dairy product was significantly higher (55.5%) before the fasting period compared to consumption during the fasting period (42.6%) (p<0.001). Consumption of flesh food was significantly higher before the fasting period (17.9%) compared to consumption during the fasting period (0.46%) (P<0.001). Similarly, consumption of egg was significantly higher before the fasting period (29.4%) compared to consumption during the fasting period (7.3%) (P<0.001)However, there was no significant difference in the consumption of grains, roots and tubers, legumes and nuts and other fruits and vegetable food groups in the two periods (Table 4).

Table 4

Comparison of food consumption pattern of 6–23-month-old children during the non-fasting and lent fasting periods in Debrebirhan, North Shewa Ethiopia, 2019.

Characteristics	Before Fasting Frequency (%)	During fasting Frequency (%)	McNemar P-value	95% CI
Children who consumed grain, roots, and tuber	215(98.6%)	216(99.1%)	1.0000	(-0.02,0.02)
Children who consumed legumes and nut	173(79.4%)	179(82.1%)	0.5446	(-0.05,0.11)
Children who consumed dairy product	121(55.5%)	92(42.6%)	0.0118**	(-0.23,-0.03)
Children who consumed flesh foods	39(17.9%)	1(0.46%)	0.0000**	(-0.23,-0.12)
Children who consumed Egg	64(29.4%)	16(7.3%)	0.0000**	(-0.29, -0.15)
Children who consumed Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetable	20(9.2%)	40(18.3%)	0.0029*	(0.03,0.15)
Children who consumed other fruits and vegetables	33(15.1%)	43(19.7%)	0.2370	(-0.03,0.12)
MDD	51(23.4%)	12(5.5%)	0.0000**	(-0.25,-0.11)

P—Values were from comparison between before and during fasting using McNemar test with significant level at p < 0.05

*P-value is significant at < 0.01.

**P-value is significant at < 0.001.

Discussion

The main aim of this study was to see how fasting practices of mothers and caregivers affected the dietary diversity of infants aged 6 to 23 months by measuring their food consumption patterns before and during fasting season. According to the findings, the fasting status of mothers/caregivers has a negative impact on the dietary diversity of children 6–23 months by reducing their consumption of animal source foods. We found a significant difference in dietary diversity due to changes meat, egg, milk and Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables consumption.

In the first measurement i.e. before the fasting period, 23.4% of children met the required dietary diversity which is consistent with results from a meta-analysis pooled prevalence of dietary diversity feeding practice in Ethiopia [16] and with results from some African regions like Namibia, Benin, Ghana, Rwanda and Mozambique [17]. However, this finding is higher than the previous results conducted in different regions of Ethiopia [16, 18–21] and lower when compared with studies conducted in Kenya, Bangladesh, Nepal and Srilanka [5, 17].

This variation in results could be due to the differences in study setting. Debrebirhan is close to Addis Ababa and thus much more urbanized than the areas in the previous studies [19, 20]. Socioeconomic factors like women’s literacy rate [5, 17] and the timing of different studies also vary [13, 19, 20, 22]. This finding is also different from the 2011 and 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) analysis results [23, 24], and this might be explained by the fact that the EDHS was performed nationwide on a larger sample. In the second measurement during the fasting time, the children’s dietary diversity significantly decreased to 5.5%. This result is in line with the result from a study done in Dejen District North West Ethiopia [13].

The diet of children in the study area was on average dominantly composed of grains (98.8%) and legumes (80.7%) which were consumed in the same amount in both the pre and intra fasting periods. This could be because this are the main staple food groups consistently consumed by Ethiopian population irrespective of fasting periods. This finding is similar to results from a study done in the Northwest and Southern region of Ethiopia [22, 25, 26].

The present study provides evidence that the children dietary diversity could be affected by the mothers/care givers’ fasting status. The consumption of different food groups, specifically animal foods, significantly decreased during the fasting period. This in turn resulted in a significant decrement of child dietary diversity in the fasting period.

Before the fasting time, the consumption of flesh foods was 17.9% which is almost similar to results from studies done in Dabat, Addis Ababa and Pakistan [20, 25, 27]. But it was relatively higher when compared to the results of other studies [19, 20, 22, 26]. This could be attributed to the variation in the study time and also the possibility that the community in the area of this study had a good animal food consumption culture [28]. During the fasting period, the proportion of children who ate flesh foods decreased to 0.5%, which is comparable with the result of a study done during a fasting period (0%) [13, 19, 26].

In the pre fasting period 29.4% of children consumed egg, which is almost identical with the report from Addis Ababa (30%) and Wolaita Zone (32.2%) [25, 29]. However, it dropped to 7.3% during the fasting period which is higher than the Dejen report (2%) [13]. This can be possibly due to the fact that most of the mothers/caregivers in our area were from urban residences and potentially had better child feeding practices than mothers/caregivers in the prior area. Before fasting, 55.5 percent of children consumed dairy products. This result was almost close to the finding from a study done in Addis Ababa [25]. During the fasting period, this number dropped to 42.6 percent, far higher than the Dejen report. This disparity may be explained by the fact that our study location has a larger cattle production and milk availability [28].

The mothers’/caregivers’ fasting status is primarily responsible for the decrease in animal source food consumption during the fasting season. Despite the fact that children under the age of seven are exempt from the fasting rule, moms and caregivers did not segregate the items and feed them to their children during the fasting seasons. Fear of contamination of equipment used by other family members, to avoid the scent of the meal while preparing, to avoid breaking their fast by handling those foods (79.3%), and non-availability of those foods in the neighborhood during this fasting period are among the key reasons (9.1 percent). This finding is supported by the previous studies [13, 14, 30] which reported the mothers/caregivers’ fasting practice as one of the contributing factors not to attain the recommended child dietary diversity. A study done by Seleshe et al also showed that this religious periodic restriction of animal food consumption influences meat consumption pattern in the population. The main reason for this was most of butcheries were closed due to the decrease in demand of meat during fasting seasons including Wednesday and Friday, as a result it was difficult to obtain animal foods in these periods [30].

Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables were consumed by 9.2% of the children before the fasting time. This finding was similar to studies conducted in Amhara and Southern regions [18, 20]. As opposed to meat, milk, and egg consumption, consumption of vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables increased to 18.3% in the fasting time. This was similar to a study conducted in Dejen during the Lent fast season, where the consumption of Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables was found to be 17.5% [13]. This might be because vegetables are more accessible and available in quantity during fasting season and mothers predominantly use those vegetables for consumption at this period.

The main strength of the study is we have conducted the survey in the pre and during fasting period, which enabled us to see the significant difference in the child dietary diversity between these two periods due to the fasting status of the mothers. The limitation of this study is we have used only a qualitative 24 hour dietary recall.

Conclusion

We found that mothers/caregivers’ fasting status or abstention from animal foods during the Orthodox fasting periods negatively affected the dietary diversity of children aged 6–23 months in the household by decreasing the consumption of animal source foods. This could be related to fear of utensil contamination as well as non or limited availability of those foods in fasting period. Therefore, the mothers/caregivers’ fasting practice might be a worsening factor to the problem issue, although the dietary diversity of children aged 6–23 months in this area is already very low in general. Intervention strategies in promoting children’s dietary diversity should be designed in a way that considers Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Christian mothers/caregivers’ fasting practice. Future nutrition studies should also consider fasting periods/respondents fasting status while measuring the children dietary diversity.

The dataset of the study.

(DTA)

Click here for additional data file.

28 Sep 2021

The effect of mothers/caregivers’ fasting status on the dietary diversity of children 6-23 months: - A longitudinal study in Debrebirhan, Ethiopia

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zebene,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The reviewers raised a number of concerns with regard to the statistical analysis, the study rationale and the interpretation of the results. Their comments can be viewed in full, below.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 31 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Natasha McDonald, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)”.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please upload a new copy of Figure 1 as the detail is not clear. Please follow the link for more information: " ext-link-type="uri" xlink:type="simple">https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/" " ext-link-type="uri" xlink:type="simple">https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/".

5. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The study is an interesting one which contributes to fill the gap of studies on the effect of mothers/caregivers’ fasting status on the dietary diversity of children 6-23months. There are however some minor corrections that need to be effected by the authors.

Abstract

Line 38: remove dot in two places

Line 50: The proportion of children who met the minimum

Line 62: caregivers could be added

Introduction

Line 98: should be......….. their children are not expected to fast, it is possible

Line 105: Despite concerns over the potential negative effect

Materials and methods

Description of methods was adequate.

Line 117: Is it Woreda or Worede

Line 119: include reference for the 2018 estimates for the population

Line 120: should be………. of which 5,084 reside in......

Line 129: should be... …dietary diversity to be 27.2% and 13.6% before and during fasting period, respectively

Line 139: should be......... ..stayed up to some hours without consuming

Line 142: Include reference for the WHO IYCF indicator

Line 145: Write MDD in full first time use

Lin 147 to 148: We have interviewed should be We intervewed

Results

Lines 168 and 169:should be.....…were males and the rest were females

Line 171: One hundred and twenty-five (57.4%) mothers

Table 1: Should be Fathers occupation not Father occupation

Line 186: … all of the fasting mothers/caregivers practice avoided animal source foods

Lines 208 and 209: should be………. reason why they did not feed animal source foods in the previous day

Line 215: Table 3 Mothers/caregivers’ reasons for not feeding foods of animal origin to their children

Line 225: should be....…. shows a significant decrease in child DDS……..

Discussion

The discussion is in line with the findings.

Line 238: should be………. by measuring their food consumption pattern before and during fasting

Line 240:should be.........…. by decreasing their consumption of animal source foods

Line 241: We a significant difference in dietary diversity due to change 241 in the consumption of meat, egg, milk and Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables

The sentence needs to be rephrased, as it is not clear what authors are trying to say.

Line 243: In the first measurement i.e. before the fasting period d, …………..

Line 271: should be…….children who ate flesh foods decreased to 0.5%, which is comparable with the result of a study done…………

Line 283: should be ..........The drop in consumption of animal……….

Line 292:……….Seleshe.S and his colleges also showed that…

Should be Seleshe and colleagues or Seleshe et al.

Line 301:should be ………where the consumption of Vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables……

Line 305: should be……..to see the significant difference in the child dietary diversity….

Line 307: The limitation of this study is we have used only a qualitative 24 hour dietary recall.

Conclusion

Line 311: Authors should note that there was no statistical analysis to show the strong relation of fear of utensil contamination as well as non or limited availability of those foods to fasting period in their findings. It is therefore suggested that this paragraph be rephrased to capture actual findings of the study.

General comments

Generally, the authors tried to describe the effect of mothers/caregivers’ fasting status on the dietary diversity of children 6-23months in the study area.

However, in few places within the manuscript, authors started sentences with figures, this should be corrected.

To improve clarity, the manuscript will benefit from language editing.

Reviewer #2: All the justifications are in place. However I think the author has to add some points to strong support the rationale for conducting this study which will add value to the the research . This will help further research on this arena.

Reviewer #3: The study still highlights a novel research topic that has broader social implications, especially for young infants whose health is sensitive to nutritional changes surrounding cultural practices. I would therefore consider the paper for publication after the authors address the comments that are major in nature. There are various issues that I have raised below for the authors to first address, which are multiple but clustered around the interpretation of the findings.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ukegbu Patricia

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Dr Danish Ahmad

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Submitted filename: PONE_Review_210916.pdf

Click here for additional data file.

31 Oct 2021

We received funding for data collection from Addis Ababa University's School of Public Health

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publication decision, or manuscript preparation.

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

14 Dec 2021

4 Jan 2022

Dear Editor,

Thank you very much for your comments on our manuscript. All of your comments were very helpful for revising and improving our paper.

We have revised the language for some of manuscript section according to your comment. We have defined some terms which may be unfamiliar to readers and ensured that we used appropriate statistical reporting as per PLOS guideline

N:B. There is an attached file for the reviewers' comment, but we discovered that it is identical to the previous one, with all of the comments previously addressed and the feedback letter uploaded separately in the previous revision. Please let us know if we need to submit that again.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

7 Feb 2022

The effect of mothers/caregivers’ fasting status on the dietary diversity of children 6-23 months: A longitudinal study in Debrebirhan, Ethiopia

PONE-D-20-37450R2

Dear Dr. Zebene,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Solveig A. Cunningham, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The title is cumbersome.  Are there both mothers and caregivers in the dataset?  If it is just mothers, you could specify that.  If it is both, than an "and" could be used for claarity.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have adequately addressed all comments raised in the previous round of review. The manuscript is technically sound and the data supports the conclusions. The statistical analysis is appropriate for the data collected. The manuscript is therefore recommended for publication in your reputable journal

Reviewer #3: Dear authors,

While the revised paper is improved, the authors have not addressed comments adequately from previous reviews

This is now the second revision which addresses main comments from previous reviews. However, previously, reviewers provided feedback that the paper has limitations with regards to grammar, language and referencing. These issues remain uncorrected in places.

For example, lines’ 123-124 124 Children 6-23 months whose mothers/caregivers were Orthodox Tewahido Christian and who 124 were living in randomly selected households were considered as the study population’ is not.

Similarly, the authors don’t consistently use % or percentages. While % are used mostly, lines 292 and 302 have used per cent for numbers as shown below:

• 292 fasting, 55.5 percent of children consumed dairy products.

• 302 fasting period are among the key reasons (9.1 percent).

The referencing in line 142 is incorrect as ‘products. (11).’ the reference needs to come before the period.

Lastly the, reference number 2 is incorrectly cited

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ukegbu, Patricia Ogechi

Reviewer #3: Yes: Dr Danish Ahmad

14 Feb 2022

PONE-D-20-37450R2

The effect of mothers and caregivers’ fasting status on the dietary diversity of children 6-23 months: A longitudinal study in Debrebirhan, Ethiopia

Dear Dr. Armdie:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Solveig A. Cunningham

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE